Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

10060 vs 10061 using coding clinic second quarter 2017

:confused:from the AHA coding clinic second Quarter 2017
Ask the Editor–and I apologize if this is a rehash.

A patient underwent an incision and drainage procedure at our facility. According to the operative report, an incision was made over the lesion and purulent material was expressed. Loculations were broken up using forceps and more of the material was expressed. The drainage cavity was then irrigated, packed and dressed with sterile gauze.

Would it be appropriate to code an incision and drainage (I&D) as complicated based on documentation that a drain or packing was used? There are many articles available that provide varying opinions and we would appreciate an official response. Should the term complicated be documented or may the coder use the drain or packing as an indicator of a complicated procedure?

ANSWER

No, it would be inappropriate for the coder to assume that the incision and drainage is complicated based on the use of a drain or packing without confirmation from the physician. When the documentation is unclear the coder should query the physician for clarification.

With that said my question is- If I’m not basing a complex I&D on whether the provider used packing or a drain, can use the fact that they probed for loculations, or explored the abscess further to come to a 10061(complex; multiple) for a more complex procedure? I’m asking in the absence of a query would probing and/or breaking up loculations be evidence of a complex I&D? According to the coding clinic we just can’t assume placement of a wick or drain is evidence of the complexity but it says nothing about probing, or breaking anything up shouldn’t be used to determine the complexity. I know it’s at the discretion of the provider, but unless they state it was complex OR if there was more than one abscess then what other indication is there to code a 10061 for the (complicated;multiple except for the obvious more than one)?
Do we call everything a simple I&D unless the provider states it’s complex?

Thank you!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Institutional billing for Suboxone Clinic

I have recently started billing for a suboxone clinic. I have several years experience in Behavioral Health billing; however, this appears to be totally different. To make matters worse, I am told that they are set up with Anthem as an institution. I have zero experience with UB-04 billing.

At first we were billing 99213 with place of service 22 – now I’m being told that is not the correct code. I’m so confused and have no idea what to bill or how to bill it.

Help!!!!!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Walk in Clinic For Quick Medical Attention

Let’s accept that no one ever plans to be sick. Well…almost, except after the forecast of a sunny Friday afternoon following a gruelling week. So what options do you have when you wake up with a sore throat or a fever that refuses to go away? Local Primary Care Physicians are booked up weeks ahead in the season of cold and flu and nothing could be sworse than walking into an emergency room with a running nose sore throat and a cough. Sitting for hours in a waiting room to see a doctor when you are feeling sick is nothing short of a punishment. Only option is to choose between toughing it out by burying your head under covers with a steaming cup of chicken soup or visiting the nearest walk in clinic

Walk in clinic offers brilliant solution when your condition is not life threatening but still demands immediate medical attention, without long wait and inconvenience of a hospital. Walkin clinic of Manhattan provide similar services as offered by hospitals and emergency rooms with minimum waiting period and far less expense..  You can just schedule same day appointment and walk into a walkin clinic and see the doctor. No wonder most people now prefer walk in clinic for unexpected illnesses and minor injuries.

Walk in Clinic of NYC is a same day appointment medical facility that provides a gamut of services including treating acute conditions, follow up and preventative care services. Sinus infections, cold and flu, allergies sore throats, migraines, sprains, bronchitis, ear infections and minor burns and cuts are some of the ailments which are treated at Walk In Clinic of NYC. Health screenings, physical examinations and vaccinations available at walk in clinic that help in preventing sickness in the future.

Centrally located in midtown Manhattan, Walk In Clinic of NYC ensures prompt medical services at reasonable rates for those who has no insurance, otherwise most insurances accepted. With provision of same day appointments you don’t have to wait for long hours.  You can also get prescription and medication refills in case you are unable to reach your doctor. When you schedule an appointment before visiting Walk In Clinic of NYC, it minimises the waiting time and guarantees a relaxing visit.

Resource box

To know more about various services offered by walk in clinic of NYC, logon to http://www.walkinclinicnyc.com/

AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-10 covers orthopedic, cardiovascular coding

by Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS
 
Some interesting tidbits of information can be gleaned from the most recent release of the AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS to help coders as they work in the new code set.
 
I never thought I’d be so eager to read a release about coding instead of the newest James Patterson novel, but this newsletter highlighted topics such as orthopedic screw removals, revision of total knee replacements, heart failure with pleural effusions, leadless pacemakers, the Glasgow Coma Scale, and decompression of the spinal cord. 
 
Orthopedics
Typically, when we see that a device is loose or breaking, we automatically think "that shouldn’t happen," so we opt to code a complication of the device. Well, when this occurs in an orthopedic screw as an expected outcome (typically when the patient begins bearing weight during the recovery/healing process), it should not be coded as a complication.
 
The correct diagnosis codes would be assigned for the specified fracture site with a seventh character identifying a subsequent encounter with routine healing, along with the external cause code (if known), also as a subsequent encounter. (Remember that place of occurrence, activity, and status codes should only be used for the initial encounter, per the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting.)
The ICD-10-PCS root operation would be Removal (third character P) for the removal of the screw from the specified bone.
 
On the other hand, some orthopedic devices can present real complications necessitating removal and replacement. For example, a patient may be admitted for a painful total knee replacement, initial encounter (T84.84xA). In order to remedy this situation, the previously placed components (tibial and femoral) are removed and replaced with new components. This ­scenario leads coders to ponder whether this should be considered a Revision or Replacement, or perhaps something else.
 
ICD-10-PCS defines a Revision as "correcting, to the extent possible, a portion of a malfunctioning device or the position of a displaced device." In this case, the prosthesis isn’t working exactly the way it should, but the ICD-10-PCS Reference Manual states that "putting in a whole new device or a complete redo is coded to the root operation(s) performed."
 
Therefore, the correct root operations would be Removal (P) for taking out the old components, then a Replacement (third character R) for putting in/on a synthetic material that takes the place of the body part. 
 
Cardiovascular
I am confident many coders noticed that the codes for heart failure (category I50) are mostly identical to their ICD-9-CM counterparts.
 
But one thing that probably raised some eyebrows for coders was the Excludes2 note at category J91 (Pleural effusion in conditions classified elsewhere), which seemed to state that a code from category J91 would be assigned as an additional code when seen "in heart failure."
 
Of course, most coders will recall that in ICD-9-CM we normally could not assign a separate code for this situation, based off information in AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM, Third Quarter 1991. The new issue provides clarification that the same rules apply in ICD-10-CM for pleural effusions seen in heart failure patients.
 
The pleural effusions would only be reported separately if therapeutic/diagnostic interventions are required. Pleural effusion is commonly seen with congestive heart failure (CHF) with or without pulmonary edema. Usually, the effusion is minimal and resolves with aggressive treatment of the underlying CHF.
 
The issue also addresses the correct coding of a newer procedure performed for heart blocks: the insertion of leadless pacemakers. You may have asked, as I did, how in the world does this device work if there are no leads to provide the electrical impulses?
 
This technology has been explored for many years and is finally here. Current pacemaker devices are susceptible to issues such as lead failure or malpositioning, as well as pulse generator pocket complications, such as scar formation or even just the visible presence of the device. In contrast, these new cylindrical devices fit directly into the right ventricle, accessed via a transcatheter approach and placed into the endocardial tissue of the right ventricular apex to provide pacing capabilities.
 
For coding purposes, the ICD-10-PCS table 02H (Insertion, heart and/or great vessels) does not provide a specific device option for a leadless pacemaker. The correct device character should be D (intraluminal device). The full ICD-10-PCS code to be assigned is 02HK3DZ (Insertion of intraluminal device into right ventricle, percutaneous) to identify a leadless pacemaker. 
 
Neurology
Revisions in ICD-10-CM allow coders not only to report a coma (R40.20-, unspecified coma) but also to report codes that incorporate a common tool to assess the depth and duration of comas or impaired consciousness, known as the Glasgow Coma Scale.
 
Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, this scale helps to gauge the impact of a variety of conditions, such as acute brain damage due to traumatic and vascular injuries or infections and metabolic disorders (e.g., hepatic or renal failure, hypoglycemia, diabetic ketosis).
 
ICD-10-CM contains subcategories to report the three elements that go into calculating the coma scale:
  • R40.21-, coma scale, eyes open
  • R40.22-, coma scale, best verbal response
  • R40.23-, coma scale, best motor response 
If coders opt to use this reporting option, three codes must be assigned to identify each of the three elements.
 
Codes for the individual Glasgow Coma Scale scores from these categories can be assigned if the provider documents the numeric values, as opposed to the physical descriptions associated with those numeric values.
 
