Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

93461, 93463 (and separate venography 36012, 75820??)

Would 36012 and 75820 be appropriate to add also? Thank you in advance!

PROCEDURE PERFORMED
1. Cardiac fluoroscopy with radiological supervision and interpretation.
2. Right heart catheterization.
3. Left heart catheterization.
4. Selective right and left coronary artery angiography.
5. Vein graft to diagonal branch angiography, left internal mammary artery
(LIMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) angiography.
6. Left axillary subclavian vein venography.
7. Dobutamine drug challenge with hemodynamic response interpretation.
8. Right iliofemoral angiography and vascular closure device with a 8-French
Angio-Seal.
9. Conscious sedation for a total of 40 minutes of preairway and postairway
examination, evaluations, and continuous cardiopulmonary monitoring.

COMPLICATIONS
None apparent.

INDICATIONS
Caucasian with a prior history of multivessel coronary artery disease and prior CABG 2-vessel, LIMA to LAD and
a vein graft of the diagonal branch, moderately severe endograft stenosis, who has had worsening dyspnea on exertion and shortness of breath. Being evaluated pre-TAVR, for worsening symptoms, NYHA Class III.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE
After written informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to our
cardiac cath lab, placed supine in the fasting state on the catheterization
table. Bilateral groins and right arm were prepped and draped in the usual
sterile fashion. Lidocaine 1% was used to anesthetize the right antecubital
area and a 6-French radial Glidesheath was exchanged out over IV with sterile
technique. Following this right heart catheterization was then performed
using a 6-French Swan-Ganz catheter advanced up to the right atrium, right
pulmonary artery. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was obtained using
serial pressure measurements, cardiac output index utilizing Fick technique.
Of note, there was some difficulty passing the Swan through this axillary
vein. Therefore, selective axillary venography was performed which showed a
patent vessel which showed a tortuous bend.[/U]

At this point the right heart catheter was removed, the sheaths were flushed.
IV fentanyl and Versed were used for conscious sedation. Micropuncture needle
and modified Seldinger technique, the right common femoral artery was
percutaneously entered and a 6-French sheath was used to dilate the right
common femoral vein and a 7 x 23 cm sheath was placed in the distal aorta.
At this point retrograde coronary angiography was then carried out using a
6-French JL4 for left coronary circulation, and a 6-French JR4 for right
coronary circulation, vein graft diagonal branch angiography, and selective
limited LAD angiography. Following this the 6-French JR4 was then used to
cross the aortic valve with an 0.035 straight wire. Simultaneous aortic LV
pressures were obtained. Baseline peak-to-peak gradient was 35 with a mean
of 32. Dobutamine drug challenge at 5 mcg titrated up to 10 mcg/kg/min
showed peak-to-peak gradient of 45 with a mean of 40. The calculated aortic
valve area was 0.64. At this point the dobutamine was discontinued. All
wires and catheters removed from the body. Right iliofemoral angiography
showed vessel anatomy suitable for vascular closure device. An 8-French
Angio-Seal was placed successfully.

FINDINGS
HEMODYNAMICS
RA pressure was 17/14 with a mean of 11 to 12. RV pressure 52/5 with an
RVEDP of 12 to 14. Pulmonary artery pressure 52/17 with a mean of 33 to 35.
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 22/21 with a mean of 19 to 20. LV
pressure was 199/4 with an LVEDP of 22 to 23 mmHg. Aortic pressure 145/56
with a mean of 91. Post dobutamine infusion the peak-to-peak gradient was 45
with a mean of 40. Calculated aortic valve area of 0.64 sq cm per sq meter
with aortic valve index of 0.33. Cardiac output of 4.56. Cardiac index of
2.34 liters per minute per sq meter.

CORONARY ANATOMY
1. Left main: Left main angiographically is a large-caliber-size vessel. It
bifurcates into the left anterior descending artery, the left circumflex and
ramus intermedius. It is widely patent, mild luminal irregularities at the
ostium. Possibly an old stent placed there, difficult to visualize.
However, the vessel is widely patent. TIMI-3 flow.
2. Left anterior descending: The left anterior descending is a
large-caliber-size vessel. It is 99% occluded in its midportion and there is
faint biphasic flow noted in the midportion of the vessel. It gives rise to
a large diagonal 1 branch which has mild luminal irregularities, TIMI-3 flow.
3. Ramus intermedius: Large-caliber-size vessel, has mild ostial luminal
irregularities, less than 10% to 20% stenosis, widely patent. TIMI-3 flow.
4. Left circumflex is a large-caliber-size vessel, widely patent. Single
obtuse marginal wall branch. TIMI-3 flow. Mild luminal irregularities.
5. Right coronary artery: Right coronary artery is a large-caliber-size
vessel. It is a dominant vessel supplying right side posterior structures.
It has a widely patent stent in the midportion with only a very mild in-stent
restenosis. The remainder of the vessel has mild luminal irregularities.
The RPDA is widely patent with mild luminal irregularities.

TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRAST
80 mL

TOTAL FLUOROSCOPY TIME
5.2 minutes

CONCLUSION
1. Widely patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior
descending (LAD).
2. Occluded vein graft to diagonal 1 branch.
3. Widely patent left main and diagonal branch.
4. Widely patent left circumflex and ramus intermedius.
5. Widely patent mid right coronary artery stent.
6. Elevated right and left-sided filling pressures.
7. Pulmonary hypertension.
8. Severe aortic valve stenosis with dobutamine drug challenge with a
peak-to-peak gradient of 45 and a mean of 40 mmHg. Calculated aortic valve
area was 0.64, index of 0.33.

PLAN
The patient will be sent to the recovery area and will be monitored for any
postprocedure complications. She received a dose of IV diuretics. We will
optimize medical therapy, continue with TAVR evaluation, likely as an
outpatient.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

HELP – Moderate Sedation for two separate procedure notes

I’m holding these services until I can get a definitive answer –
I have a GI physician who is charging for Moderate Sedation while performing two separate procedures, an EGD and a Colonoscopy. The Moderate Sedation is noted in one note (the Colonoscopy) describing the Moderate Sedation, which includes the time recorded for both the Colonoscopy and EGD.
The Dr is stating that he performed one procedure immediately after the other and that the documentation of the Moderate Sedation within the one note is sufficient.
I’m stating each note must be independent. That the Moderate Sedation should be noted in both notes.
Am I looking at this wrong?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

MDM data points for four separate biopsy/pathology

I would like everyone’s opinion…

Patient has 4 separate lesions biopsies, each sent off for pathology (i.e., 88305×4).

For MDM data points, you get 1 point for ordering path (radiology). So how do you handle four separate lesions sent to path?

I can look at this two ways.

1. Similar to ordering clinical labs (e.g., blood work) you get 1 data point regardless of the number of blood tests ordered

or

2. Four separate problems are being addressed. The provider made the decision on four separate unrelated lesions, each having a potentially different diagnosis. I can consider this as having performed medical decision making four separate times, and would lean towards 88305 x 4 generating a total of four MDM data points

Anyone know of any carrier FAQs or other authoritative sources that might clarify this issue?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Separate surgical margins with breast case

Excision of breast mass w/ margins is performed and the path report returns with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (88307). Along with the breast specimen are 6 separately submitted margins. Each margin is described as "new superior margin stitch true margin" or another location such as new medial, new posterior and so on. Each specimen states suture present and inked with black. The final diagnosis on each states "New ______ margin biopsy: Benign Breast tissue, No Tumor Seen. The pathologist is submitting these margins as Breast specimen, excision of lesion w/ indicated margins and billing a 88307 for each. What would be the correct code to report 88305 or 88307? No documentation stating they are microscopically examined. Other than the actual breast specimen, the others are the surgical margins of the breast excision. I am thinking 88305?
Any advice appreciated.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Is Separate Coding of Services Unbundling or Correct Coding?

If appropriate rules and system edits are in place, exclusionary modifiers are the link to unbundling liability. Unbundling is a commonly asserted but often misunderstood fraud theory, even by coding experts. When evaluating potential unbundling as a fraud theory, it’s important to differentiate when separate reporting of services is simply correct coding and when it […]
AAPC Blog

Proper billing for separate procedures

I have a provider, who is paid by RVU’s, and he is wanting to bill out multiple procedures on separate HCFA’s. Example, he does two different procedures, and instead of billing both out with 59 modifier on second procedure, he wants to bill out each procedure on separate HCFA. The payment modifiers change how his RVU’s are counted. If the procedures are billed out separate, in his mind, you don’t have to put the 59, thus giving him 100% value for both procedures. I have looked through CMS guidelines and I don’t see anything stating if more than one procedure is done in the same day, that they all have to be billed out on same HCFA. If anyone knows where I can find some guidelines in regards to this, I would greatly appreciate it. The provider is saying it is incorrect to bill them all out on same form, so I just need something in writing from CMS to show him otherwise. Thanks in advance for any help!

Medical Billing and Coding | AAPC Forum

Endoscopy and Separate E/M Service

Minor procedures (including colonoscopy and endoscopy) have a zero- or 10-day global period and no pre-operative period (other than the day of the procedure). As such, the initial office consultation with the provider to determine the indications and need for an endoscopy, potential risks, type of sedation, preparation, etc., is a billable service, when medically […]
AAPC Blog

ACDF through separate incisions

My physician performed an ACDF at C3-4 and then, through a separate incision, another one at C5-6 and C6-7. My question is, do I code this as 22551 and 22552 x 2? Or 22551 and 22551-59 with 22552 as there was a separate incision and one inter-space was skipped? Any advice is appreciated!

Medical Billing & Coding Forum | AAPC