Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Interpolation Flap–documentation requirements. Is this enough

Hello,
Wondering about this closure documentation. This scenario is for MOHS, for BCC on the right helix, with closure same day, this is all on one note.

At first, all it said was "Closure, Interpolation repair." Then it was corrected to say the following:

"Because of the size, location, and lack of recruitable tissue for repair of the created defect, a(n) Interpolation flap was determined necessary to maximize wound healing, relieve tension, approximate wound edges without wound edge necrosis, and minimize risk of depressed scars, railroad tracks or dehiscence.
Using a #15 blade an incision was made around the donor flap area and continued in a superficial subcutaneous plane under the flap but maintaining it’s broad vascular base. Minimal if any undermining was preformed around the skin margins of the defect. Bleeding was controlled with electrocautery. The flap was advanced into position and pivotal anchor points were positioned. The distal pedical of the interpolation flap was sutured into receiving defect using 6.0 nylon sutures. The unsutured pedical portion of the interpolation flap and recipient site were occluded with xeroform gauze. The final dimension was 2.1 x 1.4 cm. Estimated blood loss: <5 cc The wound was dressed with Bacitracin ointment, Telfa, gauze, and tape. The patient was instructed on wound care and given written postoperative instructions. The patient was instructed to return to the clinic for weekly wound checks and suture removal in 30 days."

Is this enough documentation for that type closure? If not, what else is necessary? (I am thinking at least locations should be listed..)?
Thank you in advance for your response.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Dermatology- Is this area considered the LIPS or the FACE?

Hello,
Looking for clarification on this location please.
When coding dx and procedures on the area of skin directly under the nose, not touching the actual lip or lip border at all, is this still considered the "upper lip" or "other part of face?"
I know code choices will differ depending on what location this falls under.

Thank you in advance for your response.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Is this illegal ? Beefing up E/M levels for RVU’s??

As part of the new process at our facility we are required to tell the provider that the level they have selected will be down or up coded to match the documentation.
Now what is happening is the doctor(s) are coming back and saying they will add more documentation after the fact so they can receive a higher level or the one
the originally selected. This feels wrong since the motivation is ($ $ $ ) RVU’s. Upper management doesn’t think anything is wrong with this. Am I over reacting here or does
anyone else see a problem with this?? If you agree with me please if you have anything that I can show as proof I would greatly appreciate it!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Is Transitional Care Management (TCM) appropriate for this patient?

Hello. Hoping someone can help with my TCM question.

A TCM service was started for a patient who was in the hospital and worked up for chest pain. All diagnostic testing was negative. A 2 day outreach, medication reconciliation and a face-to-face visit with the physician was completed. The physician addressed the patient’s resolved chest pain, stable hypertension and stable hyperlipidemia. He ordered the nurse to follow up with the patient in a week to get an updated status on the patient’s condition. Wants to make sure the patient is not having any chest pain symptoms that may prompt the patient to go back to the hospital. The RN called the patient who was feeling fine and reported no chest pain symptoms.

Is it appropriate to report a TCM service for this patient considering clinical non-face-to-face services only included a follow-up phone call to the patient to address current health status?

Thank you!!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Totally lost on this one

Any CPT ideas on this one would be appreciated. My doctor is saying debridement of presacral and perineal wound, debridement of lower quadrant sinus tract with placement of penrose drains. I am not seeing any actual debridement done and can’t come up with any codes for this one..

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was given general anesthetic. He was placed in Allen stirrups, prepped with Betadine solution and sterile towels. We probed the left lower quadrant site, passed a forceps and found that it seemed to go quite deep towards the pelvis, so I irrigated with saline solution and found that it did in fact tract and drained out through the rectum.
*
I then used a curette to clean out as much as possible this sinus tract and then from below probed through the anus cleaning out the sinus tract above the rectum was opened and then cleaned out with a curette the sinus tract where the Penrose exit just lateral to the anus on the right hand side. Finally, the vascular clamp passed to have his drain through the left lower quadrant wound and brought it out to the apex of the rectum and brought outside the anus and then I sutured that drained to preexisting drain that went into the rectum and came out lateral to the rectum. I then cut the looped drain and pulled it through so that the drain now came out via the perineal opening and no longer leaking out to the anus. Finally, I made a second incision just anterior to the sphincter on the right-hand side and made a second incision through there and tunneled the drain, so it went from left lower quadrant out to wound just anterior to the scrotum. Each were sutured in place with nylon. Dry dressings were applied. Dr. XXXX examined the patient and confirmed proper positioning of the drains. He was taken to recovery.

