Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Discharge resource centers on the upswing

Discharge resource centers on the upswing

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Discuss the advantages of using a centralized postacute resource center to carry out discharge plans.

 

Discharge planning has become more important in recent years. Not only is the government putting new focus on ensuring hospitals are helping patients to move to the next level of care more efficiently (see related story on p. 3), but research shows that patients are safer and less likely to return to the hospital if these transitions are well managed.

However, ensuring that discharge plans are carried out efficiently and effectively has been a challenge for many organizations. Enter the postacute resource center (PARC)?a new department many hospitals are adding, which is specifically tasked with ensuring a smooth transition to postacute follow-up.

"I encountered the concept of a ‘resource center’ back in 1997 in a Connecticut hospital," says Stefani Daniels, RN, MSNA, CMAC, ACM, president and managing partner of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., in Pompano Beach, Florida. The concept was working so well at this hospital the leadership team asked that it not be disturbed during their case management redesign, she says. "Since then, I’ve been a huge proponent of having a centralized PARC since I’ve seen firsthand what a value-added service it provides to the entire hospital community."

There are many ways to structure a PARC, but Daniels advocates for using a centralized model, one group that is tasked with facilitating the logistics necessary to carry out discharge plans, because it is the most efficient. In this model the PARC isn’t involved in the discharge planning process?that requires professional assessment?but the PARC team ensures that the plan is carried out.

"Once the process of referring discharge plans prepared by the patient’s nurse or a care manager to the PARC for facilitation is tested and reinforced, the scope of the PARC’s service can be broadened to include other community-based services, such as arranging and follow-up of postacute primary care or clinic appointments," she says. PARCs can also be marketed to community-based physicians to arrange immediate home care services to avoid an emergency department (ED) visit or direct admission. Organizations can also use PARCs as the coordinating arm of an active transitional care program when inpatients are identified as potential candidates for short-term transitional care, says Daniels.

 

The model in practice

Daniels recently helped ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital in Michigan add a PARC during a larger case management department revamp. Gary Moorman, DO, vice president of medical affairs at ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital says the hospital’s PARC acts as a hub, a central location where clinical care coordinators and physicians are able to hand off the plan they develop to individuals whose job it is to ensure it is carried out properly.

The discharge hub handles referrals, arrangements for extended care, and helps schedule follow-up physician appointments and home healthcare, says Moorman.

Clinical care coordinators along with physicians develop the discharge plans and then hand them off to the discharge hub, which is staffed by a mix of social workers and support staff.

Not only has this initiative saved money by freeing clinical staff members from the logistical aspects of discharge planning follow-up, but it has also given social workers at the organization, who were formerly in charge of these discharge planning duties, more time to focus on their real job, social work, says Moorman.

Having staff members designated for discharge follow-up helps to ensure that discharge planning tasks don’t fall through the cracks and that there is a central contact for follow-up.

"The discharge process is more coordinated, and potentially safer and more efficient," says Moorman.

He says the organization hopes the PARC will also bring the added benefit of reducing readmissions among its high-risk patients by keeping in closer contact with those individuals and helping to improve the likelihood that they will comply with follow-up care recommendations by helping them schedule their follow-up appointments.

"I think the patients generally are overall satisfied," he says. The nurses on the floor have also been happy with the effort because they’re seeing an improvement in communication.

A changing regulatory landscape

Using a PARC may become increasingly advantageous in coming years, in particular if expected changes to CMS’ Conditions of Participation for discharge planning go into effect, says Daniels. "It is expected that discharge planning, a core competency of the professional nurse, will be restored to the patient’s nurse who will once again be responsible for collaborating with the care team to establish a discharge plan for patients who are not assigned to a care manager and who typically have routine discharges to home or home with home care or DME or return to SNF," she says. "Having a PARC to facilitate that plan will be essential. Similarly, as care managers working in a fee-for-value environment are expected to monitor progression of care for selected patients more assertively, they too will benefit from having a PARC work its magic."

Organizations looking to add a PARC should recognize that this is only one component of the overall case management department and might not have worked as well if other changes hadn’t been made to support the effort, says Moorman. At their organization this larger redesign also included better defining special functions for case managers, UR, and social work to ensure the process was as efficient as possible. "You probably want to look at the whole process, not just the discharge piece of it," says Moorman. But having a new hub for discharge duties has definitely helped to make patient transitions more efficient.

HCPro.com – Case Management Monthly

Medicare’s proposed discharge planning changes at a glance

Medicare’s proposed discharge planning changes at a glance

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify the proposed changes to the Conditions of Participation that affect discharge planning.

 

Discharge planning has long been a challenge for organizations, but proposed revisions to Medicare’s Conditions of Participation (CoPs) announced in November 2015 may make the process even more difficult. (See related article, Proposed rule focusing on discharge process could increase case management staffing needs in the January issue of CMM.)

In an April webinar called "Discharge Planning Realignment of Standards and Workflow," speaker Jackie Birmingham, RN, BSN, MS, CMAC, vice president emerita of clinical leadership for Curaspan Health Group in Newton, Massachusetts, said the proposal would represent "probably the biggest change that has been proposed in years for the CoPs." The changes could likely prompt a restructuring of case management functions to help ensure compliance with these new proposed functions.

Birmingham and fellow webinar speaker Janet L. Blondo, MSW, LCSW-C, LICSW, CMAC, ACM, CCM, C-ASWCM, ACSW, manager of case management at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, Maryland, took some time at the end of the presentation to answer questions from the audience about the proposed rule and how it will affect case management and hospitals overall. Below are adapted versions of some of those questions and answers, which can help clarify some of the issues organizations may be struggling with related to these proposed changes.

 

Q: Does this proposal mean that we can send referrals to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and home healthcare and they only present patients the choice of those accepting facilities?

A: Yes, that’s what it means. If you send referrals to postacute providers, we’ll use SNF as an example, and they look at it and they have the resources, the skills to meet that patient’s needs, and they have an empty bed when the patient is being discharged, you can show the options to the patient. If you have one option, then you have one to present to the patient. If you have 12 options, then you may want to use your clinical judgment and counseling and look more at the quality ratings to narrow the list down before presenting it to the patient. Medicare does not have a minimum list of providers to give to a patient. Some hospitals do. They’ll say you have to have three providers, but that’s only so that people are forced to have a backup plan should the first provider be unable to take the patient. So the answer is you can give the patient a list of only those that are available.

 

Q: We do physician-to-physician with transfers to acute care, but not to SNFs and rehab facilities. Is this now a requirement?

A: It’s not mentioned as a requirement in the discharge planning CoPs. But, in the view of continuity of care and safe transition of care, ensuring that the next provider can start the care. It is necessary to communicate to the next medical person who’s going to be taking care of the patient. It could be a doctor. It could be a non-physician practitioner. We believe that that would have an impact on readmissions if the person responsible for the care at the next level has a history of what happened to the patient in the current setting. So the medical information does need to be shared with whoever is going to be the medical provider in the postacute setting.

For patients being referred to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) from an acute care facility, it has to be physician-to-physician. The IRF physician must accept the referral. That was implemented maybe a year or more ago so that the benefit of the IRF for the individual patient would be clarified before they accepted the patient.

 

Q: Can you please clarify the requirements for critical access hospitals (CAH) briefly?

A: The CAH is a rural hospital and it’s one that is located geographically distant to a tertiary care hospital or a larger acute care hospital and they have been not required to do such rigorous discharge planning, but Medicare has said for those who are inpatients, they have to do planning for the patient. Now remember, they’re distinguishing between a discharge to home and a transfer to another hospital.

The CAH average length of stay is about 90 hours, 72?90 hours. I don’t know how many go home, but for those patients who go home directly from an inpatient stay at hospital CAH, the CAH has to do the same thing acute care hospitals do. It has to have a plan for all patients and it also needs to have a plan for follow-up for patients who are sent back into the community and not transferred to the hospital.

CAHs have been off the radar screen for a long time, but they are just what they say. They give access to critical services in rural areas. So some health systems have CAHs as their related partners so that those of you in an acute care hospital need to work closely with CAHs to help them understand the discharge planning and maybe if they’re in your system, do a combined system for follow-up care. Follow-up of the discharge patient to home, you see all the programs that are out there. There are some commercially available products. It’s a very time-consuming situation. If you call a patient who went home, you have to have a plan to address whatever concerns come up. So I applaud any CAH. CAHs usually have one person doing case management and that person does everything. I talked to one who was the supervisor of the operating room, the bed manager, the utilization reviewer, and the quality person because the CAH had 25 beds or less.

 

Q: Does the choice list given to the patient need to be kept in the permanent medical record?

A: That’s a great question and the answer is it depends on your hospital policy on choice. If your hospital policy on choice says that you must keep that file, then that should be in the medical record. It all goes back to what your hospital policy says. You may want to get it out and look at it. What does it say about documenting patient choice? Now, do you need to list everybody that you sent the referral to and only two accepted? That should be in your choice policy. The use and disclosure of HIPAA should be used as a basis for the answer to that question. I hope I’m not skirting the issue, but because Medicare will not tell you how to do it; it tells you, you must do it. It’s up to what your policy says.

Many people will document who the referrals were made to, but if you do use an electronic referral system that will be documented as you’re making the referral, when the surveyors come you may be asked to show in the electronic referral system where the referrals were made.

 

Q: At what point will these proposals be implemented by CMS?

A: I anticipate relatively soon. It likely won’t take as long as it did last time?1988 was when the amendment to the Social Security Act came out saying you will do discharge planning and then they kept evolving it. Because this is so big and such a big expansion, I imagine that it will take a little while but I don’t think it’s going to be too long. But the other piece of advice is that everybody should act as if this is the way it’s going to be. CMS published the blue boxes two or three years ago and there’s nothing in here that’s not logical, and if they don’t pass one thing, then I’ll say you should be doing it anyway because it has good outcomes. Remember in the blue boxes that came out from Survey and Certification May 2013 CMS said that it collected information from surveyors?from The Joint Commission, from the other [deemed] one and from state surveyors, and they said in hospitals where they had good scores. CMS took that information and put the advisory boxes and now they’ve taken the advisory boxes and converted them into standards. It’s so logical.

It’s so refreshing and when you have staff in the room, when you have new staff, when you’re asking an existing staff to do a new function, use these as your training tools because they tell you what the expectation is and then get your policies wrapped around it.

 

Q: What are the 10 sections of the discharge planning process?

A: The abstract of the CoPs lists those 10 parts of the discharge process, which include the following instructions:

1.Discharge planning must be provided by a registered nurse or social worker or other qualified individual

2.An initial assessment must be performed 24 hours after admission

3.The hospital must provide regular evaluation of the patient’s condition

4.A responsible practitioner must be involved in the planning process?that means, for example, a physician or nurse practitioner

5.The hospital must also consider caregiver- and community-based support

6.The patient and caregiver must be involved in the development of the plan

7.The plan must address the patient’s goals and treatment preferences

8.The facility must assist patients in selecting a postacute provider

9.The evaluation must be documented

10.The hospital must reassess its discharge planning process on a regular basis

 

To comply with No. 10, the organization would need to take all of your readmission data, your HCAHPS scores, and referrals that you’ve made to five-star, three-star, postacute providers and look at the readmission rate related to geography. Those types of things, and you have to document that in the minutes of your discharge planning meetings or in the utilization review committee meetings if that’s your reporting structure.

Organizations might also want to consider revising their assessments and including some of this information in assessments if the organization does a checklist, to have some of this information included so it can easily be shown that you’re addressing this topic.

HCPro.com – Case Management Monthly

Final Rule Revises Discharge Planning Requirements

CMS moves to empower patients to be more active participants in the discharge planning process. A final rule revises and implements discharge planning requirements that hospitals, critical access hospitals (CAHs), and home health agencies (HHAs) must meet as a condition of participation (CoP) in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. These facilities have until Nov. 29, […]

The post Final Rule Revises Discharge Planning Requirements appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Discharge Summary Documentation/Workflow

Hey, I am looking to see if other organizations have any information they can share on Discharge Summaries: the documentation requirements, verbiage used, and workflows your facility is currently using.

1. Is the date/time stamp required on a patient’s discharge summary? or can the provider verbiage simply state, "Patient being discharge today." sufficient?
2. Do your physicians do a discharge summary before or after the patient has actually been discharged from the facility?
3. If it is prior to discharge, what is your current workflow?

Our providers have expressed numerous concerns over the years about discharge summaries. It is my understanding that currently, when a physician discharges the patient they create an order and write a summary-now this patient may not be discharged until later in the day. When the patient is finally discharged, the provider now receives an in basket for discharge verification. This can cause deficiencies for the providers and has been raising concerns.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Discharge Summary Date

If the provider completes a discharge summary on 05/01/2019 but is not actually discharged until 05/02/2019. Does the provider’s discharge summary need to be updated to include that information stating the actual discharge date of 05/02/2019? I understand we would bill our services on 05/01/2019 because that is the actual date the provider did the face to face service but not sure if we have to have them update their note to include the actual discharge date.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Billing for Hospice service after discharge from facility

I am trying to find out how to appropriate bill for the admission to Hospice service that my physician discharged from hospital to hospice on Friday (last week). We use to be able to charge the G0180 hospice certification, but now this code seems only to be for Home Health and not Hospice. Can anyone help?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Admit Discharge same day

We are a teaching hospital and we often have hospital medicine residents that will see/admit a patient at night and then attending will see them the next morning. We want to make sure we are billing correctly for this.

Scenario:
Patient admitted to inpatient by resident at 10:00pm on 4/1/2019.
Attending sees patient at 8:00am on 4/2/2019. Attending makes their note, attests to resident note and decides to discharge the patient. There is an H&P and a Discharge summary.

What should be billed?

Also, same scenario, but admitted to Observation.
What should be billed?

Thank you.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Transfer of care – Discharge?

Inpatient scenario:
Patient breaks arm –
Dr. A – Ortho – admits patient, performs surgery on arm
Dr. B – Hospitalist – is consulted for patient’s heart failure
Patient develops UTI, turns Septic
Ortho signs off on patient, transfers care to Hospitalist.
Can Hospitalist bill discharge?
If yes, what needs to be documented? Is an order for transfer of care indicated?
Thanks for your feedback!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum