Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Medical Grade Facial Cleansers Prove Vital in Acne Scar Prevention

I know what you’re thinking; of course a facial cleanser is going to have benefits for acne sufferers.  And a cleanser so effective it is considered medical grade, it makes even more sense, but would you ever imagine that facial cleansers can actually aid in the removal long term acne?  In recent clinical studies therapeutic facial cleansers have exhibited additional benefits other than the standard detoxification, exfoliation and gentle cleansing.  These advanced, state of the art facial cleansers have proven to display actual therapeutic treatment for acne scars.  The author examines how therapeutic facial cleansers may provide much more value to our skin care routine than was originally believed. 

As most of us know, acne is often caused by an accumulation of dead skin cells, too many toxins, and other impurities within the skin.  Following this logic it makes quite a bit of sense that a facial cleanser that would remove the dead skin cells, wipe away impurities, oils and dirt would have tremendous benefit for people with acne.  But it is not the obvious benefits that have scientists and dermatologists around the world taking a much closer look at these cutting edge facial cleansers.

What has generated all of the publicity about these therapeutic facial cleansers is some of the additional ingredients that they contain that have proven to be very effective in a number of ways with consistent use.  Therapeutic facial cleanses, by definition contain ingredients that provide therapeutic treatment to any number of symptoms of conditions of the skin.  As a result of this combination of ingredients, scientists have found that these cleansers actually provide significant improvement in the long term treatment for people who suffer from acne scars.

Experts say that there are a few reasons that these facial cleansers can be so effective in the long term therapeutic treatment of your skin.  Some say that the inclusion of the active ingredient of a tangerine oil is the key.  Tangerine oil allows for deeper and more rapid absorption of other active ingredients that come in contact with the skin.  This means that the ingredients in the cleanser as well as any other product that you may use as a part of your routine would be more effective.  Obviously, this is a very big deal for wrinkle treatments and other anti aging pursuits, but it has also proven extremely helpful with the treatment of acne scars.  Others, however, claim that the reason for the acne scar results is the unique blend of anti inflammatory ingredients in the cleanser.  Using balanced and effective anti inflammatory ingredients like Chamomile Extract sooth the inflamed and damaged tissue that results in acne scars.  Scientists believe that by using an advanced therapeutic facial cleanser twice daily you are able to maintain healthier skin, reduce the visibility of acne scars, and help prevent the onset of any future scars.

This is obviously very big news for the skin care industry, a facial cleanser actually delivering long term, therapeutic benefits to acne scar sufferers.  As we learn more about both our skin and the best treatments for it, the more advanced and effective the products we use every day will become.  That is certainly the case with facial cleansers and we have seen major improvement with wrinkle creams over the years.  You can never know what will be next, but for now we can be thankful that we have found effective, affordable, long term treatment for many conditions of the skin, including acne scars.

Mark Robbins is a reviewer of the best facial cleansers on the market, with particular attention paid to those that can help with the treatment of acne and acne scars. Many of his readers have shared stories like this one, http://www.acnescarscream.net on how some treatments have helped them in their battle with acne scars.

Related Medical Coding Articles

Excision of right facial lipoma with facial nerve

Having some difficulty choosing the correct codes for the following:

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Right facial lipoma.

POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Right facial lipoma.

OPERATION: Excision of right facial lipoma with facial nerve
dissection.

FINDINGS:
Surgical findings were consistent with a right cheek/facial lipoma,
which was deep to the SMAS and superficial and adjacent to the right
parotid gland with the facial nerve branches traversing the mass.
The frontal branch of the facial nerve went right through the lipoma
and the buccal and main trunk of the facial nerve was adjacent to,
but not penetrating the mass.

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION:
The patient was taken to the operating room and placed on the
operating table in supine position and sedated and intubated with
general anesthesia. An endotracheal tube was placed and secured to
the left side of the lower lip. The bed was turned 90 degrees from
anesthesia for this procedure. A surgical time-out was performed,
and all the consents were verified. The facial nerve monitor was
used for this procedure, and was placed on the patient with
electrodes at the orbicularis oculi and orbicularis auris. The
patient was then prepped and draped in a sterile fashion for the
procedure. A marking pen was then used to mark along the marked
incision, which was done in a modified face-lift incision. The
incision followed from the sideburn hairline into the preauricular
crease in a post-tragal fashion, then along the earlobe and carried
slightly posterior to the earlobe along the postauricular area.

Local anesthesia was then used to inject the incision with 1%
lidocaine and 1:100,000 concentration of epinephrine. After
allowing several minutes for the local anesthesia and epinephrine to
take full effect, the procedure began with the marked injected
incision site incised with a #15 blade. A subcutaneous skin flap
was then made extending approximately 3 cm down onto the right cheek
to allow for exposure of the underlying SMAS. Next, the SMAS was
incised just approximately 1 cm anterior to the tragus in the
preauricular area along the length of the mass. A SMAS flap was
then created by carefully dissecting the SMAS off the underlying
tissues.
The lipoma was noted to be just deep to this SMAS tissue.
The parotid gland was adjacent to the mass inferiorly and anteriorly
with the mass sitting on the superficial surface of the parotid
gland mostly.
Blunt and sharp dissection were then used to
carefully separate the lipoma from the surrounding tissue
attachments.
On initial inspection and dissection, a branch of the
facial nerve was noted to be traversing through the middle of the
lipoma. This appeared to be the frontal branch of the facial nerve
and stimulated appropriately with the nerve monitor. Careful
dissection of the frontal branch of the facial nerve that was
traversing the mass was performed separating the mass from the nerve
and mobilizing the nerve allowing the mass to be completely
separated from that branch of the facial nerve. The branch of the
facial nerve was followed inferiorly until the main branch of the
facial nerve which was discovered adjacent to, but not penetrating
or involved in the lipoma. The main branch of the facial nerve was
stimulated appropriately with the nerve monitor. The main trunk of
the facial nerve was not involved in the dissection and did not
require mobilization for removal of the lipoma.
All bleeding in the
surgical site was meticulously controlled with bipolar cautery. The
lipoma was separated from the penetrating branch of the facial nerve
and the surrounding tissues were removed in its entirety.
The
surgical site was then copiously irrigated with normal saline. The
patient was checked for any evidence of bleeding, which was
controlled meticulously with bipolar cautery. The SMAS flap that
was made previously was then laid down over the underlying parotid
bed and facial nerve that was dissected out and re-sutured to the
surrounding SMAS with 4-0 PDS sutures. This allowed for covering of
the branch of the facial nerve that were exposed as well as help to
avoid any defect or concavity in the face by removing the lipoma.
Next, the skin incisions were then closed with a combination of
running locking 5-0 plain gut suture and running locking 5-0 Prolene
sutures. A compressive dressing was then placed over the surgical
site and the procedure was completed. The patient was turned back
to Anesthesia, where the patient was successfully awakened,
extubated, and taken to recovery room in stable condition. She
tolerated the procedure well without complication. Postoperatively,
in the recovery room, the patient was noted to have full facial
nerve function with no evidence of weakness in any of the branches
on the right side.

At first, I was going to go with 21011 or 21012 depending on the Lipoma’s size (need to query provider) and mention of a subcutaneous skin flap. However the description of going all the way down to the SMAS flaps is pointing me to 21013 or 2014 depending on size since I believe SMAS is subfascial?

In addition, the mention of the lipoma being superficial to the Parotid gland plus the nerve dissection also suggests this could possibly all be coded under 42410 or 42415.

Any help clearing up my confusion here would be appreciated. Thank you.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Excision of right facial lipoma with facial nerve

Having some difficulty choosing the correct codes for the following:

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Right facial lipoma.

POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Right facial lipoma.

OPERATION: Excision of right facial lipoma with facial nerve
dissection.

FINDINGS:
Surgical findings were consistent with a right cheek/facial lipoma,
which was deep to the SMAS and superficial and adjacent to the right
parotid gland with the facial nerve branches traversing the mass.
The frontal branch of the facial nerve went right through the lipoma
and the buccal and main trunk of the facial nerve was adjacent to,
but not penetrating the mass.

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION:
The patient was taken to the operating room and placed on the
operating table in supine position and sedated and intubated with
general anesthesia. An endotracheal tube was placed and secured to
the left side of the lower lip. The bed was turned 90 degrees from
anesthesia for this procedure. A surgical time-out was performed,
and all the consents were verified. The facial nerve monitor was
used for this procedure, and was placed on the patient with
electrodes at the orbicularis oculi and orbicularis auris. The
patient was then prepped and draped in a sterile fashion for the
procedure. A marking pen was then used to mark along the marked
incision, which was done in a modified face-lift incision. The
incision followed from the sideburn hairline into the preauricular
crease in a post-tragal fashion, then along the earlobe and carried
slightly posterior to the earlobe along the postauricular area.
Local anesthesia was then used to inject the incision with 1%
lidocaine and 1:100,000 concentration of epinephrine. After
allowing several minutes for the local anesthesia and epinephrine to
take full effect, the procedure began with the marked injected
incision site incised with a #15 blade. A subcutaneous skin flap
was then made extending approximately 3 cm down onto the right cheek
to allow for exposure of the underlying SMAS. Next, the SMAS was
incised just approximately 1 cm anterior to the tragus in the
preauricular area along the length of the mass. A SMAS flap was
then created by carefully dissecting the SMAS off the underlying
tissues. The lipoma was noted to be just deep to this SMAS tissue.
The parotid gland was adjacent to the mass inferiorly and anteriorly
with the mass sitting on the superficial surface of the parotid
gland mostly. Blunt and sharp dissection were then used to
carefully separate the lipoma from the surrounding tissue
attachments.
On initial inspection and dissection, a branch of the
facial nerve was noted to be traversing through the middle of the
lipoma. This appeared to be the frontal branch of the facial nerve
and stimulated appropriately with the nerve monitor.
Careful
dissection of the frontal branch of the facial nerve that was
traversing the mass was performed separating the mass from the nerve
and mobilizing the nerve allowing the mass to be completely
separated from that branch of the facial nerve. The branch of the
facial nerve was followed inferiorly until the main branch of the
facial nerve which was discovered adjacent to, but not penetrating
or involved in the lipoma. The main branch of the facial nerve was
stimulated appropriately with the nerve monitor. The main trunk of
the facial nerve was not involved in the dissection and did not
require mobilization for removal of the lipoma.
All bleeding in the
surgical site was meticulously controlled with bipolar cautery. The
lipoma was separated from the penetrating branch of the facial nerve
and the surrounding tissues were removed in its entirety.
The
surgical site was then copiously irrigated with normal saline. The
patient was checked for any evidence of bleeding, which was
controlled meticulously with bipolar cautery. The SMAS flap that
was made previously was then laid down over the underlying parotid
bed and facial nerve that was dissected out and re-sutured to the
surrounding SMAS with 4-0 PDS sutures. This allowed for covering of
the branch of the facial nerve that were exposed as well as help to
avoid any defect or concavity in the face by removing the lipoma.
Next, the skin incisions were then closed with a combination of
running locking 5-0 plain gut suture and running locking 5-0 Prolene
sutures. A compressive dressing was then placed over the surgical
site and the procedure was completed. The patient was turned back
to Anesthesia, where the patient was successfully awakened,
extubated, and taken to recovery room in stable condition. She
tolerated the procedure well without complication. Postoperatively,
in the recovery room, the patient was noted to have full facial
nerve function with no evidence of weakness in any of the branches
on the right side.

At first, I was going to go with 21011 or 21012 depending on the Lipoma’s size (need to query provider) and mention of a subcutaneous skin flap. However the description of going all the way down to the SMAS flaps is pointing me to 21013 or 2014 depending on size since I believe SMAS is subfascial?

In addition, the mention of the lipoma being superficial to the Parotid gland plus the nerve dissection also suggests this could possibly all be coded under 42410 or 42415.

Any help clearing up my confusion here would be appreciated. Thank you.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

facial paralysis due to brain tumor – please help!

I am in need of some help with part of a facial surgery one of my physicians performed!
The brief decriptions is "Left preauricular SMAS flap with fixation buccal fat pad and additional SMAS tightening for the correction of facial laxity"
Does any one have a suggestion of what CPT code may be appropriate? I would greatly appreciate any input at all!
Thanks in advance!

Sally C

Medical Billing and Coding Forum