Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Denial for 99204 New vs Established

We have received a denial for E/M code 99204 from a managed care plan stating that the patient was an established patient based on a Diagnostic Assessment 90791, 90785 we did about 10 days prior to the E/M.

My provider wants me to appeal based on the clip from the CMS guide to billing E/M: New Patient: An individual who did not receive any professional services from the physician/non-physician practitioner (NPP) or another physician of the same specialty who belongs to the same group practice within the previous 3 years.

We are a mental health organization and he states that since our providers are not "physicians" then they cannot use the diagnostic assessment as a previously professional services. I have argued that the diagnostic assessment was an encounter and therefore makes this patient established. How can I appeal something that I think is incorrect.

Am I wrong in this matter and should I still appeal?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Simplify the New or Established Patient Decision

Many evaluation and management (E/M) service codes distinguish between new or established patients. A patient is new if he or she has not received a face-to-face, professional service from the provider, or a provider of the same specialty/subspecialty in a group practice, within the previous 36 months. This is commonly known as the “three year […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

E&M established pt level

I’m having a debate in regards to E&M billing for established pt’s. If a pt is seen & the HPI is documented by someone other than the MD (MA/Tech) it’s not being used which I understand. The exam & MDM meet level 99214. My reviewer is stating we can’t bill an E&M at all due to the HPI & changing the code to 92012 in most cases. In established visits you need 2/3 which we have. Am I understanding that if the HPI is documented by someone other than the MD we can’t use E&M at all ?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

E&M established pt level

I’m having a debate in regards to E&M billing for established pt’s. If a pt is seen & the HPI is documented by someone other than the MD (MA/Tech) it’s not being used which I understand. The exam & MDM meet level 99214. My reviewer is stating we can’t bill an E&M at all due to the HPI & changing the code to 92012 in most cases. In established visits you need 2/3 which we have. Am I understanding that if the HPI is documented by someone other than the MD we can’t use E&M at all ?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Established problem but “New” patient since it has been over 3 years

If a patient’s PCP is referring him back to our office for re-evaluation of a problem treated by us more than 3 years ago, is that worth 2 points (est. problem worsening) or 4 points (new problem, additional workup planned) under # of diagnoses or treatment options in MDM? The patient would be considered "New" since it has been 3 years, but problem is not new to the provider. Thanks.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Established Patient Office Visit – Determining Level of Service

We are having a bit of a debate in the office.

Please keep in mind that these are Medicare/Medicaid patients if that makes a difference.

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ____________________________________________

For established outpatient office visits, the documentation only requires TWO out of THREE of the required level of History, Exam and Medical Decision Making.

This being the case, if you have a note that contains a Comprehensive History, Comprehensive Exam, and Low Complexity MDM would that not be completely billable as a 99215? There is a divide between people wanting to bill based on the documentation and the information provided, and people wanting to bill based solely on the Medical Decision Making who would bill the above as a 99213.

If anyone has any information that could help swing this disagreement one way or the other, it would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

New vs Established E/M and Patients Following Physicians to New Business Location

Our question is regarding the E/M codes 99201-99215, Preventive 99381-99397, and assignment of New versus Established patient; specifically for patients following a physician from one local private practice to another local FQHC Clinic within the 3yr period (same rendering physician NPI# but different Business Group Tax ID numbers). Would these patients be considered "new" or "established" ?

As a Federally Qualified Health Center the mass majority of our patients are Medicare and/or Medicaid; and need supporting documentation from CMS.

Any help on this question is greatly appreciated.

Charlene
[email protected]

Medical Billing and Coding Forum