Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Medical Coding Manager Explains What Job Hunting Is Like Today

Job hunting has changed drastically from 20 years ago when newspaper classified ads and personal interactions were the best way to find open positions. You would go door to door to apply, make telephone calls, and snail mail and fax resumes and cover letters to the employers. Today, you scour through thousands of job listings […]

The post Medical Coding Manager Explains What Job Hunting Is Like Today appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

CPT deal today

Hello, I was told by over the phone by AAPC yesterday that there would be a special sale today on the CPT manuals. But all I see is the CPT workshop on sale for the 12 days of christmas. Does anyone know if this includes the manual? The price is $ 49 down from $ 149. Thank you for any information. Of course AAPC is not available today or I would double check before making this purchase. I only need the manual.:confused

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Medical Miracles – Do They Still Happen Today?

Doctors are very wary about the idea of medical miracles but the idea of miraculous healing has been around for thousands of years. For those people who are facing terminal or severe chronic illness the desire for a miracle healing can be immense. Is this a legitimate hope or a false hope?

Whether miracles still happen today depends on your definition of the word miracle. If by miracle you mean that something is totally against the laws of nature then I would suggest that they never did happen.

However, if by miracle you mean a turn around in serious, or terminal illness when the doctors thought there was very little chance of recovery, then, of course they do still happen.

How can I be so sure? Most doctors who have been practicing for years have stories of people who have done much better than could have ever been expected given their diagnosis, prognosis (expected outcome) and treatment. Discussion on them is usually kept to the coffee room rather than the research unit.

It is also a matter of logic. If you have 100 people with a terminal condition then not all of them die at the same instant. They die one at a time. And for every 100 people then the last 10 will die later than the first 90. That is logical. And someone has to take longer to die than all of the others in that group of 100. Also within that group of the last survivors are some people who have such a good quality of life that some would describe them as miracle survivors.

The important question is whether there is a reason for some to take longer to die than others, or whether it is just chance? Fortunately research has answered some of these questions for us. While chance is probably always a component there are many things that those who survive much longer than others all have in common.

Ground breaking research was published in the academic journal Qualitative Health Research in 2008 which described the quality of such survival as personal resilience. What was really interesting is that all of the survivors had a very large number of personal qualities and ways of interpreting life that were in common to all of them regardless of whether the person was male or female, how old they were (23 – 90 years) or how much education they had during their lives (18 months to graduate degrees and further training).

The survivors decided early on in their illness to live each day with the best quality that they could make. They lived each day to the fullest and their quality of life was self defined. These were people who came to live their own lives, not controlled by others or by their disease process, but so that they could take charge for today.

Of course they were often constrained by their illness. If you are on a drip and confined to one room there are lots of things that you can’t do. However within those constraints there were still lots of things the survivors chose as important for that time, such as being in charge of their own toileting or choosing to put make-up on for visitors. They did not allow their quality of life to be defined by their illness but by their own values and the way they chose to live on that day. The focus was on what was possible not on what they could not do.

Every person was different in the way they chose to define what was quality for them. However it was really interesting to find that by focusing on their own interpretation of quality of life that each person did come to a quality of life that anyone, whether medical carer or dispassionate observer would agree was quality. Each person ended up symptom free for at least an extensive period of time. Their disease remitted or apparently disappeared.

The fact that remission is physically possible means that there is a biological pathway for remission to occur in anyone and so hope is legitimate. Doctors worry about giving what they call false hope. However if there is just one case ever that has gone into remission means that there must be hope and when there is hope there is justification for exploring possibilities for improving the quality of life for those who are seriously and terminally ill.

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. Want to learn more about unexpected recovery from terminal illness? Claim Harriet’s popular free e-course, available at http://www.beatthemedicalodds.com/.

Medical Intern Positions Available Today

Internships present wonderful opportunities for individuals and students to start their careers in practically any field. If you are planning on creating a job in the medical industry, you are likely interested in the many internship opportunities that are available in this industry today. The following paragraphs will briefly review the various positions that are available to individuals like you.

The medical industry has many unique segments within it. Whether you are interested in executive positions, physician positions, or you are just interested in the lower end positions that are available in this industry, there are internships available that will suit you perfectly.

No matter which segment of this field you are interested in though, you will be able to acquire a great deal of skills and knowledge about how this industry operates if you obtain an internship position. Interns often complete real world tasks that keep businesses moving forward and they often help physicians complete their primary objectives.

If you are seeking out a career in the administrative portion of this industry, you can easily find an internship that revolves around administrative duties available today. These positions often work with the practical aspects of medical facilities relating to customer records, supply management, and billing.

There are also many positions that lead to more significant roles within the medical community available as well. These positions often help interns learn about the management of facilities and they help interns learn about the more complex issues relating to the business aspects of medical professions. These positions are perfect for individuals who would like to eventually become executives in this industry.

Individuals who are planning on becoming doctors in the future often become interns as well, but their roles in the medical community often differ from those who are interested in more basic operations within this field. As an intern who is in the process of becoming a doctor, you will likely have much more experience than other interns and you will possess the training that is needed to actually assist doctors in a direct manner as they serve their patients.

As an intern, you will be in a great position to learn about how this industry operates and you will have a chance to improve your skills and knowledge concerning the fields you are hoping to build a career within. Many internships within this industry are paid internships as well. For this reason, if you are hoping to obtain an internship within the medical establishment today, you can expect to earn income and you can expect to acquire the knowledge you will need to become successful in the future.

Are you thinking about becoming a pharmacy technician? Discover more about this lucrative career and request free information from Massachusetts Pharmacy Technician Schools at http://www.pharmacytechniciansalarydata.com

More Medical Coding Articles

Understanding The Home Medical Device Market Today

One of the greatest benefits that individuals enjoy is the fact that they can have vital medical device technology right at their fingertips in the comfort of their own home. Through years of innovation and technology medical devices have gone through some serious transformations that has allowed them to not only become more user-friendly but in addition to that they have become much more affordable. Many years ago the thought that so many difference devices would be able to be used in the home setting was unthinkable. One such great example is a pulse oximeter and blood pressure monitor. Both products were the type that you would typically just find in the hospital setting. One is made specifically for measuring the pulse rate and blood oxygen saturation while the other is made to strictly measure the blood pressure of individuals. If one was to use these two things at home to monitor their health they really did not have any access to them.

Then what occurred is that there was some major technological advancements in chip technology and semiconductors. Through such pulse oximeter innovation the products were able to be manufactured to be firstly smaller and more portable and secondly much less expensive. So essentially if you have a health condition like lung cancer where you need to closely monitor your oxygen levels or whether you have high blood pressure then what you can do is to easily follow your health levels. The other great benefit of the advancement is actually the fact that the pulse oximeter products became significantly cheaper and more affordable for regular home consumers. The hospitals have budgets that are able to withstand expensive health items, but regular individuals need to have the ability to have access to their monitoring systems while still being conscious of their budgets and financial capabilities.

The highest quality pulse oximeter products can be found at http://www.pulseoximetersupply.com

Related Medical Coding Articles

Computer-assisted coding: Where are we today?

Computer-assisted coding: Where are we today?

by Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP

In our computer-savvy tech world, the medical field has been notoriously slow to respond to newer technologies and applications of computer-assisted enhancements. However, in the HIM market, computer-assisted coding (CAC) has been touted to boost coding accuracy and productivity, in addition to being an important tool for the remote inpatient coder. 

 

Background

The term CAC denotes technology that automatically assigns codes from clinical documentation for a human to review, analyze, and use, according to the Journal of AHIMA.

Currently, there are a variety of methodologies, software, and integration interface applications that enable a CAC application to read text and assign codes. This type of software reads the information in a similar way to how a spell-check application works on a traditional computer. According to some users, data-driven documentation (e.g., documentation that is dictated or typed) is more accurately processed by the CAC software than documents that are scanned into the system for the software to use.  

CAC software works through recognition; it learns words and phrases, as well as learning the areas within a specific document where standardized words and phrases appear. CAC software also has the ability to discern the context or meaning of those words and phrases. The program then analyzes and predicts what the appropriate ICD-10-CM/PCS codes should be for the documented diagnoses and procedures it finds within the specified documents.

Software providing CAC functionality has been available for over 10 years, but it has come to the forefront of inpatient coding with the implementation of ICD-10-CM/PCS. CAC has allowed hospitals to reduce lag times and enhance DRGs while also finding missed MCC/CC diagnoses. The usage and integration of an electronic health record (EHR) has also played a role in better code assignment and usage for data analysis and outcomes.

It is yet to be shown whether CAC actually enhances a coder’s productivity rate. On the upside, CAC does give the coder a great place to start when working on a difficult inpatient record. CAC is now where we were more than 20 years ago when encoders were first introduced into the inpatient hospital marketplace for coding, abstracting, and data analysis.

 

Pros and cons of CAC

Due to the complexity of inpatient care records, clinical documentation, and the complexity of medical terms and abbreviations, many hospitals only use CAC together with intervention by human coders. However, the latest CAC software technology employs a type of natural language and syntax processing to compare, contrast, and extract specific medical terms from electronic data or typed text?so CAC stand-alone technology does exist. In studies conducted by AHIMA, though, the combination of a CAC with a coder/auditor has been proven to be just as good, or better than, a coder or CAC alone.

The biggest challenge CAC poses might be getting buy-in from the hospital coding and HIM staff. The HIM, coding, and clinical staff must all be a part of the changes and be on board with learning how to use this technology enhancement. In the past, there has been some uncertainty and fear related to CAC eliminating coders’ jobs. However, a good CAC solution in conjunction with HIM management allows coders to apply their critical thinking and analytical skills to create well-coded documentation of patients’ care. This, in turn, results in more accurate DRG assignment and reimbursement for the facility.

HIM and coding staff’s responsibility and role in the fiscal revenue stream will change as a result of CAC and similar technology. With this change must comes the acceptance that it takes both a human and a computer to successfully transform a CAC product into good financial outcomes and even better documentation.  

As coders will surely agree, the final code selection for inpatient records should be based upon coders’ knowledge of coding guidelines, clinical concepts, and compliance regulations. When working with CAC, the coder has the ability to agree with or to override codes that the software determines.  

Coders have the education to understand why a diagnosis or procedure should or should not be coded in a specific situation, and by using CAC, they can help the software learn to identify the importance of specific documentation and its relation to ICD-10-CM/PCS codes.

Many CAC vendors will try and sell their product based on the following list of features and benefits:

  • Better medical coding accuracy
  • Faster medical billing
  • Greater coder satisfaction
  • Identification of clinical documentation gaps
  • Increased coder productivity
  • More revenue from more detailed bills
  • Return on investment?the CAC system quickly pays for itself

 

As we’ve said, it hasn’t been shown that CAC actually increases coders’ productivity. In reality, their productivity will probably stay the same, as a coder will still have to audit the information to determine whether the code generated by the software is correct. But in regard to the other CAC benefits on the above list, coder satisfaction should not be overlooked.

During AHIMA’s pilot testing of CAC software, the organization weighed in on some of the potential issues with using CAC software alone (with no human intervention). AHIMA noted that within specific areas of the pilot CAC testing in ICD-10, the coders did not accept 75% of the diagnosis codes presented, and they did not accept 90% of the procedure codes presented within the code sets. However, the information that the CAC software presented did give the coders a good starting reference to drill down to a more comprehensive diagnosis or procedure code.

Coders and CDI personnel will still need to be in charge of the following:

  • Ensuring clinical documentation is complete and querying when appropriate
  • Ensuring complete coding (e.g., for specificity)
  • Ensuring correct sequencing of diagnosis and procedures
  • Reviewing CCs/MCCs and DRG assignments with case complexity and severity

 

CAC, clinical documentation, EHR, and providers

Integration of clinical documentation from providers and physicians has always been a challenge, and combined with the implementation of ICD-10, it has presented a huge impetus for the adoption of CAC technology in hospital- and facility-based organizations.

Unfortunately, physicians still don’t provide thorough documentation, instead relying on CDI and coding staff to guide them. There has always been a disconnect in the language spoken by providers and the language spoken by coders. Physicians document in their comfort zone and fall back on terms such as "pneumonia," whereas a coder is looking for much more specificity. The integration of an EHR-based program and CAC for providers can lead to a good team relationship for both parties.Many CAC programs integrate well with hospital-based CDI programs and EHRs. These combination interfaces allow more real-time processing of possible code selection prior to the coder’s audit and review of the final code selection.

When the CAC software identifies these possibilities, there is an opportunity to identify and improve the DRGs with MCCs and CCs, as well as more quickly address areas for query and missed procedures or diagnoses.

Wrapping it all up

It is evident that coders and HIM professionals need to make a commitment to embrace change, which includes new technologies and integration of learning processes and opportunities. A hospital’s success depends on the coder acting as part of a team that will strive for successful outcomes for both the patient and the hospital.

 

Editor’s note

Webb is an E/M and procedure-based coding, compliance, data charge entry, and HIPAA privacy specialist with more than 20 years of experience. Her coding specialty is OB/GYN office/hospitalist services, maternal fetal medicine, OB/GYN oncology, urology, and general surgical coding. She can be reached via email at [email protected], and you can find current coding information on her blog at http://lori-lynnescodingcoachblog.blogspot.com. This article originally appeared on JustCoding, and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent HCPro or ACDIS.

HCPro.com – Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies

Amazon introduces Perfect Today, a one-time delivery service

To generate an ideal essay, one needs to understand every characteristic of the subject in question. Your composition may be read by some one with an alternative viewpoint. Remember to think about your purpose, market, in addition to your theme whilst paper helper composing an essay. Any essay should supply an efficient evaluation of the […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

Zika Virus – A Q&A Primer – Info on Zika is changing quickly – here’s what I know as of today (03/02/2016)

This is the most current article that I wrote for Justcoding.com.  It is also free to access on their website.  However, I suggest becoming a full-subscription member, as they have a huge amount of resources and information available.  :) 


********************************************************************************************************

Zika Virus –  A Q&A Primer
by Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP
What is Zika?
According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC)  this is the officialdefinition:
The Zika virus is a mosquito-transmitted infection related to dengue, yellow fever and West Nile virus. It was discovered in the Zika forest in Uganda in 1947 and is common in Africa and Asia.  It did not begin spreading widely in the Western Hemisphere until last May, when an outbreak occurred in Brazil.
A bit of clinical background
This is information direct from the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)  and the Society of Maternal and Fetal Medicine  (SMFM)
The virus spreads to humans primarily through infected Aedes aegyti mosquitoes. Once a person is infected, the incubation period for the virus is approximately 3-12 days. Symptoms of the disease are non-specific but may include fever, rash, arthralgias, and conjunctivitis. It appears that only about 1 in 5 infected individuals will exhibit these symptoms and most of these will have mild symptoms. It is not known if pregnant women are at greater risk of infection than non-pregnant individuals.
Zika during pregnancy has been associated with birth defects, specifically significant microcephaly. Transmission of Zika to the fetus has been documented in all trimesters; Zika virus RNA has been detected in fetal tissue from early missed abortions, amniotic fluid, term neonates and the placenta. However, much is not yet known about Zika virus in pregnancy. Uncertainties include the incidence of Zika virus infection among pregnant women in areas of Zika virus transmission, the rate of vertical transmission and the rate with which infected fetuses manifest complications such as microcephaly or demise. The absence of this important information makes management and decision making in the setting of potential Zika virus exposure (i.e. travel to endemic areas) or maternal infection, difficult. Currently, there is no vaccine or treatment for this infection.
The ACOG and SMFM put forth guidelines for testing of pregnant women, and the laboratory tests are being done exclusively though the guidance of the CDC at the level of the local and state health departments.  Many states in the US are developing guidelines to help in identifying who has been exposed, and where an outbreak may take place. 
Currently the testing being done is a “Zika” serology IgM testing assay.  The reports have been being reported out as “likely positive”, “Inconclusive” and “likely negative”  .  Unfortunately, the labs do not know and gannot guarantee the sensitivity of the IgM assay.
Symptoms of Zika
 Below is a listing of all the known symptoms of Zika virus as put forth by the CDC, however, there may be more that are noted as the Zika Virus becomes more studied in all individuals. Zika is still a virus, and not a bacterial infection, and currently there is not vaccine to prevent it, or a specific medication or antibiotic to treat it with. 
• About 1 in 5 people infected with Zika virus become ill (i.e., develop Zika).

• The most common symptoms of Zika are fever, rash, joint pain, or conjunctivitis (red eyes). Other common symptoms include muscle pain and headache. The incubation period (the time from exposure to symptoms) for Zika virus disease is not known, but is likely to be a few days to a week.
• The illness is usually mild with symptoms lasting for several days to a week.
• People usually don’t get sick enough to go to the hospital, and they very rarely die of Zika.
• Zika virus usually remains in the blood of an infected person for about a week but it can be found longer in some people.
Risks of Zika in Pregnant Women and in their sexual  partners
Normally Zika virus is transmitted through a mosquito bite, however, the Zika virus can be transmitted from a pregnant mother to her unborn fetus during the time of pregnancy and possibly around the time of birth.  It has been noted that Zika virus has been noted in all trimesters of pregnant women, and may possibly be transmitted during the birth process.  Sexual transmission of the Zika virus can also occur, however there is limited data, but the CDC has stated that if the patient fears they are infected with the Zika virus to reduce the risk of sexual transmission via abstinence and/or usage of condoms.
Women are not the only ones at risk of contracting Zika virus.  Men who have traveled to an area of active Zika virus, or who live in these areas may become infected with the Zika virus too.  The CDC has not completely determined if the Zika virus can be transmitted sexually, so the recommendation for men is if you are symptomatic or have a confirmed case of Zika virus, condoms or abstinence is still a best practice.  However, it remains uncertain if the mirus persisits in semen even if no longer  detectible in the blood.
Fetal Evaluation for possible exposure to Zika
Ultrasound exami is the primary recommendation for pregnant mothers who have been exposed to zika virus.  The Ultrasound examinations should focus on development of the fetal brain with intracranial calcifications and microcephaly.  Micocephay has been the most frequently reported adverse fetal complication  in women who have had the virus while pregnant
SMFM is recommending not only blood tests for pregnant women who have been exposed, but also consider performing serial ultrasound, as frequently as every 3-4 weeks.   By obtaining the additional ultrasounds, this would be considered ongoing surveillance.  Considering the history of Zika virus and complications to the fetus  due to this infection is not known.  In addition,  the time from exposure and infection from Zika  to  exhibiting full-blown clinical manifestations is unknown.
The CDC, ACOG and SMFM have put out a number of clinical flow algorhythms for usage with patients’ that have been exposed or live in an area where Zika as been prevalent.  However, this is so new, that these recommendations may change very quickly.   
Case Study and Coding Consideration
Case #1:
An asymptomatic pregnant woman at 19 weeks gestation, presents to her OB office for her regularly scheduled OB prenatal visit.  She informs the receptionist of the possibility she has been exposed to Zika. She has a history of travel to Mexico between 16+0 and 16+5-weeks. She has noted mosquito bites over both legs (calf area).  The bites do not appear infected, and look as if they are resolving.  Patient states they no longer itch, and does not report any other complaints but her ongoing pregnancy related fatigue.  The physician performs a comprehensive history, a comprehensive exam, and will have labs drawn for Zika to be sent to the local district health office.  In addition, the physician decides to perform a baseline screening ultrasound exam to follow up from the patient’s first trimester ultrasound anatomy exam from 1 month ago. 
Coding Consideration: 
CPT: 
99214-25 E&M  – 
76816 Ultrasound 
36415 Venipuncture/Lab Draw
ICD-10: 
O26.812   Pregnancy related exhaustion and fatigue (2ndtrimester)
Z20.828    Contact with and (suspected) exposure to other viral communicable        diseases (Zika Virus)
S80.861A  Insect bite of rt lower leg initial encounter
S80.862A  Insect bite of lt lower leg initial encounter
Z3A.19      19 weeks gestation of pregnancy
Rationale:  The  E&M visit would be coded, as it is separately identifiable  “outside” the normal pregnancy antenatal care.  (A Zika virus exposure is not considered “normal obstetric care”)  the follow-up ultrasound/baseline ultrasound is coded for comparison to the previously performed 1st trimester ultrasound.  The venipuncture is the only thing chargeable, as the blood was drawn, and sent out to the health district for testing.  The sequencing of the pregnancy diagnosis is primary based upon the ICD-10 pregnancy guidelines.
ACOG’s Quick Zika Q&A
Q1.  True or False. Pregnant women are at greater risk of infection with the Zika virus than nonpregnant women.
A:   False – According to a practice advisory from ACOG and SMFM, “It is not known if pregnant women are at greater risk of infection than non-pregnant individuals.”
Q2.  Once a person is infected with the Zika virus, what is the approximate incubation period for the virus?
A:.   3 to 12 days – Following infection with the Zika virus, the incubation period is approximately 3 to 12 days
Q3.  The Zika virus spreads to humans primarily through infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Which of the following symptoms may be associated with the virus?
Fever
Rash
Arthralgia
Conjunctivitis
All of the above       
A.   Although symptoms associated with the Zika virus are non-specific, they may include fever, rash, arthralgia, and conjunctivitis. (eg all of the above)
Q4. In which trimester(s) has transmission of Zika been documented?
A. All trimesters — The transmission of the Zika virus has been documented in all trimesters
Wrap up
At this time, there are still a number of unanswered questions in regard to the Zika virus.  However, there is no vaccine currently available, so it is recommended that precaution be taken to avoid exposure to mosquito bites from areas where the Zika virus is prevalent.  In the United States and worldwide expert epidemiologists are helping to set forth useful clinical guidelines for identifying and managing patients who have been exposed and currently have the Zika virus.  At this time, clinical guidelines are calling for blood tests to be run, and screening ultrasound should be performed on pregnant patients to screen for possible fetal anomalies related to fetal brain development in infected female patients.
When coding, carefully review to see if the physician or provider is stating whether the patient truly has the Zika virus as a diagnosis, or if they are only “screening” for the Zika virus in light of an exposure to the virus. (either through mosquito bite, or sexual transmission).  
In addition, currently, ICD-10 does not have a specific code to identify Zika virus. Usage of code B33.8 Other specified viral diseases, would be appropriate.  However, If the patient is diagnosed with the Zika virus and has fever with it, then it may be appropriate to use code A92.8 – Other specified mosquito-borne viral fevers.   If the patient is pregnant, then usage of ICD-10 code 098.5X “other viral diseases complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium,” (be sure to use the most specific trimester as the additional character) would be the most appropriate. 
If in doubt about the clinical documentation, be sure to query the provider to obtain clarity on the diagnosis noted in the medical record. 
References:
www.acog.org/
www.cdc.gov/zika
Editor’s note: Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, CDIP, COBGC and ICD10 cm/pcs Ambassador/trainer is an E&M, and Procedure based Coding, Compliance, Data Charge entry and HIPAA Privacy specialist, with over 20 years of experience.  Lori-Lynne’s coding specialty is OB/GYN office & Hospitalist Services, Maternal Fetal Medicine, OB/GYN Oncology, Urology, and general surgical coding.  She can be reached via e-mail at [email protected] or you can also find current coding information on her blog site: http://lori-lynnescodingcoachblog.blogspot.com/.  

Lori-Lynne’s Coding Coach Blog

Computer Assisted Coding – Where are we today?

Some good Information for us that actually work with computer assisted coding.  



*********************************************************************************Originally posted from Justcoing.com August 19, 2016 (as written by me!) 
In our computer-saavy tech world, the medical field has been notoriously slow to respond to newer technologies and applications of computer assisted enhancements.   However, in the HIM market, computer-assisted coding , (aka CAC)  has been touted to boost coding accuracy and productivity, in addition to being a terrific tool for the “remote” or “at home” HIM/inpatient coder. 
Background
“The term computer-assisted coding is currently used to denote technology that automatically assigns codes from clinical documentation for a human…to review, analyze, and use.”   Currently,  there are a variety of methodologies software, and integration interface applications that enable a CAC  application to  “read” text and assign codes.  This type of software “reads” the information in a similar way to how a “spell-check” application works on a traditional computer.    According to some users, the data driven documentation (eg.  dictated/typed etc.) is more accurate from the CAC than documents that are scanned into the matrix for the CAC to utilize.   
CAC software works on a recognition premise, and “learns” words and phrases, as well as “learning” the areas within a  specific document as to where standardized words and phrases appear, (eg similar to a macro).  CAC software also has the ability to discern the context and or “meaning” of specific words and phrases.   The CAC then analyzes and predicts what the appropriate codes (ICD-10cm and pcs) should be for the documented procedures and diagnoses it finds within the specified documents.  
Computer-assisted coding (CAC) software has been available for over 10 years, but has really come to the forefront of inpatient coding with the implementation of ICD-10cm and ICD-10pcs and a way for hospitals to reduce charge lag-times and enhance DRG’s and find those “missed” MCC/CC diagnoses.  The usage and integration of an electronic health record (EHR) into a CAC has also been a factor for better code assignment and usage by the CAC for data analysis and outcomes.  However, it is yet to be shown that a CAC actually “enhances” a coders’ productivity rate.  On the up-side a CAC does give the coder a great place to “start” when working on a large difficult inpatient record.   A CAC is now where we were 20+ years ago when “encoders” were first introduced into the inpatient hospital marketplace for coding, abstracting and data analysis.
Pros and Cons of CAC 
Due to the complexity of inpatient care records, clinical documentation and the complexity of medical terms and abbreviations used, many hospitals don’t have,  or only use the CAC with “real coder”  intervention.  However, the latest CAC software technology employs a type of natural language and syntax processing to compare, contrast and extract specific medical terms from the electronic data or typed text.   The CAC stand-alone technology does exist, however in studies by AHIMA, the “combination” of a CAC with a coder/auditor has been proven to be as good or better than a “coder” alone,  or a “CAC” alone. 
Yet, the biggest Pro/Cons of a CAC is getting the buy-in of the hospital coding and HIM staff.  As the medical field is ever-changing; the HIM, coding and clinical staff must all be a part of the changes and be on-board to this new technology enhancement to their job.  In the past, there has been some uncertainty and fear related to job-elimination of coders in regard to a CAC implementation at the facility.  However, a good CAC  in conjunction with  HIM management utilization of both, allows coders to apply their critical thinking and analytical coding knowledge skills to create a well coded documentation of the patients’ care.  This in turn,  relates to better DRG and reimbursement for the facility. 
The HIM and coding staff responsibility and role in the fiscal revenue stream will change.  With this change comes the acceptance that it takes both a “human” and a “computer” to successfully transform a CAC product into good financial outcomes and even better coding documentation.  
Coders are quick to agree that the final code selection for inpatient records should be based upon their knowledge of coding guidelines, clinical concepts, and compliance regulations.  When working in tandem on a CAC, the coder has the ability to override and agree/disagree with the codes that the CAC determines.
    
