Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

External Fixator with Closed Treatment and return to OR for staged ORIF

I have a billing/coding question related to external fixator placement.

Is it commonplace to bill 20690 (uniplanar external fixator) and 27825 (closed manip tx pilon) at the initial surgery, and at the time of the definitive surgery, to bill 27827 (open tx pilon) with a 58 modifier.

The physicians thought is that the closed manipulation is a separate procedure from the external fixator, done as a separate and specific maneuver during surgery, and is a necessary step in temporizing an injury. Therefore, the closed manipulation should be coded separately, and is not inherently bundled into the external fixator code. I just need clarification and a reference, if possible.

This is not a case where fixator is applied and closed treatment did not repair the fracture, and the decision was made to return to the OR for open treatment which would be billed with a -78 modifier.

Questions I have are:
1) Is the physician meeting the global requirements of the closed procedure (number of visits required, etc.)
2) Is it acceptable to bill a patient for 2 related procedures at full reimbursement for the same fracture?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Orif greater tuberosity fracture with repair of rotator cuff

H.E.L.P. !!!
Can I bill the rotator cuff repair with the ORIF of the greater tuberosity fracture? I checked the NCCI edits 23630 and 23410 have a 1 indicator. According to the NCCI edits I don’t think I should but maybe some of you have some advice.
Thanks so much!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Closed treatment w/manipulation and ORIF trimal ankle done on same day

Hi all,

I am trying to confirm if our surgeon can submit both cpt codes 27810 and 27814 done on the same day but different encounters. Pt was seen in ER and closed reduction was performed under conscious sedation. It was discussed with the pt and family since there still was displacement of the medial mallous fragment ORIF would be performed, pt went directly to OR from ER. Please advise and thank you in advance!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

ORIF osteochondral patella fragment??

Can anyone help with how they would code this? I almost want to just code it as an ORIF patella (27524) but not sure if that’s the right way to go. Op note below..

Post-operative Diagnosis:
Left knee Knee osteochondral fracture of the patella

Procedure Performed:
Open reduction internal fixation of left knee osteochondral patellar fragment, microfracture of
patella, removal of loose bodies from knee, repair of medial retinaculum.

The patient was identified and brought to the operating room. After general anesthesia the
knee was examined under anesthesia was no significant ligamentous instability. Midline
incision was made and the skin was mobilized to view the joint capsule. Initially there was no
obvious tear in the medial retinaculum. A median parapatellar approach was utilized to
expose the patella and during this it was noted that there was a tear in the medial retinaculum
that we utilized to open the joint. The joint was then exposed and the patella was inverted.
The large osteochondral fragment was identified in the lateral gutter and removed. There
was a smaller osteochondral fragment that had very little bone on it that was also found in the
intercondylar notch. The rest of the joint was visualized after a thorough irrigation and there
was no further fragments were visualized. First the patella was examined and it was noted
that the majority of the cartilage that had sheared off came off of the inferior half of the patella
and was primarily on the medial side. This area was then curetted to remove any hematoma
and the large fragment was then placed in the position and fit excellently. This was secured
with 2, 2.5 mm screws that were countersunk down to the subchondral bone. A 1.5 mm
screw was also placed to further secure the fragment. Excellent fixation was obtained. On
the medial side of the patella there was bare spot where the smaller fragment came from.
This piece was not repairable therefore a 1 mm drill was utilized to perform a microfracture in
the area. At this point the wound was irrigated copiously.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum