Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Nerve Conduction Studies and EMG

Has anyone had the following deny do to medical necessity? I have verified that the all the dx codes used are on the current Medicare LCD and have checked using Encorder Pro that there are no CCI edits. However, these claims keep rejecting. I am on the phone with Medicare right now waiting to get a straight answer. Any help would be appreciated.

95911 (one unit and no modifier)
95886 (one unit and no modifier)

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Coding Electrophysiology Studies and Arrhythmia Ablation

Improve your claims payment success rate by understanding bundling and add-on code rules. Electrophysiology studies and arrhythmia ablation can be tricky to report due to the number of bundled and add-on codes. Here’s a step-by-step approach to coding these medical procedures with confidence. The Value of EP Studies Electrophysiology (EP) studies are used to both diagnose […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

Nerve Conduction Studies- counting nerves

We’ve had some disagreements about which nerves can be counted and have been told different answers. AANEM told us you can count median to second and median to fourth separate. However, CMS has told us only nerves listed with a letter (A,B,C, etc.) in Appendix J in the CPT book can be counted. The nerves under these headings with a numeral in front of them can’t be counted.

I also read an article from AHIMA that seems to agree with CMS, "CPT Appendix J lists the nerves that can be tested and coded under nerve conduction study codes. The branches of each nerve are also listed, but the unit of service is limited to the nerve and not the branches." https://newsletters.ahima.org/newsle…onduction.html

Does anyone know which is correct so we can put an end to this debate?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Coding Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Studies

Hello,

I hope someone can assist me with this coding issue.

I am coding for the Cardiologist’s professional portion only, I am not responsible for the facility side. Our provider performs the interpretation and supplies a report for the Cardiovascular Stress Testing portion (CPT 93015-93018) of the MPI while the a radiologist provides the report for the imaging portion of the MPI Planar studies (78453-78454). Am I correct to only be coding the 93015-93018 for the cardiologist? Another coder in my group thinks I should be coding 78453,26 but I disagree because the report completed by the cardiologist only addresses the stress test component and does not make mention of any pharmacological agents, dosing of medication, etc…

Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.

Sandy M

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

CTA studies prior to TAVR

My radiologist is asking if they can charge 72175, 75574 and 74174 when they perform CTA’s in workup prior to TAVR. As far as my research seems to indicate, these three are billable when performed in the same session. As far as the aortic annular and vascular measurements, I believe they are performed by Medtronic. Does that sound right to you? My rad didn’t perform that portion and wants to make sure we aren’t billing for something he didn’t do.

I understand the ECG gating is bundled into the 75574, right? Would you bill all three CTA codes? If not, can you guide me to any literature saying so?

Thank you!

Here is an example:

EXAM: CT TAVR W/CONTRAST-TG #/##/2018
*
HISTORY: ##-year-old male with aortic stenosis undergoing preprocedural
evaluation and planning for TAVR.
*
TECHNIQUE: After scout images, a noncontrast gated scan of the heart and
nongated acquisition of the chest abdomen pelvis was acquired. Using
retrospective dose modulated ECG gating, CT angiography of the heart, was
obtained following the uneventful administration of 100 cc of Isovue-370.
intravenous contrast. An acquisition of the chest abdomen and pelvis was
then acquired utilizing a flash acquisition. Sagittal and coronal thin
MIP reconstructions were generated and reviewed.
In accordance with CT policies/protocols and the ALARA principle,
radiation dose reduction techniques (such as automated exposure control,
adjustment of mA/kV according to patient size and/or iterative
reconstruction technique) were utilized for this examination.
*
Aortic annular and vascular measurements will be generated within a
separate report.

The body of the report:

