Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Case Management Monthly, August 2016

CMS puts short-stay audits on hold

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify what prompted CMS’ decision to temporarily suspend 2-midnight short-stay Quality Improvement Organization audits and what the decision means for compliance efforts

 

There’s good news and bad news on the 2-midnight rule front.

The good news: CMS has put short-stay inpatient audits related to the 2-midnight rule on hold as of May 4.

The bad news: This isn’t a free pass, and it isn’t going to last.

"Response at hospitals should be to do nothing different," says Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM, vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at Accretive Physician Advisory Services at Accretive Health in Chicago. "Follow the rules on every case. This is not a three-year delay; the audits will resume soon, and we have no idea if the look-back period will be altered to account for this delay."

 

The May announcement

Livanta, one of the two Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Quality Improvement Organizations (BFCC-QIO) charged with conducting 2-midnight rule compliance audits, posted a notification about the audit suspension on its website: http://bfccqioarea5.com/twomidnight.html. The announcement stated:

On May 4, 2016, CMS notified the BFCC-QIOs of a temporary pause of Two-Midnight Reviews in order to improve standardization across the program. During this period, Livanta will be collaborating with CMS and the other BFCC-QIO to ensure consistency in how the rule is applied to QIO case review. If your facility has submitted Livanta requested medical records, they will remain in the pipeline for review upon further direction from CMS. Going forward it is CMS’ intention that providers will have at least six weeks to implement changes prior to the next round of BFCC-QIO reviews.

 

"It seems that inconsistencies had resulted in many complaints, which is what prompted the suspension," says Stefani Daniels, RN, MSNA, CMAC, ACM, president and managing partner at Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., in Pompano Beach, Florida.

This suspension marks the second time CMS auditors have apparently fumbled 2-midnight rule interpretation. Medicare Administrative Contractors who conducted the initial probe and educate audits of the 2-midnight rule were also accused by hospitals of misinterpreting the standard?and hospitals had hoped that having BFCC-QIOs take over the task would solve the problem, says Hirsch. Unfortunately, it appears BFCC-QIOs are running into the same challenge.

When the BFCC-QIO audits first began back in October 2015, they brought some unwelcome surprises. Many hospitals anticipated that the reviews would only look at records from October 2015 forward. But hospitals soon began reporting that BFCC-QIOs were requesting records for cases as far back as May 2015, according to Hirsch. That wasn’t the only issue?BFCC-QIOs were also missing deadlines. Audit results were late, and the BFCC-QIOs were slowing the scheduled education for providers.

This created two problems for hospitals. First, the late BFCC-QIO audit results meant that hospitals with denied claims were poised to miss the filing deadline to rebill denied claims to Part B. Because of the delays in scheduling education related to the first round of claim denials, hospitals didn’t have an opportunity to understand their mistakes and fix them before the next set of audits began.

In addition, there was also some online buzz that BFCC-QIOs were misinterpreting the rule, says Hirsch. The main problem: benchmark admissions. Some hospitals reported that BFCC-QIOs were routinely denying inpatient admissions when patients spent one night as an outpatient in the emergency room or in observation services before they were admitted. This was the case even though these patients then spent a second night in the hospital as an inpatient that the physicians documented as medically necessary. This is a clear misinterpretation of the rule, says Hirsch. In other cases, the BFCC-QIOs were also denying the second midnight due to a lack of medical necessity, essentially overruling the judgment of hospital physicians.

 

Moving forward

As of presstime, it was unclear when the audits were going to resume or what the outcome of the suspension would be. In the meantime, though, hospitals should continue with business as usual?after all, it’s always good practice to assume claims will be audited and to be prepared for such a situation.

Best practices to follow to prepare for audits include those listed below:

  • Review every short-stay admission?those between zero and one day?prior to billing.
  • Ensure every patient’s status is appropriate up front, says Hirsch. Review the chart of every patient that goes upstairs.
  • Use the physician advisor to check compliance on cases that are murky to ensure they meet one of the exceptions under the 2-midnight rule. Change cases that don’t meet an exception using condition code 44. If the problem isn’t discovered until after discharge, self-deny and rebill the claim.
  • Ensure that case managers and physicians are up-to-date about any potential changes to the 2-midnight rule and how to comply with them.

 

In addition, it’s important to understand how audits work and be aware of any changes that will occur when they resume. KEPRO said before the audit suspension that auditors of short-stay claims need to see the following two components:

1.Documentation of medical necessity

2.Application of the 2-midnight rule

 

Reviewers also were charged with looking for quality-of-care issues and will validate coding associated with the claims. Before the suspension, a nonphysician using InterQual® would perform the first BFCC-QIO audit. If the case fails the initial review, a physician review would then follow, which is based on the physician’s medical judgment

Specifically, the physician reviewer would look at:

  • Acuity of the patient’s signs and symptoms
  • Medical predictability of adverse events
  • Need for diagnostic studies

 

Another concurrent review was designed to look at physician documentation to ensure patients needed hospital-level care and that their admission was not for social, custodial, or convenience reasons.

Ultimately, when it comes to BFCC-QIO reviews, the advice remains the same despite the temporary suspension: Stay on top of this issue, make sure physicians are assigning patients to the proper status, and ensure docs have the documentation to back up their decisions.

 

Ask the expert

Navigating the skilled nursing benefit for Medicare

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify strategies to help patients who don’t qualify for inpatient admission find postacute options

 

Assigning the correct patient status is important not only to ensure that the hospital gets accurate payment for a patient stay, but also to ensure that the patient receives access to the postacute benefits to which he or she is entitled. One of the more problematic topics in this arena is the three-day inpatient stay required by Medicare for a patient to qualify for a covered postacute stay in a SNF. One reader submitted the question below on this topic, and we asked Janet L. Blondo, MSW, LCSW-C, LICSW, CMAC, ACM, CCM, the manager of case management at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, Maryland, to supply an answer.

 

Q: As a case manager, I already know that my patients placed in observation don’t qualify to use their Medicare SNF benefits after a hospital stay. However, family members often oppose a patient’s discharge date, citing safety concerns and demanding that the patient be admitted as an inpatient for three days so that he or she can be transferred to a SNF to use the patient’s Medicare SNF benefit to pay for nursing home care. What do I do when the patient’s family members resist the plan of discharging their loved one home?

 

A: Family members often become concerned about how their loved one will manage when there is a change in the patient’s ability to provide self-care. An injury or illness that results in a hospital stay?even a short one?can prompt a temporary or permanent loss of function. Patients and families may have some knowledge that insurance could pay for some rehabilitation services.

Beginning in August 2016, the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility (NOTICE) Act requires all hospitals to explain to patients?both verbally and in writing?what it means when they are placed in observation. The NOTICE Act also compels the hospital to inform patients that they do not qualify to use their Medicare SNF benefits to recover from a hospital stay. This may result in more patients demanding that they be admitted for inpatient care.

Despite the current emphasis on population health, few patients have long-term care plans in place. This means that seniors are caught unprepared after a short stay in hospital observation care. They may not be able to return to a home that lacks a 24-hour caregiver or that has stairs they can no longer negotiate.

Patients and family members often believe that their insurance, Medicare, will pay the entire cost for care in a nursing home. They don’t fully understand the difference between skilled versus custodial care, or that if Medicare does provide coverage, it won’t pay the entire cost of care and will cover costs only for a short time.

Since explaining the above information to patients can be challenging, the smart case manager should get busy and assess what options are available to the patient. First, review the situation and determine that the patient truly does not meet inpatient criteria. When in doubt, refer the case to your physician advisor without delay.

The 2016 OPPS final rule, CMS-1633-F, effective January 1, 2016, allows the physician to document the need for inpatient care based on a set of "complex medical factors," which include:

  • Severity of signs and symptoms
  • Current medical needs
  • Risk of an adverse event occurring

 

Qualifying for inpatient care does not mean a patient must require hospitalization that extends for more than two midnights. If the patient truly does not meet inpatient criteria, next determine if he or she is a candidate for acute rehab. Acute rehab does not require a prior three-day or greater hospital stay. Does your patient have Medicare Part C? A managed Medicare plan does not require an inpatient stay of three days or more, although it does require an authorization for a SNF benefit.

Some secondary payers will cover a rehab stay in a SNF. Look at all of the patient’s insurance policies and call the payers. A Medigap policy will pay only if Medicare pays, which requires a three-day inpatient admission. Some patients, however, are covered by a spouse’s policy or have a policy from a previous job that is not a Medigap policy?these policies will potentially cover a SNF stay.

Ask if the patient has been in a nursing facility prior to the current hospital stay while using his or her Medicare SNF benefits. If the patient was in a SNF after a three-day qualifying hospital stay, and his or her discharge from the SNF was within 30 days of the expected date of admission for the new SNF stay, then chances are the patient’s stay will be covered under Medicare.

Case managers often don’t ask about private-pay funds. Patients may pay privately for care in a nursing home. Ask if the patient has a long-term care policy that will cover the cost. Alternatively, the patient’s family may assist with the funding. Some patients who own a home use a home equity line of credit to pay for the cost or apply for a reverse mortgage.

Applying for long-term care Medicaid is an option, but this can take a long time, and many nursing homes want a source of funding at the time the patient enters the facility.

A patient can also go home with family members who are able to help with care until the patient is able to make a more permanent plan. Family members who work can apply for family and medical leave while they are serving as caregivers.

Adult medical day care facilities also have all-day programs where patients can be cared for during the day while family members work. Patients can receive nursing education about their illness, undergo blood pressure and blood sugar checks, and receive physical and occupational therapy. Payment is provided through sliding-scale or private-pay funding, or by community Medicaid.

Finally, patients may benefit from skilled home health care services, covered by insurance or by private-duty aide care paid for with the patient’s (or family’s) funds.

If, after reviewing these options, none are acceptable to the patient or family, you may have to give the patient the Hospital-Issued Notice of Noncoverage, or HINN, which notifies the patient that you do not anticipate the hospital bill or subsequent rehab will be paid by Medicare. The notice may help the patient determine what course of action to take.

 

Editor’s note: Got a question? Email it to us and we’ll send it to one of our experts. Send questions to Kelly Bilodeau at [email protected].

 

10 things you should know to ensure successful discharge planning

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify strategies to comply with proposed Medicare changes to the discharge process

 

One of the more challenging aspects of a case manager’s job is helping to ensure a patient successfully transfers from the hospital to the next level of care. Under a set of proposed revisions to Medicare’s Conditions of Participation (CoP) announced in November 2015. This job may get even harder, more specific, and apply to more patients. The changes, among other things, will require hospitals, including critical access hospitals, to create discharge plans for more patients. Case managers will need a more direct plan to include patients and their caregivers in the discharge planning process, in particular taking into account their individual "goals and preferences." This discharge planning process will also need to start sooner?within 24 hours of admission instead.

So what can you do to ensure your organization is up for the challenge? In an April webinar titled "Discharge Planning: Realignment of Standards and Workflow," speaker Jackie Birmingham, RN, BSN, MS, CMAC, vice president emerita of clinical leadership for Curaspan Health Group in Newton, Massachusetts, and Janet L. Blondo, MSW, LCSW-C, LICSW, CMAC, ACM, CCM, the manager of case management at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, Maryland, offered up some compliance tips that you can use to ensure your hospital is ready:

1.Assess your current discharge process. Under the proposed changes, the discharge planning process needs to start in the first 24 hours after the patient arrives at the facility. You’ll need to identify how your current processes work in order to make sure they comply with this timeline. Identify your current workflow?specifically, who does what, why they do it, and how it’s done. Ask the following questions:

  • What is your current case management model?
  • Who’s on your team?
  • What’s their role?
  • Who does the screening right now in the current
  • Who does the patient assessment?
  • Who makes referrals when you need to refer patients for services?
  • In your current model, do the nurses perform the assessment for patients who go home while the social workers do the placements? Or do you have nurses and social workers assess everyone? "If you’re having all your patients assessed right now, well, you’re ahead of the game already, because that’s the new proposal," said Blondo.

