Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Denials on 20610

Is anyone getting denials on 20610? (This was to Aetna/Coventry Medicare). I billed a 20610 RT and J3301 x 4 with dx M70.61. The denial was 1952 ( No valid LCD). I go to check the LCD for 20610 and it is gone. I can’t find the LCD for 20600 or 20605 either. I am so confused. I looked up the CCI edits and the 20610 is still in there and doesn’t mention any changes besides adding the imagining codes. Have I been billing the hip and knee injections all wrong? I thought the 20610 could be used for bursitis, effusion and osteoarthritis? Regardless of what you medication injected. I then went to the LCD for 20552 and 20553 and bursitis is on there. I am at a loss. Thank you for any help.
Necole

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

IOL master denials

We have been having trouble with Coventry and Medicare denying code 92136. With Coventry the first eye is billed with no modifier, second eye with modifiers 52 and the eye performed on. Medicare is being billed with the eye being performed on for the first eye, and modifier 26 with the second eye being done. This has always been paid in the past. Any suggestions?
Thank you!!!!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

SC BCBS Blue Essentials 00811 Denials

Hello,

We bill for CRNA’s for anesthesia in South Carolina . We recently have been getting denials for SC BCBS Blue Essentials when we bill 00811 (When screening colonoscopy procedure turns diagnostic) as the reason "Benefit Plan does not cover this service." Is anyone else experience this issue/ have a remedy? We have reviewed the medical policy on BCBS website for our state, asked provider services, and used the Snat Chat option without getting a direct answer if policy has changed. We don’t have access to any of the Blue Essentials policy details.

Thank you!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

96127 Tricare denials

Hello we are billing Tricare South for 96127 with modifier 59 and 2 units. These are being denied stating: Billed Procedure Code(S) Pairs Found To Be Unbundled Per Cms Ncc
I can’t find any information on this. Triwest/Vets choice paid with no issues.
I did read that some payers will only pay 1 unit. Also that a 59 modifier is needed.
Anyone have any experience on this with Tricare?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

HELP! using modifier 62 and 80 on the same claim and getting denials

Can anyone give feedback or help me find documentation on billing co-surgeon and assist on the same claim. In Appendix A of the AMA CPT book, modifier 62 states if a co-surgeon acts as an assistant in the performance of additional procedures, other than those reported with modifier 62, during the same surgical session, those services may be reported using separate procedure codes with modifier 80, as appropriate. If we are asked by another specialty to act as co-surgeon we of course bill with modifier 62 on primary procedures however since modifier 62 cannot be appended to instrumentation codes we bill with 80 on instrumentation. We are getting denials now from Horizon and Medicare on the instrumentation codes stating no qualifying base code is being used due to the the primary procedure being billed with 62 makes the TOS 2 and 80 makes TOS 8.
Example:
22551.62
22845.80
22552.62
20930.80

Thanks in advance.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Debridement denials 10005 & 10008

During an intrathecal baclofen pump replacement, the surgeon says he completed a debridement and coded as 11005 & 11008. Medicare denied both, saying 10008 did not have a qualifying claim or service and 11005 for being incompatible with another code. Below is a clip from the operative note. Any ideas on the proper coding here?

Attention was first turned to the abdominal incision. Incision was made using a scalpel. Dissection was carried down to the level of the pocket using monopolar cautery. Upon entering the pocket, a yellow white slightly viscous fluid was encountered. The fluid was swabbed and sent for stat Gram stain and culture. The pocket was then entered and the pump was explanted from the pocket. The pump was then placed in an antibiotic solution. Upon inspection, the catheter was noted to be intact through the connector sites in between the pump catheter and the lumbar catheter. The side port was accessed using a 3 mL syringe and a Huber needle and clear CSF was aspirated with some difficulty, showing that the catheter was patent. The lab called back and stated that the fluid did not have any organisms or leukocytes making the risk of infection low. Therefore, given the fact that the catheter was functioning and the pump was not infected, decision was made to reimplant the pump. The current Medtronic SynchroMed II pump that was soaked in antibiotic solution was then reimplanted. All the fluid was copiously irrigated out with antibiotic solution as well as suctioned away. The pump was then re-primed and filled with baclofen and attached to the current catheter system. Clear CSF was noted to be egressing throughout the whole system. The new pump then was attached to the catheter system and with aspiration of the sites very easily.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Coventry and 20611 denials

Has anyone else had issues with Coventry lately denying 20611 as not medically necessary per LCD? The only LCD I can find is for injections of the knee with hyaluronan. However, the ones that are denying are not being injected with hyaluronan and may be in any of the major joints, not just knees. We’ve tried appealing stating it is not related to the LCD, but denial was upheld. We are usually billing with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis for the related joint. Thoughts?

Thanks!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum