Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Second opinion needed on earwax removal

I would like the opinion from other coders on this scenario:

Patient presented to our urgent care center, where he was seen by a provider who is new to him. (He has previously been seen by other providers within the group practice.) Patient had a comprehensive history and comprehensive exam done. Patient received a prescription for pain medication, and he had impacted cerumen removed bilaterally by curette. I coded this as 99214-25 and 69210-50. My supervisor argues that we cannot bill the 69210, with her reasoning being that BCBS denied the charge as incidental, and that the diagnosis code for the E/M ended up only being the impacted cerumen, with nothing else wrong with the patient. My argument is that just because something isn’t "payable" by a particular carrier doesn’t mean that it isn’t "billable." The patient did receive a full work-up prior to having the cerumen removed, so I feel that it justifies billing both services. What does everyone else think?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum