Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Valves: unspecified rheumatic vs non-rheum

When mitral, aortic, tricuspid and pulmonary valves are all documented as having insufficiency, is I08.8 reported or I08.3 with I37.1?

The rationale in favor of the latter is that the I08 section only names mitral, aortic and tricuspid valves with *no mention of pulmonic* whether rheumatic or not, while the I37 section "Excludes 1" note, only excludes *congenital or specified* rheumatic disorders.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Guidance for selecting Acute vs Chronic Osteomyelitis with site when A/C unspecified

When osteomyelitis is unspecified as to acute or chronic in documentation, certainly best to query re status so location can be coded. But in absence of clarification, is there any guidance to select acute or chronic as default?

Thanks for your thoughts

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Unspecified vs ‘Other specified” Codes

I am in a quandary right now. I was taught that you do not code anything that is not documented in the encounter note. (except chronic conditions etc that have been established and are under ongoing treatment). With this being said, the office I worked for was getting a lot of kickback for using the ‘unspecified’ codes (ex: D51.9, E78.00 etc.) and as a result they wanted to use the other specified codes (D51.8 vs D51.9).

My question is – can we do that? Here is an example:

PT comes in for a B12 shot for "Vitamin b12 def, unspecified" (word for word) as noted on the encounter. We were told to bill as "other specified B12 def" as this would pay and the other would not. Usually I would query the physician for a more accurate diagnosis but a lot of the time there WAS no more specific diagnosis, especially in these cases. Also, asking them to go back and change their diagnosis so we could bill and get paid seemed unethical. This isn’t a case of there being a more accurate diagnosis available, but changing the diagnosis on the claim.

I am relatively new, so I am curious as to whether we could do this. I refused to until I got clarification but I haven’t found any specific documentation on it. Can someone help me out or point me in the right direction? Thank you!

Medical Billing and Coding

Unspecified vs. other

When is it appropriate to use unspecified vs. other? Example, the orthopedic surgeon simply documents distal radius fracture. There is no code for distal radius fracture, other than unspecified. If they don’t document that it’s an intra-articular, extra-articular, etc…. would it be appropriate to choose the "other specified" or should I use unspecified since the physician knew a more specific diagnosis but simply didn’t document it?

Medical Billing and Coding | AAPC Forum