 

Also think about why your processes were designed the way they are. "If you have it on one unit a certain way and not on another, think about what you need to do to change your practice so that perhaps every unit you can do assessment on every patient," said Blondo. "If your model is something that doesn’t seem to make sense with the proposal, what can you do to change it?"

Changes to bring the model in line could include adding technology (e.g., laptops, tablets) to speed up the process, adding staff members, or reassigning current staff members. "Perhaps some of your social workers can do UR," said Blondo. Alternatively, maybe a staff nurse can do an initial assessment instead of a case manager, or perhaps a nonclinical staff member can take over certain tasks. Taking the time to examine your current processes and think about how they can be switched up to meet the new requirements will give you the foundation for a new plan.

2.Drill documentation. Hold physicians accountable for following through and documenting discharge plans and dates. "If they’re documenting in the chart the discharge date and plan, that makes your job a little easier, because you have that in the chart already and can discuss that with the patient and their family," said Blondo. Take advantage of pre-procedure assessments by ensuring they are included in the chart, then making sure staff members follow through on that plan. "You don’t want Joint Commission or the state coming to do their survey and then you find out the assessment is not getting done because your staff has decided they want to do something different. So make sure everyone is doing the same," said Blondo.

3.Focus on delays. Use these potential discharge changes in the CoPs as an opportunity for process improvement. Look at what’s causing delays in your current process?use this information to improve systems and boost patient satisfaction. "You’re going to improve, perhaps, length of stay with this increased attention with discharge planning," said Blondo.

4.Make rounds count. If you are currently using rounds, examine what they’re being used for and how they’re working. Blondo says it’s important to ask:

  • Are rounds being used for discharge planning?
  • Are they used for the patient experience to improve your scores?
  • Are they used for throughput or for some other reason?

 

After thinking about the current purpose your rounds serve, consider how they can be modified to fit your new objectives. "Many people just do one type of rounds per day, but you could actually be creative with these. There are some hospitals that I know of that divide rounds into different parts of the day," said Blondo. "For instance, you might want to think about doing rounds early in the morning for those patients that will be discharged [later] that day." The discussion could center on determining whether those patients are prepared to leave and have the right resources. Another idea is to add rounds to the short-stay area or outpatient area for procedures done late in the day. "And if you have case managers in the emergency room, you could ask them to round for those areas, catching any patients that might need something late in the day after your regular case management staff have left," said Blondo.

5.Understand patient options. This topic includes both big-picture and smaller issues. Case managers should focus on patient-based issues, which relate to talking to the patient, as well as on setting the patient’s broader goals and preferences. The organization’s systems must be set up to give patients a choice of postacute options. But keep in mind, when working with patients, you’ll always come across those who don’t like what you’re doing or who don’t agree with you and want to go another direction. "You need to have something standardized and something that you can fall back on when you’re presented with a patient and family who, in their eyes, have a reasonable goal and clinically or medically or psychosocially, they don’t," said Birmingham. Staff members must understand the concept of patient choice. "The staff must be comfortable that they are doing the right thing for the patient and the right thing for networks and the right thing for the organization."

It’s also important for staff to understand that the patient has the right to refuse the plan. "[The patient] may be in denial. They may be suffering grief," said Birmingham. The hospital should have a policy for patients leaving against medical advice (AMA), but case management must have its own discharge planning policy for those leaving AMA. In these instances, it’s not just enough to have the patient sign a paper, but rather actively assist the patient with the transition by ensuring that he or she has transportation and needed prescriptions. Even though there is an exemption for patients who signed out AMA and are readmitted the hospital, the hospital should have a plan for how to work with these patients, said Birmingham., said Birmingham.

You should also consider planning for a patient’s deficits related to loss of functioning, whether it be ADLs or IADLs. Birmingham recommended asking the following questions:

  • Is the patient medicated and therefore unable to participate in planning?
  • Does the patient need to have a conservatorship?
  • Is there conflict among the patient’s children or the patient’s siblings?
  • Does the patient have a family or responsible person?
  • Is the patient appealing the discharge?

 

A plan should be in place to address the answers to these questions.

6.Help patients achieve their goals. This is something that organizations should have been doing all along, but there is much more emphasis on it now. A problem arises when the patient’s goals and preferences don’t align with what is medically necessary or what is reasonable and necessary. In these instances, it may be wise to involve social workers. "Look at some of the things that patients might be going through?denial, grief that might affect their decision-making at the time," said Birmingham. "With the family dynamics, there might be family members trying to convince the patient to make a decision that isn’t really what the patient wants." Ultimately, the goal is to help the patient make the decision that is best for him or her, but also to think about what is medically the best option.

7.Involve the physician. Physicians are an integral part of discharge planning, so it’s important to make sure they are actively involved in the process. This communication between the patient and the physician needs to be sensitive to generational and cultural differences. "To involve perhaps some of the older patients, just have the doctor come in and say, ‘We want you to do this,’ " said Blondo. "That might not work for younger generation or baby boomers who are used to rebelling, but if you have the doctor come in and say, ‘This is what we’re recommending and this is why’ and help the patient to understand why it is recommended."

While it may be easier to foster good communication if you’re working with a hospitalist, it can be more of a challenge if the physician is community based. "How will you manage when the patient is transferred to another facility? It’s not been a problem if you’re transferring the patient to another hospital, but if that patient is being transferred to a SNF, there haven’t been that many times when the doctors have called to the doctor in that SNF to give them an update," said Blondo. Have a plan in place to ensure the communication lines are always open.

8.Work to decrease unplanned readmissions and improve patient outcomes. "Readmissions are an old problem with new incentives," said Birmingham. Readmissions can be strongly linked to location and patient access to resources, which shows that they often depend on factors other than the medical treatment the patient received. This underscores the importance of ensuring your patients have access to things like food and transportation when they leave the facility. "Is your [patient’s] area in a food desert? No car, no supermarket store within a mile?and that makes a huge difference," said Birmingham. If this is the case, your organization might want to develop or contact an existing program that delivers food to the homes of qualifying individuals. "Home health agencies could do that too for some programs to be able to provide some fresh groceries to some patients," she said.

