Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”
Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page 2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationaleTag Archives: Common
Training strategies to help overcome common collections challenges
Most Common Types of Medical Malpractice
When a medical professional such as a nurse, doctor or hospital provides medical treatment at a lower level than the accepted standard, resulting in the patient’s personal injury or wrongful death, medical malpractice likely occurred. Medical malpractice, also termed medical negligence, is a serious issue which affects many Americans every year. These are a few of the situations which may warrant a medical malpractice lawyer.
Pharmaceutical Negligence. When a doctor prescribes medication which has a negative effect on a patient, it may warrant a personal injury lawsuit. If the patient has a previously disclosed allergy against the medication, for example, a claim may be in order. If the medication mixes with other current medication in a harmful manner, personal injury or even wrongful death may occur. Pharmacists may be at fault, as well, if they dispensed a medication incorrectly.
Hospital Negligence. On occasion, the individual physician may not be the one at fault; the establishment is. When the hospital does not offer the procedures, equipment or policies necessary to serve the patient and that patient’s health is compromised because of it, a medical negligence lawyer can help.
Anesthesia Negligence. Just like prescriptions, anesthesia can be dangerous when administered incorrectly. If your anesthesiologist allows you to be harmed by the anesthesia, whether it occurs before, during or after the surgery, call an Austin personal injury law firm.
Delayed Diagnosis. A delayed diagnosis can be disastrous to a patient’s recovery process, particularly in cancer patients. A delayed diagnosis can worsen a person’s condition beyond repair, resulting in brain damage, head injury or spinal cord injury.
Misdiagnosis. When an incorrect diagnosis is made, a patient often receives inappropriate treatment, exacerbating the condition.
Surgical Error. Whether the surgeon accidentally cut an organ or left a piece of equipment inside the body, a surgical error can result in extensive damage and further procedures. If you’ve been the victim of surgical error, consider contacting your Austin attorney-at-law.
Birth Injuries. Medical negligence can cause oxygen deprivation to occur during a child’s birth. Not even considering all the other reasons for birth injury lawsuits, oxygen deprivation in-and-of itself can cause cerebral palsy, erb’s palsy and brain damage in your child.
If you believe you’re the victim of medical malpractice, contact your Austin medical negligence lawyers immediately. The statute of limitations in Texas is two years, meaning you may file a personal injury claim for up to two years after the incident occurs.
McMinn Law Firm stands up for your rights. In Austin, TX, this personal injury law firm has extensive experience fighting for clients in a variety of medical negligence cases. Call McMinn Law Firm today to schedule your free initial consultation.
Meredi is a writer in Austin, TX interested in protecting her rights. For more thorough information on Austin personal injury law, consult with your local attorneys.
Find More Medical Coding Articles
Use of snare retrieval system with open cut down of common femoral vein
Thanks,
SNF ABNs: Avoiding common errors that lead to Medicare Part A denials
Avoid common errors that lead to Medicare denials
Three Pointers To Help You Avoid Common Stent Coding Mistakes
When your urologist places a stent after a ureteroscopic procedure (say for instance stone removal, the coding is not always cut and dry. You will need to dig into the documentation details to ensure you select the proper code for the clinical circumstances.
Here are three pointers which will help you stay away from the most common stent coding mistakes.
Get to know when the stent is not really a stent
Not each and every mention of stent’ in your urologist’s documentation means you can report a stent code such as 52332 (Cystourethroscopy, with insertion of indwelling ureteral stent [e.g., Gibbons or double-J type]).
Here’s the reason: There are two types of stents your urologist will make use of temporary and permanent and the first one is not really a true stent. A temporary stent is in actuality a ureteral catheter, placed at surgery to assist during surgery. The urologist then removes the catheter post surgery before the patient leaves the operating room. In this situation, you should not report stent code 52332. Instead, use 52005 (Cystourethroscopy, with ureteral catheterization, with or without irrigation, instillation, or ureteropyelography, exclusive of radiological service).
For postoperative drainage stents, stick with 52332
The second type of stent is a permanent stent. These types of stents are placed after surgery for drainage, and are indwelling and self retaining. The patient goes away from the operative room with the stent in place, and the stent will be removed at a later date.
Whereas temporary stents that are often placed as part of an endoscopic procedure (52320-52355) can’t be reported in addition to the primary procedure, an indwelling stent, which is placed during the procedure to keep the ureter open and to aid recovery after the procedure can be billed separately.
Here’s how: When your urologist documents that he placed a double-J stent for postoperative drainage, you should use 52332.
Bilateral coding: If your urologist places bilateral double-J stents for postop drainage, your exact coding will depend on the payer. For Medicare, use 52332 with modifier 50 (Bilateral procedure) appended. Private payers may also want 52332-50 or they may request you use 52332-LT (Left side) and 52332-50-RT (Right side) on two lines.
In many instances, report stent placement separately
If your urologist places a stent during the same session in which he also carries out another ureteroscopic procedure, most likely you can report both procedures.
When the patient has a large ureteral stone which the urologist removes ureteroscopically, there may follow a significant amount of ureteral swelling. In order to avoid complete ureteral obstruction, an indwelling ureteral stent may be placed to keep the ureter open.”
In this situation, bill the ureteroscopy code (52352, Cystourethroscopy, with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy; with removal or manipulation of calculus [ureteral catheterization is included]) and 52332. For some payers you may need to add modifier 51 (multiple procedures) to 52332 to indicate that you have carried out a secondary procedure. You don’t need to add modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) as because 52332 is no longer bundled with 52320-52355.
For more on this and for other specialty-specific articles to assist your urology coding, sign up for a good Medical coding resource like Coding Institute.
The Coding Institute is dedicated to offering quality products and services to help healthcare organizations succeed. We are primarily focused on providing specialty-specific content, codesets, continuing education opportunities, consulting services, and a supportive community of healthcare professionals and experts.
Related Medical Coding Articles
Answering common questions for OB coding in ICD-10-CM
- O80, encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery
- M06.9, rheumatoid arthritis, unspecified
- Z37.-, birth status
- Z3A.-
- O26.89-, other specified pregnancy-related conditions
- M06.9, unless you have more specificity regarding the rheumatoid arthritis
- Z37.-
- Z3A.-
- Outcome of delivery; A code from category Z37, Outcome of delivery, should be included on every maternal record when a delivery has occurred. These codes are not to be used on subsequent records or on the newborn record.
- CPT code 59514-22 (cesarean delivery only, with increased procedural service)
- ICD-10-CM code O82.0, encounter for cesarean delivery without indication
- ICD-10-CM code Z37.2
- ICD-10-CM code Z3A.-
- A baseline rate of 110–160 beats/min
- Moderate variability
- No late or variable decelerations
- Early decelerations being present or absent
- Accelerations being present or absent
- If FHR accelerations or moderate variability are detected, the fetus is unlikely to be currently acidemic
- If fetal heart accelerations are absent and variability is absent or minimal, the risk of fetal acidemia increases
- Category II tracings should be monitored closely and evaluated carefully
- Absent variability plus any one of the following:
- Recurrent late decelerations
- Recurrent variable decelerations
- Bradycardia
Common SNF billing struggles
Common SNF billing struggles
Written by Lisa McIntire and Julie Bilyeu of BKD, LLP.
With ever changing billing requirements and increased payer scrutiny, skilled nursing facility (SNF) billing personnel encounter more challenges than ever. Providers that don’t stay on top of changes that impact billing are at risk for noncompliance and decreased cash flow. Oftentimes billing issues can be avoided with ongoing education, consistent review of outstanding accounts receivable, and a thorough process for pre-submission claims review.
Lack of understanding about payment methodology
It sounds simple enough, but understanding how each payer reimburses for services is critical to determining if claims are paid correctly.
Important components of Medicare payment methodology include knowing when rates change annually. This can be confusing since Part A rates are updated in October, while coinsurance and Part B rates change each January. If the new rates aren’t loaded into billing software in a timely manner, accounts receivable will not be accurate, which can make follow-up daunting.
Other considerations include accounting for the 2% sequestration cut that has been in effect since April 1, 2013, and the Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) that applies to certain therapy service codes, both of which your software may or may not apply automatically.
Knowing what to expect in reimbursement from insurance primary and Medicare Advantage (MA) plans can also be confusing. Providers often mistakenly assume these plans pay according to Medicare guidelines; however, contracted providers are generally paid a daily rate based on level of care or charges billed. Insurance payment rates may not change, depending on how often the contract is renegotiated, so it is advisable to review your contract on an annual basis.
