Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Can someone review chart note to see if I’m on the right track?

Hello again, colleagues,
After receiving helpful advice from a fellow member, have come across another scenario that is baffling due to my limited experience in this type of coding.

PRE-OP DX: ischemic ULCER RIGHT LATERAL FOOT
post-op dx: osteomyelitis WITH ISCHEMIC ULCERATION OF RIGHT LATERAL FOOT INVOLVING 4TH AND 5TH METATARSAL AND CUBOID BON

Performed:
1) debridement of right foot to include skin & soft tissue and cuboid bone right foot.
2)Right 5th metatarsal resection, partial
3) right 4th metatarsal resection, partial

Description: (extraction of pertinent verbiage). Ischemic ulceration was then debrided over the lateral foot. This clearly involve the 5th metartarsal bone.
Wound did extend more medially w/involvement of the cuboid bone as well as the 4th metatarsal. These were all sharply debrided back with a rongeur and
the 5th metatarsal was resected along with a portion of the 4th metatarsal. Would was packed w/saline-good bleeding was appreciated from wound bed.

My efforts: I see a debridement here in #1, but not sure about the two codes for #2 and #3. I’m thinking 28122, 28122. (The 5th metatarsal was resected, with a portion
of 4th?), so not sure about choosing the same code for both procedures when one was a partial.

Can anyone offer guidance?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Telemedicine – can someone clarify?

Forgive me if this question has been asked already, I couldn’t find anything definitive. I have never worked for a practice that’s even entertained the idea of telemedicine, so it’s brand new to me. :)

Everything I’m reading on telemedicine (from Medicare and Medicaid) indicates that it’s primarily for "underserved rural areas". Does this mean that it’s for when a patient is in a hospital or PCP office in the middle of nowhere and needs a specialist to consult on their case and that’s how the specialist is brought in rather than one of them having to make the trip to wherever? Or if the doctor is on call for a local facility and gets "dialed in" (for lack of a better term) rather than rushing over to the hospital? Or is it for a patient after hours who has a minor ailment that can be addressed without making them wait for the next business day to physically come into the office?

I would imagine that in the the instance of the first two scenarios, all the elements of the E&M could be hit because it’d be almost a collaborative effort, right? (the practitioner who’s physically with the patient does the exam) But in the last scenario – the after hours patient – it really could never be higher than a 99213 because it would be a limited physical exam.

Do I have the right idea on this or am I not even in the right ballpark?

Thanks!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Can someone PLEASE help me code this report??

Pre-op Ox: Critical limb ischemia of the left foot Post-op Ox: Critical limb ischemia of the left foot

Procedures:
1. Suprarenal aortogram
2. Bilateral LE Angiogram
3. 3rd order catheter placement (Selective L LE angiogram from L SFA)
4. Laser Artherectomy with 2.0 laser catheter of the mid-distal Left SFA
5. Angioplasty of the left popliteal artery with 5.0x120mm DCB Spectranetics
6. Stenting of the mid-distal left SFA with 6.0x120mm DES Zilver
7. Moderate sedation supervision

Anesthesia: lidocaine 2% Sedati on: Versed and Fentanyl

Moderate Conscious sedation was provided under my direct supervision with the sedation trained nurse using 2 mg of IV Versed and SO mcg of IV Fentanyl.
Start time was 0935 and end time was 1145 . There were no complications. See hospital trained nurses sedation sheet I signed and dated for the completed procedure

Access Site: Right femoral artery 6F

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: Using micropuncture needle and ultrasound guidance, we placed a 6-French sheath via Seldinger technique to the left common femoral artery. A catheter was inserted into the aorta and an aortogram was performed. The Omni Flush catheter was then pulled down to the aortic bifurcation and a bilateral runoff was performed. The results of the angiogram are listed below. Next, the Omni Flush catheter was selectively placed in the proximalright SFA and contrast injections of the right leg were performed to further evaluate the infrapopliteal disease.

Findings:

Aortogram
– Patent b/I renal arteries
– Mild distal aortic disease

Right Lower Extremity
1. Common Iliac artery patent
2. Internal Iliac artery patent
3. External Iliac artery patent
4. CFA patent
5. Profunda patent
6. SFA patent
7. Popliteal patent
8. TP trunk patent
9. AT artery patent
10. PT artery patent
11. Peroneal artery 100% occluded ostially

Left Lower Extremity
1. Common iliac artery patent
2. Internal Iliac artery patent
3. External Iliac artery patent
4. CFA patent
5. Profunda patent
6. SFA Mid 70-80% disease; Distal 100% occluded
7. Popliteal proximal 100% occluded; Mid 80% disease
8. TP trunk patent
9. AT artery patent
10. PT patent
11. Peroneal artery severely diseased

Intervention:
Given disease in the left superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery, the decision was made to Intervene on that vessel. The short 6 French sheath was exchanged for a long 6 French sheath and placed into the proximal superficial femoral artery.
Once the sheath was in the proximal superficial femoral artery a run-through wire was used to circumvent the lesions In the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery. The wire was placed distally into the TP trunk. Laser arthrectomy was decided upon in origin debulk the lesion. A Spectranetics 2.0 laser catheter was used to to laser arthrectomy of the mid to distal left superficial femoral artery. After multiple runs, an angiogram was done which showed significant improvement
in disease and improvement in flow. A 5.0 x 120 mm drug-coated balloon was then used to angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery. Once that was completed, an anglogram was done which showed good flow in the vessel; however there appeared to be a small dissection in the mid to distal left superficial femoral artery. A 6.0 x 120 mm Zllver was placed In the mid to distal portion and an angiogram was done showing no perforations or dissections and good flow in the vessel.
The long 6 French sheath was then exchanged for a short 6 French straight over a J-wire. Groin shots were done which showed that we are above the bifurcation and noted there was no significant calcification at the site of entry. Angio·Seal was deployed with good hemostasis.

Oosure Device: Angioseal

EBL: less than 25 ml Complications: None lines: None Specimens: None Condition: Stable

NP:
Critical limb ischemia of the left foot
– ASA, plavix and lipitor
– Monitor and bedrest for 3 hours. D/C Home at 630pm
– IVF

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Can someone please help me with these coding questions

I am practicing some coding questions before my exam and would like some help with an ICD-10 CM question and CPT questions. From what I remember, if there is a definitive diagnosis there is no need to code signs and symptoms, but in some questions, the answer includes signs and symptoms even though there is a diagnosis.

I am confused as to why fever is coded in this question, can someone please explain?

Patient with thyroid cancer has fever and found to have chemo drug induced agranulocyctosis

D72.0: Genetic anomalies of leukocytes
D70.1: Agranulocytosis secondary to cancer chemotherapy
C73: Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland
R50.81: Fever presenting with conditions classified elsewhere
J34.81 Nasal mucositis (ulcerative
K92. 81: Gastrointestinal mucositis (ulcerative)
T36.91XA: Poisoning by unspecified systemic antibiotic, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter
T45.1X1A: Poisoning by antineoplastic and immunosuppressive drugs, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

a) D72.0, T36.91XA, C73, R50.81
b) D70.1, T45.1X1A, C73
c) R50.81, J43. 81, K92.81
d)D70.1, T45.1X5A, C73, R50.81

Can someone please explain how to get these codes for this example?

Case 1 – Right transfemoral approach with the right vertebral, right common carotid artery, left common carotid artery, left vertebral arteries selected with normal arch anatomy.

Catheter codes: 36217, 36218, 36215-59, 36216-59

A 40-year old hospitalized patient is in need of a kidney transplant and is next on the transplant list. A man who matches the patient’s tissue type and is an organ donor, is involved in an MVA and is pronounced brain dead upon arrival to the hospital. A nephrectomy is performed on the individual from the mVA. what is the correct code for the nephrectomy?

a) 50300
b) 50320
c) 50220
d) 50234

Why is the answer b?

Thanks so much for your help!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

“Obtain hx from someone other than patient”

This phrase is in the "Amount and/or Complexity of Data Reviewed" for one point and also for two. It is my understanding the "someone" must be a medical provider to get to that second point. What is the degree the "someone" must have to get to that second point? Is obtaining a patient’s history with an LPN enough to get that point in the complexity?

Thank you,
Michelle

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

93279-93281 vs 93288-93292 Can someone help explain the differences??

I have tried to understand the differences between these two different types of evaluations and when I read the code descriptions they sound so similar I am having trouble discerning how exactly to tell the difference between the two when looking at a device print out, report, and interpretation. Can someone help explain in lay terms what I am looking for in the interpretation or report to help distinguish when I should use each code set? Your help would be so very much appreciated!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

93279-93281 vs 93288-93292 Can someone help explain the differences??

(I also posted this in the cardiology section) I have tried to understand the differences between these two different types of evaluations and when I read the code descriptions they sound so similar I am having trouble discerning how exactly to tell the difference between the two when looking at a device print out, report, and interpretation. Can someone help explain in lay terms what I am looking for in the interpretation or report to help distinguish when I should use each code set? Your help would be so very much appreciated!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Advice for someone who has failed the CPC exam twice.

Hello,

Ive taken the CPC twice and failed it both times (The first time I scored a 66% and this last time I scored a 61%). Money is an issue for my wife and I dont know yet if I will be spending another $ 380 to retake the test again. I have a 9 month online certificate from Carrington College in Medical Coding and also work as a receptionist and referrals coordinator at a Neurology office. Needless to say, I dont understand why Im struggling with this so much.

Im thinking about quitting my membership to AAPC and switching to AHIMA to obtain the CCS certification. I have a friend who codes for a local hospital that has the CCS so I figure it might be worth the shot. It also looks like the membership fee to AHIMA and test fee for the CCS exam are also slightly cheaper.

My question is should I save up and retake the CPC again, or should I try a different angle by enrolling in AHIMA and taking the CCS exam?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

someone please help !!

:confused:Can someone please see if this is coded correctly as I am not sure if any of the CPT CODES are bundled in the surgery below
the codes I see think are
23615-RT
24515-RT
27524-RT
24341
23430-???

The patient is a 74-year-old female with a slip and fall at home with resultant comminuted humerus fracture that extended from the mid diaphyseal region up to the proximal humerus. She underwent a CT scan demonstrating a comminuted fracture in multiple pieces with significant displacement. She also fell and sustained an inferior pole of the patella fracture with significant displacement. She was seen in the emergency room at Milford Hospital. She was then transferred to MidState Hospital for definitive operative intervention.
*
I saw the patient in preoperative holding area, had a long discussion with the patient regarding her diagnosis and treatment options. Following that discussion, she elected to proceed with surgery. I discussed risks, benefits, alternatives and complications including blood loss, nerve and vessel injury, as well as infection. Following that, she wished to proceed.
*
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:
The patient was seen in the preoperative holding area, surgical consent was obtained. Surgical site was marked. The patient was transported back to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was induced. At this point, the right upper extremity was then prepped and draped in normal sterile fashion. Following this, a standard anterior approach to the humerus was performed. It began at the coracoid process and extended down to the antecubital fossa. Dissection continued down. The deltopectoral interval was completed proximally. The cephalic vein was identified and retracted laterally. The clavipectoral fascia was released just lateral to the conjoined tendon. The CA ligament was released anteriorly. Dissection continued down. The long head of the biceps was identified as well as the deltoid insertion. There was a comminuted fracture extending from the humeral head distally. The fracture then became more comminuted around the proximal diaphysis and extended down as far as the mid diaphysis of the humerus. The biceps tendon was identified. The muscle was taken medially. The underlying brachialis muscle was identified and was split longitudinally down to the humeral shaft. At this point, copious irrigation was performed. Abundant hematoma was removed from around the fracture fragments. A large amount of comminution was present posterior to the pectoralis major insertion. Dissection continued around behind it, but due to the comminution in that area, it was required to perform a pectoralis major tenotomy for later repair. The ends of the tendon were identified and were then transected approximately 1 inch from the insertion. The tendon edges were tagged. A #5 FiberWire was then utilized to Krackow from the superior edge to the middle and then a second #5 was utilized to Krackow from the middle down to the inferior aspect of the tendon and muscle interface. This was then tagged for later repair. At this point, a meticulous dissection through the fracture bed was performed. Multiple reduction clamps were utilized to obtain a reduction. Once this was obtained, 2 lag screws were placed distally and 2 lag screws were placed proximally through the different fracture fragments. At this point, a bridge plate was then placed anteriorly, beginning distally with 3 screws distal to the fracture and extending proximally up to the humeral head. Due to the placement of the plate, it would be directly over the biceps tendon and the biceps tendon was then tenotomized for later tenodesis. Once screws were obtained proximally and distally, fluoroscopic images were taken demonstrating an anatomic reduction.
*
There was still difficulty with the fracture extending up into the greater tuberosity. Once the diaphyseal portion of the fracture was neutralized with the anterior bridge plate, attention was then paid to the proximal humerus. At this point, a lateral plate was then selected and this was checked on fluoroscopic imaging to obtain the correct height. A nonlocking screw was then placed through the sliding hole of the plate and the height was adjusted. Following this, sequential locking screws were placed through the proximal portion of the plate as well as distally interdigitating between these screws through the other plate.
*
This gave good overlap without any evidence of any stress risers in the humerus.
*
Intraoperative fluoroscopy was utilized to further check reduction and screw length, which demonstrated good position.
*
At this point, it was copiously irrigated. The biceps tendon was then tenodesed to the plate utilizing a #5 FiberWire.
*
At this point, the pectoralis tendon, which lay between the 2 plates, was then repaired utilizing a Krackow #5 FiberWire. These were then repaired to the tendon stump with reinforcement around the plate.
*
At this point, the wound was copiously irrigated again. At this point, skin was then closed with 2-0 Monocryl followed by staples. A sterile dressing was applied.
*
At this point, the drapes were then taken down and attention was then paid to the right patella. The right lower extremity was then prepped and draped in a normal sterile fashion. Superficial landmarks were delineated. An Esmarch bandage was then utilized to exsanguinate the limb and a 15 cm incision overlying the patella was performed. Dissection continued down to the tendon. Medial and lateral flaps were developed. The fracture bed was identified. There was only a thin fragment of bone inferiorly as well as superiorly and was an extraarticular part of the inferior pole. At this point, it was determined to perform the repair similar to the patellar tendon repair. Two #5 FiberWire were then utilized to Krackow through the patellar tendon. A drill hole was placed in the inferior pole of the patella and the 4 suture limbs were then brought through. At this point, 3 drill holes were placed in a parallel fashion through the patella. Once this was performed, a Hewson suture passer was utilized to pass the sutures through the patella. The sutures were then retrieved superiorly. The middle sutures were then passed both medially and laterally to be paired with the other suture. The leg was then taken into extension and the sutures were then sequentially tied, repairing the inferior pole of the patella to the patella. Following this, an internal brace was then utilized utilizing a SwiveLock. Two SwiveLock were placed, 1 medially and 1 laterally on the tibial tubercle. A drill guide was placed followed by a 4 mm reamer. At this point, 1 FiberTape as well as 2 of the anterior FiberWire were then placed. The FiberWire were placed under tension. The FiberTape was just placed into the SwiveLock. This was then anchored to the medial portion of the tibial tubercle. Following this, the FiberTape was then utilized along with a large free needle to pass a cerclage around from the medial up to the superior around the superior pole of the patella and then laterally. This was then tensioned in 20 degrees of knee flexion to maximize the sturdiness of the repair. Once this was tensioned to 20 degrees of flexion, the FiberTape as well as FiberWire were then placed down the SwiveLock reamed hole and the SwiveLock was then deployed. Following this, the knee was taken through a range of motion up to 90 degrees with no gapping. It was then copiously irrigated. The medial and lateral retinaculum were repaired with #1 Vicryl.
*
At this point, skin was then closed with 2-0 Monocryl followed by staples. A sterile dressing was applied. The patient was then extubated and transported to the postoperative care unit in stable condition.
*

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Can someone help code this Thromboendarterectomy>

DX: Critical limb ischemia of left upper extremity

Operation Performed:
1. Left upper extremity brachial artery cutdown with incision, thromboembolectomy of brachial artery.
2. Thromboembolectomy of the axial artery.
3.Tthromboembolectomy o the ulnar artery in the upper left extremity

…..cutdown ensued, proximal and distal control of the brachial artery was obtained and an arteriotomy was made in a transverse fashion, a proximal embolectomy balloon used, a #5, to perform an embolectomy o first the subclavian and brachial artery, following this the axillary artery. Several different specimens were sent to Pathol from this____ good palpable pulse was delivered to the brachial artery____ this. Distal embolectomy of the ulnar artery was performed. This
specimen was sent off to pathology

Thanks

Medical Billing and Coding Forum