Electronic Medical Records prove to be a lot more useful than paper-based records. EMR offers the medical practitioners a far more economical and user-friendly alternative to the decades old paper-based documentation. Medical practitioners or healthcare units using this system do not have to hire a special person to organize their records. The huge space that the papers and files cover made it another gigantic task to accomplish as it asked for a huge space for maintaining the hard-copies. Doctors throughout the world are stereotyped as having an illegible hand-writing. This though may not be a problem for the other doctors, sometimes it may cost dearly in sensitive issue relevant to health if the doctor’s report is not legible. This is also possible that the authoring doctor, himself, cannot read his hand-written report some years later. Not only can this hinder the case study of a patient in future for further medical purposes, it may also have an adverse impact on the course of law if the record is sought by the courts. With Electronic Medical Records, this issue diminishes due. The exchange of hard copies is pretty cumbersome. But the same can simply be emailed within seconds if the Electronic Medical Records is being in use. Certain reports are needed to be kept, both, by the hospital/doctor and the patients. In some cases, when the patient alone has some needed records , but lost by him/her ; it becomes another ordeal to impart treatment. With EMR, a doctor can simply scan the records of the patients, when seen by him, and attached to the profile of the patient. He can even study these records later on.
Yet, there are vast number of hospitals and medical practitioners who still use the paper-based record-keeping and prefer it. The reasons for this vary. Some doctors do it to avoid the ordeal of entering the data into computer by typing or hiring a person for the data-entry is also not economical. The Electronic Medical Records is relatively expensive to install. The outlay cost deters many doctors from using it. Even in a country like US, the number of doctors, preferring the hard copy records outnumber those using Electronic Medical Records
Despite of the relative modernity and long-term economical alternative, to choose or otherwise, is dependant the medical heath provider. It remains only to be a matter of choice. This may be the only field on earth where most professionals are technology-shy. We hope to fix the problem one day. More information can be found at http://www.healthtec-software.com/electronic-medical-records.htm
Electronic Medical Records