Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Correct Coding for a Micro implatanable Sacral Nerve Stimulator

Unique tiny sacral nerve stimulator billing question:

This is a percutaneous implantable micro stimulator device w/o battery, no leads need to be connected, no pulse generator pocket needs to be created.
Powered externally.

The device is considered to be an all-in-one, Micro implant with integrated circuit (IC) for pulse control, and electrodes, entirely assembled within a 2-mm diameter, 3.5-mm height device small enough to fit inside a catheter.

If the electrodes and the generator are all inside the device, and the physician makes an incision for insertion by an introducer needle, would we bill both the following?:
• 64561 Percutaneous implantation of neurostimulator electrode array; sacral nerve (transforaminal placement) including image guidance, if performed -and-
• 64590 Insertion or replacement of peripheral or gastric neurostimulator pulse generator or receiver, direct or inductive coupling

Basic procedure micro-implant for Sacral Nerve Stimulation:

o Physician uses scalpel to do a very small starter incision adjacent to the needle, followed by insertion of an introducer/dilator/sheath.

o Both the dilator and needle are then withdrawn providing clear access to the target anatomy just adjacent to the sacral nerve.

o All-in-one device is placed adjacent to the sacral nerve by advancing it through the sheath. Physician has the option of using fluoroscopy throughout this procedure as tooling and implant are radiopaque

Any advice is greatly appreciated!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Finger radial digital nerve exploration

Hello Fellow Coders,

Does anyone know if cpt 64702 can be used for exploration only. Pt has dist finger closed fractures and developed absent sensation so the MD wants to confirm the digital nerve was not lacerated as well. Surgeon incised middle aspect of the finger with exploration and closure.

I’ve exhausted my resources and not sure since 64702 states Neuroplasty as well.

Thanks in advance

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

51/59 Nerve Block Modifiers – bundling issue

Hello-

I work for a neurology office – having some difficulty with a bundling issue.
On an extreme case I could bill for one patient:

64450
64405
20553
64615
96372

How i was trained – typically I would use:
64450 – 50, 59
64405 – 59
20553
64615
96372 – 59

BCBS – pays for all minus 20553 – UHC pays for 64615/96372 and 64405 – but not 20553/64450
We have a lot of UHC patients so i’m wondering if anyone has any advice
I’ve tried leaving 64450/64405/20553 blank as i’ve seen suggested for someone else – they bundled – i’ve tried using 51 modifier, which then 20553/64450 was paid but not 64405

Appreciate any advice – thanks so much!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

nerve transfer

Hi All,

A doctor performed an ulnar nerve transferred to the first motor branch of the flexor carpi ulnaris (64905) at the medial aspect of left elbow. Also billing cpt code 64718 (neuroplasty) he transferred the anterior interosseous nerve end to side to the motor fascicle of the ulnar nerve at the level of the distal forearm. When is it okay to report both codes together since there is a cci edit.

Thank you so much everyone for your replies

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Dictation requirements for intercostal nerve injections

I am in serious need of help! I am assisting with our Rheumatology clinic and even though I have a background in Ortho I am not too familiar with this procedure.
I requested clarification from the provider on this note:

NOTE: The procedure is an intercostal nerve block. The reason for the procedure is severe intercostal neuralgia and pain. The medication injected for each injection was 1 cc of 1% lidocaine mixed with 0.5 cc of triamcinalone acetonide ( 15mg/ml). This was only (1) injection with kenalog.
The patient also received 8 additional injections of 1% lidocaine only with no epi for a total of 9 injections.
*
Sedation medication: None
Complications: None
*
Technique: Consent was signed, time out was done to identify the target area with the patient. This was done by careful palpation. Tenderness was elicited over the intercostal nerve roots by palpation which caused reproducible pain. Then using a 27 gauge 1.5 inch Monject needle the nerve root was injected very carefully by gently advancing the needle on a 20 degree angle until it dipped just below the nerve. The area was then injected at multiple sites along the nerve dermatome.

He is wanting to bill out 64421 and I just asked what nerves he was injected and he told me to just bill it out as he has always done it this way?
I am not able to find anything that just says this is ok…
I would appreciate any help.
Thank you

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Potential Genicular nerve & Si Joint Ablation Codes in 2020

In the 2019 OPPS/ASC final rule, it appears CMS published a comment from someone who states they are aware of the planned creation of CPT codes for radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves and SI joint in 2020
____________________________________

https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-insp…2018-24243.pdf

Summary of Comment Page 321-322
The commenter also recommended that CMS develop two new HCPCS G-codes to describe the performance of radiofrequency nerve ablation procedures. The commenter suggested that one of the G-codes could be created to describe procedures involving the genicular nerve, and the other G-code could be created to describe procedures involving the sacroiliac joint. The commenter further recommended that both of these G-codes be created to describe procedures describing non-opioid treatment alternatives for chronic pain management, and to assign both of these newly created G-codes to Level 2 Nerve Procedures APC 5232 based on its recommended three-level APC structure, with an estimated payment rate of $ 2,431. The commenter was aware that Category I CPT codes are in development, but will not be ready for release until CY 2020 at the earliest.

Summary of Response
With regard to the request to establish new HCPCS G-codes, although new CPT codes are in development for release for the CY 2020 update, we note that it does not appear that a request for new temporary Category III codes was made for CY 2019. Nonetheless, we intend to take the commenter’s request for new HCPCS G-codes under advisement.

Medicare Program: Changes to Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems and Quality Reporting Programs

17. Nerve Procedures and Services (APCs 5431 through 5432)

Comment: One commenter suggested that CMS restructure the two-level Nerve Procedure APCs (APCs 5431 and 5432) to provide more payment granularity for the types of procedures included in the APCs by creating a third level. The commenter believed that there is a substantial payment differential between the procedures assigned to Level 1 Nerve Procedures APC 5431 and Level 2 Nerve Procedures APC 5432, and that the current payment for some of these procedures does not adequately cover the cost of providing the services. The commenter further stated that, as an example, the procedures described by CPT codes 64633 (Destruction by neurolytic agent, paravertebral facet joint nerve(s), with imaging guidance (fluoroscopy or CT); cervical or thoracic, single facet joint) and 64635 (destruction by neurolytic agent paravertebral facet joint nerve(s), with imaging guidance (fluoroscopy or CT); lumbar or sacral, single facet joint), which are assigned to APC 5431 with a proposed payment rate of approximately $ 1,644, while the geometric means for each of the procedures described by CPT codes 64633 and 64635 are $ 1,482 and $ 1,729, respectively. The commenter recommended a potential geometric mean cost for a potential three-level APC structure within the Nerve Procedures APCs and submitted a three-level APC structure, along with estimated payment rates, which is shown in the table below.
The commenter also recommended that CMS develop two new HCPCS G-codes to describe the performance of radiofrequency nerve ablation procedures. The commenter suggested that one of the G-codes could be created to describe procedures involving the genicular nerve, and the other G-code could be created to describe procedures involving the sacroiliac joint. The commenter further recommended that both of these G-codes be created to describe procedures describing non-opioid treatment alternatives for chronic pain management, and to assign both of these newly created G-codes to Level 2 Nerve Procedures APC 5232 based on its recommended three-level APC structure, with an estimated payment rate of $ 2,431. The commenter was aware that Category I CPT codes are in development, but will not be ready for release until CY 2020 at the earliest. Therefore, the commenter requested that CMS create such G-codes in order to allow for physicians and hospitals to report the performance of the procedures and use of the approach, and to be paid for utilization of these procedures in the interim. The commenter supplied a suggested descriptor for the G-code for the genicular nerve as: Radiofrequency nerve ablation; genicular nerves, including imaging guidance, when performed. The commenter also supplied a suggested descriptor for the APC Level Number of Singles Used to Calculate APC Geometric Mean Total Frequency of Claims APC Geometric Mean Cost Estimated Payment Rate Number of HCPCS Codes 2 Times Rule Violation 5431 113,284 116,158 $ 1,583 $ 1,555 15 0 5432 15,035 17,051 $ 2,476 $ 2,431 58 0 5433 1,757 1,763 $ 5,373 $ 5,276 28 0 G-code for the sacroiliac joint as: Radiofrequency never ablation; sacroiliac joint, including imaging guidance, when performed. Response: We appreciate the commenter’s suggestions. However, at this time, we believe that the current two-level structure Nerve Procedures APCs provide an appropriate distinction between the resource costs at each level and clinical homogeneity. We will continue to review the APCs’ structure to determine if additional granularity is necessary for this APC family in future rulemaking. In addition, we believe that more analysis of such groupings is necessary before adopting such change. With regard to the request to establish new HCPCS G-codes, although new CPT codes are in development for release for the CY 2020 update, we note that it does not appear that a request for new temporary Category III codes was made for CY 2019. Nonetheless, we intend to take the commenter’s request for new HCPCS G-codes under advisement. Therefore, after consideration of the public comment received, we are finalizing our CY 2019 Nerve Procedures APCs two-level structure, as proposed. We refer readers to Addendum A to this final rule with comment period for the complete list of APCs and their payment rates. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum B to this final rule with comment period for the payment rates for all codes reported under the OPPS. Both Addendum A and Addendum B are available via the Internet on the CMS website.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Morton’s Neuroma and Nerve Implantation???

NEED HELP WITH CPT CODING FOR THE FOLLOWING OP NOTE:

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS 1. Morton’s neuroma, 3rd interspace, left foot, causing chronic discomfort.
2. Morton’s neuroma, 3rd interspace, right foot, causing chronic discomfort.
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Same.
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: 1. Excision of Morton’s neuroma, 3rd interspace, left foot, under loupe magnification.
2. Nerve implantation, left foot.
3. Excision of Morton’s neuroma, 3rd interspace, right foot.
4. Nerve implantation, right foot.
ANESTHESIA: Local with intravenous sedation per Dr. Scott Himelstein.
FLUIDS: Crystalloid.
ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: 20 mL.
TOURNIQUET: Bilateral ankle pneumatic tourniquets to 250 mmHg.
COMPLICATIONS: None.

INDICATIONS: This 49-year-old female has been followed in my outpatient clinics over the past year with multiple foot complaints. Her main issue has been Morton’s neuromas that have been treated conservatively with cortisone injections, orthotic management, NSAIDs, and attempt at sclerosing agent injections. She did obtain relief for short periods of time with the injections — making the diagnosis definitive, but unfortunately, the injections did not ameliorate her symptoms. She is requesting operative intervention in an attempt to address her underlying structural/functional foot deformities in an attempt to ameliorate her symptoms.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: Neurovascular status was grossly intact of the bilateral extremities. Pedal pulses are +2. There is pain with palpation of the 3rd intermetatarsal space with distal and proximal paresthesias, positive Mulder’s. There is no pain at the 2nd or 4th interspace area. No pain at the lesser metatarsophalangeal joint areas bilateral.

CONSENT: The above diagnosis was established and the procedures recommended. The procedure, postoperative care, and possible complications, including but not exclusive to risks of infection, delayed or nonhealing, continued pain at the area, possibility of numbness and/or nerve entrapment and chronic pain syndrome/RSD/CRPS, and stump neuroma formation. Heather relates she accepts the above stated risks and complications and requests the above operative intervention. No medical contraindications were identified to preclude the above surgery.

Prior to the patient being brought into the Operating Room, she was administered 2 grams Ancef for general orthopedic prophylaxis.

OPERATIVE SUMMARY: The patient was brought to the Operating Room and placed on the table in the supine position. Intravenous sedation was administered per Dr. Himelstein. At that point in time, Dr. Miller performed a local field block consisting of 0.5% Marcaine with dexamethasone phosphate in a 9:1 ratio over the proximal surgical sites of the both feet. Both feet and legs were prepped and draped in the usual aseptic manner. Pneumatic ankle tourniquets were placed, and after elevation to 60 degrees for 3 minutes, inflated to 250 mmHg.

1. Excision of Morton’s neuroma, 3rd interspace, left foot, under loupe magnification. Attention was directed to the 3rd intermetatarsal space where approximately 3 cm incision was made and under loupe magnification the procedure was performed. The incision was deepened, vital structures identified and retraced, bleeding vessels cauterized per electrocautery. Both sharp and blunt dissection was carried down to the deep transverse intermetatarsal ligament where it was identified and transected to reveal a large neuromatous mass. The neuromatous mass was identified and traced out distally to its bifurcations to the 3rd and 4th toe where it was transected and the neuromatous mass was then brought back proximal-proximal to the deep transverse intermetatarsal ligament where it was transected while utilizing gentle traction on the nerve. It was transected with a 15-blade without incident. The wound was irrigated with copious amounts of sterile saline and bacitracin solution. The skin was reapproximated with 4-0 nylon in simple horizontal fashion. This completed the excision of Morton neuroma, 3rd interspace.

2. Excision of Morton’s neuroma, 3rd interspace, right foot, under loupe magnification. Attention was directed to the 3rd intermetatarsal space where approximately 3 cm incision was made and under loupe magnification the procedure was performed. The incision was deepened, vital structures identified and retraced, bleeding vessels cauterized per electrocautery. Both sharp and blunt dissection was carried down to the deep transverse intermetatarsal ligament where it was identified and transected to reveal a large neuromatous mass. The neuromatous mass was identified and traced out distally to its bifurcations to the 3rd and 4th toe where it was transected and the neuromatous mass was then brought back proximal-proximal to the deep transverse intermetatarsal ligament where it was transected while utilizing gentle traction on the nerve. It was transected with a 15-blade without incident. The wound was irrigated with copious amounts of sterile saline and bacitracin solution. The skin was reapproximated with 4-0 nylon in simple horizontal fashion. This completed the excision of Morton neuroma, 3rd interspace.

