Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Understanding Coding of Hypertension in Pregnancy

Understanding Coding of Hypertension in Pregnancy
Saturday, June 23, 2018
Hypertension in pregnancy still remains as one of the most misunderstood complications of pregnancy, in addition to the incorrect usage of the ICD-10 diagnosis codes that go with it.   ICD-10cm has a specific block of codes allocated to Pregnancy and hypertension, that should be used with all pregnancy coding.  These codes denote a pre-existing hypertention and then the gestational or pregnancy-induced hypertension.

ICD-10cm Code block Group
·         O10  Pre-existing hypertension complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
·         O11  Pre-existing hypertension with pre-eclampsia
·         O12  Gestational [pregnancy-induced] edema and proteinuria without hypertension
·         O13  Gestational [pregnancy-induced] hypertension without significant proteinuria
·         O14  Pre-eclampsia
·         O15  Eclampsia
·         O16  Unspecified maternal hypertension
As you can see from the list above, there are numerous codes to choose from.  As coders, we rely on our physicians to give us good clinical documentation within the pregnancy record, so we can code and bill appropriately for their services.  As in the case of a pregnancy that the OB is supervising, the added diagnosis of Hypertension in pregnancy brings added risk factors to that pregnancy oversight.  We also need to add ICD-10cm code for a high risk pregnancy due to hypertension.  The pregnancy supervision code for high risk pregnancy will be coded as the primary code based upon the ICD-10cm guidelines.   ICD-10cm coding guidelines for high-risk pregnancy changed in 2017. The current rule from the 2018 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting (effective Oct 1, 2017 – Sept 30, 2018) is below:
Supervision of High-Risk Pregnancy (ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 Page 58 of 117) Codes from category O09, Supervision of high-risk pregnancy, are intended for use only during the prenatal period. For complications during the labor or delivery episode as a result of a high-risk pregnancy, assign the applicable complication codes from Chapter 15. If there are no complications during the labor or delivery episode, assign code O80, Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery.  
For routine prenatal outpatient visits for patients with high-risk pregnancies, a code from category O09, Supervision of high-risk pregnancy, should be used as the first-listed diagnosis..  
The high risk supervision codes noted below, do not have a category specifically for oversight of hypertension in pregnancy, however this is something that we need to have coded for our diagnoses.  If we are going to add a high risk pregnancy diagnosis to our record, the code choice of O09.89 would the best choice, as the hypertension in pregnancy is in the “other high risk” category and our provided has specified it as such. 

 O09 Supervision of high risk pregnancy

·          O09.0 Supervision of pregnancy with history of infertility
·          O09.1 Supervision of pregnancy with history of ectopic pregnancy
·          O09.A Supervision of pregnancy with history of molar pregnancy
·          O09.2 Supervision of pregnancy with other poor reproductive or obstetric history
o    O09.21 Supervision of pregnancy with history of pre-term labor
o    O09.29 Supervision of pregnancy with other poor reproductive or obstetric history 
·          O09.3 Supervision of pregnancy with insufficient antenatal care
·          O09.4 Supervision of pregnancy with grand multiparity 
·          O09.5 Supervision of elderly primigravida and multigravida
o    O09.51 Supervision of elderly primigravida 
o    O09.52 Supervision of elderly multigravida 
·          O09.6 Supervision of young primigravida and multigravida
o    O09.61 Supervision of young primigravida
o    O09.62 Supervision of young multigravida
·          O09.7 Supervision of high risk pregnancy due to social problems
·          O09.8 Supervision of other high risk pregnancies
o    O09.81 Supervision of pregnancy resulting from assisted reproductive technology
o    O09.82 Supervision of pregnancy with history of in utero procedure during previous pregnancy
o    O09.89 Supervision of other high risk pregnancies
·          O09.9 Supervision of high risk pregnancy, unspecified
In some cases, the high blood pressure diagnosis is present prior to the pregnancy,  however, the patient can develop high blood pressure during pregnancy, which would then be noted as gestational hypertension.   
Ø  Chronic hypertension is high blood pressure that was present before pregnancy or that occurs before 20 weeks of pregnancy. But because high blood pressure usually doesn’t have symptoms, the provider may be reluctant to state this as a chronic condition, as this may or may not have been noted as a diagnosis for the patient by a previous provider or prior to the pregnancy.

Ø  Chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia is condition that can also occur in women with chronic hypertension before pregnancy who develop worsening high blood pressure and protein in the urine or other blood pressure related complications during pregnancy.

Ø  Gestational hypertension is the patient noted in the record to have high blood pressure that develops after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Normally there is no excess protein noted in the urine or other signs of organ damage however, some women with gestational hypertension may develop preeclampsia.

Ø  Preeclampsia occurs when hypertension develops after 20 weeks of pregnancy, and is associated with signs of damage to other organ systems, including the kidneys, liver, blood and/or brain. Untreated preeclampsia can lead to serious complications for mother and baby, including development of seizures which then the diagnosis becomes eclampsia.

o   Previously, preeclampsia was clinically diagnosed only if a pregnant woman had high blood pressure and protein in her urine. However, it has been noted that it’s possible for the patient to have preeclampsia without having protein in the urine.

Ø  Eclampsia is the onset of seizures (convulsions) in a woman with pre-eclampsia.  The onset may be before, during, or after delivery, but it can be diagnosed and treated  during the second trimester in the  pregnancy.
o   The seizures are usually the  tonic–clonic type and typically last between 30 and 60 seconds.  Complications of eclampsia include aspiration pneumonia, cerebral hemorrhage, kidney failure, and cardiac arrest

Ø  HELLP Syndrome is another variant of pre-eclampsia and/or eclampsia  as a known pregnancy complication. HELLP syndrome is characterized as hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and  low platelet count.  HELLP syndrome can be fatal to both the mother and the fetus. 
The clinical documentation of consistent pregnancy blood pressure is an important part of the patients’ prenatal care. The list below designates the levels at which the blood pressures should be noted.  As a coder, if you are not seeing these designations, you will want to query the provider and ensure if the patient has a true “hypertension” or simply an elevated blood pressure.  This will make a difference in your code choice.  This will also determine if the ob visit should be considered part of the prenatal care/OB package, or if it should be billed as a separately identifiable visit outside of the prenatal care/OB package.
o   Elevated blood pressure:  Elevated blood pressure is a systolic pressure ranging from 120 to 129 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) and a diastolic pressure below 80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure tends to get worse over time unless steps are taken to control blood pressure.

o   Stage 1 hypertension: Stage 1 hypertension is a systolic pressure ranging from 130 to 139 mm Hg or a diastolic pressure ranging from 80 to 89 mm Hg.

o   Stage 2 hypertension: More severe hypertension, stage 2 hypertension is a systolic pressure of 140 mm Hg or higher or a diastolic pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher.

NOTE:  After 20 weeks of pregnancy, blood pressures that exceeds 140/90 mm HG — documented on two or more occasions within the prenatal record, that are at least four hours apart, without any other organ damage — is considered to be gestational hypertension. 
As we look to the ICD-10cm coding guidelines, the pre-existing condition (such as hypertension) should be considered carefully. 
Pre-existing conditions versus conditions due to the pregnancy (ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 Page 59 of 117)
Certain categories in Chapter 15 distinguish between conditions of the mother that existed prior to pregnancy (pre-existing) and those that are a direct result of pregnancy. When assigning codes from Chapter 15, it is important to assess if a condition was pre-existing prior to pregnancy or developed during or due to the pregnancy in order to assign the correct code.
Categories that do not distinguish between pre-existing and pregnancy-related conditions may be used for either. It is acceptable to use codes specifically for the puerperium with codes complicating pregnancy and childbirth if a condition arises postpartum during the delivery encounter. 
The ICD-10cm guidelines also go on to say that the “O” codes that have been set forth for hypertension in pregnancy also include the codes for hypertensive chronic kidney disease.  If this is the case we are then to assign not only the appropriate O10 code, but also add an additional code from the appropriate hypertension category from ICD_10cm Chapter 9: Diseases of the Circulatory System (I00-I99) and specify the type of heart failure or CKD.
Pre-existing hypertension in pregnancy (ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 Page 60 of 117)

Category O10, Pre-existing hypertension complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, includes codes for hypertensive heart and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. When assigning one of the O10 codes that includes hypertensive heart disease or hypertensive chronic kidney disease, it is necessary to add a secondary code from the appropriate hypertension category to specify the type of heart failure or chronic kidney disease. See Section I.C.9. Hypertension
Office Coding Scenario – Admission to L&D:
Patient is a 32 year old who has come in at the request of our Triage RN status post patient call 1 hr ago. Pt is G2 and P1 at 35 and 3/7 weeks with gestational hypertension stable on labeletol. Pt arrived 20 minutes ago and is now complaining of a severe headache, leg swelling, blurred vision, abdominal pains, and a BP of 170/102.   She notes baby is moving well, but is having contractions.  Her husband is present with her and is very supportive, but concerned.  Sarah has a history of mild pre-eclampsia with her first child who delivered vaginally 2 years ago. She is allergic to PCN with a bad rash noted 4 years ago. Her Blood pressure in the clinic 2 days ago was 140/85.. She was not started on any new medications, nor any changes to her current Labeletal dose,  but was put on bedrest.   She continues to complain of a severe headache.  She is oriented x3, but somewhat sleepy. She has pitting edema bilaterally at a 3+  She has also complained of some mild nausea with no vomiting at this point. No complaints of shortness of breath. Lungs are still clear. She continues to complain of upper abdominal pain. Her urine dip indicated some mild 2+ proteinuria.  Her most recent vital signs are BP158/98, P98 R14, T98.6 .   She has current symptoms of severe pre-eclampsia, with pre-term labor and trending toward eclampsia.  At this time, I will send orders for direct admission to L&D Observation for continued surveillance of severe pre-eclampsia.  Patient directed to L&D.  I will follow with patient at evening rounds.
Coding Considerations:
ICD-10 cm Diagnosis:
O09.89 Supervision of other high risk pregnancies
O14.13 Severe pre-eclampsia third trimester
O60.03 Preterm labor without delivery
Z3A.37
37 weeks gestation of pregnancy
According to the CPT Maternity Care and Delivery guidelines that are noted at the beginning of the maternity care section within the CPT book it clearly states
“Medical complications of pregnancy; (eg cardiac problems, neurological problems, diabetes, hypertension, toxemia, hyperemesis, preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes,trauma) and medical problems complicating labor and delivery management may require additional resources and may be reported separately.” 
Billing/Reimbursement Issues
Some 3rdparty payers may consider the above scenario of care as part of the OB package of care, and not reimburse for the admission to observation as a separately identifiable service outside of the OB package.  If that is the case, CPT does allow for this and you should code, bill and subsequently appeal for your appropriate payment of such. 
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, CDIP, COBGC and ICD10 cm/pcs Ambassador/trainer is an E&M, and Procedure based Coding, Compliance, Data Charge entry and HIPAA Privacy specialist, with over 20 years of experience.  Lori-Lynne’s coding specialty is OB/GYN office & Hospitalist Services, Maternal Fetal Medicine, OB/GYN Oncology, Urology, and general surgical coding.  She can be reached via e-mail at [email protected] or you can also find current coding information on her blog site: http://lori-lynnescodingcoachblog.blogspot.com/.  

Lori-Lynne’s Coding Coach Blog

Hypertension “with” ICD-10 Coding

When assigning diagnosis codes for hypertension (HTM), there is an presumed causal relationship between hypertension and heart involvement, and between hypertension and kidney involvement. The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting (I.C.9) instruct, “These conditions should be coded as related even in the absence of provider documentation explicitly linking them, unless the documentation clearly […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

Guideline Hypertension, CKD, CHF and Diabetes Mellitus

Have a question for the guidelines experts!!

Discussion

Assessment plan:
Diabetes with CKD-3
Hypertension

Code:
E11.22
N18.3
I10

Rationale/opion given is that the physician has linked the DM and CKD utilizing the word "with" and coding guideline for "with" should be interpreted as "associated or due to"

Similar question

Diagnosis
Diabetes with CKD-3
Hypertension
Chronic diastolic CHF

Code:
E11.22
N18.3
I11.0
I50.32

So is this the correct interpreration of the guidelines as opposed to coding?
I12.9 on the first one.
I13.0 on the second one

Thanks for the help

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

DX for Pulmonary Hypertension w/CKD

Hi everyone,

I hopefully have an easy question that I just can’t find…… If a patient has Pulmonary hypertension with ESRD, do I code I12.0 and N18.6? I was thinking I27.0 and N18.6. I understand that Pulmonary hypertension is different than regular hypertension but one of our Cardiology providers coded I27.0, N18.6 and I12.0. Thank you in advance.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Chronic kidney disease and hypertension???

In the ICd-10 guidelines it states to assume a causal relationship between chronic kidney disease and hypertension. However, while coding a patient’s chart at work I was informed to assume this was incorrect unless the provider documents that there is a relationship between hypertension and chronic kidney disease; such as key words that state due to or with. I was informed to code hypertension as just I10 because there was no documentation stating a relationship between hypertension and chronic kidney disease?? I work in a nursing home-long term care facility and just wanted to verify. Thanks.

Medical Billing and Coding | AAPC Forum

Hypertension and CHF

Good Afternoon Coding World!

I want to make sure that i’m under the right impression when reading 2017 coding guidelines.

The ICD-10 coding guidelines states :

Hypertension
The classification presumes a causal relationship between hypertension and heart involvement and between hypertension and kidney involvement, as the two conditions are linked by the term “with” in the Alphabetic Index. These conditions should be coded as related even in the absence of provider documentation explicitly linking them, unless the documentation clearly states the conditions are unrelated.
For hypertension and conditions not specifically linked by relational terms such as “with,” “associated with” or “due to” in the classification, provider documentation must link the conditions in order to code them as related.

So, If hypertension (without any mention of relationship) is documented in the same note as CHF. I should presume relationship and link both HTN and CHF?

Medical Billing and Coding | AAPC Forum

Coding Complications of Pregnancy: Hypertension, Pre-eclampsia, Eclampsia and ICD-10

Coding Complications of Pregnancy:  Hypertension, Pre-eclampsia, Eclampsia and ICD-10
Hypertension is dangerous during pregnancy because it may interfere with the placenta’s ability to deliver oxygen and nutrition to the fetus and has also been noted to be a contributing factor in  low-birthweight babies.  Pregnant patients may have other health problems too, such as gestational diabetes,  that can contribute to the complexity of the pregnancy.  These pregnancy complication may necessitate a patient be induced for delivery prior to the “normal” timeframe of 38-40 weeks of gestation.  If induced for delivery,  the patient will be closely monitored for a vaginal, or if more complications arrise, be delivered via cesarean section.
Women with hypertension in pregnancy have a higher risk of complications such as:
·         Abruptio placentae. (Placental abruption)
·         Cerebrovascular accident. (CVA)
·         Disseminated intravascular coagulation. (DIC)
The fetus has an increased risk of:
·         Intrauterine growth restriction. (IUGR)
·         Prematurity.
·         Intrauterine death.
As you can see in the table below, ICD-10cm gives us these codes to be used when hypertension is a factor in pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium.
O10  Pre-existing hypertension complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
O11  Pre-existing hypertension with pre-eclampsia

O12  Gestational [pregnancy-induced] edema and proteinuria without hypertension
O13  Gestational [pregnancy-induced] hypertension without significant proteinuria

