Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Feds Revise Stark Law and Anti-kickback Statute

Two final rules make value-based programs less of a liability for physicians. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and Office of Inspector General (OIG) announced, Nov. 20, coordinated efforts to revise the physician self-referral law, or Stark law, and anti-kickback statute through rulemaking to make value-based programs less risky for healthcare providers to […]

The post Feds Revise Stark Law and Anti-kickback Statute appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

CMS to revise E&M Documentation Guidelines


Most physicians and other practitioners bill patient visits to the PFS under a relatively generic set of codes that distinguish level of complexity, site of care, and in some cases whether or not the patient is new or established. These codes are called Evaluation and Management (E/M) visit codes. Billing practitioners must maintain information in the medical record that documents that they have reported the appropriate level of E/M visit code. CMS maintains guidelines that specify the kind of information that is required to support Medicare payment for each level. There are three key components to selecting the appropriate level:
  • History of Present Illness (History)
  • Physical Examination (Exam) and
  • Medical Decision Making (MDM). 

CMS agreed with continued feedback from stakeholders that these guidelines are potentially outdated and need to be revised, especially the history and exam components.

CMS is seeking comment from stakeholders on specific changes they should undertake to update the guidelines, to reduce the associated burden, and to better align E/M coding and documentation with the current practice of medicine.

Comments on the CMS proposal to revise the E/M documentation guidelines are due no later than Sept. 11, and can be submitted by one of four methods:

1. Submit electronic comments on this regulation to www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for “submitting a comment.”

2. Mail written comments to:

CMS-1676-P 2
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1676-P
P.O. Box 8016
Baltimore, MD 21244-8013.

3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1676-P
Mail Stop C4-26-05
7500 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.

4. Deliver (by hand or courier) written comments before the close of the comment period to:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services,
Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building,
200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201


Coding Ahead

CMS Wants to Revise E/M Documentation Guidelines

Among the many provisions detailed within the 2018 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, released July 13, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) acknowledges that the current evaluation and management documentation guidelines create an administrative burden and increased audit risk for providers: Stakeholders have long maintained that both the 1995 and 1997 guidelines are […]
AAPC Knowledge Center