Coders have the education to understand why a diagnosis or procedure is, or is not coded, and with that by using the CAC, they can help the CAC “learn” to distinguish the importance of specific documentation and it’s relation to ICD-10 cm/pcs codes. 
Many CAC vendors will try and “sell” their product based upon this listing of “Pros”…
·         Increased medical coder productivity
·         Return on investment that quickly pays for CAC system
·         Faster medical billing
·         More revenue from more detailed bills
·         Greater medical coder satisfaction
·         Better  medical coding accuracy
·         Identification of clinical documentation gaps
·          
It has been highly touted that CAC’s in optimize coder productivity.  However, in reality, productivity will probably stay the same, as the coder will still have to “audit” the information to determine if, in fact, the CAC code is correct.   In regard to the other “pros” on the vendor list, coder satisfaction should not be overlooked. 
According to AHIMA’s pilot testing of CAC’s , they weighed in on some of the potential issues with a CAC use only.  However, these potential areas of concern can be addressed quickly if the coder uses the CAC to audit the case prior to any claims sent to insurance carriers.   AHIMA noted that within “specific” areas of the pilot CAC testing in ICD-10, the coders did not accept 75% of the diagnosis codes presented, and did not accept 90% of the procedure codes presented within the ICD-10cm and ICD-pcs codesets.   However, the information that the CAC presented, did give the coders a good “starting” reference to drill down to a more comprehensive code for both diagnosis and procedures. 
Coders and CDI personnel will still need to be the ones charged with
·         Ensuring clinical documentation is complete and query when appropriate. 
·         Ensuring complete coding (eg for 4th and 5th digits/specificity)
·         Ensuring correct sequencing of diagnosis and procedures
·         Reviewing of correct MCC/CC’s  and DRG assignments with case complexity and severity
CAC, Clinical Documentation, EHR, and Providers’
Integration of clinical documentation by provider and physicians has always been a challenge combined with the  and the implementation of ICD-10 in 2015  has been a huge impetus for CAC utilization for hospital and facility based organizations.  Unfortunately, physicians still don’t provide thorough documentation and rely on CDI and coding staff to guide them.  There has always been a HUGE disconnect in the language spoken by “providers” and the language spoken by “coders”.  Physicians document in their comfort zone, and fall back on those terms such as “pneumonia”.  Whereas a coder, they are looking for much more specificity.  The integration of an EHR based program for the physician/providers to use and a CAC providers a good “team relationship” for both parties. 
Many CAC programs extend out and integrate well with hospital based CDI programs and EHR’s.  These combination computer interfaces allow more “real time” processing of “possible” code selection prior to the final code selection being audited and reviewed by the coder.  When the CAC identifies these “possibilities” the opportunity exists to identify and improve the DRG’s with MCC/CC’s , and address more quickly areas for query, and missed procedures or diagnoses. 
Case Study to make It work:
The scenario below (provided from  Smith, Gail I.; Bronnert, June. “Transitioning to CAC: The Skills and Tools Required to Work with Computer-assisted Coding” Journal of AHIMA 81, no.7 (July 2010): 60-61.)
ICD-10-CM CAC Example
In the example below, the CAC software assigned the code T15.91A based on documentation in the emergency department record that states the patient had a “foreign body in the right eye.” The coder is presented with the decision to accept the code or reject it based on further analysis.
Emergency Department Record
A patient is brought to the emergency department due to a foreign body in the right eye. He was working with metal, and a piece flew in his eye. He reports slight irritation to the right eye but no blurred vision.
A slit lamp shows a foreign body approximately 2–3 o’clock on the edge of the cornea. The foreign body appears to be metallic. The iris is intact.
Procedure: Two drops of Alcaine were used in the right eye. Foreign body is removed from the right eye.
CAC: Computer-Generated Codes: T15.91xA, Foreign body, external eye, right.
Final Coding Decision: T15.01xA. Foreign body of cornea,
Review of the documentation in the record by the coder and then the information from the CAC,  revealed that the foreign body was located on the edge of the cornea, which changes the fourth character in ICD-10-CM from 9 to 1. The coding professional replaces the T15.91xA code with T15.01A, Foreign body in cornea, right eye.
Wrapping it all up
The above scenario is a very simplistic case study, but an important one, as it shows and validates the importance of the coder as the “knowledge” behind the “technology”.   Coders and HIM professionals need to make a commitment to embracing change which includes “new” technologies and integration of learning processes and opportunities.  A hospital’s success depends on the “knowledge” worker as part of the ongoing and ultimate team member for successful outcomes for both patients and hospital fiscal solvency. 

Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC and ICD10 cm/pcs Ambassador/trainer is an E&M, and Procedure based Coding, Compliance, Data Charge entry and HIPAA Privacy specialist, with over 20 years of experience.  Lori-Lynne’s coding specialty is OB/GYN office & Hospitalist Services, Maternal Fetal Medicine, OB/GYN Oncology, Urology, and general surgical coding.  She can be reached via e-mail at [email protected] or you can also find current coding information on her blog site: http://lori-lynnescodingcoachblog.blogspot.com/.   

Lori-Lynne’s Coding Coach Blog