Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Payers Ending Telehealth Expansion Coverage

Unless ordered otherwise, most commercial payers will return to business as usual Jan. 1, or sooner. The COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) continues, but will expanded telehealth coverage and cost sharing waivers? Some health insurers will stop paying for expanded telehealth services as soon as Oct. 1. Patient cost-sharing may resume soon, as well. In […]

The post Payers Ending Telehealth Expansion Coverage appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

COVID-19 Prompts Telehealth Expansion to Home-bound Patients

Physicians now may use telehealth to conduct face-to-Face encounters for home health patients. Home care providers may not be getting all the support they want from regulators in the face of the COVID-19 crisis, but the feds are helping home health agencies on one critical point: reimbursement for face-to-face physician encounter visits. What Does the […]

The post COVID-19 Prompts Telehealth Expansion to Home-bound Patients appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Pay-per-view: CMS shifts 2-midnight rule responsibility to QIOs, finalizes packaging expansion

CMS finalized its proposals regarding the 2-midnight rule, including moving responsibility for rule enforcement and education from Recovery Auditors to Quality Improvement Organizations (QIO). This latter change occurred October 1, 2015.

For stays in which the physician expects the patient will need less than two midnights of hospital care, inpatient admission may be allowed on a case-by-case basis determined by the judgment of the admitting physician. The documentation must support the admission and will be subject to review by a QIO. CMS expects inpatient admission for minor surgical procedures to be unlikely and will prioritize those cases for medical review. For hospital stays expected to last two midnights or longer, CMS policy remains unchanged.
 
Continue reading "CMS shifts 2-midnight rule responsibility to QIOs, finalizes packaging expansion" on HCPro’s website. Subscribers to Briefings on APCs have free access to this article in the January issue. 

HCPro.com – APCs Insider

Ready CDI teams for CMS’ proposed expansion of mandatory ortho episode payment models

Ready CDI teams for CMS’ proposed expansion of mandatory ortho episode payment models

by Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer

If your hospital resides in one of the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) required to participate in the Comprehensive Joint Replacement Model (CJR), you will also be required to participate in a new orthopedic payment model called SHFFT (surgical hip and femur fracture treatment) if an August 2 proposed rule is finalized. The impact? The following assigned MS-DRGs will no longer define hospital reimbursement:

  • Major Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity (MS-DRGs 469, 470)
  • Hip and Femur Procedures Except Major Joint (MS-DRGs 480, 481, 482)

 

MS-DRGs 469 and 470 are included in the CJR, which we have discussed in prior articles. Let’s take a look at the proposed SHFFT episode payment model (EPM), which involves the other three MS-DRGs, and see what role the CDI program can play as reimbursement shifts to episode-based payments.

Model overview

The episode of care defined for the SHFFT EPM begins with an admission to a participating hospital of a fee-for-service Medicare patient assigned MS-DRGs 480?482. This admission is referred to as the anchor hospitalization. The episode continues 90 days post-discharge from the hospital, and payments for all related Part A and Part B services are included in the episode payment bundle. CMS holds the hospital accountable for defined cost and quality outcomes during the episode and links reimbursement?which may consist of payment penalties and/or financial incentives?to outcome performance.

This is a mandatory EPM for hospitals already impacted by the CJR; the SHFFT model will apply to the same 67 geographic MSAs. The EPM is proposed to begin July 1, 2017, and will last for five years, ending in December 2021.

Cost outcomes

CMS will initially pay the hospital and all providers who bill for services during the episode using the usual fee-for-service models. Thus, the SHFFT EPM will not impact the revenue cycle at first. However, at the end of each performance period, which typically represents 12 months (January through December), CMS will compare or reconcile the actual costs with a preestablished "target price."

CMS will set target prices using an approach that will phase in a blended rate of hospital to regional costs. In recognition of the higher costs associated with discharges in MS-DRGs with an MCC or CC, CMS has developed an algorithm to adjust the target price for this subset of the patient population.

If the reconciliation process indicates that the costs to deliver services for the episode were higher than the target price, CMS will require repayment from the hospital. If, however, the costs to deliver care for the episode were lower than the target price, CMS will provide additional payments to the hospital for the provided services. To receive additional payments, however, performance for defined quality outcomes must meet or exceed established standards.

 

Quality-adjusted target price

To receive any earned financial incentives, the hospital must meet or exceed performance standards for established quality outcomes. CMS therefore adjusts the target price based on quality performance, referred to as the quality-adjusted target price.

The SHFFT EPM uses the exact same quality outcomes as those defined for the CJR:

  • Patient experience. This is the HCAHPS measure also used in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP). The source of information for this measures is the HCAHPS survey.
  • Patient-reported outcome data. As with the CJR, the hospital can collect and submit patient-reported data elements and at present will earn quality composite points for submitting the data. These data elements are collected both before and after the procedure and will be used by CMS to create a functional status measurement tool.
  • THA/TKA complication rates. This is the Hospital-Level Risk Standardized Complication Rate (RSCR) following the THA/TKA measure. This measure already impacts financial performance under the HVBP. Like the CJR, performance for this measure is weighted the heaviest in the quality composite comprising 50% of the composite score.

 

Hospital (accountable party), collaborators, and Advanced Payment Models

The hospital is held accountable for episode cost and quality outcomes and all associated financial risks/rewards, even though a variety of providers deliver services and impact performance. As with the CJR, the hospital has been designated as the accountable party because CMS believes the hospital is best positioned to influence coordinated, efficient delivery of services from the patient’s initial hospitalization through recovery.

CMS permits the hospital to enter into collaborative arrangements with physicians and other providers to support and redesign care delivery across the episode and to share financial gains and/or losses. The proposed rule expands the list of collaborators defined in the previous CJR final rule to include other hospitals and Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organizations.

The proposed rule also provides an Advanced Payment Model (APM) track for the EPMs, an important step that will further incentivize collaborator participation.

 

CDI program opportunities

There are five key ways that clinical documentation and reported codes across the continuum impact SHFFT performance:

  • Identification of patients included in the EPM. The assigned MS-DRG impacts which discharges are included in the cohort. As one example, consider a patient who would fall into the EPM (MS-DRGs 480?482) unless he or she has a bone biopsy. If reported, the bone biopsy would result in assignment of different MS-DRGs (477?479) and the discharge would not be included in the EPM.
  • Establishment of target costs. The capture of the MCC and/or CC impacts establishment of the episode target price.
  • Determination of related costs. The costs for hospital readmissions within the episode are included in episode costs if the readmissions are related. The assigned MS-DRG for the readmission determines whether the readmission is related.

The costs associated with Part B claims are included in episode costs if the services are related. The primary diagnosis for each visit determines whether the visit is related.

  • Reported complications. Assignment of ICD codes for the following conditions are counted as complications when those conditions result in inpatient readmission:
  • Complication risk adjustment. As with other hospital-centric measures such as risk-adjusted readmission and mortality rates, comorbidities reported for the 12 months prior to the anchor hospitalization are used to assess case-mix complexity. The CMS risk adjustment module uses defined comorbidity categories to identify conditions that impacted predicted rates of complications for the THA/TKA cohort.

The capture of at least one condition for each of the 28 comorbid categories over the 12-month period will strengthen risk adjustment and RSCR performance. RSCR performance contributes to 50% of the quality composite score, which, in turn, impacts the quality-adjusted target price.

 

Summary

Together the CJR and SHFFT models cover all surgical treatment options (hip arthroplasty and fixation) for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fractures. These MS-DRGs typically represent one of the largest inpatient surgical volumes for most short-term acute care hospitals.

As hospitals and collaborators assess and refine the management of patients to achieve or exceed the quality-adjusted target price, the data we submit on claims will be used to assess our performance. The CDI program in the inpatient and ambulatory setting must be positioned to promote and support the capture and reporting of impactful documentation.

Additional information on the proposed rule can be located at https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm.

 

Editor’s note

Newell is the director of CDI quality initiatives for Enjoin. Her team provides CDI programs with education, infrastructure design, and audits to successfully and sustainably address the transition to value-based payments. She has extensive operational and consulting expertise in coding and clinical documentation improvement, case management, and health information management. You can reach Newell at 704-931-8537 or [email protected].

HCPro.com – Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies

Ready CDI teams for CMS’ proposed expansion of mandatory ortho episode payment models

Ready CDI teams for CMS’ proposed expansion of mandatory ortho episode payment models

by Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, an AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer

If your hospital resides in one of the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) required to participate in the Comprehensive Joint Replacement Model (CJR), you will also be required to participate in a new orthopedic payment model called ‘SHFFT’ (surgical hip and femur fracture treatment) if an August 2 proposed rule is finalized. The impact? The following assigned MS-DRGs will no longer define hospital reimbursement:

  • Major Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity (MS-DRGs 469, 470)
  • Hip and Femur Procedures Except Major Joint (MS-DRGs 480, 481, 482)

 

MS-DRGs 469 and 470 are included in the CJR, which we have discussed in prior articles. Let’s take a look at the proposed SHFFT episode payment model (EPM), which involves the other three MS-DRGs, and see what role the CDI program can play as reimbursement shifts to episode-based payments.

Model overview

The episode of care defined for the SHFFT EPM begins with an admission to a participating hospital of a fee-for-service Medicare patient assigned MS-DRGs 480?482. This admission is referred to as the anchor hospitalization. The episode continues 90 days post-discharge from the hospital, and payments for all related Part A and Part B services are included in the episode payment bundle. CMS holds the hospital accountable for defined cost and quality outcomes during the episode and links reimbursement?which may consist of payment penalties and/or financial incentives?to outcome performance.

This is a mandatory EPM for hospitals already impacted by the CJR; the SHFFT model will apply to the same 67 geographic MSAs. The EPM is proposed to begin July 1, 2017, and will last for five years, ending in December 2021.

 

Cost outcomes

CMS will initially pay the hospital and all providers who bill for services during the episode using the usual fee-for-service models. Thus, the SHFFT EPM will not impact the revenue cycle at first. However, at the end of each performance period, which typically represents 12 months (January through December), CMS will compare or reconcile the actual costs with a preestablished ‘target price.’

CMS will set target prices using an approach that will phase in a blended rate of hospital to regional costs. In recognition of the higher costs associated with discharges in MS-DRGs with an MCC or CC, CMS has developed an algorithm to adjust the target price for this subset of the patient population.

If the reconciliation process indicates that the costs to deliver services for the episode were higher than the target price, CMS will require repayment from the hospital. If, however, the costs to deliver care for the episode were lower than the target price, CMS will provide additional payments to the hospital for the provided services. To receive additional payments, however, performance for defined quality outcomes must meet or exceed established standards.

Quality-adjusted target price

To receive any earned financial incentives, the hospital must meet or exceed performance standards for established quality outcomes. CMS therefore adjusts the target price based on quality performance, referred to as the quality-adjusted target price.

The SHFFT EPM uses the exact same quality outcomes as those defined for the CJR:

  • Patient experience. This is the HCAHPS measure also used in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP). The source of information for this measure is the HCAHPS survey.
  • Patient-reported outcome data. As with the CJR, the hospital can collect and submit patient-reported data elements and at present will earn quality composite points for submitting the data. These data elements are collected both before and after the procedure and will be used by CMS to create a functional status measurement tool.
  • THA/TKA complication rates. This is the Hospital-Level Risk Standardized Complication Rate (RSCR) following the THA/TKA measure. This measure already impacts financial performance under the HVBP. Like the CJR, performance for this measure is weighted the heaviest in the quality composite comprising 50% of the composite score.

 

Hospital (accountable party), collaborators, and Advanced Payment Models

The hospital is held accountable for episode cost and quality outcomes and all associated financial risks/rewards, even though a variety of providers deliver services and impact performance. As with the CJR, the hospital has been designated as the accountable party because CMS believes the hospital is best positioned to influence coordinated, efficient delivery of services from the patient’s initial hospitalization through recovery.

CMS permits the hospital to enter into collaborative arrangements with physicians and other providers to support and redesign care delivery across the episode and to share financial gains and/or losses. The proposed rule expands the list of collaborators defined in the previous CJR final rule to include other hospitals and Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organizations.

The proposed rule also provides an Advanced Payment Model (APM) track for the EPMs, an important step that will further incentivize collaborator participation.

 

CDI program opportunities

There are five key ways that clinical documentation and reported codes across the continuum impact SHFFT performance:

  • Identification of patients included in the EPM. The assigned MS-DRG impacts which discharges are included in the cohort. As one example, consider a patient who would fall into the EPM (MS-DRGs 480?482) unless he or she has a bone biopsy. If reported, the bone biopsy would result in assignment of different MS-DRGs (477?479) and the discharge would not be included in the EPM.
  • Establishment of target costs. The capture of the MCC and/or CC impacts establishment of the episode target price.
  • Determination of related costs. The costs for hospital readmissions within the episode are included in episode costs if the readmissions are related. The assigned MS-DRG for the readmission determines whether the readmission is related.

The costs associated with Part B claims are included in episode costs if the services are related. The primary diagnosis for each visit determines whether the visit is related.

  • Reported complications. Assignment of ICD codes for the following conditions are counted as complications when those conditions result in inpatient readmission:
  • Complication risk adjustment. As with other hospital-centric measures such as risk-adjusted readmission and mortality rates, comorbidities reported for the 12 months prior to the anchor hospitalization are used to assess case-mix complexity. The CMS risk adjustment module uses defined comorbidity categories to identify conditions that impacted predicted rates of complications for the THA/TKA cohort.

