Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Palmetto GBA LCD L33445 removal of skin lesions

Palmetto GBA became our MAC at the beginning of the year. With that comes their LCD L33445 Removal of Benign and Malignant Skin Lesions with (or in this case without) a different set of "covered" or "deemed medically necessary" ICD-10 codes. This has really shook the physicians in terms of treating lesions that we are used to treating day in and out. They are scratching their head for example as to how/why only a few cyst codes are covered and others are not (specifically Pilar Cyst which they excise quite commonly in our practice). I wondered if anyone would share what your experience is when moving to a new MAC and getting through this transition. What is the recourse when you send in a claim that is automatically hitting an edit? I have a provider who is adamant Pilar Cyst needs to be on the list and asked if I could get someone on the phone for her to speak with about it.

What is the recourse? The appeal chain? Is that what we try to do in order for her to try to appeal to someone’s medical sense to reimburse these claims? I have offered a few suggestions to the physician – for example: Is a pilar cyst more subcutaneous and perhaps Palmetto feels the excisions should be coded with the musculoskeletal codes? She didn’t feel that was appropriate.

I have several questions and claim examples with varying issues but my ground level question at this point is – What do you guys do when this comes up? We can’t just wait and hold out hope that a revision to the LCD comes along that fits our case. We have claims that need to get out the door now.

I’ll appreciate your feedback

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Palmetto ASC Discontinued Procedure Documentation

Just seeing if anyone has an example of the discontinued procedure (74) documentation that you are sending to Palmetto GBA to cover all their requirements to get this procedure paid for. They sent me to the following URL:https://www.palmettogba.com/palmetto…t-B~8EELE32452

ASC claims that involve a terminated surgery must be accompanied by an operative report that specifies all of the following:
Reason for termination of surgery
Description of services actually performed
Description of supplies actually provided
Services not performed that would have been if surgery had not been terminated
Supplies that would have been provided if the surgery had not been terminated
Time actually spent in each stage (e.g., pre-op, operative, post-op)
Time that would have been spent in each of these stages if the surgery had not been terminated
CPT code for procedures that were scheduled to be performed

I am curious if you have given them all of the above in order to get paid.

Thanks for your help in advance

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

77080-26 Bone Density Interp. Denying Palmetto GBA

77080 with modifier 26 for interp. is denying through Palmetto GBA with denial code- N130-Consult plan benefit documents/guidelines for information about restrictions for this service. I can’t find anything on CMS on why this is denying. Our physician’s file the interp. only and hospital files the TC portion. Does anyone know of any reason these would be denying? Has the benefit changed on these??/ Any help will be appreciated.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Fecal Microbiota Transplant (G0455) and Palmetto

Has anyone had any luck getting Palmetto to pay G0455? They are denying stating it is not medically necessary. We were a part of the transition from Cahaba to Palmetto, and Cahaba always paid. Any advice? I found this link and it does not look like Palmetto covers this code :

https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverag…=IAAAACAAAAAA&

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

01992/aaqs – palmetto

Hello!

I’m hoping someone can help. We just recently switched over from Cahaba to Palmetto. We are getting rejections on anesthesia claims that we don’t understand. One of my doctors billed out an ESI and SNR. My other doctor is trying to bill out the anesthesia for the claim. The rejection that we are getting on the anesthesia says "procedure code inconsistent with modifier or required modifier is missing." Can anybody shed any light on this for us?

Doctor #1
62323
64483

Doctor #2
01992/AAQS

Thanks in advance!
Jessica

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Palmetto Offers a Smooth Transition from Cahaba

Palmetto GBA is preparing to become the A/B Medicare administrative contractor (MAC) for Jurisdiction J (JJ), which includes the states of Alabama, Georgia, and Tennessee — and so should you if you submit Medicare claims for healthcare providers who practice in those states. Part A providers will transition from Cahaba GBA effective Jan. 29, 2018, and Part […]
AAPC Knowledge Center