Also find out if your patient has been readmitted in the past, a risk factor for readmissions. "You can look to see if a patient is readmitted from an acute level of care, but you’ll need to ask the patient if they’ve been in the emergency room in the past 30 days, if they were admitted from a facility SNF," said Blondo. "Often, that information is sent with them to the hospital, but you can ask them." Ask if the patient was receiving home health services prior to admission. Encourage physicians to include this type of information in the history and physical to ensure it won’t be missed.

"We’re never going to be perfect and have no readmissions, because some patients have a legitimate need to come back to the hospital within those 30 days, but look at your readmissions. Learn from who is coming back and think about what strategies you can put in place for that," said Blondo.

9.Keep the focus where it belongs. "Discharge planning is a patient-centered function," said Birmingham. "You can do utilization review without talking to the patient. You can do quality improvement without talking to the patient and family, but you can’t do discharge planning." For this reason, discharge planning can be very rewarding to clinicians who want to be involved in the patient’s care, and to be there for them when they’re at their most vulnerable.

10.Take your cues from the experts. While Medicare’s CoPs aren’t a cookbook on how to run your organization, they are a good place to start because they’re based on years of evidence. "Many of the changes in the original CoPs happen because commenters send in a comment to CMS and CMS responded and actually changed the proposed rule," said Birmingham. "Now, will they change these proposed [discharge planning] rules? I don’t think so, and I think that’s because they’ve been published as interpretive guidelines for over two years." That means these discharge changes are likely here to stay. Like all other CoPs, they should be blended into your workflow and your strategies and partnerships with other departments, said Birmingham.

 

HCPro.com – Case Management Monthly

Case Management Monthly, September 2016

Case study

Using physician advisors as an agent for change

Learning objective:

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify the advantages and challenges of having physician advisors involved in performance improvement efforts.

 

Physician advisors (PA) are an important ally for case managers at many organizations when it comes to ensuring proper patient status. But one organization has greatly expanded the role of PAs to include performance improvement and as a result has seen improvements in everything from readmissions to length of stay.

Ven Mothkur, MD, MBA, LSSBB, the corporate physician advisor at the Franciscan Alliance, a 14-hospital health system based in Illinois and Indiana, says that the organization shifted from an outsourced group of PAs to an internal team of 13 PAs and five physician clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists over a one-year period in 2014.

"I think we’re quite traditional in some respects," he says. "The primary function of the PAs is to perform patient status reviews. But what makes the role unique is its emphasis on the PA as a leader in performance improvement."

In the past, PAs at the organization were very much in figurehead roles. That has since changed dramatically. Today, PAs at the health system are still visible leaders but are also engaged, active full-time staff members that serve as a bridge between the medical staff, case management, and the C-suite.

The PAs run daily interdisciplinary rounds and are essentially the physician representative for case management and utilization review, but they are also liaisons between the chief medical officer (CMO) and the chief financial officer (CFO), helping to translate corporate goals into actionable plans. This includes global efforts to improve continuity of care and work as part of multiple accountable care organizations.

When an issue crops up, the PA’s are in a position to investigate the challenge. For example, if the observation rate starts creeping up they may jump in and start asking questions.

"What’s happening on the ground? Is it an issue with a payer? Are they being too delayed in getting back with authorizations? Is it a delay in communication between the attending physicians and case managers? Is it a delay on the end of the physician advisor getting back?" says Mothkur.

This new, "mid-revenue cycle" position allows the PAs to focus on what’s going on in the organization as a whole and help make performance improvements in response.

The health system implemented the new PA program after looking at its outsourced PAs and the value they were bringing to the organization. "When we looked at the cost to benefit ratio, it was just not there," says Mothkur.

The health system realized that there may be a real benefit to having well-respected members of the medical staff take on this role working alongside their colleagues.

Today, the PAs at Franciscan Alliance perform regular status reviews and ensure that the hospital is running a tight ship on the front end, but they also keep an eye on all the organization’s dashboards, metrics, and trends and turn those numbers into performance improvements.

Making the shift to the new model required a multi-step process that began by taking a good look at the organization and its needs.

Below are the main steps an organization will need to take to begin a similar program.

 

Shifting the role of the PA

Step 1: Financially justifying the change. The most challenging aspect of allowing PAs to shift their focus is justifying the change to upper management. "You have to give as much of a financially justifiable ROI as possible to the CFO. They’re the ones who approve it," says Mothkur.

When analyzing data to determine whether changing the focus of PAs, consider all the soft returns on investment, such as decreases in the observation rate, fewer denials, more medical staff engagement, or a higher case mix index, he says.

Step 2: Assessing the need. What are the problems your organization wants to address and will they be best solved by a wholly internal group of PAs or a hybrid model?

Some organizations use internal PAs during the week and switch to outsourced PAs to handle calls on nights and weekends, says Mothkur.

"I think the first step in doing this is to look at where you have huge gaps," he says. One starting point might be to look at the organization’s gross revenue write-offs. If this number is beyond national benchmarks, there may be an immediate and readily apparent benefit to having PAs move in and address the problem areas you find.

Also look at your mix of physicians. Are they primarily employed or independent? It may be easier to gain compliance from employed doctors with educational initiatives while independent physicians may require more intervention from PAs to accomplish the same goals.

Also look for other areas that could use improvement. For example, if your denials are high then your observation rate is high, or you are having trouble with payers then PAs can help smooth over some of these problem areas.

The PAs at Franciscan Alliance have become the oil that keeps the machine humming. If the oil was not there, the machine wouldn’t be operating as effectively. "There are now gaps that are picked up, there is improved compliance, nurses are happier, CM is ecstatic, the CFO has answers to what they’re seeing in numbers, the CMO has a second in command," says Mothkur.

Step 3: Choose the right PA. Finding the right person to fill this challenging role can be difficult. "It’s a matter of identifying the right person who is willing to do it all," says Mothkur. But this person also has to be someone who has the respect of the medical staff, someone who is ready to move on from practicing medicine daily to an administrative role and is excited about the opportunity to make improvements at a hospital level.

This job is not for the physician who took the opportunity in the past to scale back and work remotely, he says.

"Our PAs have to come to the hospital, attend leadership meetings, sit in the medical staff office for lunch, just to be there," he says. "This is very much a full-time job. The docs that we’ve gotten into it say it’s harder than clinical practice."

Often the PAs work 50 hour weeks. They also have to have thick skin, because they need to push back against their peers in some instances.

"It’s hard to find someone like I just described," says Mothkur.

To make its selections, Franciscan Alliance asked the CMO, among others, to identify potential candidates who were well respected, possessed leadership qualities, and were potentially interested in leaving clinical practice. Also look for physicians who have an appetite for looking at data and analyzing numbers.

Step 4: Ensure proper training. Once candidates are identified, training should begin as quickly as possible, says Mothkur. In the absence of formal training programs, organizations often have to cobble together their own programs, which should involve the following:

  • Getting the candidate introduced to and embedded in the case management and CDI departments.
  • Linking PA with educational resources, such as professional organizations like the American Case Management Association, Case Management Society of America, ACDIS, or the American College of Physician Advisors.
  • Ensuring familiarity with different payers and health plans and ensuring proper education on InterQual® and MCG® (formerly Milliman) standards.
  • Encouraging PAs to attend conferences on related topics and to join industry list-servs where PA topics are discussed. "The training is really very much on-the-job training, learning as you go," says Mothkur.

 

Step 4: Follow up. After the initial adjustment period, determine how the PAs are performing by polling case management and other departments, including the medical staff. Don’t be surprised if the medical staff is a little agitated by PAs, after all the job can be and should be a little adversarial.

The relationship between case management and PAs should always be one of mutual respect. A good PA will have respect and empathy for the increasingly complex and evolving case management role. A PA should have the attitude of "how can I help you," says Mothkur.

"There is often a shared bonding [between the PA and case management] over war stories because you’re fighting the same payers," he says.

A functional and positive relationship can pay dividends.

Franciscan Alliance has not only saved money by using an internal group of physicians. The other benefits of this approach include a reduction in the following:

  • Denials
  • Inappropriate admissions
  • Avoidable days
  • Readmissions
  • Observation length of stay
  • Overall length of stay

 

And case management has an important ally to support them and to help drive organizational change. "For case management it’s about knowing they have this leader and champion standing behind them that they never had," says Mothkur.

 

NOTICE Act confusion continued into the summer

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify challenges related to the lack of information about the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice and the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility Act.

 

Hospitals were struggling this summer to comply with the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility (NOTICE) Act, which was signed by President Barack Obama August 6, requiring hospitals to provide a verbal and written notice of outpatient status to any patient in observation who has been in the hospital for more than 24-hours.

With only a preliminary form on the PRA website to guide them (http://ow.ly/7TPE302eSiM), many organizations were finding more questions than answers in their quest to comply with the regulation.

"[The preliminary form] does not have an Office of Management and Budget approval number, so it is not finalized," says Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM, vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at Accretive Health in Chicago. "And there are several comments that it is not written to the federal standard for understanding by someone with limited education, so it may not even be approved in its present form. CMS has also said they will give further guidance on the requirement for verbal explanation so it is hard to know who will be allowed to present and explain the form."

In July, Janet Blondo, MSW, LCSW-C, LICSW, CMAC, ACM, CCM, C-ASWCM, ACSW, the manager of case management at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, Maryland, was still looking to have a number of questions about the rule answered.

"I contacted the Maryland Hospital Association who researched this issue," she says. "The staff at MHA are conferring with experts at the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene about my questions and concerns and expect to have a response soon."

This lingering uncertainty not only was making it difficult for hospitals to start planning for compliance, but also led some to speculate that the compliance date would be extended.

The Ohio Hospital Association (OHA) in June told its members that the requirement date could be pushed back until October.

"The implementation of the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice, or MOON, was set for August 6, 2016. However, as hospitals await the details of the federal fiscal year 2017 inpatient prospective payment system final rule, CMS is now stating that the MOON requirement date may be pushed back to October. Stay tuned for a final decision on the MOON implementation date," the OHA stated in a written release (http://ow.ly/z0qZ302fmvH). But as of mid-summer this talk still amounted to unsubstantiated rumors, says Hirsch.

"Unless someone knows someone at CMS, there is no official word. I did read many of the comments to the rule and many asked for a six-month delay. My guess is that they cannot delay the implementation since it is a law but they will delay enforcement for three months," he says.

In the meantime, organizations were trying to do what they could to get ready.

The NOTICE Act stipulates hospitals must inform patients within 36 hours from the start of the service, or at the time of discharge, about their status.

The goal of the legislation is to ensure patients are aware of their status and what it might mean for them financially?in particular, how it might affect their post-acute care options.

Patients often (wrongly) assume that if they’re in a hospital bed, they are an inpatient.

They also don’t understand the implications of outpatient billing status.

One of the biggest issues that can crop up when a patient’s care orders place him or her on observation status is that he or she will not be eligible for Medicare coverage for a post-acute stay in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), and instead may need to pay more out of pocket. Medicare currently only covers SNF extended care rehabilitation services for patients who have three consecutive inpatient days in a hospital. For example, one day in observation and two days as inpatient equals three days in the hospital, but does not meet the three-day inpatient day stay requirement because it only includes two inpatient days.

"An Office of Inspector General report found that the average out-of-pocket cost for SNF services not covered by Medicare was more than $ 10,000 per beneficiary," states a press release issued by the congressional leaders who promoted the bill (http://ow.ly/S6JSB).

To comply with the rule, hospitals will now need to designate someone?in some cases it may be the case manager?to provide this notification.

Stefani Daniels, RN, MSNA, ACM, CMAC, founder and managing partner of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., in Pompano Beach, Florida, says a few of her clients were trying to get the form included in a packet of admission papers that are given to each Medicare patient to sign.

But even so, as of press time most organizations had more questions than answers about compliance. Stay tuned for updates in future issues of CMM.

 

Ask the expert

Understanding nuances of patient status and therapeutic services

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify strategies to comply with condition code 44 and the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON), and understand rules related to some aspects of therapeutic services.

 

Assigning the correct patient status is a constant challenge for hospitals and the case managers who are charged with ensuring these decisions are accurate. CMM often gets questions from readers on related topics and we forward them to our experts to get the answers. This month’s questions were answered by Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM, vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at Accretive Health in Chicago. 

 

Q: If a Medicare patient is downgraded from inpatient to observation is it expected that the patient will be issued the MOON and condition code 44 will be used on the claim? 

 

A: First, it must be noted that all patients who are downgraded using the condition code 44 process are being downgraded from inpatient status to outpatient status. If the patient then needs continuing hospital care (i.e., is not ready to be discharged), then observation can also be ordered. If observation is needed and is ordered, the MOON will be required only if the patient receives observation for 24 or more hours from the time of this order for observation services.  

 

Q: I have a question about how to interpret the CMS Standard Operating Procedures. If a requisition/order for physical therapy treatment is received at a hospital facility and is not authenticated (e.g., signed, timed, dated) by a community physician who is not credentialed at the hospital, is it true that facility can begin treatment but the order must be authenticated when it will be filed in the record?

A: Therapy services (e.g., physical, occupational, speech-language pathology) are unique in that an actual order from a physician or non-physician practitioner is not required (see the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15, Section 220.1, at www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/bp102c15.pdf). The following is required:

  • The patient must be under the care of a physician
  • The therapy must be provided under a plan of care
  • The physician must certify that plan of care by way of signature and date

 

In this case, the therapy provider may develop a plan of care and forward it to the physician for certification. Treatment may begin while awaiting the return of the signed plan of care. But the organization staff should do their best to get the signed certification returned within 30 days of start of therapy services.

Because the physician is not on the medical staff, the therapy provider may want to confirm that the physician is enrolled with Medicare and therefore eligible to order and certify services on Medicare recipients.

Got a question on any case management topic that you’d like to ask our experts? Email it to Kelly Bilodeau at [email protected].

 

Bonus question

Q: What do you do with a patient who does not have a safe discharge plan, but does not meet inpatient criteria and has been in observation status for 48 hours?

A: The original instruction from CMS that still stands is that we give the patient an advance beneficiary notice that says his or her care in the hospital setting is no longer medically necessary and is not being billed to Medicare and that he or she will be financially responsible.

 

HCPro.com – Case Management Monthly

Case Management Monthly, October 2016

Case study

MOON requirement delayed in IPPS final rule

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify details of the delay to the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON) notification requirement

 

Hospitals got a last-minute reprieve from the MOON notification requirement, which was set to go into effect August 6. Citing the need for additional time to revise the standardized notification form that hospitals will need to use to notify patients about the financial implications of being assigned to observation services, CMS moved back the start date for the requirement in the 2017 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) final rule to "no later than 90 days," after the final version of the form is approved.

CMS released the new draft of the form August 1 and planned to accept public comments for 30 days. Some experts said that this could mean a January 1, 2017, start date for the requirement, but that remains to be determined, says Stefani Daniels, RN, MSNA, ACM, CMAC, founder and managing partner of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., in Pompano Beach, Florida.

 

A reprieve for struggling hospitals

The decision to push back the notification requirement start date was likely a relief for many hospitals who reported struggling this summer to comply with the notification requirement, formally known as the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility (NOTICE) Act, which was signed by President Barack Obama August 6. (See related story on p. 3.) The act requires hospitals to provide a verbal and written notice of outpatient status to any patient in observation who has been in the hospital for more than 24 hours, stipulating that hospitals must inform patients within 36 hours from the start of the service, or at the time of discharge, about their status.

The goal of the legislation is to ensure patients are aware of their status and what it might mean for them financially?in particular, how it might affect their postacute care options.

Patients often (wrongly) assume that if they’re in a hospital bed, they are an inpatient.

They also don’t understand the implications of outpatient billing status.

One of the biggest issues that can crop up when a patient’s care orders place him or her on observation status is that he or she will not be eligible for Medicare coverage for a postacute stay in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), and instead may need to pay more out of pocket. Medicare currently only covers SNF extended care rehabilitation services for patients who have three consecutive inpatient days in a hospital. For example, one day in observation and two days as inpatient equals three days in the hospital, but does not meet the three-day inpatient day stay requirement because it only includes two inpatient days.

"An Office of Inspector General report found that the average out-of-pocket cost for SNF services not covered by Medicare was more than $ 10,000 per beneficiary," stated a press release issued by the congressional leaders who promoted the bill (http://ow.ly/S6JSB).

To comply with the rule, hospitals will now need to designate someone?in some cases it may be the case manager?to provide this notification.

 

A changing requirement

The 2017 IPPS final rule shed a few additional details about the notification requirement, including that "hospitals and CAHs may deliver the MOON to individuals receiving observation services as an outpatient before such individuals have received more than 24 hours if "the individual is transferred, discharged, or admitted as an inpatient," says Daniels. The final rule also states that insurers must notify patients of any changes in status initiated by the insurer before he or she has left the hospital.

"Too often, hospital business office reps are informed that a level of care change to observation services is being made by the insurer long after the patient has left the hospital. This could result in the risk of noncompliance with the NOTICE Act," says Daniels.

CMS issued a revised version of the MOON document from the first draft of the document, which was published on the PRA website (http://ow.ly/7TPE302eSiM). (See the new version of the form on pp. 7?8.)

"CMS has made substantive changes to the MOON from the first iteration. The old MOON cannot be used," says Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM, vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at Accretive Health in Chicago.

The new version of the MOON document requires a narrative outlining why the patient is being placed in outpatient status with observation services. "CMS says that in the future it will consider model language for use in this section. The MOON ‘additional information’ section may be used to add information to meet any state law observation notification requirements that differ from the MOON federal requirements but the MOON may not be used for non-Medicare/Medicare Advantage (MA) patients," says Hirsch.

The final rule also says that the MOON is required for any Medicare/MA patient who receives 24 hours of observation and must be given to the patient within 36 hours. But CMS allows the MOON to be given to any Medicare/MA patient who receives observation services.

"On the other hand, CMS ‘encourages hospitals not to deliver the MOON at the initiation of observation services,’ at which point patients may be overwhelmed and confused," says Hirsch.

When organizations are determining which patient should get the MOON, observation hour counting should begin with the order for observation. The 24-hour period is consecutive and "carved out hours" should not be considered, says Hirsch.

CMS doesn’t dictate which staff members can deliver the MOON, rather leaving that up to the hospital or CAH to decide.

In addition, it states that patients don’t have the right to appeal their placement in outpatient status with observation services, says Hirsch. "CMS removed the QIO quality complaint reference on the MOON to avoid confusion about this," he says.

Organizations should note that the MOON is required for patients in whom Medicare is a second payer and for all patients with MA plans even though the copayments and SNF requirements for those patients may differ from those described on the MOON.

Stay tuned for future updates on this topic as CMS works on the MOON and other details of the requirement.

 

Getting ready for MOON

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify challenges related to implementing the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON) and the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility (NOTICE) Act.

 

When CMS decided to postpone the MOON notification requirement a few days before the scheduled implementation date of August 6, it provided a welcome reprieve for many hospital staff members who were scrambling to get ready (see related story on p. 1).

"We were almost ready to go, however, plans are actually now on hold until the final draft is approved, in probably January," says Frantzie Firmin, MS, RN, director, utilization management and care coordination of Brigham & Women’s Hospital in Boston.

The hospital’s preparations included development of a process to deliver the notification to patients who needed it.

"Our organization, Partners Healthcare System, has decided to address the MOON implementation systemwide. As a result, we set up a case management expert panel, which is a collaborative practice committee that meets regularly to address and develop a plan that will ensure regulatory compliance across the system," she says.

The group worked with the electronic medical system team to develop an automated workflow directly within the system. "Each hospital has its own work queue set up," says Firmin. "The Medicare patients in the work queue are only those in observation status that have been there 12 hours or more."

Care coordinators and insurance support nurses have access to the work queue, which allows them to identify their observation patients. "Furthermore, we have also added functionality in [our electronic system] to document that the notice has been given," she says. Staff members are able to check off the status and date of receipt for each patient, and then the patient’s name moves out of the work queue.

The system also allows the insurance support nurse or care coordinator to print the form and provide a copy to the patient before discharge.

Other organizations had taken similar steps.

RWJ Barnabas Health in Toms River, New Jersey, also formed a small task force to ensure compliance with MOON, says Shawna Grossman Kates, MSW, MBA, LSW, CMA, the organization’s case and bed management director. But while MOON is new to them, this type of observation notification requirement is not. New Jersey hospitals have already been subject to an even more restrictive patient notification requirement for several years, she says.

Hospitals in New Jersey must issue a letter to patients detailing their status at the time of placement.

Sometimes that’s difficult to do. It requires different portals because notifications may affect everyone, from the elderly adult coming in through the ER to pediatrics observation patients or labor and delivery observation patients.

"To some degree, the emphasis on MOON has instigated a renewed attention to make sure we’re in compliance with the state of New Jersey’s regulations and that we have continuity and standard practices on a systemwide basis," she says.

Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston has come up with a workflow for how the form will be delivered and a communication plan to deliver it, says Nancy Sullivan, MBA, CMAC, executive director of case management at the organization.

But like other organizations, plans at Massachusetts General Hospital are on hold as CMS prepares the final version of the new MOON form.

Part of the hospital’s initial plan to comply with MOON prior to the postponement was to print a daily report that listed the patients who would need the notice and to use case management resource specialist staff members, who provide support to case managers, to deliver the notification. The hospital worked with staff members to develop a training script.

 

A challenging requirement

While case management experts agree that notifying patients and giving them information about their status is the right thing to do, there are significant challenges they are trying to work past to make the notification a reality.

For example, CMS’ new proposed form, says Kates, is not written in simple language that is easy for most patients to understand. "The Medicare MOON document is not third-grade reading level language," she says. This means that unless CMS makes changes to the form before finalizing it, there will be an additional burden on staff members delivering the notification to clearly explain it to patients. Many organizations will likely need to come up with simpler materials to augment the form to help patients understand the complex subject matter.

Organizations are not permitted to modify the finalized version of the MOON form. "But many are coming up with a one-page handout or an FAQ, or adapting their state hospital association FAQ on observation documents," says Kates.

While CMS estimates the notification process would take about 15 minutes per patient, says Sullivan, it’s likely to take much more staff time due to the complexity of the material.

"The kinds of topics that they plan to include in the letter are complicated," she says.

The challenging nature of these discussions was reinforced by a recent conversation Sullivan had with an elderly family member whose husband was admitted to the hospital.

The woman had called Sullivan in hopes of having her explain all the hospital jargon and insurance-speak. Trying to explain the billing nuances involved in skilled nursing facilities and Medicare Advantage is no easy task, says Sullivan?particularly if the family is in the midst of a medical crisis.

"I feel like the patient should know what their financial responsibilities will be, I support the concept," she says. But at the same time she says she also understands the real challenges hospital staff members involved in delivering that information will face.

Another factor complicating the notification is that it’s unclear how many languages the document will be available in. At Massachusetts General Hospital, patients speak a multitude of languages so the hospital will likely need translation services when delivering the written and verbal notices.

A third challenge is having a system in place to ensure all the patients who need notifications, get them.

"The biggest implementation challenge will be to ensure we have a mechanism in place to capture all the patients that have been in observation across the hospital," says Firmin. "Although we have a dedicated observation unit, we often have observation patients overflowing across the hospital."

In order for the notification process to be successful, staff members?including nursing staff?should be engaged in the process, says Sullivan. Ideally, nursing staff should have a working knowledge of these issues, particularly in the event a case manager isn’t available and a patient starts asking questions.

It remains to be seen what the final MOON form will look like. CMS opened a 30-day comment period on the MOON August 1 and has said that the rule will go into effect no more than 90 days from the finalization of the form.

Based on this timeline, Kates says she anticipates a January 1 start date, but that remains to be seen.

In the meantime, organizations will be waiting to see the final result of this process, and from there determining how to comply.

