Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Capture the Complete Clinical Picture With Precision

Clinical validation could upend your current risk adjustment policies. The rise of risk adjustment-based managed care programs in the past 15 years within Medicare, Medicaid, and Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans has led to remarkably good news: There has been a significant improvement in the accuracy of the diagnosis codes abstracted from medical documentation among […]

The post Capture the Complete Clinical Picture With Precision appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Provider treated patients- did not complete notes and relocated

We have a nurse practitioner that treated patients in our rural health clinic however did not complete some of her notes in EHR for them. Can another provider within our organization (physicians with same tax id) sign off on those notes? And for the patients whom she did not create a note, what is protocol for that? I was given instruction if physician relocated to mail them copies of records to sign and return via certified mail for a paper trail? Does this seem typical? Thanks in advance!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Pacemaker status codes and complete heart block/sick sinus syndrome

Can I use a Complete Heart Block diagnosis code along with a pacemaker status code?

I have found the below documentation from the 2010 ICD-9 Coding Clinic that states if a pacemaker is placed to treat the sick sinus syndrome, that only the pacemaker code should be used. I am not able to find any documentation that shows this has changed. Would this only occur during the interrogation? Would you be able to bill both codes out at a regular follow-up visit?

Would a complete heart block fall into the same situation? I am not able to find any official documentation to confirm if the complete heart block and pacemaker codes can be used together.

Not billing the complete heart block would affect the patient’s risk score just as with the sick sinus syndrome.

Any and all help is greatly appreciated!

Thank you – Missy

ICD-9-CM Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2010 Pages: 9-10 Effective with discharges: October 1, 2010
Question:
Coding Clinic, Fifth Issue 1993, page 12, advised that when sick sinus syndrome (SSS) is controlled by a pacemaker, no code assignment is required if no attention or treatment is provided to the condition or the device. However, we are seeing records where the patient is admitted for an unrelated condition, but during the stay the physician does an interrogation of the pacemaker. Is it appropriate to assign a code for sick sinus syndrome, as a chronic condition, when a patient has a previously placed pacemaker and it is interrogated during the hospitalization?

Answer:
Assign code V53.31, Fitting and adjustment of other device, Cardiac device, cardiac pacemaker, as an additional code assignment. A code is not assigned for sick sinus syndrome when it is being controlled by the pacemaker and no problems are detected during the check. Interrogation is a routine check, which is done via computer to assess pacemaker function. The pacemaker is routinely evaluated to ensure the device is programmed accurately as well as to assess battery and lead function. Pacemaker settings may be reprogrammed, if required. Interrogation of the device can be done in the inpatient setting or in the office setting.

Code 89.45, Artificial pacemaker rate check, may be assigned for the procedure.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

arterial bleeder of the right fifth finger with complete loss of skin of the distal

which CPT code would you use for a right fifth finger with complete loss of skin on the ulnar aspect of the distal phalanx. one point has pulsating bleeding. there are several other points of venous bleeding. The provider infiltrated with lidocaine the did superficial figure of eight suture was placed at the level of the arteial bleeder and at 2 other locations where venous bleeding was most prominent. the bleeding was controlled.
our coders are not agreeing 1 wants to use 35207 with modifier 52, the coder thinks should be simple repair of superficial wound 12001 -12018.. Any suggestions
:confused:

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Limited Vs. Complete Kidney Ultrasound

Hello… I am reaching out for guidance and advise of the coding of a complete Vs. Limited Kidney US.
Per the CPT book it states "if clinical history suggests urinary tract pathology, complete evaluation of the kidneys and urinary bladder also comprises a complete retro peritoneal ultrasound."
Does anyone have advise regarding this statement when coding in a service like 3M’s Code Assist. How are you interpreting the urinary tract pathology?
For example clinical indications states "CKD" both kidneys and the bladder are evaluated, what would you code? Limited or complete?
Are there any training guides or resources that you all use for guidance?

Thanks in advance….

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

ostectomy- not indicated as partial or complete?

I’m coding a surgery from from procedure report (and hasn’t been dictated yet). They did not indicate whether the ostectomy was partial or complete. Is there a default to code when they don’t give you the information (like in icd-10) or would I need to request this information before I can code appropriately? The following is what’s on the procedure report:

excision and application of wound vac 6×5
ostectomy of the 4th and 5th metatarsal and cuboid
excision and intermediate closure 4cm lateral foot

anesthesia: MAC
diagnosis: wound to the right foot

Thanks for the help!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Complete retroperitoneal ultrasound w/ bladder scan

One of the urologist physicians that I work for wants to report CPT 76770 along with CPT 51798 (Measurement of post voiding residual urine). Per AUA, a complete retroperitoneal ultrasound (CPT 76770) can be reported if complete evaluation of the kidneys and urinary bladder has been done and with clinical history suggesting urinary track pathology. AUA has added that "when an abdominal ultrasound and pelvic ultrasound are performed to evaluate the kidneys and bladder, technically both a 76705 and a 76857 are performed to evaluate each of these organs. However, the American Medical Association has determined that CPT code 76770 should be billed if the clinical history suggest urinary tract pathology." Based on this information, CPT 76705 + 76857 = 76770 (for evaluation of kidneys and urinary bladder). In addition, AUA indicates that "if the urologist performs bladder US to view the anatomy, the architecture , or the morphology of the full bladder as well as to DETERMINE PVR AFTER VOIDING, use CPT code 76857." My questions, is our physician wrong to report CPT 51798 if based on the information from AUA, the PVR is included in the complete retroperitoneal study? Or in what cases CPT 51798 can be unbundled since the it has indicator 1 when CPT 76770 and 51798 are report together? Hope I am making sense. Thank you in advance for any response

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Echocardiogram Complete vs Limited

I understand what is needed in order to bill a complete echo what I would like to have clarified (if someone would please let me know as I cannot find it); whether we can bill a complete if say the patient was experiencing AFIB on the day of the study which rendered some of the areas uninterpretable .

For instance I see: LV diastolic function could not be assessed due to the presence of atrial fibrillation during the study.

since the provider tried to get a reading and could not are they able to get credit for that or is this a modifier 52 situation?

thank you!!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Review of Systems – Documentation for Complete ROS

Guidelines say: At least ten organ systems must be reviewed. Those systems with positive or pertinent negative responses must be individually documented. For the remaining systems, a notation of indicating all other systems are negative is permissible. In the absence of such a notation, at least 10 systems must be individually documented.

There are 14 possible systems to be reviewed. Does this statement mean that to get credit for a complete ROS you have to individually document the 10 systems and then all remaining (4) can be documented as "all other systems negative)?

I have always allowed my providers to document the pertinent +/- (however many that may be) and then state "all other systems negative" to get credit for a complete ROS. A coder on our team is reading the guidelines differently so we thought we’d see how others interpret this.

Thank you,

Medical Billing and Coding Forum