The capture of at least one condition for each of the 28 comorbid categories over the 12-month period will strengthen risk adjustment and RSCR performance. RSCR performance contributes to 50% of the quality composite score, which, in turn, impacts the quality-adjusted target price.

 

Summary

Together the CJR and SHFFT models cover all surgical treatment options (hip arthroplasty and fixation) for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fractures. These MS-DRGs typically represent one of the largest inpatient surgical volumes for most short-term acute care hospitals.

As hospitals and collaborators assess and refine the management of patients to achieve or exceed the quality-adjusted target price, the data we submit on claims will be used to assess our performance. The CDI program in the inpatient and ambulatory setting must be positioned to promote and support the capture and reporting of impactful documentation.

Additional information on the proposed rule can be located at https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm.

 

 

Editor’s note

Newell is the director of CDI quality initiatives for Enjoin. Her team provides CDI programs with education, infrastructure design, and audits to successfully and sustainably address the transition to value-based payments. She has extensive operational and consulting expertise in coding and clinical documentation improvement, case management, and health information management. You can reach Newell at 704-931-8537 or [email protected].

HCPro.com – HIM Briefings

Medical Centers – Meeting Growing Demands Through Expansion

Medical centers must grow alongside growing communities and an increasing population. Many general hospitals provide a number of healthcare services, offering patients convenience as they take care of all their needs in one location. Comprehensive medical centers meet the varied needs of patients by providing high quality medical care using advanced technologies.

Home Care

Many general hospitals offer patients specialized services in addition to 24-hour emergency care, in-patient care, and surgical care, including cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, dedicated heart centers, and care in a patient’s home.

Medical centers and clinics know patients feel better and tend to heal faster when they recuperate in the comfort of home. In-home treatment plans are a viable option for homebound patients or for patients who move from a hospital stay to home care.

General hospitals and home care clinics feature trained, licensed professionals in healthcare areas that include nutrition, speech therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and nursing. Home care treatments can consist of many options like disease management, wound care, post-operative care, and rehabilitation.

Heart Clinics

Since the number one cause of death in America is heart disease, many general hospitals have technologically advanced heart clinics that respond to heart attack and stroke victims. These medical centers also assist patients with preventative measures that include accurate diagnoses, regular screenings, and heart and stroke education.

Heart clinics also have dedicated cardiac teams waiting on standby to provide patients bypassing the emergency room with immediate critical care. More advanced medical centers offer innovative ICE programs that involve cooling a patient’s body for 24 to 36 hours after cardiac arrest before slowly raising it to normal. This unique technology increases the survival rate above the national average. In addition, comprehensive medicals use heart clinics to endorse other community outreach programs.

Rehabilitation Programs

Patients suffering from cardiac arrest, stroke, or pulmonary disease recover quicker when participating in a cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program. The patients benefiting the most include those who suffered cardiac arrest and then underwent bypass surgery, coronary stent replacement, or a heart transplant.

Physicians watch and evaluate a patient in a cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program, monitoring the oxygen level, blood pressure, and heart rate of these patients during prescription exercises on therapeutic equipment.

Equally important, cardiopulmonary rehabilitation places emphasis on heart and health education after a patient’s hospital discharge and rehabilitation completion. This helps patients learn new healthy habits that aid in the recovery process and prevent future complications.

Medical centers understand the importance of offering comprehensive healthcare to their varied, growing communities. General hospitals provide patients with the individual care needed from a team of expert healthcare professionals dedicated to caring for the diverse needs of their patients.

Christine O’Kelly writes for the Citrus Memorial Health System, a premier Inverness medical center. Citrus Memorial Health System is a top Florida general hospital.

More Medical Coding Articles

Trump Orders Expansion of Healthcare Insurance Options with Cheaper Coverage

Despite the inability of republicans in Congress to roll back the Affordable Care Act (ACA), President Trump has promised an executive order to offer relief to healthcare consumers facing rising insurance premiums. He is using “the power of the pen,” according to a tweet, to overhaul healthcare. <INSERT TWEET SCREENSHOT> Under the ACA, new insurance requirements prohibited insurers […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

Red Flags for Hospitals in Medicaid Expansion States




Health Leaders Media


Please add this newsletter to your Safe Sender list
View this email as a Web page | Manage Account

  November 25, 2015 Follow us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterJoin us on LinkedInRSS feed

Red Flags for Hospitals in Medicaid Expansion States

Rene Letourneau, Senior Editor for HealthLeaders Media

Less charity care has been offset by lower patient volume. The result is revenue cuts and worrisome implications for tax-exempt status and DSH payments. >>>

 

Editor’s Picks

Seeking Interoperability in a Sea of Data

While it has been an elusive goal for years, the costs associated with not having standardization are mounting and "interoperability is becoming the main act" for healthcare leaders, says an HIT expert. >>>

