Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Change in Guidelines – Chapter 9 Diseases of the Circulatory System

There is a significant change to the guidelines in chapter 9: Diseases of the Circulatory System. As you may recall in order to code the diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart and/or Kidney Disease the documentation had to be supported with language linking the conditions. This has changed. There is a presumed causal relationship between hypertension and heart involvement (I50.- or I51.4 – I51.9) and between hypertension and kidney involvement, as the two conditions are linked by the term “with” in the Alphabetic Index of the ICD-10 CM book. These conditions should be coded as related even in the absence of provider documentation explicitly linking them, unless the documentation clearly states the conditions are unrelated.

I am posting this as the changes did not make it to print.

Here is a link to a great article giving an overview of the changes. http://www.icd10monitor.com/enews/it…sions-for-2017

Steph

Medical Billing and Coding | AAPC Forum

Diabetes Type 2 with Circulatory Complications – PLEASE CHIME IN!!

This a general question. In a case were the Dr. documents "Diabetes Type 2 with other circulatory complications" and the patient actively has CAD (which is a circulatory system issue) as well, but the Dr. does not specifically say that the CAD is the diabetic complication. Is it ok to accept the code of "Diabetes Type 2 with other circulatory complications" or should it be down coded to just "Diabetes Type 2" since the Dr. didn’t specifically state that the CAD was the complication?

A co-worker and I going over this issue. I stated that I would code it as "Diabetes Type 2 with other circulatory complications". He stated that he would down code it to "Diabetes Type 2" since the Dr. didn’t specifically note that the CAD was the circulatory complication.

Medical Billing and Coding | AAPC Forum