:confused::confused:

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Please help! Is this renal billable?

Impressions
Two-vessel coronary artery disease
Severe in-stent restenosis within mid RCA
Positive FFR of RCA
Successful cutting balloon angioplasty to mid RCA with 3.0 x 10 mm Wolverine balloon
Elevated LV filling pressure
Abdominal aortography with runoff showing no severe renal artery stenosis and no significant PAD in the aortoiliac system

Coronary Findings
Diagnostic
Dominance: Right

Left Main
The left main was selectively engaged with a catheter and visualized by angiography. Other findings: Large caliber vessel that is angiographically normal..

Left Anterior Descending
The LAD was visualized by angiography. Other findings: Medium to large caliber vessel proximally with a ledge-like 30-40% proximal stenosis. The mid to distal vessel has diffuse luminal irregularities but no area of critical stenosis. The first diagonal is a sizable branching vessel that has mild luminal irregularities but no critical stenosis..

Left Circumflex
The circumflex was visualized by angiography. Other findings: Medium to large caliber vessel with a 20-30% proximal stenosis. The mid stent is patent with 20-30% in-stent restenosis. OM1 is angiographically normal..

Right Coronary Artery
The RCA was selectively engaged with a catheter and was visualized by angiography. Other findings: Medium to large caliber dominant vessel with a proximal 20-30% stenosis. There is a patent stent in the mid vessel (2 layers) with 60-70% in-stent restenosis proximally and 50-60% in-stent restenosis distally. The RPDA is small with mild ostial disease. The RPL has a patent proximal stent with 30-40% in-stent restenosis that appears stable from prior angiograms. There are 2 branches to the RPL that have mild luminal irregularities..
Mid RCA lesion is 70% stenosed. This is the culprit lesion. The lesion is not complex (non high-C). The lesion was previously treated using a drug-eluting stent. Previous treatment took place 1-2 years ago. There is in-stent restenosis. There is no in-stent thrombosis. The stenosis was measured using by visual assessment.

Intervention
Mid RCA lesion
POBA
Guide catheter used: CATH GUIDE 6F FR4 BOSTON SCI.Guidewire that crossed the lesion: GUIDEWIRE PROWATER .014"X180CM STRAIGHT PTCA ASAHI INTECC. Angioplasty using a scoring balloon was performed. The balloon used was a CATHETER BALLOON CUTTING 3.00X10MM WOLVERINE BOSTON. Maximum pressure: 12 atm. Comments: Inflated both proximally once and distally once within previously placed stent.
Post-Intervention Lesion Assessment
There is no residual stenosis post intervention.

Left Heart
Left Ventricle LV end diastolic pressure is moderately elevated and was measured at 30 mmHg. Comments: Abdominal aortography with runoff: Abdominal aorta is patent. Left renal artery has a 30% proximal stenosis. Right renal artery is patent with no significant stenosis. Bilateral common iliac, bilateral internal iliac, and bilateral external iliac arteries are patent with no significant stenosis. Bilateral common femorals are patent with no significant stenosis..

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Can someone PLEASE help me code this report??

Pre-op Ox: Critical limb ischemia of the left foot Post-op Ox: Critical limb ischemia of the left foot

Procedures:
1. Suprarenal aortogram
2. Bilateral LE Angiogram
3. 3rd order catheter placement (Selective L LE angiogram from L SFA)
4. Laser Artherectomy with 2.0 laser catheter of the mid-distal Left SFA
5. Angioplasty of the left popliteal artery with 5.0x120mm DCB Spectranetics
6. Stenting of the mid-distal left SFA with 6.0x120mm DES Zilver
7. Moderate sedation supervision

Anesthesia: lidocaine 2% Sedati on: Versed and Fentanyl

Moderate Conscious sedation was provided under my direct supervision with the sedation trained nurse using 2 mg of IV Versed and SO mcg of IV Fentanyl.
Start time was 0935 and end time was 1145 . There were no complications. See hospital trained nurses sedation sheet I signed and dated for the completed procedure

Access Site: Right femoral artery 6F

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: Using micropuncture needle and ultrasound guidance, we placed a 6-French sheath via Seldinger technique to the left common femoral artery. A catheter was inserted into the aorta and an aortogram was performed. The Omni Flush catheter was then pulled down to the aortic bifurcation and a bilateral runoff was performed. The results of the angiogram are listed below. Next, the Omni Flush catheter was selectively placed in the proximalright SFA and contrast injections of the right leg were performed to further evaluate the infrapopliteal disease.

Findings:

Aortogram
– Patent b/I renal arteries
– Mild distal aortic disease

Right Lower Extremity
1. Common Iliac artery patent
2. Internal Iliac artery patent
3. External Iliac artery patent
4. CFA patent
5. Profunda patent
6. SFA patent
7. Popliteal patent
8. TP trunk patent
9. AT artery patent
10. PT artery patent
11. Peroneal artery 100% occluded ostially

Left Lower Extremity
1. Common iliac artery patent
2. Internal Iliac artery patent
3. External Iliac artery patent
4. CFA patent
5. Profunda patent
6. SFA Mid 70-80% disease; Distal 100% occluded
7. Popliteal proximal 100% occluded; Mid 80% disease
8. TP trunk patent
9. AT artery patent
10. PT patent
11. Peroneal artery severely diseased

Intervention:
Given disease in the left superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery, the decision was made to Intervene on that vessel. The short 6 French sheath was exchanged for a long 6 French sheath and placed into the proximal superficial femoral artery.
Once the sheath was in the proximal superficial femoral artery a run-through wire was used to circumvent the lesions In the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery. The wire was placed distally into the TP trunk. Laser arthrectomy was decided upon in origin debulk the lesion. A Spectranetics 2.0 laser catheter was used to to laser arthrectomy of the mid to distal left superficial femoral artery. After multiple runs, an angiogram was done which showed significant improvement
in disease and improvement in flow. A 5.0 x 120 mm drug-coated balloon was then used to angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery. Once that was completed, an anglogram was done which showed good flow in the vessel; however there appeared to be a small dissection in the mid to distal left superficial femoral artery. A 6.0 x 120 mm Zllver was placed In the mid to distal portion and an angiogram was done showing no perforations or dissections and good flow in the vessel.
The long 6 French sheath was then exchanged for a short 6 French straight over a J-wire. Groin shots were done which showed that we are above the bifurcation and noted there was no significant calcification at the site of entry. Angio·Seal was deployed with good hemostasis.

Oosure Device: Angioseal

EBL: less than 25 ml Complications: None lines: None Specimens: None Condition: Stable

NP:
Critical limb ischemia of the left foot
– ASA, plavix and lipitor
– Monitor and bedrest for 3 hours. D/C Home at 630pm
– IVF

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

New to coding this speciality please help

Postoperative Diagnosis:*
Empyema, Left
*
Procedure:
1. Video thoracoscopy converted to mini-thoracotomy, Left
2. Left lower lobe lung biopsy
3. Partial decortication, Left

*
Indications:
68 y/o gentleman who presented to hospital with general malaise and leukocytosis. A CT Chest was concerning for left empyema, as well as multiple lung nodules and lymphadenopathy. For these reasons, he was consented and brought to the operating room for the aforementioned procedures.
*
Anesthesia:
General
*
Estimated Blood Loss:
150*mL
*
Wound Classification:
Dirty / Infected
*
Findings:
Significant pleural thickening, pleural and lung based nodularity with partial fibrothorax of the left lower lobe. Approximately 300ml and white, cloudy effluent was drained upon initial pleural entry. Multiple pleural and lung biopsies were taken. Fluid was sent for culture and cytology.
*
Specimens:
1. Left pleural fluid for culture
2. Left pleural fluid for cytology
3. Left pleural biopsy
4. Left lower lobe, lung biopsy
*
Procedure Details:*
The patient had their history and physical updated prior to the procedure. They were then transferred to the operating suite and placed on the operating table where general anesthesia with a dual-lumen endotracheal tube was affected by the anesthesia team. The patient was then repositioned in the right lateral decubitus position with their left side up. The left chest was then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A surgical time-out was then performed to confirm patient identity, laterality, as well as the surgery to be performed.
*
Next, an approximately 1cm skin incision was made overlying the 8th interspace lateral to the anterior axillary line. Dissection was carried down through subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery. Lung isolation was verified with anesthesia. The pleural cavity was then entered. Cloudy effluent was evident upon pleural entry, some of which was sent off the field in a Luekens’ trap for culture. 2 additional working incisions were placed, one overlying the auscultory triangle and one overlying the 6th interspace and one in the 9th interspace anteriorly. The lower lobe of the lung was significantly adhered to the diaphragm and chest wall in several areas. In these areas, the parietal pleura was thickened up to 1cm, and there was significant pleural and lung based nodularity. Several areas of which were taken for biopsy using biopsy forceps. In order to attempt a decortication, the decision was made to extend our original incision to a mini thoracotomy.
*
Next, the initial incision was extended with a 10-blade scalpel. Dissection was carried down through the subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery. A small portion of latissimus was divided. The intercostal muscle overlying the 9th rib was divided and retractor inserted. The lower lobe was bluntly dissected free from the chest wall. There was thick, almost early fibrothorax present overlying most of the lower lobe. On the superior segment of the lower lobe nodularity was present. This area was biopsied sharply the the thickness of tissue was unable to accommodate a linear cutting stapler. Hemostasis was obtained. The upper lobe was lightly fused to the chest was and pericardium. The pericardial surface was left in place, while the apex and posterior surfaces were freed using blunt dissection. Several small pleural rents were made during this process.
*
Next, two 36Fr chest tubes were placed under direct vision. An anterior tube was directed towards the apex, while a posterior/inferior curved tube was placed along the diaphragm. The left upper lobe was reexpanded under direct vision. Number 2 Vicryl paracostal sutures were placed to close the interspace. All skin incisions were closed in layers with 0 and 2-0 Vicryl. 4-0 Monocryl in a running subcuticular manner was used to close the skin. Dermabond was placed over the wounds. At this stage, the procedure was discontinued. The patient was delivered from anesthesia, extubated, and transferred to the postanesthesia recovery unit in stable condition having tolerated the procedure well. I was present, scrubbed and active throughout the entirety of the procedure.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

HEALTHCON 2019: You Don’t Want This Guy Knocking at Your Door

HEALTHCON 2019 (April 28-May 1 in Las Vegas) is for everyone on the business side of healthcare, and provides cutting-edge education, networking, and other opportunities to attendees. Expert speakers, such as Office of Inspector General (OIG) Special Agent Tony Maffei, help make this a professional event you can’t miss. AAPC asked Maffei about his presentation, […]

The post HEALTHCON 2019: You Don’t Want This Guy Knocking at Your Door appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

How is this should be coded? (OB/GYN OUTPATIENT)

Hi guys!

Can you please help me to code this ob encounter?

Scenario:
An established patient visited the clinic for her initial antenatal care. She is currently 15 weeks pregnant (G2,P1) with previous cesarean section due to breech presentation. This is a spontaneous pregnancy. Patient has currently no complaints. No nausea, no vomiting, no abdominal pain, no vaginal bleeding. She is a known case of Uterine Fibroid, and Iron Deficiency Anemia. Patient is taking oral iron replacement. No surgical history, negative family history. The physician requested dating scan and booking investigation for the patient.

I hope you can help me with this.

Thank you!!!
:):)

Medical Billing and Coding Forum