Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Reviewing behavioral health & AODA notes in Wisconsin

I started a new coding position at a small clinic that offers behavioral health and AODA counseling. Former billers/coders did not have access to notes or encounters because the provider took care of things herself but there have been many changes to staff. I have access to our AODA notes to make sure certain criteria has been met but our other counselor does not want anyone to have access to her notes; she goes as far as typing them up is Microsoft Word and prints off the note to place in a paper chart and deletes what is typed even though we have an electronic system. I know there are certain policies in place on who can have access to what but I am getting mixed messages from co-workers and superiors on who should be able to review what type of note. Can someone tell me where I can find documentation that states the billing/coding department can review such notes and what criteria needs to be met so as a facility we do not get dinged when an audit occurs.

Thank you,
Lisa

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Are Recovery Auditors Reviewing Your Claims?

Recovery Auditors have been busy. This year alone there are 23 topics under review and three more were just proposed. If you are coding/billing for any of the topics under review, this may be all the reason you need to conduct an internal review. Who Are They? Recovery Auditors, or Recover Audit Contractors (RACs), review […]

The post Are Recovery Auditors Reviewing Your Claims? appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

What to look for when reviewing cardiovascular documentation in ICD-10-CM

By Cindy Basham, MHA, MSCCS, BSN, CCS, CPC
 
“Oh no, I don’t like coding cases involving cardiovascular diagnoses or procedures,” I’ve heard some coders moan loudly, while others throw their hands in the air.
 
Coding for cardiovascular diseases and procedures has a tendency to bring out a level of frustration that was present when we used the ICD-9-CM coding system and is now transferred to our use in ICD-10-CM. Coding educators are hearing these responses frequently when the coding training is focused on the cardiovascular system.
 
This article will explain what to look for when reviewing cardiovascular documentation. Yes, anatomical location and laterality is required by ICD-10-CM for the level of specificity expected with this new coding system. This detail reflects how physicians and coders communicate and to what they pay attention. It is a matter of ensuring the information is captured in the medical record documentation.
 
ICD-10-CM has three main categories of changes for cardiovascular codes:
  • Definition changes
  • Terminology differences
  • Increased specificity
For cardiology, the goal is increased specificity and documentation of the effects of the patient’s condition. Let’s review some of the more common cardiovascular diseases changes.
 
Acute myocardial infarction: Definition change
Documentation for hypertension should include the following:
  • Timeframe: An acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is now considered “acute” for four weeks or 28 days from the time of the incident, a revised timeframe from the previous ICD-9-CM period of eight weeks
  • Episode of care: ICD-10-CM does not capture episode of care (e.g., initial, subsequent, sequelae)
  • Subsequent AMI: ICD-10-CM allows coding of a new myocardial infarction that occurs during the four-week or 28-day acute period of the original (initial) AMI
 
Hypertension: Definition change
In ICD-10-CM, hypertension is defined as essential (primary). The concept of benign or malignant, as it relates to hypertension, no longer exists. Documentation for hypertension should include the following:
  • Type: For example, essential, secondary, etc.
  • Causal relationship: For example, renal, pulmonary, etc.
 
Congestive heart failure: Terminology differences, increased specificity
The terminology used in ICD-10 exactly matches the types of congestive heart failure (CHF). If the physician documents “decompensation” or “exacerbation,” the CHF type will be coded as “acute on chronic.” Documentation for CHF should include the following:
  • Cause: For example, acute or chronic
  • Severity: For example, systolic or diastolic
Atherosclerotic heart disease with angina pectoris: Terminology difference
When documenting atherosclerotic heart disease with angina pectoris, physicians should include the following:
  • Cause: Assumed to be atherosclerosis, note whether there is another cause
  • Stability: For example, stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris
  • Vessel: Note which artery, if known, is involved and whether the artery is native or autologous
  • Graft involvement: If appropriate, physicians should report whether a bypass graft was involved in the angina pectoris diagnosis; also note the original location of the graft and whether it is autologous or biologic
 
Cardiomyopathy: Increased specificity
When documenting cardiomyopathy, physicians should include the following, where appropriate:
  • Type: For example, dilated/congestive, obstructive or non-obstructive hypertrophic, etc.
  • Location: For example, endocarditis, right ventricle, etc.
  • Cause: For example, congenital, alcohol, etc.
 
Heart valve disease: Increased specificity
ICD-10-CM assumes heart valve diseases are rheumatic. If this is not the case, the physician should note otherwise. When reviewing documentation for heart valve disease, look for the following:
  • Cause: For example, rheumatic or non-rheumatic
  • Type: For example, prolapse, insufficiency, regurgitation, incompetence, stenosis, etc.
  • Location: For example, mitral valve, aortic valve, etc.
 
Arrhythmias/dysrhythmia: Increased specificity
When documenting arrhythmias, physicians should include the following:
  • Location: For example, atrial, ventricular, supraventricular, etc.
  • Rhythm name: For example, flutter, fibrillation, type 1 atrial flutter, long QT syndrome, sick sinus syndrome, etc.
  • Acuity: For example, acute, chronic, etc. 
  • Cause: For example, hyperkalemia, hypertension, alcohol consumption, digoxin, amiodarone, verapamil HCI, etc.
Unlike ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM is designed to capture specific clinical documentation, which is essential for communicating the intent of an encounter, confirming medical necessity, and providing detail to support ICD-10-CM code selection. Coders can limit their apprehension by understanding the changes made to various code groups and sharing this information with physicians and non-physician providers. 

 

Email your questions to editor Steven Andrews at [email protected].

HCPro.com – JustCoding News: Outpatient