Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Additional Reimbursement for Modifier 22

I have a provider who is challenging me that he should get additional wRVU value for using modifier 22, I can’t find anything on CMS website, and I don’t think payors reimburse additionally for this. I think it is just documenting that it took you longer. Any of you experts know any different?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Tips for Handling an Additional Documentation Request

If  you receive Additional Documentation Requests (ADR) from a Medicare Administrative Contractors (MAC) and others, here are some tips  to respond most effectively. Additional Documentation Request Success Isn’t that Hard CGS  Administrators, a MAC and Durable Medicare Administrative Contractor (DMAC) with a presence in 38 states, offers helpful tips in their ADR process.  ADRs may […]

The post Tips for Handling an Additional Documentation Request appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

How to factor additional diagnosis into MDM

How would you factor in additional diagnosis for the MDM that are given in the assessment/plan, when these are not documented in the HPI/Exam of why the patient is coming in? For example, an elderly patient is coming in for knee joint pain and then in the assessment/plan the provider lists Hypertension(refilled meds), Gastroenteritis(wants labs done), Glaucoma(referral given), Diabetes(checks A1C) in addition to the joint pain.

My understanding is that you would not use any of these additional diagnosis to level the MDM, even though for each dx the provider wants more work up done.

I’m looking for feedback on what others are doing when a provider adds additional diagnosis and how the MDM is determined.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

G31.84 Mild Cognitive disorder use additional code error

I contacted AAPC back in August about the incorrect information included as reference under ICD-10 code G31.84. The error revolves around the use of additional ICD-10 codes F02.80 and F02.81. Both ICD-10 codes are listed under the Excludes 1 list under dementia (F01.-, F02.-, F03). Could someone look into this?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

CPC looking for additional work

Hello All,

Do to the government shutdown I am looking for additional ways to bring in additional income for my household. i do already have a full time job but looking for anywhere that needs help temporarily or part time that I can work from home to help supplement my husbands income. I have both medical billing and coding experience. Thank you!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Appropriate Coding for unplanned additional procedures during planned surgery

I have searched high and low for an answer to this question and I cannot come to a definite conclusion.

Question: During the course of a planned surgical procedure, if the surgeon discovers some pathology requiring maneuvers that are NOT a part of the major procedure or global surgery package, something considered by the surgeon to be medically necessary and perhaps unrelated to the planned procedure, is this separately reportable? I do not have a specific example at this time.

What is known: In page 10, chapter 1 of the CMS NCCI Policy manual, it is clearly outlined what is considered integral to a planned surgical procedure… a smaller portion inclusive of a larger procedure. This chapter also covers sequential procedures, conversions, and intraoperative complications and what is not separately reportable.

But, Ch1, page 15 of NCCI Policy Manual states: "If exploration of the surgical field results in additional procedures other than the primary procedure, the additional procedures may generally be reported separately." CMS 2018 NCCI Policy Manual, Ch1, General Correct Coding Policies

Can anyone help me out with this?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Laparoscopic Appendectomy- Need help with possible additional code(s)

I think the surgeon will be able to get more than 44970. Does anyone see any other codes that can be billed?