FINDINGS:
VASCULAR:
There is a left-sided 3 vessel aortic arch. No aortic aneurysm,
dissection, or intramural hematoma. There are mild ascending aortic
calcifications.
There are moderate calcified and noncalcified atherosclerotic plaques in
the aorta and its major branches. There is severe stenosis of the
bilateral subclavian arteries secondary to bilateral cervical ribs.
Significant calcification and thickening seen about the aortic valve
leaflets, consistent with known aortic stenosis. Aortic valve is
tricuspid.
*
Heart: An atrial diverticulum is noted about the intra-atrial septum.
Slitlike structure about the septum is suggestive of a PFO. Patient is
status post CABG, with patent LIMA to LAD graft as well as 2 left-sided
patent aortocoronary bypass grafts. No right-sided bypass graft
identified. There is no significant pericardial effusion.
*
Pulmonary Arteries:The pulmonary arteries are normal in caliber. No
definite pulmonary artery filling defect identified.
*
There is advanced atherosclerosis throughout the abdominal aorta with
multifocal ulcerating plaque and a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer in
the infrarenal aorta (location -480.5).
The celiac artery, SMA and IMA are patent.
One right renal artery and one left renal artery are identified. There is
moderate stenosis at the right renal ostium with poststenotic dilatation.
*
Advanced atherosclerotic changes are seen in the bilateral iliofemoral
arteries, with moderate to severe stenoses in the bilateral common iliac
arteries
*
*
CT CHEST:
Thoracic Inlet: Evaluation of the thyroid gland is limited due to beam
hardening. No supraclavicular lymphadenopathy.
Mediastinum / Hila: No pathologically enlarged lymph nodes. The esophagus
is patulous.
Chest wall: Normal.
*
Lungs / Airways: There are emphysematous changes most pronounced in the
upper lobes. Clustered groundglass opacities in the periphery of the left
upper lobe are likely infectious/inflammatory. There is dependent
atelectasis and peripheral reticulation throughout the bilateral lungs.
Central airways are patent without suspicious filling defects.
Pleural Space: There is no significant pleural effusion. No pneumothorax
is seen.
*
CT ABDOMEN / PELVIS:
Liver: Unremarkable.
Gallbladder: Normal.
Bile Ducts: Normal.
Pancreas: No suspicious pancreatic mass.
Spleen: Unremarkable.
GI Tract: Unremarkable.
*
Kidneys: Symmetric perfusion. No hydronephrosis or suspicious renal
masses.
Adrenals: No discrete adrenal nodules.
*
Lymph nodes: No pathologically enlarged lymph nodes.
*
Pelvic Organs: There is prostatomegaly.
Bladder: Diffuse wall thickening is likely related to chronic outlet
obstruction.
Miscellaneous: No significant free fluid.
Abdominal Wall: Unremarkable.
*
Bones: Sternotomy wiring is intact. There are multilevel degenerative
changes throughout the visualized spine. No acute fractures.
*
IMPRESSION:
*Severe stenoses of the bilateral subclavian artery secondary to cervical
ribs. Advanced atherosclerosis of the abdominal aorta and iliofemoral
arteries, with moderate to severe stenoses in the bilateral common iliac
arteries and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer in the infrarenal aorta.
*Status post CABG with patent LIMA to LAD and 2 patent left sided
aortocoronary bypass grafts.
*Aortic valve thickening and calcification, compatible with known aortic
valve stenosis. Please see separate report for preprocedural TAVR
measurements.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Ncs nerve conduction studies – comparisons

Hello.
I have searched and cannot find specific guidance related to if the "Comparison Summary" Studies can be counted. I am receiving many UHC denials.

I understand that we count each nerve OR branch of a nerve (ie RT Ulnar Seg Motor ABD and Right Ulnar Seg Motor FDI are counted separately, as they are listed individually in Appendix J).

I actually have 2 issues – UHC is denying the separate branches of the nerve stating the nerve can only be counted once despite Appendix J. I am appealing these. Has anyone else had this problem with UHC and have you been successful in your appeals?

My other issue is my testing provider, who is ABPTS Board Certified in Clinical Electrophysiology Testing & credentials PT, PMSK, ECS, and I disagree on whether or not the comparison studies can be counted separately. (Again these are being denied by UHC as we are over-coding.)

Example:
MOTOR SUMMARY
Right Median Motor (ABD Poll Brev)
Right Ulnar Seg Motor (ABD Dig Minimi)
Right Ulnar Seg FDI Motor (FDI)

SENSORY SUMMARY
Left Dors Cutan Sensory (Dorsum 5th MC)
Right Dor Cutan Sensory (Dorsum 5th MC)
Right Median D2 Sensory (2nd Digit)
Right Radial Sensory (1st Digit)
Right Ulnar D5 Sensory (5th Digit)

SENSORY COMPARISON SUMMARY

Right Median/Radial Sen Comparison (Digit 1) (Median Wst, Radial Wst)
Right Median/Ulnar Sen Comparison (Digit 4) (Median Wst, Ulnar Wst)

MOTOR COMPARISON SUMMARY
Right 2nd Lumb-Interos Motor Comparison (2nd Lumb Interos) (Median Wrist, Ulnar Wrist)

The testing provider is counting this as 11 nerves = 95912.
I’ve been told that the Comparisons don’t count separate, so I would get 8 nerves = 95910.

Any help/advice / reference material that you could provide to me would be Greatly appreciated!
Thanks! Tina

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

sleep studies

Does anyone have any good references or know of anything that would help to ensure I am billing sleep studies correctly? In addition to the general coding, perhaps the dates of service to be used, the place of service, etc?

One of the main questions we have is if the technical component is performed at place of service 22, and the provider reads/interprets the report in their own office, is the professional component place of service 11, or the same as the TC and is 22?

Any help with guidelines would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

-Cathy

Medical Billing and Coding Forum