Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

OP Note assistance

Hello all,

I’m in need of some assistance withe coding the below report. It has me a little confused due to the scope only went to the duodenum, but the report also states "Papillotome was used for cannulation and a cholangiogram was obtained and showed no filling defects". I’m thinking 43247 and not sure on the cannulation. :confused: Any assistance would be great!

PROCEDURE PERFORMED: Endoscopic Retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stent removal.

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Normal cholangiogram

PROCEDURE: Olympus sided viewing duodenoscope was inserted into the patient’s mouth and advanced down to the descending duodenum. The stent was noted to be protruding the ampulla. A snare was placed through the endoscope and the tip of the stent was grasped. The scope was withdrawn, and this pilled the stent up through the patient’s esophagus and out the patient’s mouth. The scope was then reintroduced back into the descending duodenum. Papillotome was used for cannulation and a cholangiogram was obtained and showed no filling defects. The common bile duct appeared normal in caliber. There was no evidence of any bile leak. The scope was removed and no immediate postprocedure complications.

Thanks in advance for any help!!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Help with Breast Excision Op Note Please

Can anyone give any guidance for this. Thinking 19281 or 19125 or both??

Indications: This patient has a papilloma and mass of the of the right breast which was previously biopsied and requires excision.

Pre-operative Diagnosis: right breast mass and papilloma
*
Post-operative Diagnosis: right breast mass and papilloma
*
*
*
Procedure Details
The patient was seen in the Holding Room. The risks, benefits, complications, treatment options, and expected outcomes were discussed with the patient. The possibilities of reaction to medication, pulmonary aspiration, bleeding, infection, the need for additional procedures, failure to diagnose a condition, and creating a complication requiring transfusion or operation were discussed with the patient. The patient concurred with the proposed plan, giving informed consent. The site of surgery properly noted/marked. The patient was taken to operating room identified correctly and the procedure verified as right Needle localized Breast mass Excision. A Time Out was held and the above information confirmed.
*
The patient was placed prone on the stereotactic core table. The right breast clip lesion was localized stereotactically. Using standard aseptic technique and 1% Lidocaine and for local anesthetic. A 9cm Kopans needle wire device was then advanced ot the targeting coordinates. Stereotactic imaging was used to confirm appropriate localization. The wire was deployed and imaging confirmed appropriate wire placement. Sterile dressing was placed with steristrips and gauze. The patient tolerated this procedure well without complications. She was then brought to the OR.
The patient was placed supine. The breast was prepped and draped in the standard fashion. Lidocaine 0.5% with epinephrine and bicarbonate was used to anesthetize the skin over the external portion of the wire.

An curvilinear incision was created at 8-10:00 in the periareolar skin near the external wire. Dissection was carried down through the subcutaneous fat. A core of breast tissue was taken around the wire and excised. The specimen was then imaged and the clip was confirmed to be in the tissue. Hemostasis was achieved with cautery. Closure was performed in 2 layers with a 4-0 monocrylsubcuticular closure. The specimen was oriented with sutures- short superior,long lateral.
*
Steri-Strips were applied. At the end of the operation all sponge, instrument and needle counts were correct. interpreted all images during the procedure.
*

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Progress Note Signatures

I am wondering if there is any hard rule about a physician signing off on a progress note before it’s complete.

I have an issue of receiving encounter forms and notes( it’s a paper-based clinic) that may have the encounter form fully filled out and signed, but missing dx, exam, and ros in the note. The notes are usually signed, though.

I may be searching it the wrong way, but I thought the signatures were meant to indicate the physician has authenticate what was done during the visit.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

California medicaid (medi-cal) progress note — start / end time

Good morning,

Does anyone know where exactly that I could find any literature on clinical documentation requirements (verbatim) regarding the "start and end" time for Mental Health services (Individual / Family) rendered to a Medi-Cal (California Medicaid) Beneficiary?

Thank you in advance.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Where can I find what is required to be in a procedure note?

Does anyone know where I can find out what needs to be in a specific procedure note? i.e: Laceration Repair note, Reduction, etc. We have providers stating the information is in the documentation but it isn’t always complete. I was hoping there was something that spelled out what information needs to be included so we can give them exact feedback on what is missing.

Thank you in advance.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

OP Note Review : SML; laser and BTX (hypertrophy of trachealis/bronchialis muscles)

Physician chose 31573 and 31641. I appreciate in advance, input

Ehler’s-Danlos Syndrome; excessive dynamic airway collapse; hypertrophy of the trachealis and bronchialis muscles

Spasm of muscle [M62.838]Subglottic stenosis [J38.6]
Chronic respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia (HCC) [J96.10]

Suspension MicrolaryngoscopyBronchoscopy with Botox injection of trachealis/bronchialis muscles.
Bronchoscopy with CO2 laser scarification of Posterior Bronchial/Tracheal Wall

Anesthesia: General

Estimated Blood Loss: Minimal

Drain: NA

Total IV Fluids: as per anesthesia

Specimens: * No specimens in log *

Implants: * No implants in log *

Complications: 3 mm anterior tongue laceration sustained during exposure with Lindholm scope

Findings:
1) Moderate difficulty with Lindholm scope, placed in suspension
2) Stable tracheal stenosis, minimally obstructive without intervention necessary today
3) Improvement in bulk of trachealis and bronchialis from prior botox and laser procedures, but overall still with some hypertrophy
4) Around 20-25 U botox injected to right and left mainstem bronchus bronchialis muscle each using sclerotherapy needle. Another 50-60 U botox injected to trachealis in multiple locations.
5) Flexible CO2 laser with flexible bronchoscopy used to scar distal posterior tracheal wall and right mainstem posterior bronchial wall (left side left untouched as it appeared less hypertrophied and sufficiently open)

Disposition: awakened from anesthesia, extubated and taken to the recovery room in a stable condition, having suffered no apparent untoward event.

Condition: doing well without problems

Technique: clean, contaminated

Procedure Details: Patient was brought into operating room and turned over to Anesthesia. After timeout was performed, patient was induced under general anesthesia and bag masked with no difficulty. Patient was then turned over to the ENT team, and we performed bag mask ventilation with ease. Mouth guard was put over patient’s maxillary teeth for protection, and the Lindholm scope was then used to expose the larynx with moderate difficulty. The patient was placed in suspension with the Lewis arm. The zero degree hopkins rod was used to visualize the larynx, however, the angle of suspension did not allow for visualization of the trachea. Jet ventilation was initiated through the scope port, but patient’s saturations were not sustained, as such, the patient was intubated with a 5-0 ET tube with no difficulty through the scope. After ventilating sufficiently, tube was taken out, and jet ventilation was reinitiated by extending a catheter below the glottis. The flexible bronchoscope was used to examine the airway. There was persistent stable tracheal stenosis that was only minimally obstructive. As such, no intervention was deemed necessary. The trachealis and bilateral mainstem bronchialis muscles were noted to still be hypertrophied as before, though seemingly less so (particularly the left mainstem bronchus). The previous laser marks were no longer visible in the posterior wall, but there did appear to be a drop off where the laser marks had ended previously (c/w a reduction in bulk of the muscle where laser had been used). After examination, jet ventilation was held, and the ET tube was re-inserted, and the patient was ventilated by Anesthesia. The botox was then prepared to a concentration of 50 U/mL. This was placed in a 5cc syringe attached to a sclerotherapy needle, which was threaded into the flexible bronchoscope. When Anesthesia had deemed patient ready for jet ventilation again, the ET tube was removed, jet ventilation was initiated, and the flexible bronchoscope was used to direct the needle towards the trachealis and bronchialis muscle. A total of about 20-25U was injected into each mainstem bronchus bronchialis muscle, and about 50-60U into the main trachealis muscle in multiple locations. Methylene blue was injected into the sclerotherapy catheter after the botox syringe ran out in order to determine when the botox was all used up. After this was completed, the patient was re-intubated and ventilated by Anesthesia.
Then, patient’s face was draped with wet towels, and the CO2 laser was prepared. Patient was extubated, and jet ventilation initiated again with transglottic catheter. All personnel in the OR at this time donned the appropriate eye protective wear. The laser flexible catheter was threaded through the flexible bronchoscope, which was then advanced into the trachea, and two longitudinal furrows were made over the right mainstem posterior bronchial wall extending up into the distal posterior tracheal wall. the jet ventilator was used at a laser safe mode while using the CO2 laser. The bronchoscope was withdrawn, the vocal cords were sprayed with 4% lidocaine, and the patient was re-intubated. Long grabbing forceps were used to hold the ET tube in place while the Lindholm scope was removed from the patient’s mouth, and patient was handed over to Anesthesia. The case was deemed to be finished at this point. All counts were correct at the end of the case. Patient was extubated and awakened from anesthesia without complication.

Many thanks, Jamie

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

MA Health Review included in a Behavioral Health Med Mgmt progress note

We have several progress notes for Behavioral Health Med Mgmt that mistakenly included an MA Health Review copied over from a previous medical visit. Our EHR is not allowing the provider to delete this. Would this documentation now not meet requirements since the MA HR is present?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Using a definitive dx from the EGD report vs signs/symptoms from Consultant’s note

Hi all,

I understand that when it comes to pathology and diagnosis coding, the provider can wait for the pathology report to come back in order to supply a definitive diagnosis. Likewise, as a coder you can code from the path report.

If Dr. A sees the patient at 9am, and Dr. B performs the EGD at 1pm. The coder doesn’t code the notes until 14 days later (long after the patient has been discharged from the hospital). Can the coder still pull the diagnosis from the EGD report for Dr. A’s claim or would the coder have to report the signs/symptoms for Dr. As claim because technically the patient didnt have a definitive diagnosis at 9am??…If this logic is true, it just seems to contradict the pathology rules.

I’m speaking from the pro-fee inpatient side.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum