Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Indiana system to pay $2.9M to settle Medicaid overbilling allegations

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/indiana-system-to-pay-2-9m-to-settle-medicaid-overbilling-allegations.html

Fort Wayne, Ind.-based Parkview Health System has agreed to pay $ 2.9 million to settle allegations it overbilled Medicaid between January 2017 and March 2021.

Improper revenue codes were submitted to Medicaid for certain blood-clotting tests performed on patients at several Parkview hospitals, according to a Sept. 27 news release from the Indiana Attorney General’s Office.

Attorney General Todd Rokita said Parkview cooperated with the office when the overbilling was brought to its attention.

The post Indiana system to pay $ 2.9M to settle Medicaid overbilling allegations appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

Pain Doctor Pays to Settle Allegations of Deceptive Medicare Billing

Pain doctor pays to settle allegations of deceptive Medicare billing.

A 52-year-old pain management physician from Houston has paid $ 530,000 to resolve allegations he falsely billed Medicare for the use of electro-acupuncture devices, announced U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Patrick.

From March 1, 2019, to Oct. 31, 2019, Dr. Syed Nasir billed Medicare for the implantation of neurostimulator electrodes–a surgical procedure that usually requires use of an operating room.

The post Pain Doctor Pays to Settle Allegations of Deceptive Medicare Billing appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

Texas Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims

Texas Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims

The settlement agreement resolves allegations that Dr. Robbins submitted claims for Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code 93965, when those claims were for a procedure that was already included as a component of the duplex ultrasound procedures for which Dr. Robbins submitted claims using HCPCS codes 93970 or 93971 for the same beneficiary on the same dates of service.

 

The post Texas Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

New Mexico Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims

New Mexico Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims

The settlement agreement resolves allegations that Dr. Reddy submitted claims for Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code 93965, when those claims were for a procedure that was already included as a component of the duplex ultrasound procedures for which Dr. Reddy submitted claims using HCPCS codes 93970 or 93971 for the same beneficiary on the same dates of service.

The post New Mexico Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

Medicare Advantage Supplier and Doctor to Pay $5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations

Beaver Medical Group L.P. (BMG) and a doctor who works for it, Dr. Sherif Khalil, have agreed to pay a little over the amount of $ 5 million to resolve accusations that they falsely reported diagnosis codes to plans of Medicare Advantage, thereby causing said plans to receive inflated payments. BMG is headquartered in Redlands, CA. “The United States relies on healthcare providers to submit accurate diagnosis data to Medicare Advantage plans to ensure those plans receive the appropriate compensation,” said Jody Hunt, Assistant Attorney General of the DOJ’s Civil Division. “We will pursue those who undermine the integrity of the Medicare program and the data it relies upon.”

Read the Full Story Here!

The post Medicare Advantage Supplier and Doctor to Pay $ 5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

$1.85 Million Paid to Settle Urology Modifier 25 Whistleblower Case

Separately asking routine evaluation and management (E/M) services provided on a similar day as another procedure is usually denied by Medicare. Care providers might typically individually bill E/M services if they meet certain criteria and append modifier 25 vital, on an individual basis specifiable analysis and management service by a similar MD or different qualified health care skilled on a similar day of the procedure or different service to the claim. Modifier twenty five shows payers, like Medicare, that a care supplier went higher than and on the far side the standard E/M of pre-operative and post-operative care related to the medical procedure; which it had been vital, on an individual basis specifiable service. If this modifier gets used, a supplier unbundles a service and receives further compensation ― overpayments of Medicare bucks. Per a whistleblower, this is what Skyline urology allegedly did between January. 1, 2013 and Dec. 31, 2016.

Read the Full Story here!

The post $ 1.85 Million Paid to Settle Urology Modifier 25 Whistleblower Case appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

Florida Physicians and Practice Settle False and Fraudulent Claims Case

Jaime L. Sepulveda, MD, LLC (d/b/a Miami Urogynecology Center), Jaime L. Sepulveda, M.D., and Sujata Yavagal, M.D. (collectively, “Miami Urogynecology Center”), South Miami, Florida, entered into a $ 173,768.08 settlement agreement with OIG. The settlement agreement resolves allegations that Miami Urogynecology Center submitted claims to Medicare for items or services that it knew or should have known were not provided as claimed and were false or fraudulent. Specifically, OIG contended that Miami Urogynecology Center submitted claims for: (1) diagnostic electromyography services using CPT code 51784 when therapeutic, not diagnostic, services had been provided; (2) pelvic floor physical therapy services using CPT codes 97032 and 97110 when those services were provided by an unqualified individual; and (3) evaluation and management (E&M) services using CPT codes 99213 and 99214 that were billed in conjunction with pelvic floor therapy procedures when no separate and identifiable E&M services were provided. OIG’s Consolidated Data Analysis Center and Office of Counsel to the Inspector General, represented by Senior Counsels Srishti Sheffner and Michael Torrisi, with the assistance of Program Analyst Mariel Filtz, collaborated to achieve this settlement.

The post Florida Physicians and Practice Settle False and Fraudulent Claims Case appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

California Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims

On December 20, 2018, Michael Jadali, D.O., and the Center for Pain & Rehabilitation Medicine (collectively, “Dr. Jadali”), San Jose, California, entered into a $ 60,406.30 settlement agreement with OIG. The settlement agreement resolves allegations that Dr. Jadali submitted claims to Medicare for Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes 80500 (clinical pathology consultation; limited, without review of patient’s history and medical records) and 80502 (clinical pathology consultation, comprehensive, for a complex diagnostic problem, with review of patient’s history and medical records), where no consultation request had been made, no written narrative report by a consultant pathologist was produced, and no exercise of medical judgement by a consultant pathologist was required. Senior Counsels Geoffrey Hymans and Kenneth Kraft represented OIG.

The post California Physician and Practice Settle Case Involving False Claims appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

California Physician and Practice Settle False and Fraudulent Claims Case

On April 12, 2019, Complete Women Care, Inc., and Miriam Mackovic-Basic, M.D. (collectively, “CWC”), with multiple locations in Los Angeles County, California, entered into a $ 258,045 settlement agreement with OIG. The settlement agreement resolves allegations that CWC submitted claims to Medicare for items or services that it knew or should have known were not provided as claimed and were false or fraudulent. Specifically, OIG contended that CWC submitted claims for: (1) diagnostic electromyography services using CPT Code 51784 and diagnostic anorectal manometry (ARM) services using CPT Code 91122 when therapeutic, not diagnostic services, had been provided; (2) ARM services using CPT Code 91122 that were not performed according to CMS guidelines; (3) pelvic floor electrical stimulation that was not preceded by a four-week course of failed pelvic muscle exercise training; and (4) in 13 instances, evaluation and management services using CPT Code 99214 that did not meet the criteria for billing under that code. OIG’s Division of Data Analytics and Office of Counsel to the Inspector General, represented by Senior Counsels David Traskey and Michael Torrisi, with the assistance of Program Analyst Mariel Filtz, collaborated to achieve this settlement.

The post California Physician and Practice Settle False and Fraudulent Claims Case appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

Medicare Advantage Provider To Pay $30 Million To Settle Alleged Overpayment Of Medicare Advantage Funds

Sutter Health LLC, a California-based healthcare services provider, and several affiliated entities, Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation, Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation, Sutter Gould Medical Foundation, and Sutter Medical Foundation, have agreed to pay $ 30 million to resolve allegations that the affiliated entities submitted inaccurate information about the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans, which resulted in the plans and providers being overpaid, the Justice Department announced today.  Sutter Health is headquartered in Sacramento, California.

“The Medicare Advantage Program provides benefits to a significant portion of federal health care beneficiaries,” said Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division. “The Department of Justice will help ensure that accurate information is supplied to the Medicare Advantage Program by plans and providers, and to pursue appropriate remedies when it is not.”

Under Medicare Advantage, also known as the Medicare Part C program, Medicare beneficiaries have the option of enrolling in managed healthcare insurance plans called Medicare Advantage Plans (“MA Plans”) that are owned and operated by private Medicare Advantage Organizations (“MAOs”).  MA Plans are paid a capitated, or per-person, amount to provide Medicare-covered benefits to beneficiaries who enroll in one of their plans.  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), which oversees the Medicare program, adjusts the payments to MA Plans based on demographic information and the health status of each plan beneficiary.  The adjustments are commonly referred to as “risk scores.”  In general, a beneficiary with more severe diagnoses will have a higher risk score, and CMS will make a larger risk-adjusted payment to the MA Plan for that beneficiary.

Sutter Health, a non-profit public benefit corporation that provides healthcare services through its affiliates, including hospitals and medical foundations, contracted with certain MAOs to provide healthcare services to California beneficiaries enrolled in the MAOs’ MA Plans.  In exchange, Sutter received a share of the payments that the MAOs received from CMS for the beneficiaries under Sutter’s care.

Sutter submitted diagnoses to the MAOs for the MA Plan enrollees that they treated.  The MAOs, in turn, submitted the diagnosis codes to CMS from the beneficiaries’ medical encounters, such as office visits and hospital stays.  The diagnosis codes were used in CMS’ calculation of a risk score for each beneficiary.

The settlement announced today resolves allegations that Sutter and its affiliates submitted unsupported diagnosis codes for certain patient encounters of beneficiaries under their care.  These unsupported diagnosis scores inflated the risk scores of these beneficiaries, resulting in the MAO plans being overpaid.

Earlier this month, the government filed a complaint against Sutter and a separate affiliated entity, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, alleging that they violated the False Claims Act by knowingly submitting unsupported diagnosis scores. That case is captioned United States ex rel. Ormsby v. Sutter Health, et al., Case No. 15-CV-01062-JD (N.D. Cal.), and is still ongoing.

“Misrepresenting patients’ risk results in higher payments and wasted Medicare funds,” said Steven J. Ryan, Special Agent in Charge with the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “With some one-third of people in Medicare now enrolled in managed care Advantage plans, large health systems such as Sutter can expect a thorough investigation of claimed enrollees’ health status.”

The settlement was the result of a coordinated effort by the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, and HHS-OIG.

The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

Topic(s): 

False Claims Act

Component(s): 

Civil Division

USAO – California, Northern

Press Release Number: 

19-379

The post Medicare Advantage Provider To Pay $ 30 Million To Settle Alleged Overpayment Of Medicare Advantage Funds appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network