Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

1997 musclosketal exam

Hello;
can someone help me determine how many bullets are counted for the musuloskeletal exam(1997 guidelines)

PE:
Height 5.0′, Weight 163lb
she is alert and oriented x 3. Pulses are regular and respirations are rhythimic. Patient has appropriate mood and affect, and appears to be well developed and well nourished, in no acute distress.
Left Wrist: Dorsiflexion 50 degrees and palmar felxion is 60 degrees. This is compared to 60 and 70 degrees respectively for the univolved wrist. The DRUJ is stable. She does have bossing consisted with carpal bossing at the dorsal aspect of the index and middle finger CMC joint bilaterally-but minimal pain with palpation directly. Negative squeeze test of the metacarpals. Negative Finkelstein test. Negative tuck test. No skin irregularties or cellulitis. She does have pain at the intersection zone of the extensor. No pain with palpation at the terminal intersection of the ECRL and ECRB. No crepitus at the second dorsal compartment with range of motion of the wrist. Distally gross intact motor sensory function in the radial, ulnar and median nerve distribution.

Can you tell where you counted each element please?

Help…thank you

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Need help with e&m coding with 1997 guidelines

I am new to E&M coding and need help coding the below note. I calculated 99214 with DX codes N40.0, K21.9, I10, E03.9, Z86.79, Z95.5. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

REASON FOR VISIT: Follow up of primary care.

HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: The patient is a 69 yrs. old, last seen 5/18, who states he’s been doing well except that he is having worsening BPH symptoms. Last w/up IU 5?17. He was told there was nothing they could offer. Pt also is having a lump in his throat when he swallows, but not when he eats or drinks. No abd pain, change in stools, fatigue, and only an intentional weight loss. There have been no hospital admissions or ER visits since the last clinic visit. No other health concerns. Med list reviewed and refills given.

PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: Compensated hypothyroidism, Low back pain, Coronary arteriosclerosis in native artery, Dream anxiety disorder, Hyperlipidemia, Benign essential hypertension, Iron defed anemia, Hearing loss, GERD, Hemorrhoids, Colonic polyps, SCC of rt hand

REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: General: No fever, chills, or anorexia, dec intentionally 10 lbs. NECK: no swelling, stiffness, pain CHEST: No dyspnea, pleuritic CP, or URI symptoms COR: No CP, SOB, Diaphoresis, PND, or edema ABD: No abd pain, N/V, change in stools or blood GU: Worsening symptoms, nocturia, not assc with diet, or fluids PSYCHE: No SI/HI, sleeping well, appropriate affect

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: Gen: WD, WN, BMI 28 dec 10 lbs, W, in NAD, VSS, Afebrile Chest: Bilateral clear CVS: S1 S2 present, No murmur ABD: Soft, Non tender, Bowel sound present, No organomegaly EXT: No LE edema CNS: C, A, Ox3, No focal deficit.

LABORATORY: Reviewed and discussed

ASSESSMENT/PLAN: #Hypertension – controlled cont same #Hx of CAD s/p stents=stable #Hypothy- WNL cont same SYN .1 #BPH- Worsening despite max meds, last URO consult 7/17. #Constipation- batter with corrected Thy #GERD- Not much better, despite meds. Will make sure taking correctly, if he is will get GI consult.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

1997 Exam Bullets

I audit our GYN and Neuro docs using the 1997 specialty exams. I need an opinion….I have researched this and cannot find an answer. If a "bullet" cannot be performed in the exam due to circumstances beyond provider control, should they be penalized and not allowed an otherwise comprehensive exam? For example, a GYN patient has had the uterus removed or the neuro patient that is confined to a wheelchair and the provider cannot assess gait and station? I know if a ROS is unobtainable and the reason is documented, the provider isn’t penalized. But….I have not been able to find anything to support this for the 1997 exam. I agree with my physicians when they state they should not be down-coded from a justified, medically necessary 99205 to a 99203 because of something beyond their control. I would just like to have something (preferably in writing) that would hold up in case of an audit. I could not find anything on my MACs website (Novitas). The documentation definitely would not meet a comprehensive exam using the 1995 guidelines, especially Neuro, and I don’t want them documenting organ systems just to get to a comprehensive exam (i.e. ENT, GI, GU for Neuro). Opinions? Would it be sufficient to document "uterus surgically absent" or "patient confined to wheelchair – unable to assess gait and station"?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

1995 or 1997 E&M Guidelines Initial/subsequent Hospital

There is a debate between coders in our office as to which Guideline (95 or 97) is better suited when coding Initial/Subsequent Hospital and Initial/Subsequent Observation for our Cardiologists. Do any of you consistently use one or the other or find one to be more beneficial than the other? Just wanted to get a few opinions.

Thanks!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

1997 Guidelines for Specialty Eye Exam – Is dilation required?

Hi There,

I’m trying to figure out whether dilation is required for a comprehensive eye examination to be coded. There is new technology out there that allows an optometrist to view the optic discs, retina, & vitreous bodies without having to use drops to dilate the pupil. However, according the 1997 guidelines, these areas of the eye must be "through dilated pupils (unless contraindicated)." This information can be found on the CMS website here:
https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Edu…eferenceii.pdf

I have been trying to see if these guidelines have been updated, without luck. There is an AAPC article that states the dilated exam is optional (https://www.aapc.com/blog/30462-spli…ye-exam-or-em/), but to me, you cannot get a comprehensive examination if it is not done (comprehensive is defined as "perform[ing] all elements identified by a bullet; document[ing] every element in each box with a shaded border and at least one element in each box with an unshaded border".

If anyone has additional information that could pass along, or if they have experience with the new technology that I described above & how to document it, I’d really appreciate any help I can get!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Need help with counting 1997 Physical Exam for Dermatology

Could you please help with counting number of bullet of 1997 Physical Exam for Dermatology?

EXAM:

Well developed, well nourished, female in no acute distress, oriented and without outward signs of anxiety or depression. Complete examination of the scalp and hair, digits/nails, right and left arms and legs, eyelids and conjunctiva, neck, face, ears, nose, lips was normal except for the following significant findings:——

Thank you for your help.

Medical Billing and Coding