3. Implantation of nerve, left lower extremity. Attention was directed to the 3rd interspace area where an approximately 3 cm incision was made coursing back out to the previous incisional area. The incision was deepened, vital structures identified and retracted, and bleeding vessels cauterized with electrocautery. The procedure was performed under loupe magnification and dissection was carried down to the transected nerve where it was identified and then the nerve was placed within the intrinsic muscular area of the 3rd interspace and sutured with a perineurial technique utilizing 3-0 Vicryl suture to secure the nerve into the implanted area. The wound was irrigated with copious amounts of sterile saline and bacitracin solution. The skin was reapproximated with 4-0 nylon in simple horizontal fashion.

4. Implantation of nerve, right lower extremity. Attention was directed to the 3rd interspace area where an approximately 3 cm incision was made coursing back out to the previous incisional area. The incision was deepened, vital structures identified and retracted, and bleeding vessels cauterized with electrocautery. The procedure was performed under loupe magnification and dissection was carried down to the transected nerve where it was identified and then the nerve was placed within the intrinsic muscular area of the 3rd interspace and sutured with a perineurial technique utilizing 3-0 Vicryl suture to secure the nerve into the implanted area. The wound was irrigated with copious amounts of sterile saline and bacitracin solution. The skin was reapproximated with 4-0 nylon in simple horizontal fashion.

The tourniquet was released and blood flow was reestablished to digits 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of both feet and, in particular, all four quadrants of digits 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and the surrounding incisional areas. A sterile dressing was applied with surgical shoes. The patient tolerated the procedures and anesthesia well, and was discharged to PAR in stable condition.

HERE IS THS ISSUE IM HAVING………

Due to specific CPT 2018 instructions: "For Morton neurectomy, use 28080"
Excision of Morton’s Neuroma, each, (RT Foot; Lt Foot): 64782×2 should be 28080×2

Due to CPT 2018 instructions for the add-on codes: "Use 64787 in conjunction with 64774-64786"; this does not allow use with 28080.

Implantation of nerve end into bone or muscle for each nerve: 64787×2 should MAYBE be an unlisted code 64999??
I believe Documentation supports the 64787 codes…..

I can’t find definitive instructions about the use of 28080 and 64787 codes that would allow reporting the implantation part of the surgery with the Morton’s neurectomy.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Retroeritoneal Approach to Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve

Hi,
My surgeon did a neuroplasty/neurectomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. It was retroperitoneal approach. I am new to peripheral nerve coding and I am not sure what CPT code to use.

OP Note:

Neuroplasty of right lateral femoral cutaneous nerve distal to the inguinal ligament
*
Neurectomy of the right lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and the retroperitoneal space.

patient was taken to the operating room and placed in supine position. Right side of the abdomen and right proximal thigh were prepped and draped in normal fashion. Timeout performed.
*
A retroperitoneal exposure was performed by the general surgery service as co-surgeons for this procedure.
*
As we explored the retroperitoneal space and the area along the iliac is possible we’re unable to clearly identify the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. This was likely secondary to previous surgery and some scarring. The incision was undermined and we started to expose more distally along the inguinal ligament. At the junction of the inguinal ligament and the anterior superior iliac spine, dissection proceeded. We moved just distal to the inguinal ligament and were able to identify the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve as it was exiting from under the ligament into the thigh. We then traced the nerve proximal under the inguinal ligament towards the retrograde peritoneal space. This allowed us to then identify the nerve In the retroperitoneal space. Gentle neuroplasty was now performed as we exposed the nerve over at least a distance of 2-3 cm In the retroperitoneal space. This was proximal to the likely pathology for the patient.. The nerve was fully divided. The proximal stump was then rotated and a opening was placed in the iliac’s muscle. Proximal stump was then buried into the muscle.

Thanks so much,
Tracy

*

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Coding for Nerve Blocks

Have a question related to the CPT 64450 using it once or twice.

In the ED note, the chart shows the below procedures done in one encounter on a patient.

Femoral nerve block (CPT 64447)

Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) block – (CPT 64450)

Obturator nerve block – (CPT 64450)

The question is do we code only one time for LFCN and Obturator block performed on same encounter, or do 64450 x 2. The doctor made separate procedure note for each of the above three.

Thanks in advance for helping me solve this.

Anitha Lingala, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CCS

Medical Billing and Coding Forum