Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

US gets the ball rolling on ICD-11

The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) met with several industry experts in preparation for the implementation of the ICD-11 code set in the US market. Committee members and industry stakeholders used the two-day assembly to reach a shared understanding of the critical lessons learned from the transition to ICD-10 and what needs […]

The post US gets the ball rolling on ICD-11 appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Expired Medicare Legislative Provisions and Therapy Claims with the KX Modifier Rolling Hold


CMS is committed to implementing the Medicare program in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, including timely claims processing.  Several Medicare legislative provisions affecting health care providers and beneficiaries recently expired, including exceptions to the outpatient therapy caps, the Medicare physician work geographic adjustment floor, add-on payments for ambulance services and home health rural services, payments for low volume hospitals, and payments for Medicare dependent hospitals.  CMS is implementing these payment policies as required under current law.

For a short period of time beginning on January 1, 2018, CMS took steps to limit the impact on Medicare beneficiaries by holding claims affected by the therapy caps exceptions process expiration. Only therapy claims containing the KX modifier were held; claims submitted with the KX modifier indicate that the cap has been met but the service meets the exception criteria for payment consideration. During this short period of time, claims that were submitted without the KX modifier were paid if the beneficiary had not exceeded the cap but were denied if the beneficiary exceeded the cap.

Starting January 25, 2018, CMS will immediately release for processing held therapy claims with the KX modifier with dates of receipt beginning from January 1-10, 2018.  Then, starting January 31, 2018, CMS will release for processing the held claims one day at a time based on the date the claim was received, i.e., on a first-in, first-out basis. At the same time, CMS will hold all newly received therapy claims with the KX modifier and implement a “rolling hold” of 20 days of claims to help minimize the number of claims requiring reprocessing and minimize the impact on beneficiaries if legislation regarding therapy caps is enacted.  For example, on January 31, 2018, CMS will hold all therapy claims with the KX modifier received that day and release for processing the held claims received on January 11.  Similarly, on February 1, CMS will hold all therapy claims with the KX modifier received that day and release for processing the held claims received on January 12, and so on.


Coding Ahead

CMS proposes rolling back 2-midnight rule

CMS proposes rolling back 2-midnight rule

The controversial 2-midnight rule may be no more following CMS’ release of its latest proposed rule for the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS). When it was first put in place for fiscal year 2014, the 2-midnight rule established a benchmark for inpatient admissions where a Medicare Part A payment would be considered reasonable and necessary for patient stays that lasted at least two midnights. Stays that didn’t reach that benchmark would be billed as outpatient services, which are covered by Medicare Part B and tend to result in lower hospital reimbursements.

Under the new proposed rule, CMS would no longer impose a 0.2% payment cut for inpatient stays under the 2-midnight rule. Hospitals would also receive a one-time 0.6% payment in fiscal year 2017 to offset the reduction in inpatient payments over the previous three years.

In the proposed rule, CMS wrote, "We still believe the assumptions underlying the 0.2[%] reduction to the rates put in place beginning in FY 2014 were reasonable at the time we made them in 2013. Nevertheless … in the context of this case, we believe it would be appropriate to use our authority … to prospectively remove, beginning in FY 2017, the 0.2[%] reduction to the rates put in place beginning in FY 2014."

The proposed rule, which would affect about 3,330 acute care hospitals and 430 long-term care hospitals, would apply to patient discharges from October 1, 2016 and later.

Under the proposed rule, acute care hospitals that are meaningful use electronic health record (EHR) users and that successfully participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program would receive a 0.9% payment increase.

Overall, CMS estimates that the elimination of the payment cut and proposed payment increases will result in an additional $ 539 million in payments in fiscal year 2017.

CMS held a comment period for the proposed rule, which ended in June. A final rule will be issued August 1.

The proposed rule comes as welcome news to some. Following the announcement of the proposed rule, the American Hospital Association (AHA) released a statement from President and CEO Rick Pollack that said, "[The] rule includes a very important outcome because it reverses the inappropriate and unfair 0.2[%] payment reduction for inpatient services that was implemented as part of the original ‘two-midnight’ policy. The AHA successfully challenged [CMS’] interpretation through the courts to convince them to restore the resources that hospitals are lawfully due."

 

Background

Two years ago, CMS enacted the payment cuts for inpatient stays to offset an anticipated increase in inpatient admissions as a result of the 2014 IPPS 2-midnight rule. The increase in admissions was predicted to cost $ 220 million.

Following the rule’s introduction, there was vocal opposition to the rule from hospitals that argued it arbitrarily complicated care for Medicare beneficiaries, and legal challenges were subsequently launched over the 0.2% cut.

In the case Shands Jacksonville Medical Center v. Burwell, several hospitals and hospital associations, including the AHA, questioned whether Sylvia Burwell, secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), had the authority to make the proposed across-the-board reductions, and whether her prediction of the $ 220 million increase was valid.

In September, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found that HHS did have the authority to reduce the reimbursement rates, but that the justification for the 0.2% cut was lacking.

In his ruling, District Judge Randolph Moss wrote, "The Court is unable to evaluate whether the [s]ecretary’s decision was reasonable because her omission prevented the public from offering meaningful comments. The [p]laintiffs never had the opportunity to explain where, in their view, she went wrong, and, thus, the [s]ecretary never had to provide a reasoned justification of her position."

Moss ordered Burwell to provide additional justification for the reimbursement cut and allow a public comment period. CMS issued a request for comments in December.

The following month, 55 additional hospitals filed a similar lawsuit over the 2-midnight rule’s 0.2% inpatient payment cut and the estimated increase in inpatient admissions the cut was based on.

 

CMS pauses reviews of short-stay claims

On a related note, in May, CMS put a temporary pause on reviews performed by Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Quality Improvement Organizations (BFCC-QIO) to determine if payments under Medicare Part A are appropriate for claims for inpatient stays that span less than two midnights.

In a message posted June 6, CMS explained it "became aware of inconsistencies in the BFCC-QIOs’ application of the two-midnight policy for short hospital stay reviews, and … we temporarily paused short stay patient status reviews to give us time to improve standardization in the BFCC-QIOs’ review process."

BFCC-QIOs will use the temporary pause to complete retraining on the two-midnight policy and to review all claims that were denied since last October. BFCC-QIOs began conducting the short-stay claim reviews in October, which were previously conducted by Medicare Administrative Contractors.

CMS believes audit activities will resume in 60?90 days, according to the update it posted in June. In the meantime, hospitals that previously had a claim denied should check with their BFCC-QIO to see if the claim has been denied before filing an appeal. Hospitals that have already filed appeals will have the findings of the re-review performed by the BFCC-QIO shared with the appeals adjudicators.

HCPro.com – Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider