Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Industry Standards for Amount of Providers to 1 Auditor?

I’m looking for some information on what are the industry standards for how many providers 1 auditor should have? This would be based on a standard yearly audit for each provider, as well as fixing any errors that may come across our WQs as we call them. So far the consensus is, 1 Auditor: 50 Providers. Is there information somewhere on that?

Thanks!
Krystle

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

The Joint Commission deletes 225 standards

JC quarterly update

The Joint Commission deletes 225 standards

by Jean S. Clark, RHIA, CSHA

The May 2016 issue of Perspectives outlined 225 hospital requirements from the accreditation manual?nine from the Information Management (IM) chapter and five from the Record of Care, Treatment and Services (RC) chapter?that have been deleted. This initiative is part of the Joint Commission’s project REFRESH and improving the survey process. Deletions fell into three categories:

1.Those that were duplicative of or implicit in the element of performance

2.Those that were a routine part of operations or clinical care processes

3.Those that were adequately addressed by external requirements

 

The largest number of deletions fell into those that were a routine part of operations or clinical processes. The good news is that we now have fewer standards/elements of performance to contend with. The bad news is that the majority of the IM and RC chapter deletions fell into the duplicative category, so we still have to be compliant in other standards. Let’s take a look at what was deleted and where requirements can now be located.

As you can see, the majority of the deletions are duplicative, which means the standards did not go away entirely. My advice is to review the deletions and compare your compliance with the referenced standard or requirement. Don’t become complacent just because some standards have been removed! And take time to review the other standards identified in the May 2016 issue of Perspectives, especially the Provision of Care deletions. The good news here is that all hospitals, regardless of deemed status, will be using the CMS restraints and seclusion requirements.

 

Editor’s note

Clark is a consultant, author, and speaker with more than 30 years of experience in HIM, accreditation, and regulatory compliance. Contact her at [email protected]. Opinions expressed are that of the author and do not represent HCPro or ACDIS.

HCPro.com – HIM Briefings

Struggling with standards: Almost two-thirds of hospitals are not compliant with EC, LS requirements

 Almost two-thirds of the hospitals surveyed in 2017 were found noncompliant in at least one—and possibly many more—of the top 10 most challenging standards for hospitals.

HCPro.com – Briefings on Accreditation and Quality

Auditor Productivity Standards

I am looking for any information anyone might have on auditing productivity standards. Not coding productivity but Auditing. Is there a standard on the amount of records that an auditor should be able to do per hour, per day or per week? We have standards of about 11 records per hour but I believe that might be affecting accuracy.

Thanks

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

ONC releases final 2016 interoperability standards

The ONC published the final 2016 Interoperability Standards Advisory (ISA) December 22, 2015. The final version includes structural changes available in the fall 2015 draft version. Each standard and implementation specification is assigned six informative characteristics that describe its maturity and adoptability. These informative characteristics will also allow the measures and standards to be tracked as they progress through updates and version, and the rate at which they are adopted, ONC said in a blog post.

The 2016 ISA has undergone significant changes from the 2015 version. These changes are largely attributed to the two rounds of public comment periods ONC conducted, as well as recommendations from the HIT Standards Committee, according to ONC. The most notable changes and additions are:

  • The inclusion of “interoperability needs,” or desired outcomes for each standard
  • Informative characteristics to describe the status and adoption of each standard and implementation specification
  • Subsections that describe attributes or usage concerns such as limitations or general security recommendations
  • Security standards sources appendix
  • “Projected additions” section
  • Summary public comments that were not incorporated into the 2016 ISA including ONC’s responses
  • Revision history section

Other changes from the draft version include revisions and descriptions for the informative characteristics.

The 2016 ISA will serve as the basis for the 2017 version. The comment period to develop the 2017 version will begin early this year.

HCPro.com – HIM-HIPAA Insider

CMS and Joint Commission clarify door-closing devices standards

 Examine all automatic door arrangements in light of the newest clarification on fire doors from CMS and revisions to The Joint Commission’s Life Safety standard on providing building features to protect against fire and smoke hazards.

HCPro.com – Briefings on Accreditation and Quality

Standards for additional reimbursement or reduction with modifiers

Hello,
I know many are at the discretion of the payer but is there a set standard that payers go by when determining if a modifier warrants additional payment (ie. -22) or reduction (ie. -52) and by what percentage? If so, who sets this standard?

Thank you.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum