Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

How To Code E/M Levels with Confidence

Don’t let insufficient documentation lead you astray. How many times has a provider asked you, “What do I need to document to get a 99215?” All too often, medical coders feel they should help their providers understand what elements of documentation are needed to warrant the higher level evaluation and management (E/M) service. Do not […]

The post How To Code E/M Levels with Confidence appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Is this illegal ? Beefing up E/M levels for RVU’s??

As part of the new process at our facility we are required to tell the provider that the level they have selected will be down or up coded to match the documentation.
Now what is happening is the doctor(s) are coming back and saying they will add more documentation after the fact so they can receive a higher level or the one
the originally selected. This feels wrong since the motivation is ($ $ $ ) RVU’s. Upper management doesn’t think anything is wrong with this. Am I over reacting here or does
anyone else see a problem with this?? If you agree with me please if you have anything that I can show as proof I would greatly appreciate it!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Nerve block spanning thoracic and lumbar levels

We are having a debate in the office and I was hoping to find some assistance here.

If a facet nerve block (64490-64495) or ablation spans two spinal regions, since the description in the additional level CPT codes indicate the regions (ie 64491-64492 indicate cervical or thoracic and 64494-64495 indicate lumbar or sacral), does that mean, you would jump to the primary code of the next spinal region for the additional levels?

For example, T11-L2 facet nerve block. Would it be 64490 for T11-12, 64491 for T12-L1, & 64493 for L1-2 or should the L1-2 be coded as 64492?

The only guideline I can find is in the NCCI where it talks about procedures done at contiguous spine levels but it mentions if the additional level code doesn’t indicate the spine region that you would use the add on code rather than another primary code.

Thanks!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Cloned notes-determining follow up levels

I have a Hospitalists that clones (copies and pastes) all his notes despite being told about this. I’m having a battle with myself on how to codes his follow ups. My Managers says to code per documentation which I do. Since his notes are cloned and his template is set for a COMPREHENSIVE exam each time (whether medically necessary or not), his follow ups are scored as level 3’s. But what happens when he adds a paragraph to the top of the cloned note stating patient is improved and goes into detail about that? He then adjusts time spent from 35 or 40 minutes down to 25 or 30 minutes. All of this indicates to me a reduced level. I really struggle as these should be coded as level 2’s even though the rest of the note scores a level 3!

I’m trying to justify scoring these as level 2’s because the E/M guidelines are just that…guidelines. The Medical Necessity just isn’t there to ethically score any higher. But yet………when you have 20 pages cloned from when the patient was in ICU……….what does one do?

I’d surely appreciate any guidance in this.
Thank you.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum