Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Adding Screens to surveillance exams?

Several patients have contacted our office after being told by their insurance that we should be adding a screening code of Z12.11 for full payment of a SURVEILLANCE exam for personal hx of polyps (Z86.010). This is clearly not a screening. We have been informed that a very large practice has been billing with the screening code in the primary position resulting in full payment and no transfers to patients’ deductibles/co-insurances. We have always believed that we only code for the indication, as screens are only performed every 10 years and surveillance exams are more often based on doctor recommendation. Does anyone else charge for both screening(Z12.11) and hx of polyps(Z86.010) together? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks!!!!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Adding new LV lead with pacemaker generator change, old LV lead not removed

Need help please. Our provider changed biventricular pacemaker due to depletion of the battery and noticed that LV lead was not working and inserted new one. it was not removed but new one added. I coded the scenario as 33229 and 33224 but 33229 is not allowed with 33224. Should I use 33225 instead?
thank so much for help.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Adding venous thromboembolism to the CDI checklist at your facility

By Linda Renee Brown, RN, MA, CCDS, CCS, CDIP
 
The annual incidence of an initial venous thromboembolism (VTE) event, either a pulmonary embolus (PE) or a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is approximately 0.1% in the United States, with the highest incidence among the elderly and a recurrence rate of about 7% at six months. At the same time, thrombotic stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Virchow’s triad theory suggests that VTE occurs due to three factors: 
  • Altered blood flow
  • Vascular endothelial injury
  • Alterations in the blood constituents, or hypercoagulable state

A patient with an abnormally increased tendency toward coagulation may be said to experience a hypercoagulable state. Hypercoagulable states can be further specified as primary or secondary. Primary hypercoagulable states are inherited thrombophilia conditions caused by deficiencies or defects of the physiologic anticoagulants or increased coagulation factors, according to the journal Cardiovascular Medicine (2007). The major causes of inherited thrombophilia include factor V Leiden mutation, antithrombin deficiency, protein S and protein C deficiency, and prothrombin gene mutation.

Secondary, or acquired, hypercoagulable states are a varied group of disorders with an associated elevated risk for developing thromboses. Many conditions can effect changes in the coagulation system, resulting in a hypercoagulable state. Secondary hypercoagulable state, when documented in the medical record, is a comorbidity that can increase reimbursement, impact length of stay, and reflect a higher severity of illness and risk of mortality, but it is often underdocumented and underreported.
 
Many clinicians easily recognize that patients may present a higher risk of thrombosis with evidence of a previous thrombus, recent major surgery, new trauma, malignancy, pregnancy, the use of oral contraception, antiphospholipid syndrome, or the use of a central venous catheter.
 
Patients undergoing surgery who have not received VTE prophylaxis experience a rate of DVT from 15% to 30%, and fatal PEs from 0.2% to 0.9%, according to a 2007 article in the journal Circulation. Trauma patients run almost a 60% risk of VTE. Among cancer patients, at least 50% are found to have a VTE at autopsy.
Increases in blood viscosity, fibrinogen, and factor VIII during pregnancy increase the risk of VTE in pregnant women six times higher than that of nonpregnant women. The prevalence of VTE in pregnancy is 1:600, and PE causes 9% of all deaths during pregnancy. In one study, currently available oral contraceptives increased the risk of VTE to five times that of a non-user.
 
The risk increases within four months of the start of therapy and remains unchanged, regardless of duration of use, until three months after the end of therapy.
 
However, additional conditions seen among the inpatient population also may increase the risk of developing VTE. Diabetic patients are at higher risk of thrombosis; 80% of Type 2 diabetic deaths may be attributed to thrombi. The risk of stroke and myocardial infarction is significantly higher in the diabetic population. 
 
Researchers have found modifications in the coagulation pathway in diabetic patients, including abnormal coagulation screening tests and altered clotting factor levels. Enhanced platelet aggregation and activation, along with an inhibited fibrinolytic system associated with insulin resistance, can suggest a hypercoagulable prothrombotic state that increases risk of a cardiovascular event.
 
In metabolic syndrome, in which we find obesity, chronic inflammation, and insulin resistance, we also find a hypercoagulable state associated with increased clotting factors and an inhibited fibrinolytic pathway. Elevated cholesterol levels can impact platelet aggregation and clot formation. Smoking causes damage to the endothelium, adhesion of platelets, release of growth factor, and reduced tPA production that can result in a prothrombotic state. Immobility associated with travel can triple the risk of thrombosis, particularly in obese patients. Heart failure, chronic renal failure, thyroid disease, and sepsis can also result in a prothrombotic state.
 
Documentation of secondary hypercoagulable state must, as with all secondary diagnoses, meet the definition of a secondary diagnosis, to include at least one of the following: 
  • Clinical evaluation
  • Therapeutic treatment
  • Diagnostic procedures
  • Extended length of stay
  • Increased nursing care and/or monitoring
 
In all physician documentation, the diagnosis to the correct degree of specificity, the supporting clinical indicators, and the treatment plan must always be in alignment. 
 
While encouraging physicians to capture this comorbidity when clinically warranted, we must also emphasize that documentation of secondary hypercoagulable state is incomplete without referencing the indicators that support the diagnosis, as well as how it is being evaluated, treated, or diagnosed. 
 
Documentation of anticoagulant therapy in patients at risk for VTE should not only be associated with meeting core measures requirements, but should also be linked to the secondary hypercoagulable state and the ­underlying conditions that put the patient at risk.
 
The goal of any clinical documentation program is to paint the full clinical picture, so consider adding secondary hypercoagulable state to the paintbox. 

 

Editor’s note: Brown is the director of CDI for Tanner Health System, Carrollton, Georgia. She has experience in critical care, nursing education, case management, long-term care, and, of course, CDI. She thinks the only thing better than writing for the Association for Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists is snuggling with her cat ­Thomas. Contact Brown at [email protected]. Email your questions to editor Steven Andrews at [email protected].

HCPro.com – JustCoding News: Inpatient

OIG Reports Hospital Billing Issues – Adding Modifier 59 for RHC when Heart Biopsy is performed on the same day


In one of the recent reports, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) cites significant issues in which hospitals are making coding errors on Medicare claims. Correct coding of claims is important for hospitals to avoid improper payments, which can lead to recoveries of overpayments. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) encourages hospital billing and coding personnel to review the OIG reports and take steps to avoid the problems identified in those reports. It is also very important that claims submitted are supported by documentation in the beneficiary’s medical records. 

In the report, “Hospitals Nationwide Generally Did Not Comply with Medicare Requirements for Billing Outpatient Right Heart Catheterizations with Heart Biopsies,” the OIG analyzed claims to determine if hospitals were correctly reporting modifier -59 for RHCs and heart biopsies. The OIG found that in billing for outpatient RHCs with heart biopsies, hospitals often use modifier -59 inappropriately, which leads to significant overpayments and overpayment recoveries on claims for these services. 

For detail information on OIG audits & findings, visit: https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region1/11300511.pdf


Coding Ahead

Adding Credentials Brings Both Short and Long-Term Benefits

Are you thinking about adding to your current credentials? Are you unsure which one to go for next? Well, the answer to that question isn’t the same for everyone. Ask yourself a few questions and do your research. The questions below can help most individuals quickly narrow down their list of potentials. (Side note: Did […]
AAPC Knowledge Center