 

Ask the Expert

Questions about MOON and CMS notification regulations

Learning objective

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:

  • Identify strategies to comply with the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON) notification and understand rules related to navigating the skilled benefit for Medicare

 

One of the topics raising the most questions in case management today is related to the MOON notification requirement. Hospitals were struggling this summer to comply with the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility (NOTICE) Act, which was signed by President Barack Obama August 6, requiring hospitals to provide a verbal and written notice of outpatient status to any patient in observation who has been in the hospital for more than 24 hours. Just prior to the August 6 implementation date, hospitals received word that the notification requirement would be delayed pending approval of modifications made to the government’s notification form. (See related story on p. 1.)

But despite the delay, case managers still have questions about MOON, which were answered this month by Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM, vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at Accretive Health in Chicago. Janet L. Blondo, MSW, LCSW-C, LICSW, CMAC, ACM, CCM, C-ASWCM, ACSW, manager of case management at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, Maryland, and Peggy Rossi, BSN, MPA, CCM, a consulting associate for the Center for Case Management in Wellesley, Massachusetts, also tackled a Medicare notification question this month.

 

Q: What is the consequence if we miss giving a patient who meets the MOON criteria the notice? Has there been an update if the observation hours will need a modifier or the claim a value or condition code to show that the notice was given?

 

Hirsch: CMS has not stated the consequence of not issuing a MOON. CMS will be updating its survey tools in the future and may address it there. CMS stated in the IPPS final rule that, "all monitoring and enforcement of the MOON will be consistent with our oversight procedures for other hospital delivered notices."

 

Q: Now that CMS has released a new version of the MOON form, how should my organization proceed?

 

Hirsch: CMS released a new version of the MOON August 1, but it must go through the public comment period. After that time, it will be issued an Office of Management and Budget number and then there will be a 90-day implementation period. Until that time, hospitals should follow any state regulations for notices to outpatients and patients receiving observation services.

 

Q: I read your article on navigating the skilled benefit for Medicare and I have a few related questions. My understanding is that you can only use a Hospital-Issued Notice of Noncoverage (HINN) for inpatient, so you could use it if less than a three-day stay. We have been giving Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN) for our traditional Medicare patients that are observation when families are not timely on getting a skilled nursing facility secured to those patients that require it. Is this correct?

 

Rossi: The HINNs have varied uses, and if a HINN is used it should be the HINN1, as this is a letter used to deny any admission?it is a preadmission denial and is issued when it is known the stay will not be covered. Another letter to use will be an ABN, as the ABN is a letter designed by CMS to deny outpatient services, when it is known they will not be covered.

 

Blondo: HINN1 is known as a preadmission/admission HINN and can be given prior to a hospital stay when it is expected that the entire stay will be denied for coverage. So if a patient was brought to the hospital ED for the purpose of SNF placement and the physician is writing an order to admit to inpatient, many hospitals have their ED case manager intervene by giving the patient and family the HINN1. The physician does not have to agree with the issuance of the denial notice. Seeing the denial notice often convinces the patient and family to choose another plan of care for the patient, and no admission takes place.

For patients placed in observation, ABNs are used for Medicare Part B outpatient services when it is believed Medicare will no longer pay for the services it normally would cover. Some common reasons one would issue an ABN include when services are not reasonable and necessary or when the care is custodial. So if the family hasn’t moved fast enough to take that available SNF bed and the patient’s care is considered custodial, it is correct to issue the ABN.

For more information, see Medicare Advance Beneficiary Notices, October 2015, Medicare Learning Network, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at: www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/abn_booklet_icn006266.pdf.

 

Got a question on any case management topic that you’d like to ask our experts? Email it to Kelly Bilodeau at [email protected].

 

HCPro.com – Case Management Monthly

E/M Modifier article in Healthcare Business Monthly

Did anyone notice that this article states "Modifier 57 is used when an E/M service is rendered within the three days preceding, or on the same day as, a procedure with a 90-day global period." I’ve always been instructed that modifier 57 is used for ONE day preceding, or on the same day as, a major procedure. I checked the 2 resources at the bottom of the article and I can find nothing that states you use mod 57 for up to 3 days preceding the procedure. Does anyone have any information on this?

Thank you!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Join the Monthly Local Chapter Q&A for Officers

We look forward to our monthly calls with officers because we learn so much just by listening. We invite you to spend time listening with us to other officers as they share and brainstorm. You may even want to join in! Two great ideas from our call in August are: Using committees can strengthen the […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

Nephrology monthly dialysis billing – professional

I’m reaching out to other nephrology billers to see if anyone knows if amending a monthly dialysis limited note to a comprehensive note is a legal, acceptable, and common practice that you have done or heard of.

For example: A provider does a limited visit earlier in the month. Then, when the provider is at the dialysis unit again later in the month to do a comprehensive visit, the patient is absent. By the end of the month, there is only 1 limited visit captured for that patient – which means we are unable to bill out anything for that month. If the provider that did the original limited visit can justify that the work they have done falls under the guidelines of a comprehensive visit, can that provider go back and amend their note to a comprehensive visit so that we can bill out for that month?

Any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
Amanda

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Join the Monthly Local Chapter Q&A for Officers

Here are three things we learned from our session in July: The third week of the month seems to be the most successful for getting attendees out, and Thursday is typically the best day to meet. “Networking is mentoring”, according to Rik Salomon, secretary/treasurer of the Charlotte NC Chapter. He said that as officers they […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

Financial Question: How to properly pull monthly report for billing department?

I run a monthly closing report for a clinic using NextGen EMR, the claims billed out are always more than the payments we received, they are never matched. For example, the charge amount is $ 160,000 with the adjustment payments of $ 287,000, the payments received is only $ 61,000. So how should I pulled the monthly closing reports the proper way, should I use the post payment dates or the service dates?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Healthcare Business Monthly Article from Feb 2018

Hello,

I need help understanding the article titled "2018 OPPS Payments" on page 38. In particular the paragraph “Packaging Expansion Continues” in the article it states, “Physician offices are not eligible for the payment of a visit if drug administration services are provided.” I take this to mean that Medicare will no longer pay IM administration code 96372 with an E/M code.

The CMS NCCI edits effective Jan 1, 2018 do not reflect this edit. I also have not seen an email from Medicare confirming this packaging of services.

Can anybody clarify or confirm this?

Thank-You,
Nancy Jensen, CPC

Medical Billing and Coding Forum