Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Physician assistant – Clinic Visits with X-Rays Performed in Office –

I am writing all of you to see if you have any contacts or answers to a coding/denial question for our office. Our group of neurosurgeons each have a physician assistant who frequently see patients with x-rays performed in the office. We have billed with the 26 modifier but insurance is denying those claims.

See below the reasoning why we have been told to bill with the 26 modifier when the physician assistant sees and reads the images.

The policy is in place because:
1) We do not have actual orders in our system, x-rays are done by verbal orders. If the PA is seeing the patient, they are technically ordering unless ordered by the physician in their dictation prior to.

2) PA’s under Medicare, MPB Ch. 80, are not eligible to ‘supervise’ x-rays done by an x-ray tech. If there is no documentation of physician involvement in the treatment that day then we can’t bill the x-ray under the physician.

3) We did try to bill the TC under the physician in some cases, but again, due to no actual order in place, we didn’t have documentation to back it up (This is supposedly being addressed by Nick, our IT director)

So the decision was until we have a system in place to be able to provide some actual documentation of the order of the x-ray being ordered by the doctor that it would be billed under the interpreting provider, for some docs, if they are in clinic then they are dictating their own interpretation and we should be billing the x-ray under them. Please forward this to your contact and see what she thinks. This came from an attorney who did a compliance course, If you want to change it you will need to address it with Star and it may need to go back to the doctors.

If the supervising physician is not present to supervise the PA, and the PA is not eligible to supervise the technician who performed it, then what is your suggestion.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Physician Assistant – Clinic Visits with X-Rays Performed in Office –

I am writing all of you to see if you have any contacts or answers to a coding/denial question for our office. Our group of neurosurgeons each have a physician assistant who frequently see patients with x-rays performed in the office. We have billed with the 26 modifier but insurance is denying those claims.

See below the reasoning why we have been told to bill with the 26 modifier when the physician assistant sees and reads the images.

The policy is in place because:
1) We do not have actual orders in our system, x-rays are done by verbal orders. If the PA is seeing the patient, they are technically ordering unless ordered by the physician in their dictation prior to.

2) PA’s under Medicare, MPB Ch. 80, are not eligible to ‘supervise’ x-rays done by an x-ray tech. If there is no documentation of physician involvement in the treatment that day then we can’t bill the x-ray under the physician.

3) We did try to bill the TC under the physician in some cases, but again, due to no actual order in place, we didn’t have documentation to back it up (This is supposedly being addressed by Nick, our IT director)

So the decision was until we have a system in place to be able to provide some actual documentation of the order of the x-ray being ordered by the doctor that it would be billed under the interpreting provider, for some docs, if they are in clinic then they are dictating their own interpretation and we should be billing the x-ray under them. Please forward this to your contact and see what she thinks. This came from an attorney who did a compliance course, If you want to change it you will need to address it with Star and it may need to go back to the doctors.

If the supervising physician is not present to supervise the PA, and the PA is not eligible to supervise the technician who performed it, then what is your suggestion.

Posted for Member by Midtown OKC Chapter

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Modifier 25 with X-rays? AAPC practice exam says it is required?

Maybe I am missing something… I am trying to clarify the issue.

I was taking the AAPC module that I purchased: Specialty Practice Exam COSC™
And on Case 20 it goes over a basic office visit for knee pain. All that is done is an e/m and an x-ray, 73562.

Question three asks if a modifier should be appended. I chose no, which it says is incorrect, the rational being:

The provider performs an E/M and radiology service. According to NCCI policy, when a provider performs a significant and separately identifiable E/M service with a procedure with XXX global days, append modifier 25 to the E/M service.

I am so confused. I have never used modifier 25 on an OV for just a knee xray since the xray has no gobal?
I would have gotten this wrong on the exam… Can anyone explain why this is correct?
I understand using it in cases with minor procedues like 20610 but an xray??

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Entire spine x-rays vs individual codes for c spine, t spine and l spine

I was wondering if anyone had information regarding billing the entire spine X-ray codes vs billing the individual codes for C-spine, T-spine and L-spine X-rays?
Our radiology practice normally codes each body part separate, unless they are performing the scoliosis study. Is there any specified rule for this? I assumed that the entire spine codes were coded when the entire spine was included in each view, and the individual codes were coded when the X-rays were just focused in on the C spine, T spine, and L spine.
Example:
C spine 3 views 72040
T spine 2 views 72070
L Spine 3 views 72100
Insurance paid on 72100, and did not pay the others stating it was included in the primary procedure.

Would it be correct to code 72040, 72070 and 72100 on a claim? Or should it be coded 72084?

Any info or reference material would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum | AAPC