O14  Pre-eclampsia
O15  Eclampsia
O16  Unspecified maternal hypertension
As we can see, not only do coders have to choose the correct code, the providers need to give good clear documentation for the coders to choose from.   However, before we can correctly choose these codes, we need to have a good working knowledge of what the definitions are of the pregnancy hypertensive code-set.   Unfortunately , the cause of pre-eclampsia is still unknown. 
Pre-existing hypertension is defined as: 
·         a systolic blood pressure (BP) of 140 mm Hg or greater,
·         and/or a diastolic BP of 90 mm Hg or more,
·         either pre-pregnancy or  before 20 weeks
Gestational hypertension (aka pregnancy-induced hypertension)  
·         Is the development of a new hypertension diagnosis in a pregnant woman after 20 weeks gestation without the presence of protein in the urine or other signs of preeclampsia.
·         Can be considered severe when systolic blood pressure is ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure is ≥110 mmHg on two consecutive blood pressure measurements at least four hours apart
Preeclampsia is defined as:
·         A condition in pregnancy characterized by abrupt hypertension (a sharp rise in blood pressure),
·         Albuminuria (leakage of large amounts of the protein albumin into the urine)
·         Edema (swelling) of the hands, feet, and face
·         A headache that will not go away
·         Seeing spots or changes in eyesight
·         Pain in the upper abdomen or shoulder
·         Nausea and vomiting (in the second half of pregnancy)
·         Sudden weight gain
·         Difficulty breathing
·         Severe hypertension and signs/symptoms of end-organ injury are considered within the severe spectrum of the pre-eclampsia disease process.
o   Note:  In 2013, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) removed proteinuria as an essential criterion for diagnosis of preeclampsia with severe features.
Eclampsia is defined as:
·         The development of grand mal seizures in a pregnant patient with diagnosed pre-eclampsia, (in the absence of other neurologic conditions that could account for the seizure activity)
HELLP syndrome (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets) is commonly defined as :
·         a severe form of pre-eclampsia,  OR
·         HELLP syndrome can be considered an independent disorder from pre-eclampsia based upon the providers documentation)
Preeclampsia affects 3% to 5% of all pregnancies and any pregnant woman can get preeclampsia, but studies have shown that a patient is at a higher risk of pre-eclampsia if the provider has noted any of these risk factors:
·         This is the first pregnancy
·         A family history where the patient’s mother or sister had preeclampsia or eclampsia during pregnancy
·         Patient is pregnant with a multiple gestation (eg: twins, triplets)
·         Patient is under age 20 or over age 40 at the time of pregnancy
·         The patient has a pre-existing diagnosis of high blood pressure, kidney disease, or diabetes
·         The patient has a pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 (potential obesity)
·         The patient was diagnosed with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy
What to look for clinically – to choose the correct codes in ICD-10
Now that we are fully entrenched in ICD-10 coders will need to look for the above and verify that the provider has clearly stated the diagnosis when coding for a pregnant patient with symptoms of hypertension and/or pre-eclampsia.    If only the symptoms are noted, it is warranted to then query the physician and ask if the symptoms correlate to a specific diagnosis, or are simply “separately identifiable”  signs and symptoms.
Clinical Emergency Department Note:
HPI: 41-year female, G2P0A1, at 36 and 3/7 weeks,  presents to the Emergency room with sever headache and confusion.  Husband and mother both report that the patient has had episodes of muddled thinking for last ten days or more.  Pregnancy has been uneventful.  While in the Emergency Department, the  pt complains of bilateral pulsing headache with no visual disturbances. Headache is aggravated with any movement and has not responded to Tylenol.  Pt has had nausea x 3 days, no vomiting, but has symptoms of oliguria. Pt states “Cannot remember when I last urinated”.   ROS includes  RUQ pain.  Patient reports good fetal movement, denies contractions, vaginal bleeding, or pelvic cramping. Patient also denies dizziness, loss of coconsciousness, tremors, seizures, SOB, chest pain.   Patient denies tobacco, alcohol, or drug use.  Patient states she took Tylenol 2 hrs ago, but without relief of headache.
Physical Exam:
Vital Signs: BP 142/94, T 98.9°F, P 94, R 22. Ht: 5’ 0” Wt: 151 lb.
Well nourished, well-groomed, A&Ox3, mood distressed.
HEENT, Respiratory and Cardiac exams all normal.
Abdomen: Fundal height consistent with 36 weeks, single fetus, vertex and engaged; fetal weight ~ 2,200g, FHR 142 bpm. Fetus small for gestational age.
Musculoskeletal: Adequate muscle tone + full AROM x4. Deep tendon reflexes were 4+/4+ with sustained knee and ankle clonus.
Extremities: Generalized edema present, 3+ bilateral edema LE. No cyanosis.
Vaginal exam: Cervix fingertip dilated and 5% effaced. The vertex was presenting at 0 station. Membranes intact. Laboratory: U/A 3+ proteinuria +2 glucose
Assessment/Plan:  Severe pre-eclampsia.  Will obtain Fetal ultrasound with bio-physicial profile and fetal non-stress test to assess fetal status.  Proceed with Direct admit to Labor and Delivery unit for induction of labor.  Admission orders: called and faxed to L&D unit nurse.  Will contact patient’s primary OB to meet the patient at L&D and assume care for induction of labor in a pre-eclamptic advanced maternal age patient.
*****************************************************************************************
Operative Note:
Indication:   41-year-old patient that has been admitted to Labor and Delivery unit for induction of labor due to Severe pre-eclampsia.  Induction attempted with IV Pitocin, but patient failed to progress. Fetus is cephalic per bedside ultrasound, and we will proceed with low transverse c/s
Patient was prepared and draped in the usual manner.  Incision was made as noted above and carried down through the subcutaneous tissue, muscular fascia and peritoneum. Once inside the abdominal cavity, a low cervical transverse incision was made in the lower uterine segment after creating a bladder flap by both blunt and sharp dissection. With creation of the bladder flap, a transverse incision was made and the infant was delivered as a vertex. The placenta was removed and appeared normal w/3 vessel cord, cord blood was obtained. The infant was handed off to the nurses in attendance. The uterus was then exteriorized and brought out through the abdominal incision. We then closed the uterine incision in the usual manner with #1 Chromic suture in a running continuous manner. The bladder flap was inspected for hemostasis and closed with #2-0 Chromic in a running continuous manner as well. Number 0 Vicryl was used to close the fascia in a running continuous manner. The subcutaneous tissue and peritoneum were closed with #2-0 Vicryl suture in a running continuous manner. The skin was closed as noted above. Foley catheter inserted. Clear urine was noted. The sponge count was correct times 2. There were no complications.  Estimated blood loss was 600 cc.  Delivery of live male infant weighting 5 pounds 1oz having Apgar’s of 7 at one minute and 9 at five minutes.  The patient was then awakened and taken to the Recovery Room in good condition 
CPT Procedure Coding considerations for the above include:
A)     Coding and Billing for the Emergency Department visit (99281 – 99285)
B)      Coding and Billing for the Cesarean and/or Global Delivery Care by OB  (Depending on care delivered)
a.       59510    Routine obstetric care including antepartum care, cesarean delivery, and postpartum care (Global Service)
b.      59514    Cesarean delivery only;
c.       59515    Cesarean delivery only; including postpartum care
ICD10 pcs Procedure Coding Consideration
10D00Z1 Extraction, Products of Conception, Low Cervical cesarean section
ICD-10 cm Diagnosis Coding considerations include:
O14.13 Severe pre-eclampsia, third trimester
O61.0  Failed medical or unspecified induction of labor, delivered, with or without mention of antepartum condition
O09.513 Supervision of high-risk pregnancy with elderly primigravida third trimester N/A
Z3A.36  36 Weeks gestation
Z37.0 Single live birth
Coding Wrap up
In the clinical documentation by the provider, it was very well outlined and recorded to show the clinical diagnosis of severe pre-eclampsia.  As per the ICD-10cm guidelines, In coding for obstetrics, if the trimesters are known, it is to be coded, in addition to the weeks of gestation. 
When coding for this scenario in CPT, the E&M of the emergency room physician is considered “separately identifiable” from the obstetricians’ charges.  Therefore, it is appropriate to code and bill for the emergency room physician, based upon the documentation. 
When choosing the CPT code for the delivery, the coder will need to ascertain whether or not the delivery was performed as a “global” service.  If the global service was performed by the OB provider, the entire spectrum of pregnancy care (which includes; antepartum, delivery care, and postpartum care services) should be billed.   If the physician performed only the cesarean delivery and is not the global provider of service, then the cesarean only code should be billed.  This also holds true if the provider performed the cesarean and is going to provide the postpartum care too.
ICD-10pcs – the coder needs to know whether or not the cesarean was performed as a classical, low cervical, or extraperitoneal cesarean section.  In the operative note, the physician noted this was a low transverse cesarean section.  The ICD-10 tables bring us to the code 10D00Z1 Extraction, Products of Conception, Low Cervical cesarean section.
If you are not seeing all the information you need in the clinical documentation to determine if the diagnosis is “hypertension”  “pre-eclampsia”  “Eclampsia” or “HELLP” syndrome,  do not hesitate to query the provider and ask for additional clarification to be documented in the record. 

Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC and ICD10 cm/pcs Ambassador/trainer is an E&M, and Procedure based Coding, Compliance, Data Charge entry and HIPAA Privacy specialist, with over 20 years of experience.  Lori-Lynne’s coding specialty is OB/GYN office & Hospitalist Services, Maternal Fetal Medicine, OB/GYN Oncology, Urology, and general surgical coding.  She can be reached via e-mail at [email protected] or you can also find current coding information on her blog site: http://lori-lynnescodingcoachblog.blogspot.com/.   

Lori-Lynne’s Coding Coach Blog