The eye opening response is scored as follows:
  • 4, spontaneous eye opening
  • 3, eyes open to speech
  • 2, eyes open to pain
  • 1, no eye opening
 
The verbal response is divided into five categories:
  • 5, alert and oriented
  • 4, confused, yet coherent, speech
  • 3, inappropriate words and jumbled phrases consisting of words
  • 2, incomprehensible sounds
  • 1, no sounds 
The motor response is divided into six different levels:
  • 6, obeys commands fully
  • 5, localizes to noxious stimuli
  • 4, withdraws from noxious stimuli
  • 3, abnormal flexion, i.e., decorticate posturing, an abnormal posture that can include rigidity, clenched fists, legs held straight out, and arms bent inward toward the body with the wrists and fingers bent and held on the chest
  • 2, extensor response, i.e., decerebrate posturing, an abnormal posture that can include rigidity, arms and legs held straight out, toes pointed downward, and head and neck arched backwards
  • 1, no response 
For example, the documentation states "Glasgow Coma Scale score was obtained upon arrival at the ED; eyes open = 2, best verbal = 3, and best motor = 5." Coders may assign the following:
  • R40.2122, coma scale, eyes open, to pain, at arrival to ED
  • R40.2232, coma scale, best verbal response, inappropriate words, at arrival to ED
  • R40.2352, coma scale, best motor response, localizes pain, at arrival to ED 
Per the Official Guidelines, the seventh characters must match for all three codes.
Subcategory R40.24- (Glasgow Coma Scale, total score) is an additional option provided that identifies the overall score as opposed to each of the three individual elements.
Those codes are:
  • R40.241, Glasgow Coma Scale score 13-15
  • R40.242, Glasgow Coma Scale score 9-12
  • R40.243, Glasgow Coma Scale score 3-8
  • R40.244, other coma, without documented Glasgow Coma Scale score, or with partial score reported 
Codes from R40.24- would not be assigned if the individual scores are documented.
 
Procedurally, Coding Clinic provided clarification regarding decompressive laminectomies and the assignment of the appropriate body part characters. When assigning an ICD-10-PCS code for a cervical decompressive laminectomy, the body part value states "cervical spinal cord."
 
The cervical spinal cord is considered a single body part value in ICD-10-PCS and would only be assigned one time regardless of the number of cervical levels decompressed to release the spinal cord.
The vertebral level designations of the cervical spinal cord do not constitute separate and distinct body parts anatomically; therefore, ICD-10-PCS Guideline B3.2 does not apply:
 
During the same operative episode, multiple procedures are coded if: The same root operation is repeated at different body sites that are included in the same body part value. 
 
Another note of caution: The ICD-10-PCS Index entry "Laminectomy" instructs coders to see Excision (B), but the objective of a decompressive laminectomy is to release pressure and free up the spinal nerve root. Therefore, the appropriate root operation is Release (N). 

 

Editor’s note: McCall is the director of HIM and coding for HCPro, a division of BLR, in Danvers, Massachusetts. She oversees all of the Certified Coder Boot Camp programs. McCall works with hospitals, medical practices, and other healthcare providers on a wide range of coding-related custom education sessions. For more information, see www.hcprobootcamps.com.This article was originally published in Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.

HCPro.com – JustCoding News: Inpatient

When You Start A Medical Clinic

The practice of medicine is a profession that will not run out of clients. It’s because our body isn’t invincible. Time and time again, he is bound to contract some form of disease and he is going to need a doctor. Let us discuss how to start a medical clinic business.

First of all, you need to have a business plan. The plan should include a business goal, some reason that the business should work, and a phase-by-phase plan on how to achieve the goal.

Next on the list is the capital. Without initial capital, no business can be made possible. You might need to apply for a bank loan. In such a case, you are going to incur an accounts payable. A short-term accounts payable is expected to be resolved in one operation cycle which is one year. Whereas a long-term accounts payable takes more than a year, about two years, to pay off.

Then you have to find a suitable location for your medical clinic. Let’s just assume that you are a medical doctor, you should already have a small clientele that you have built from your years as a medical resident. Location should be somewhere in the business section of the city or town with accessibility to buses or subway trains.

By the time you have found a suitable location, you should have an architect or interior designer plan the layout of your clinic. Your clinic should have a reception area where theres a counter for the receptionist. Equipment that the receptionist needs are a computer unit, Adjacent to it is the waiting area where patients wait for their turn. There should be furniture for sitting, a TV set or some reading materials so the patients dont get bored while waiting. A toilet should also be provided, either unisex or one for each sex.

Depending on the number of doctors, so should there be the same number of offices. There should be two or three treatment rooms. You should make a deal with medical equipment manufacturers to get a good deal on EEG machines, ECG machines, EKG machines, ultrasound machines, weighing scales, etc. They could offer you short-term or long-term accounts payable services. A vending machine can also be put up in the waiting area so that patients could have refreshments to tide over the wait. Make sure you have provisions for parking.

This is no different for a business intending to market their products to another business. Sales and marketing both have something in common: they’re both dependent on the right contacts. If you don’t have the right contacts to sell your products or services to, then your revenue streams will be stagnant at zero. Nothing gets marketed, nothing gets sold. On the flipside, you spend your resources marketing a product, but to the wrong target audience. Something gets marketed, but nothing gets sold, which eats away at your profit margin or even break-even point.

