Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Please help

Please help with correct coding of this note. Are codes 63266 and 63055 correct?

POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
epidural lesion-disc herniation
*
PROCEDURE PERFORMED:
transpedicular far lateral discectomy. Resection of intraspinal extradural lesion
microdissection techniques
*
*
An incision was made with a #10 blade over the thoracic and exposure was carried out with Cobb periosteal and monopolar cauterization. Confirmatory x-ray was performed. The attending radiologist was called and on speakerphone confirmed that the marker was at the location of the lesion on MRI. Medial wall of the pedicle was drill down and laminectomy, medial facetectomy, and foraminotomies were performed with the Midas Rex drill with AM8 drill bit, Leksell rongeur, Woodson tip elevator, 4-0 Kerrison, 3-0 Kerrison, 2-0 Kerrison, and 1-0 Kerrison rongeur at levels T12, L1. Extension of laminectomy and foraminotomy and removal of lateral recess ligament and compression was performed with 1-0, 2-0, and 3-0 Kerrison rongeurs. Extensive lesion, consistent with disc fragment, was removed. Additionally, curettes were used to elevate the ligament off the neural elements. Woodson tip elevator was used to demonstrate decompression of the neural elements. Copious irrigation was performed. Hemostasis was achieved. Fascia was closed with 1-0 Vicryl sutures, dermis closed with 2-0 Vicryl sutures, and skin closed with staples.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Please help! – Breast–IRRIGATION & DEBRIDEMENT BREAST WOUND / ABSCESS

Hello, which debridement code should I use along with implant removal code?

Operative Procedure: A 3.5 cm diameter circle at her mastectomy scar, and a 2.5 cm diameter circle superiorly where her tissue expander port site was previously located. Her implant is grossly visible at both of these locations. There is a thin intervening skin bridge connecting these 2 locations. With her consent a photo was taken in preoperative holding area and scanned into media prior to surgery. The skin bridge is clearly not viable and it is incised. The implant is removed and sent to pathology for gross examination. The implant pocket is then copiously irrigated with 3 L of pulse lavage saline. There is an inflammatory rind evident in the pocket. However there is no gross purulence. At the level of the prepectoral plane under direct visualization using cautery the skin flaps are elevated circumferentially. Using a 15 blade the skin edges were then debrided to remove the circular skin defects which leads to a vertical defect measuring 11 cm her left chest wall. The skin edges do bleed with this tissue removed. The mastectomy skin is sent to pathology for examination. 30 cc of quarter percent Marcaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine is injected for local anesthetic and hemostasis. With the wide undermining I am able to close the skin flaps with only minimal tension. Hemostasis is achieved using cautery. Saline was used for additional irrigation. A 10 French round JP drain is placed within the pocket. 3-0 Vicryl sutures were used to reapproximate the dermis. 4-0 Monocryl horizontal mattress sutures were used to loosely reapproximate the skin edges. A 13 cm Prevena incisional wound VAC is placed over the incision. A drain sponges placed around the drain site. The patient was awoken from anesthesia without complication and transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. At the end of the case all the needle, sponge and instrument counts were correct x 2 and I was present for the entire case.
*

thank you :)

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Diabetes Coding- Please help

hello,

How would I code, pt has all of the below diabetes dx and I want to make I sure sequence correctly.
Diabetic right foot infection with gangrene s/p transmetatarsal amputation-intraoperative cultures yield GBS
*Diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled-A1c 13.1
*Diabetes mellitus with peripheral vascular disease
*Diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease

I cannot find dx for diabetic foot infection and pt does not have an ulcer, so e11.621 wouldn’t work.

thanks in advance

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

debridement help please

can someone help explain to me how to code this thanks

Procedure:
Sharp excisional debridement of muscle 13 x 4 cm ?11043 11046 x2
Primary closure of fasciotomy sites 13 x 4 cm and 10 x 2 cm ?
Findings:
Nonviable muscle on the lateral aspect of the fasciotomy site and this was sharply debrided down to bleeding healthy muscle.

*
Procedure Details:
The patient was operating room placed in supine position. Gen. anesthesia was induced. The right lower extremity was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A timeout was performed verifying correct patient and procedure. The previous fasciotomy sites were explored and on the lateral incision the muscle was noted to be dark and dusky. This was sharply excised with some bumps his back to healthy bleeding muscle. Total muscle debrided measured approximately 13 x 4 cm. The medial fasciotomy site was explored and the muscle viable. Both wounds irrigated copiously. Hemostasis was achieved. The wounds were then closed with interrupted deep dermal absorbable suture and the skin was closed with staples and interrupted nylon sutures. Skin edges came together without any tension. Incisions were then dressed. At this point the procedure was ended.
*
Instrument, sponge, and needle counts were correct prior to closure and at the conclusion of the case. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was transferred to the PACU in stable condition.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Shave biopsy help PLEASE!

A patient came in and had three seperate lesions removed by shaving full thickness. All on the back two the same size and one larger. The provider coded as 11300,11300-59 and 11301-59. I feel this is correct. There is some confusion in our office with the "new" biopsy codes that came out this year 11102-11107. Someone said since they are on the back they should all be added together in one code. I said that was for laceration repairs. Can I get some help with this please as they were all full thickness lesions removed all benign. Thank you

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

need help on debridement code please

So our doc wants 11004 but I just don’t think I see that he is in the perineum region. I am new to Gen Surg coding and struggling.
I keep leaning towards 11043 with an add on but I can’t do the add on because he doesn’t give me the measurements.

Thank you in advance!!

procedure: Wide sharp excisional debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue and fascia with drainage of ischiorectal and left buttock abscess

The patient has necrotic tissue and foul purulent drainage from the left buttock. This area is opened up and the underlying skin, subcutaneous tissue and fascia were found to be necrotic. This is sharply excised and pockets up puss and necrotic tissue were excised with Metzenbaum scissors and a 10 blade scalpel. Electrocautery was used to assure hemostasis. The delineation of the sharp debridement is made by evidence of bleeding from the sharp cut surfaces of the skin, subcutaneous tissues and fascias and underlying muscle. An S-shaped probe was used to look for any fistula tracts. There are several deep crypts but there is no connection to the anorectal region, anal canal or distal rectum. Hemostatis is assured. The infection and pockets of abscess do not extend to the contralateral side. There is no FB or tumor. Area is packed with iodoform packing gauze.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Help with hand surgery please

DIAGNOSIS: Open complex dislocation to the left fourth digit involving volar plate collateral ligaments with near total avulsion of the fingertips with involvement of the digital nerves.

OPERATION PERFORMED
1.Open irrigation and debridement including removal of foreign material, devitalized soft tissue extending down to tendinous structures involving open complex dislocation.
2.Repair of ulnar collateral ligament.
3.Repair of radial collateral ligament.
4.Repair of radial digital nerve.
5.Repair of ulnar digital nerve.
6.Repair of volar plate of interphalangeal joint.

INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: This patient is status post a very complex dislocation in which he nearly totally avulsed his finger and due to extensive ligament tendon injuries he was sent for a specialist consultation. This was much more complex than a normal tendon or ligament repair, which is often done by emergency room physicians. The patient was referred by ____[CLINIC].

This patient’s occupation is construction, and on this date, he did have a very large piece of concrete fall on him, severing and causing a near avulsion, open dislocation, of which his finger bent over backwards completely with the bone protruding and only connected by some soft tissue, nearly completely ripping all the ligamentous structures of the interphalangeal joint.

OPERATION IN DETAIL: After sterile preparation and draping in the normal fashion, and a regional digital block anesthesia, tourniquet exsanguination of the fingers, the digit was approached. The collateral ligaments were repaired using 4-0 PDS suture. The wound was also cleansed and irrigated copiously using antibiotic saline solution. Removal of foreign body, devitalized, crushed soft tissue was done for the open complex dislocation. The patient also had near complete amputation. There were 2 significant sized digital nerve branches, which were repaired under magnification using an epineural repair using micro technique and micro instruments and they were my own microinstruments.

However, prior to this, the patient also had disruptions of the volar plate. This is thought to be one of the main causes of the patient having no flexion of the digit and minimal movement.

The volar plate was repaired after using PDS suture. The profundus tendon was examined and found to be intact. It required no repair other than the surrounding structures around it. The patient did regain some movement after this; however, did not have forward flexion. He did have function of his extensor tendon and it was thought that part of the flexor belly was in spasm; however, the proximal and distal portions of the flexor tendon were intact upon extensive traction of the area prior to the repair of the previous mentioned structures.

Detailed instructions and appropriate dressings were used for the patient with followup discussed with the patient. He was also under the instruction that he should be very careful, keep his finger splinted at all times, and we will start him on a hand rehabilitation regimen, which will take months before he is able to have fairly normal function of the digit and it will not be back near its normal strength for 4 to 6 months.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Please help! Is this renal billable?

Impressions
Two-vessel coronary artery disease
Severe in-stent restenosis within mid RCA
Positive FFR of RCA
Successful cutting balloon angioplasty to mid RCA with 3.0 x 10 mm Wolverine balloon
Elevated LV filling pressure
Abdominal aortography with runoff showing no severe renal artery stenosis and no significant PAD in the aortoiliac system

Coronary Findings
Diagnostic
Dominance: Right

Left Main
The left main was selectively engaged with a catheter and visualized by angiography. Other findings: Large caliber vessel that is angiographically normal..

Left Anterior Descending
The LAD was visualized by angiography. Other findings: Medium to large caliber vessel proximally with a ledge-like 30-40% proximal stenosis. The mid to distal vessel has diffuse luminal irregularities but no area of critical stenosis. The first diagonal is a sizable branching vessel that has mild luminal irregularities but no critical stenosis..

Left Circumflex
The circumflex was visualized by angiography. Other findings: Medium to large caliber vessel with a 20-30% proximal stenosis. The mid stent is patent with 20-30% in-stent restenosis. OM1 is angiographically normal..

Right Coronary Artery
The RCA was selectively engaged with a catheter and was visualized by angiography. Other findings: Medium to large caliber dominant vessel with a proximal 20-30% stenosis. There is a patent stent in the mid vessel (2 layers) with 60-70% in-stent restenosis proximally and 50-60% in-stent restenosis distally. The RPDA is small with mild ostial disease. The RPL has a patent proximal stent with 30-40% in-stent restenosis that appears stable from prior angiograms. There are 2 branches to the RPL that have mild luminal irregularities..
Mid RCA lesion is 70% stenosed. This is the culprit lesion. The lesion is not complex (non high-C). The lesion was previously treated using a drug-eluting stent. Previous treatment took place 1-2 years ago. There is in-stent restenosis. There is no in-stent thrombosis. The stenosis was measured using by visual assessment.

Intervention
Mid RCA lesion
POBA
Guide catheter used: CATH GUIDE 6F FR4 BOSTON SCI.Guidewire that crossed the lesion: GUIDEWIRE PROWATER .014"X180CM STRAIGHT PTCA ASAHI INTECC. Angioplasty using a scoring balloon was performed. The balloon used was a CATHETER BALLOON CUTTING 3.00X10MM WOLVERINE BOSTON. Maximum pressure: 12 atm. Comments: Inflated both proximally once and distally once within previously placed stent.
Post-Intervention Lesion Assessment
There is no residual stenosis post intervention.

Left Heart
Left Ventricle LV end diastolic pressure is moderately elevated and was measured at 30 mmHg. Comments: Abdominal aortography with runoff: Abdominal aorta is patent. Left renal artery has a 30% proximal stenosis. Right renal artery is patent with no significant stenosis. Bilateral common iliac, bilateral internal iliac, and bilateral external iliac arteries are patent with no significant stenosis. Bilateral common femorals are patent with no significant stenosis..

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Can someone PLEASE help me code this report??

Pre-op Ox: Critical limb ischemia of the left foot Post-op Ox: Critical limb ischemia of the left foot

Procedures:
1. Suprarenal aortogram
2. Bilateral LE Angiogram
3. 3rd order catheter placement (Selective L LE angiogram from L SFA)
4. Laser Artherectomy with 2.0 laser catheter of the mid-distal Left SFA
5. Angioplasty of the left popliteal artery with 5.0x120mm DCB Spectranetics
6. Stenting of the mid-distal left SFA with 6.0x120mm DES Zilver
7. Moderate sedation supervision

Anesthesia: lidocaine 2% Sedati on: Versed and Fentanyl

Moderate Conscious sedation was provided under my direct supervision with the sedation trained nurse using 2 mg of IV Versed and SO mcg of IV Fentanyl.
Start time was 0935 and end time was 1145 . There were no complications. See hospital trained nurses sedation sheet I signed and dated for the completed procedure

Access Site: Right femoral artery 6F

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: Using micropuncture needle and ultrasound guidance, we placed a 6-French sheath via Seldinger technique to the left common femoral artery. A catheter was inserted into the aorta and an aortogram was performed. The Omni Flush catheter was then pulled down to the aortic bifurcation and a bilateral runoff was performed. The results of the angiogram are listed below. Next, the Omni Flush catheter was selectively placed in the proximalright SFA and contrast injections of the right leg were performed to further evaluate the infrapopliteal disease.

Findings:

Aortogram
– Patent b/I renal arteries
– Mild distal aortic disease

Right Lower Extremity
1. Common Iliac artery patent
2. Internal Iliac artery patent
3. External Iliac artery patent
4. CFA patent
5. Profunda patent
6. SFA patent
7. Popliteal patent
8. TP trunk patent
9. AT artery patent
10. PT artery patent
11. Peroneal artery 100% occluded ostially

Left Lower Extremity
1. Common iliac artery patent
2. Internal Iliac artery patent
3. External Iliac artery patent
4. CFA patent
5. Profunda patent
6. SFA Mid 70-80% disease; Distal 100% occluded
7. Popliteal proximal 100% occluded; Mid 80% disease
8. TP trunk patent
9. AT artery patent
10. PT patent
11. Peroneal artery severely diseased

Intervention:
Given disease in the left superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery, the decision was made to Intervene on that vessel. The short 6 French sheath was exchanged for a long 6 French sheath and placed into the proximal superficial femoral artery.
Once the sheath was in the proximal superficial femoral artery a run-through wire was used to circumvent the lesions In the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery. The wire was placed distally into the TP trunk. Laser arthrectomy was decided upon in origin debulk the lesion. A Spectranetics 2.0 laser catheter was used to to laser arthrectomy of the mid to distal left superficial femoral artery. After multiple runs, an angiogram was done which showed significant improvement
in disease and improvement in flow. A 5.0 x 120 mm drug-coated balloon was then used to angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery. Once that was completed, an anglogram was done which showed good flow in the vessel; however there appeared to be a small dissection in the mid to distal left superficial femoral artery. A 6.0 x 120 mm Zllver was placed In the mid to distal portion and an angiogram was done showing no perforations or dissections and good flow in the vessel.
The long 6 French sheath was then exchanged for a short 6 French straight over a J-wire. Groin shots were done which showed that we are above the bifurcation and noted there was no significant calcification at the site of entry. Angio·Seal was deployed with good hemostasis.

Oosure Device: Angioseal

EBL: less than 25 ml Complications: None lines: None Specimens: None Condition: Stable

NP:
Critical limb ischemia of the left foot
– ASA, plavix and lipitor
– Monitor and bedrest for 3 hours. D/C Home at 630pm
– IVF

Medical Billing and Coding Forum