Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

3 part distal radius ORIF WITH tenotomy of brachioradialis

Our provider is performing a tenotomy of the brachioradialis tendon (CPT 25290) during an ORIF of a distal radius fracture (CPT 25609) He is using the same fracture diagnosis on both the ORIF and the tenotomy.

Documentation:
"due to the pull of the brachioradialis , it was not possible to reduce the fracture. Therefore, a brachioradialis tenotomy was performed.", or

" brachioradialis tenotomy was performed in a subperiosteal fashion to allow radial styloid manipulation"

Although there are no bundling edits on these codes, it is my feeling that this is would be part of the ORIF approach, and not separately reportable.

Am I right in saying this?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

ORIF Metacarpal Malunion w/ Osteotomy

Hello

My provider performed a ORIF metacarpal malunion with osteotomy. My code choices are 26546 or 26565. The issue I’m having is I’m not sure if I can use 26546. The description for this code is for a nonunion and my procedure was performed on a malunion..

Thanks in advance.

I then examined the middle finger metacarpal. Traction and manipulation efforts would not move the dislocation at all. I therefore elected to proceed with open reduction internal fixation. A 4 cm longitudinal incision was then made in the region overlying the metacarpal fracture. Skin was incised sharply. Blunt dissection was then taken. The extensor tendons were protected. The periosteum overlying the fracture was sharply elevated. Debris was cleared from the fracture site. After clearing fibrous tissue it became clear that there was bone bridging the dislocated shaft and the other fracture fragments including the large articular segment which was dislocated. This was therefore a malunion. I therefore needed to proceed with an osteotomy. Using an osteotome, I carefully attempted to follow the original fracture lines and osteotomed through the newly formed bone to recreate the original fracture fragments. A roungeur was also used to clear debris.

The wound was irrigated. The shaft was first reduced to the proximal ulnar fragment. This fracture was reduced with traction manipulation and pointed reduction clamp. I then placed a pin through the index metacarpal into the middle finger metacarpal while maintaining traction and reduction of the middle finger metacarpal. I then fixed the shaft to the proximal ulnar piece again. While maintaining this reduction a pin was placed across it. I was initially hoping to place a lag screw across the fragment but there was not enough sufficient bone on the exposed side and I feared fracturing the fragment. However, there appeared to be adequate fixation with the pins. I then fixed the ulnar articular surface piece to the shaft with two additional pins.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

CPT 20694 with ORIF

I am looking for research resources. I review claims, and frequently see Orthopedic providers submitting CPT 20694 (removal of external fixation device, requiring general anesthesia) with an ORIF. I have performed exhaustive searches through my coding manual, the NCCI manual, AAOS Code-X, and Google to find any vetted research indicating whether or not this can be separately reported with an open definitive treatment code. The closest I have is this entry from the NCCI Manual regarding the removal of internal hardware at the same site as a surgical procedure, but I’m looking for something more specific:

National Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual for Medicare Services

CHAPTER IV SURGERY: MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM

G. Fractures, Dislocations, and Casting/Splinting/Strapping

10. There are CPT codes (20670 and 20680) for removal of internal fixation devices (e.g., pin, rod). These codes are not separately reportable if the removal is performed as a necessary integral component of another procedure. For example, if revision of an open fracture repair for nonunion or malunion of bone requires removal of a previously inserted pin, CPT code 20670 or 20680 is not separately reportable.

Similarly, if a superficial or deep implant (e.g., buried wire, pin, rod) requires surgical removal (CPT codes 20670 and 20680), it is not separately reportable if it is performed as an integral part of another procedure.

I’m really looking for a cited/vetted resource rather than interpretation or a clinical practice. Thanks!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Failed ORIF patella fx

Hello,

Can anyone help me, The patient just had ORIF of the patella 1 week ago, but a few days ago she was up in the middle of the night and fell so now they are going back in for surgery.

It is within the 90 day Global Period so I am not sure how to code this one. The fx is now displaced.

Do I code the Non Displaced Fx or would this be considered a complication?

M96.89 – Other post procedural complication

Then code the FX

G89.18 – Other acute post procedural pain

Would I Code the 99014 with modifier 78 -Unplanned return to operating room.

I am at a loss.

Thank you,
LLR

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Closed and ORIF

I am looking for written documentation regarding the following scenario please:

Pt. is seen in E.R. by Ortho physician & physician documents that ankle fx is too swollen to go to the O.R. Pt. will be scheduled at a later date after swelling subsides. The physician is wanting to bill for an E.R. visit and closed treatment of the ankle fx even though he documents that the pt. will be going to surgery after the swelling subsides. To me, this is "double dipping". So I’m looking for written documention for this scenario please. Any help/guidance/info would be muchly appreciated! TIA

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Closed Reduction W/o Manipulation Code Billed the Day Prior to ORIF

Good afternoon,

My orthopedic surgeon wants to bill for a closed reduction w/o manipulation code (24500) on 6/8 and bill for the ORIF (24515) on 6/9 (the following day). I advised the provider that all he did on 6/8 was assessed the condition and plan for surgery therefore, 24500 is not separately billable. According to the guideline I’m currently reviewing "if plan is for manipulative procedure at a future date, non-manipulative fracture management should not be billed" If however, "treatment is instituted, with the possibility for a manipulative procedure at a future date, bill non-manipulative fracture management". In this case, the provider already knew and planned for surgery the next day.
My understanding is that closed reduction codes without manipulation involve treating a fracture until is healed that’s why they carry a 90-day global day.
My provider wants me to add modifier 58 to the ORIF code but I think is inappropriate. I honestly think all he should be billing for 6/8 is the E/M code along with modifier 57 and for 6/9 bill for the ORIF.
Any opinions will be appreciated.

Thank you.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

ORIF Tibial eminence fracture / ACL avulsion

I have 27540 for ORIF tibial eminence/ intercondylar spine. But I’m not sure if 27428 for ACL repair of the avulsion is coded in addition.?

OP Note:
Open reduction internal fixation of tibial eminence fracture

A medial para-patellar incision was made approximately 8 cm long. The patellar tendon was retracted with a Gelpi. Additional hoffa’s fat pad was debrided. The fracture fragment was elevated and fracture hematoma and fragments were removed. The fracture fragment was reduced while freeing the medial meniscus. The fracture was reduced using a ball spike pusher. The fracture was held in place with a threaded K-wire. Fluoroscopic images were obtained to verify satisfactory fracture reduction in both the AP and lateral planes. The anterior cruciate ligament was then sutured with #2 Fiberwire in a locking Krakow stitch with 2 sutures. Attention was then turned to creating 2 tibial bone tunnels with the anterior cruciate ligament guide with a beath pin through the tibia and fracture fragment. The 4 tails from the sutures were passed through the tunnels and the sutures were tied over a button and bone bridge at 30 deg of knee extension with an posterior drawer applied. Final fluoroscopic images showed satisfactory fracture reduction in both the AP and lateral planes.

Thank you,
Cindy

Medical Billing and Coding Forum