So you see, even as a business you need a proper and highly targeted list, if you’re in an industry that deals majorly in medical equipment or pharmaceuticals or anything medical related that can be of use to a medical clinic, then you must have a qualified list of medical clinics in order for you to do business.

Come visit us and we’ll teach you everything you need to know about account payables, from accounts payable automation to accounts payable jobs.

Related Medical Coding Articles

Theft at Portland medical clinic affects more than 5,000 patients

A former employee of Portland, Oregon-based Northwest Primary Care (NWPC) allegedly stole the personal information of 5,372 patients. The employee accessed this information between April and December 2013, according to a statement released by NWPC. The incident went undetected for two years until law enforcement informed NWPC of the theft on October 13, 2015. NWPC notified the public on December 11, 2015. The former employee accessed patients’:
 

  • Names
  • Dates of birth
  • Social Security numbers
  • Credit card numbers

There is no evidence that the employee used or attempted to use the information, NWPC says. However, NWPC is offering affected patients identity theft protection services including identity recovery services, 12 months of credit monitoring, and a $ 1,000,000 insurance policy.

Reference and background checks are performed on all employees, and employees who work in highly sensitive positions, such as working with patient financial data, undergo additional background checks, NWPC says. Existing policies, procedures, and the employee code of conduct contain guidelines for accessing PHI and prohibit employees from inappropriately accessing or using PHI. NWPC is increasing its technology monitoring and employee training on accessing patient records in response to this incident. Additional technical safeguards will also be implemented to further protect PHI from theft or other criminal activity.

HCPro.com – HIM-HIPAA Insider

Physician assistant – Clinic Visits with X-Rays Performed in Office –

I am writing all of you to see if you have any contacts or answers to a coding/denial question for our office. Our group of neurosurgeons each have a physician assistant who frequently see patients with x-rays performed in the office. We have billed with the 26 modifier but insurance is denying those claims.

See below the reasoning why we have been told to bill with the 26 modifier when the physician assistant sees and reads the images.

The policy is in place because:
1) We do not have actual orders in our system, x-rays are done by verbal orders. If the PA is seeing the patient, they are technically ordering unless ordered by the physician in their dictation prior to.

2) PA’s under Medicare, MPB Ch. 80, are not eligible to ‘supervise’ x-rays done by an x-ray tech. If there is no documentation of physician involvement in the treatment that day then we can’t bill the x-ray under the physician.

3) We did try to bill the TC under the physician in some cases, but again, due to no actual order in place, we didn’t have documentation to back it up (This is supposedly being addressed by Nick, our IT director)

So the decision was until we have a system in place to be able to provide some actual documentation of the order of the x-ray being ordered by the doctor that it would be billed under the interpreting provider, for some docs, if they are in clinic then they are dictating their own interpretation and we should be billing the x-ray under them. Please forward this to your contact and see what she thinks. This came from an attorney who did a compliance course, If you want to change it you will need to address it with Star and it may need to go back to the doctors.

If the supervising physician is not present to supervise the PA, and the PA is not eligible to supervise the technician who performed it, then what is your suggestion.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Physician Assistant – Clinic Visits with X-Rays Performed in Office –

I am writing all of you to see if you have any contacts or answers to a coding/denial question for our office. Our group of neurosurgeons each have a physician assistant who frequently see patients with x-rays performed in the office. We have billed with the 26 modifier but insurance is denying those claims.

See below the reasoning why we have been told to bill with the 26 modifier when the physician assistant sees and reads the images.

The policy is in place because:
1) We do not have actual orders in our system, x-rays are done by verbal orders. If the PA is seeing the patient, they are technically ordering unless ordered by the physician in their dictation prior to.

2) PA’s under Medicare, MPB Ch. 80, are not eligible to ‘supervise’ x-rays done by an x-ray tech. If there is no documentation of physician involvement in the treatment that day then we can’t bill the x-ray under the physician.

3) We did try to bill the TC under the physician in some cases, but again, due to no actual order in place, we didn’t have documentation to back it up (This is supposedly being addressed by Nick, our IT director)

So the decision was until we have a system in place to be able to provide some actual documentation of the order of the x-ray being ordered by the doctor that it would be billed under the interpreting provider, for some docs, if they are in clinic then they are dictating their own interpretation and we should be billing the x-ray under them. Please forward this to your contact and see what she thinks. This came from an attorney who did a compliance course, If you want to change it you will need to address it with Star and it may need to go back to the doctors.

If the supervising physician is not present to supervise the PA, and the PA is not eligible to supervise the technician who performed it, then what is your suggestion.

Posted for Member by Midtown OKC Chapter

Medical Billing and Coding Forum