Bundled Pay for Joint Replacement Could Boost Quality

Some organizations grumbled about CMS’s proposed rule on bundled payments for hip and knee replacements, but now that the final rule—with some concessions to providers— is out, the push for better quality outcomes is on. >>>

Cyber Security Risk a Factor in Hospital Credit Ratings

The not-for-profit healthcare sector is not immune to cyber security threats, particularly as they relate to patient records and the disruption of medical technology, Moody’s Investors Service says. And larger healthcare systems are more vulnerable than stand-alone hospitals. >>>

Cost-Consciousness Dawning on Providers

The lines are blurring between payer and provider perspectives on total cost of care as healthcare’s payment model shifts from volume to value. Now, using a payer’s methodology, providers are mastering TCOC accounting. >>>

Prep Now for Overtime Pay Rule Changes

Uncertainty over coming revisions to federal overtime pay regulations is no excuse for delaying to prepare for changes that could profoundly affect how workers view their jobs. >>>

The Patient as Care Team Member

An engaged patient can and should be involved in the decision-making process. But don’t think of patient-centered care as a customer service program. >>>

Healthcare Mergers: Good, Bad, or Both?

While two major merger deals involving the four largest health insurers in the US are being investigated by the Department of Justice, industry experts are debating whether consolidation is good for business and for patients. From MedPage Today. >>>

Intelligence Report

Intelligence Report: Executive Compensation—Strategies to Align with New Directions

In this HealthLeaders Media research report, learn compensation tactics to inspire the executive team to guide the organization away from volume-based incentives and toward value-based metrics.
Order Today >>>


News Headlines

5 charged in $ 600 million CA healthcare fraud scheme

Reuters, November 25, 2015

End of Medicare bonus program will cut pay to primary care doctors

U.S. News & World Report / Kaiser Health News, November 25, 2015

Health co-op failure in NY leaves doctors owed millions

WRAL.com / Associated Press, November 25, 2015

AZ health insurance co-op to close shop Dec. 31

ABC News / Associated Press, November 25, 2015

Poll: Most Americans say healthcare is government duty

Politico, November 24, 2015

Doctors, hospitals still oppose revised bill to limit out-of-network charges

NJ Spotlight, November 24, 2015

Choked, punched, bitten: Nurses recount attacks by patients

Stat News, November 23, 2015

Rural IA hospitals worry Medicaid transition could end essential funding

The Gazette, November 23, 2015

CMS’ 2017 ACA marketplace proposed rule seeks to streamline direct enrollment

Healthcare Dive, November 23, 2015

Obamacare architect: High-deductible plans overdone

CNBC, November 23, 2015

Stay Connected to HealthLeaders

Don’t Miss the News You Want.

Spam filters exist for a reason, but not for the news you need. Make sure you aren’t missing your daily and/or weekly industry coverage. Add our address — [email protected] — to your address book or e-mail whitelist to keep the news you need in your inbox.

Is All of Your Leadership Team In The Know?

Our award-winning Daily News & Analysis e-newsletter can keep your leadership team abreast of relevant breaking news, and with in-depth industry coverage through 10 weekly e-newsletters that hit every pillar of healthcare, we’ve got your whole leadership team covered. Subscribe to any — or all — of our e-newsletters.

Multimedia/Events

HealthLeaders Media LIVE from Sharp Healthcare: The Pod ED

Date: December 16, 2015 | 11:00–2:00PM ET
In this live e-conference, discover how Sharp Healthcare has realigned its staffing structure to increase flexibility and teamwork, resulting in decreased patient wait times and a greatly enhanced patient experience.
Register Today >>>

From HealthLeaders Magazine

Seeking Interoperability in a Sea of Data

While it has been an elusive goal for years, "interoperability is becoming the main act" for healthcare leaders. >>>

 

Unlocking the Value in Unstructured Data

 

Making Total Cost of Care Contracting Work

Sponsor this Newsletter

For advertising opportunities in this or other HealthLeaders Media email newsletters, please contact [email protected] or call 800.639.7477.

  MAGAZINE | NEWS | TERMS OF SERVICE | PRIVACY POLICY | ADVERTISE Follow us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterJoin us on LinkedInRSS feed

©2015 HealthLeaders Media

If you prefer not to receive this email newsletter, let us know.
HealthLeaders Media Health Plan Insider is a division of Fortis Business Media
HEALTHLEADERS MEDIA
100 Winners Circle, Brentwood, TN 37027
Serving the business information needs of healthcare executives and professionals.

 



HCPro.com – Health Plan Insider