Description of Procedure: In the supine position with appropriate monitoring she received general anesthesia and has remained on IV antibiotics. The obese abdomen is widely prepped with DuraPrep and draped. A vertical incision was made in the previous supraumbilical vertical scar, with remarkably thin subcutaneous tissue identifying loose fascia. This is opened, I can palpate adhesions on the right side but none on the left and introduced a 12 mm port with CO2 insufflation and camera introduction. The liver has a somewhat blunted edges and has a regular texture. The stomach is deflated. Pus is evident in the right lower quadrant with obviously inflamed small bowel, omentum adherent to the right lower quadrant. Omental and small bowel adhesions to the infero-umbilical midline and down toward the pelvis. Rotating the camera around the adhesion I find a left suprapubic site and can indent, make a small incision and introduced the 5 mm port under vision. Using grasper and Maryland LigaSure I release the omental adhesions from the anterior abdominal wall, somewhat tediously. I then released the omental adhesions over the ascending colon and find the terminal ileum and inflamed Fat Pad of Treves. The cecum is inflamed, I find the medial tinea in the anterior free tinea and finds inflamed tissue and exudate but no obvious appendix. I then aspirate for cultures and then begin irrigation, freeing the inflamed small bowel and its mesentery from this process retracted to the left, and identifying inflamed fat and inflamed redundant rectum, depressed inferiorly. Then I release the lowest lateral attachments of the cecum and elevate, staying adjacent to the intestine to avoid the inflamed retroperitoneum and course of the right ureter, neither sought nor identified. The exposure of the cecum for definitive dissection now commences, about an hour and 15 minutes of the 2-hour operation was with lysis of adhesions.
*
I then follow the two identified tinea to inflamed tissue which has a tubular texture to it and I am able to elevate, with difficulty from exposure, I am able to release until its apparent attachment to the cecum and I amputate with a tan load tri-stapler. This is collected and submitted to the pathologist but returns as probably inflamed and necrotic fat. Dr. department is kind enough to scrub and into the room and begin separately dissecting the fat pad of Treves to clearly identify the introduction medially of the terminal ileum into the a sending colon. He dissects beneath that to clearly identify the medial posterior cecum and absence of inflamed tissue or abscess. More laterally against the lateral sidewall, a superficial dissection is initiated and I commence release of the lateral cecum more thoroughly and then beneath. We now recognized perhaps a tubular structure plastered against the right side of the lower most posterior cecum. That is gently teased, quite tediously with a pulling technique and find separation and feels apparent it can be separated in its midportion. This looks to be normal appendix and probably represents the tip. With more tedious dissection and separation in the inflamed tissues, to avoid injury to the cecum, this can be finally freed. Now it is apparent that the proximal appendix is congested and purple with a small pinpoint opening that may have represented a perforation. By grasping the inflamed fat, which includes the previous staple line of, what is now recognized as, para-appendiceal inflamed fat, I can elevate and circumferentially dissect more to the origin with the cecum. I now introduced a second 45 mm tan load tri-stapler and amputated against the cecum. This is collected in a new specimen retrieval bag. I now complete irrigation in different positioning, and initially head of bed down and then head of bed up to aspirate sequentially the left diaphragmatic area, right diaphragmatic area, right paracolic gutter, right mesentery, right paracolic gutter, and then finally into the pelvis. The irrigant returns clear. There is minimal blood loss during the dissection mostly the lysis of adhesions but total blood loss is perhaps less than 10 or 15 mL’s. Under vision I remove the two 5 mm ports, I find no back bleeding. I now deflate the abdomen and remove the midline port. All sites are irrigated with saline. The midline fascia at the umbilicus is closed with 2 placed 0 Vicryl sutures under direct vision. Each site is irrigated and skin closed loosely with staples with covered arm applied. I had infiltrated a total of 30 mL 0.5% Marcaine with epinephrine distributed at the 3 port sites. She is awakened and extubated, transported to PACU. There were no intraoperative complications and no cardiopulmonary altered vital signs.
*

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Additional Work-up and MDM question.

Need opinion on the following Assessment and Plan:

1. Strain of supraspinatus muscle
S46.012D: Strain of muscle(s) and tendon(s) of the rotator cuff of left shoulder, subsequent encounter
PHYSICAL THERAPY SHOULDER REFERRAL – Schedule Within: provider’s discretion

2. Strain of subscapularis muscle
S46.012D: Strain of muscle(s) and tendon(s) of the rotator cuff of left shoulder, subsequent encounter

3. Chronic kidney disease due to type 2 diabetes mellitus
E11.22: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease
GLYCOHEMOGLOBIN, TOTAL, BLOOD – To be performed on or around 12/08/2018
BMP, BLOOD – To be performed on or around 12/08/2018
LIPID PANEL, SERUM – To be performed on or around 12/08/2018

4. Hypothyroidism –

E03.9: Hypothyroidism, unspecified
levothyroxine 137 mcg tablet – TAKE 1 TAB DAILY MONDAY-SATURDAY, 1/2 TAB SUNDAY Qty: 28 tablet(s) Refills: 1 Pharmacy: CVS/PHARMACY #6510
TSH, SERUM OR PLASMA – To be performed on or around 12/08/2018

Discussion Notes
Will refer to PT and have Pt f/u in the next month. Informed her that an injection was not appropriate this close to the last and would likely not help as she has more than one tendonopathy. Pt given lab order which should be completed the week prior to her next visit.

I am going back and forth as far as counting the Chronic Kidney disease due to type 2 diabetes mellitus and the Hypothyroidism for the Medical Decision Making. There is no HPI relating to either of these diagnoses. Patient came in for the shoulder issue and that is all that is addressed in the History and Exam. It appears the provider ordered the lab work so he would have it for the patient’s future visit, and possibly the patient needed a refill on medication. I know I need to query the provider, as need to know the status of each of these diagnoses. However, if the sole purpose was ordering the lab work, do I even need to consider these two diagnoses in the MDM?

Thanks, in advance, for your assistance.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum