Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

screening colonoscopy: correct coding of primary and subsequent diagnoses

A patient scheduled a screening colonoscopy, confirmed by ins rep to be covered benefit at 100%. Based on a past history (over 10 yrs.) of benign colonic polyp, procedure was coded with Z86.010 (personal hx benign colonic polyp) as primary and sole diagnosis. I understand correct coding rationale to be: primary dx – Z12.11/screening colonoscopy, and secondary dx – Z86.010, due to polyps not being an active illness/condition and, further, because no polyps were found on colonoscopy. However someone told me that even if "screening" diagnosis Z12.11 is submitted as primary, if a "history of" diagnosis (i.e. Z86.010) is sequenced 2nd, 3rd, etc., the claim won’t be processed as a 100% coverage benefit, unless patient has Medicare, since as of 2012, although pre-existing diagnoses (i.e. "hx of") are "covered" under the Affordable Care Act, the caveat is that if they are now life-time factors and if included anywhere in the diagnosis sequencing, even if in the extreme past/not currently active or concerning, and even with "screening" dx as primary, commercial payers assign the responsibility to patient’s out-of-pocket. Can anyone clarify and/or validate this?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum