Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

$1.85 Million Paid to Settle Urology Modifier 25 Whistleblower Case

Separately asking routine evaluation and management (E/M) services provided on a similar day as another procedure is usually denied by Medicare. Care providers might typically individually bill E/M services if they meet certain criteria and append modifier 25 vital, on an individual basis specifiable analysis and management service by a similar MD or different qualified health care skilled on a similar day of the procedure or different service to the claim. Modifier twenty five shows payers, like Medicare, that a care supplier went higher than and on the far side the standard E/M of pre-operative and post-operative care related to the medical procedure; which it had been vital, on an individual basis specifiable service. If this modifier gets used, a supplier unbundles a service and receives further compensation ― overpayments of Medicare bucks. Per a whistleblower, this is what Skyline urology allegedly did between January. 1, 2013 and Dec. 31, 2016.

Read the Full Story here!

The post $ 1.85 Million Paid to Settle Urology Modifier 25 Whistleblower Case appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

$1.85 Million Paid to Settle Urology Modifier 25 Whistleblower Case

Separately billing routine evaluation and management (E/M) services provided on the same day as another medical procedure is typically denied by Medicare. Healthcare providers can sometimes separately bill E/M services if they meet certain criteria and append modifier 25 Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician or other qualified health care […]

The post $ 1.85 Million Paid to Settle Urology Modifier 25 Whistleblower Case appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Urology subcontract billing with Rad/Onc

We are a Urology Practice, (listed as Urology under NPPES) who contracts out the services of a Rad/Onc provider that we bill for under our Tax ID/NPI.

We initially see the patient as a new patient, and refer to the Rad/Onc provider to consult and plan IMRT treatment. Are we able to bill the Rad/Onc visit as new patient to the Practice, or should we bill an established visit because we are not listed as Multispecialy.

Please advise, thank you

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Urology help needed-

This is NOT a test question..this is an actual procedure note I am struggling with and getting mixed answers so wanted to see if anyone on the forum could help me out. (done in oupt hospital)

I am thinking 52005- MOD 50, 57420, 74455- MOD 26

But someone else said 52281, 76000- MOD 26, 74420, 51600

And then someone else said 51610, 52000- MOD 59, 57420-MOD 59, 74430, MOD 26

ANY AND ALL HELP AND LOGIC IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!

Operation Performed:
Urethral Dilatation to 28 French
cystoscopy
Voiding Cystourethrogram & Fluoroscopy
Bilateral Retrograde Ureterograms & Fluroscopy
Vaginoscopy

Pre Op Diagnosis: Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections

Post OP Diagnosis: Same

Operative Findings: Normal bladder, ureters, renal pelvis, vagina, digital rectal exam.

Complications: None

Estimated Blood Loss: None

Reason for Operation: Current Urinary tract infections.

Description of Operation:
Patient was place in lithotomy position after anesthesia was induced with no difficulty. the genitalia were then prepped and draped in usual fashion. The female dilators were then used to dilate the urethra up progressively to a caliber of 28 French. The 25 French cystoscope was then placed inside the bladder. Examination of the bladder mucosa revealed normal findings. There was no erythema. There were no calculus debris. there were no trabeculation. The ureteral orfices were normal in position and configuration. The cystoscope was then removed and a 14 French Foley catheter was placed inside the bladder with the balloon dilated with 5mls. 200mls of cystografin was then placed inside the bladder. Under fluoroscopy the bladder contour was noted to be normal. A voiding phase was initiated and no reflux was seen going up either ureter. The bladder was then emptied. The cystoscope was placed back inside the bladder. bilateral retrogrades were then performed with the cone-tip ureter stent. Both ureters were seen to be normal in caliber. Both renal pelves were normal in anatomy. Cystoscope was then removed. The cystoscope was then placed in vagina which demonstrated normal vagina and cervix. Rectal Exam was performed and no stool impaction was noted. Anal Sphincter was normal. She tolerated procedure well and was taken to the recover room in good condition.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Urology Help…..

There is some discussion going back and forth on how this procedure should be coded. If anyone has any input, please help….

Pre-Operative Diagnosis: Right kidney cancer. Positive surgical margin during previous partial nephrectomy.
Post-Operative Diagnosis: Same

Procedure: Right radical nephrectomy, retroperitoneal lymph node sampling.

Anesthesia: General Anesthesia
Complications: None
EBL: less than 100
Fluids: Crystalloids
Specimens: Right kidney and peri renal fat

Narrative of the Procedure:
After informed consent was obtained in preoperative area, the patient was taken back to the operating room. Anesthesia was induced and antibiotics had already been given. The patient was rolled onto the left side with the right flank toward the ceiling. An axillary roll placed. The patient was appropriately padded and strapped to the bed. The lower leg was bent and the upper leg remained straight. The lower knee and ankle were padded. Time-out occurred. Two patient identifiers were used. The previous incision was opened sharply. The fascial sutures were removed. We had access to the kidney. We found the plane between the Gerota’s fascia and the overlying peritoneum. Retractors were placed. The renal hilum was exposed as it had previously been dissected out. The renal artery and vein could be seen. Vessel loops were placed around the renal artery and the renal vein. At this time we stapled across the renal artery to devascularize the kidney. We carefully dissected the remainder of the hilum to ensure there was no further arterial supply to the kidney and there was none. At this time we obtained superior control around the top of the kidney and we stapled across the superior perirenal fat. The vein was then stapled across also. The kidney was completely freed from all of its surrounding attachments and the ureter was the only remaining attachment. We went ahead and stapled across this also. The kidney was then removed. The perirenal fat came with it. We then inspected the hilum. We noted that there was a prominent lymph node roughly 1.5 to 2 centimeters in greatest diameter. This was carefully dissected off of the surrounding tissues and sent separately for permanent pathologic analysis. Reinspection of the fossa demonstrated no bleeding. The fossa was then irrigated with a liter of normal saline. It was removed. One last inspection demonstrated complete hemostasis. We decided not to leave a drain. We then closed the patient’s fascia using 0 Vicryl figure-of-eight sutures. The layers were difficult to ascertain as she had previous surgery 1 week ago. Because of this we took large, single bites across all fascia layers. They were tied down. Once tied down, finger palpation demonstrated no gaps in the closure. The wound was irrigated. The subcutaneous Scarpa’s layer was re-approximated using 2-0 Vicryl. The skin was closed using 4-0 Monocryl in a running sub-cuticular manner. Patient was then awakened, extubated, and discharged back to the PACU in good stable condition.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

New to Urology Coding

I’m new to Urology coding, I’ve done basic urology coding with anesthesia, but now I’m getting more into the field and need a little assistance.

the provider performed: CO2 Laser Condyloma Ablation penile, Penile Biopsy and Cystoscopy. The op report reads: "Procedure:* Genitalia prepped appears fashion.* Lidocaine jelly placed per urethra.* Inspection of the penis revealed the 2 more prominent condylomatous lesions and then several flat condylomatous lesions about 3 millimeters x 4 millimeters.* Couple other small areas that look like new condylomatous lesions.* I did use dilute ascetic acid.* I did not see any other areas of his acetowhite.* I used local anesthesia to numb up the areas on the penis.*

Then placed flexible cystoscope per urethra bladder. He did have a ring stricture at the bulbar urethra.* Narrowed but just let the cystoscope pass.* Once inside the bladder trabeculations noted.* Circumferential protrusion of the prostate was noted.* No tumors no stones no diverticuli.* Pulling into the prostatic urethra he had reasonably open bladder neck but elements of potential early median lobe as well as lateral lobe hypertrophy noted.* Visual obstruction of bladder neck noted.

Then used the scalpel to remove a condylomatous lesion.* Ventral mid shaft distal.* Sent this for by pathology.* The remaining lesions were treated using CO2 laser ablation 2.5-3 watts.* Lesions treated in their entirety.* Good hemostasis.* At the ventral aspect with a biopsy used silver nitrate stick for hemostasis.* Excellent hemostasis.* Antibiotic ointment applied."

I believe this should be coded: 54057, 11420, 52000.

Any input would be helpful…

Thanks

Medical Billing and Coding Forum