Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Abdominal Wall Abscess- Exploration of abdominal wall with debridement and drainage

Just trying to feel a bit more secure in coding this one. Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks in advance!!

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
Abdominal wall abscess.
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
Abdominal wall abscess involving urethral sling.

PROCEDURE PERFORMED:
Exploration of abdominal wall with debridement and drainage.

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:
The patient was taken to the OR. After induction of adequate general anesthesia, the patient was prepped with Betadine and draped sterilely. The abscess was slightly to the right of midline extending from across the symphysis towards the right mons and labia. The incision was made to the right of midline, carried down through subcutaneous tissue. Upon entering the cavity, foul-smelling frothy fluid exuded. Cultures for anaerobic and anaerobic were taken. There was necrotic tissue underneath. Extensive debridement was performed tunneling to the left of midline along the pubic ramus was noted and then significantly towards the labia and then also towards the right anterior superior iliac spine. The area was well debrided completely open with no residual necrotic tissue appreciated. In the base of the wound, the sling was noted. The thinned end of polypropylene was easily detached on the left side, but as well secured to the right of midline and tunneling down towards the introitus in the urethra. It was still well attached. Decision was not to more aggressively pull on this but to tag it with 0 silk suture and __________ that proper debridement of all areas were performed. The debridement extended from the skin through all subcutaneous tissue down to the pubic ramus and symphysis. The fascia was exposed. The area of debridement measured approximately 15 cm x 12 cm. The
patient’s wound was packed with Kerlix and a dry sterile dressing. She was taken to recovery room in stable condition.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Removal of infected chest wall implant

My surgeon removed an implant made of a "sandwich" of Proceed mesh & methymathcrlate. I am posting the op note:

The patient had had an aggressive left breast cancer that required mastectomy and then later had a recurrence that required radiation therapy which progressed. She ultimately had to have a chest wall resection and to cover this an implant and a latissimus flap were used. This was in 2017. She has had a sinus tract for the past two to three weeks.

The medial portion and inferior portion of the latissimus flap were opened with the use of a #10 knife blade. Bleeding was controlled with electrocautery. At this point, copious amounts of purulent drainage were identified and this was cultured. The myocutaneous flap, this was a latissimus myocutaneous flap that had been fashioned by Dr. B several months ago, was actually fairly adherent to the Proceed mesh. Underneath this, there was an opening that had to be bridged with a prosthesis/implant several months ago. She had had a chest wall resection where we removed several ribs. The entire chest wall and lung were present and could be visualized. The prosthesis/implant was fashioned with methyl methacrylate and Proceed mesh as a sandwich type prosthesis. It was fashioned appropriately and originally affixed to the chest wall and ribs with wire.

The incision this time required dissecting the myocutaneous flap off of the mesh and the methyl methacrylate implant. This was peeled back and drainage was identified as well as granulation tissue. All wire sutures were removed, and in doing so we removed the entire implant, as I stated consistent with a sandwich of Proceed mesh and methyl methacrylate. At this point, using a curette and a rongeur, all granulation tissue and obviously infected tissue was debrided. We did not have to place a new implant because the pleura underneath the prosthesis had sealed, there was no evidence of a pneumothorax, and there was no exposure of the lung.

At this point, the task was to remove all infected tissue as well as all foreign bodies that had been impregnated in the surrounding tissue. This also required debridement of granulation tissue from underneath the flap. The flap remained quite viable. Again, after removing this we irrigated the defect with 3 liters of saline to which bacitracin was added.

I cannot find a code that addresses this adequately. Help please????

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

CPT code for Excision of Abd Wall Mass (Keloid Scar) s/p Cesarean Section & Hyst

Hi there, I am new to this forum :)
I am trying to get the best CPT code for the following description "Suspect cutaneous nerve entrapment in knot of keloid tissue s/p cesarean section and total laparoscopic hysterectomy, Pfannestiel incision; approximately size of scar tissue is 1 cm in left lateral edge. Will be an open approach for superficial wound exploration."
I’m thinking 11401 for wide local excision of cesarean scar but have used 49203 in the past. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Jenette

Medical Billing and Coding Forum