Determining patient out-of-pocket costs is another burden, as it can vary greatly by payer. But the earlier patients are notified of their financial responsibility, the higher the likelihood the SNF will be able to collect.
Overlooked adjustments and bad debt write-offs
A common theme surrounding aged accounts receivable (AR) is that the claims have paid, but a balance or credit balance remains after the payment was applied. Just because the claim paid does not mean the situation is finalized. If a balance remains after payment posting, further investigation is in order?and the sooner, the better.
Otherwise, these incorrect balances build up over time, making it difficult and time-consuming to determine later if claims were correctly paid or if there are balances that need to be collected or reported as overpayments. This also contributes to inaccurate AR, which can lead to increased scrutiny by stakeholders as well as unrealistic expectations about cash yet to be collected. However, these issues can be easily avoided by researching any discrepancies at the time payments are posted as well as determining?and resolving?the core issue.
As previously mentioned, incorrect rates in billing software is a common contributor to inaccurate AR balances. Depending on the state, Medicaid rates may change as often as quarterly, which requires even more diligence in ensuring they are correct. Not adjusting for sequestration and MPPR, as detailed on the Medicare remittance advices (RAs), is another reason why balances remain after claims have paid.
For providers with a high volume of MA claims, contractual adjustments can come in many forms, depending on how the receivable is recorded in the billing software. The best way to mitigate the number of necessary adjustments is to take time to proactively set up each insurance payer in the software with detailed reimbursement criteria, which may be based on a daily rate, RUG rates, or total charges billed. If you invest the time on the front end, there will be fewer adjustments to make post-payment.
Reclassifications between payers also need to be done as quickly as feasible. For example, when Medicare processes full pay and coinsurance days differently than what was entered into the billing software, this often results in the need to reclassify a balance from one payer to another which, if not done, will result in an erroneous balance “due” from one payer and a credit balance under the other payer. Not reclassifying patient responsibility amounts also seems to be a pitfall particularly applicable to MA or insurance primary plans.
Reviewing AR to determine which accounts are uncollectible should be done on a quarterly basis, but no less than annually. It is imperative that write-off criteria and approval processes are clear and easily understood by billing personnel as well as monitored closely by management. This is especially important as it relates to Part A coinsurance bad debts that are potentially reimbursable on the year-end cost report.
Lack of adequate training and resources
Throughout the last several years, Medicare?and in many states, Medicaid?billing has become increasingly complex. Gone are the days of straightforward scheduled assessments and simple Part B claims.
With the addition of many types of unscheduled assessments?Start of Therapy (SOT), End of Therapy (EOT), and Change of Therapy (COT), just to name a few?Part B 59 and KX modifiers, and more recently, G codes, which are used to report functional limitations, the importance of providing thorough training and reliable resources for billing staff cannot be overstated.
As anyone who has billed for SNFs knows, it is very unlike billing for any other provider type. All billing is not equal, and expecting someone who has billed for a physician’s office or hospital, for instance, to acclimate to SNF billing with little or no training, is unrealistic and will likely have a negative impact on compliance and overall revenue cycle health.
But just as billing for SNFs is unique, not all training options are equal. It can be tempting to choose low cost or free options, such as articles or webinars offered by the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), but keep in mind that these general resources, while helpful, do not typically provide the detailed knowledge your business office manager will need to not only create and submit claims but also to follow up on the claims appropriately and resolve any technical errors or payer disputes efficiently. Be willing to seek out?and invest in?quality training and consulting resources to ensure your billing team has ongoing access to the latest technical information and guidance around best practices.
To be expected, as billing has increased in complexity, so has billing software. Many integrated systems are highly customizable, which can be exciting or overwhelming, depending on the skill and knowledge of billing personnel. Also depending on the size of your organization, it may be necessary to review and change processes to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness.
Poor clinical to billing communication
Since the inception of minimum data set (MDS) 3.0, it is more important than ever that billers and clinicians communicate frequently and collaborate in a pre-claims submission review process each month. This review process is commonly referred to as triple check, since it includes representatives from nursing, therapy, and billing.
The purpose of the triple check process is to confirm information on the UB-04 claim forms against the supporting documentation. Many times providers only review the information generated by their clinical and/or billing software; however, that information can be overridden on the claims due to software glitches or other factors.
A thorough triple check review should include verifying patient demographic information, ancillary charges, and billing and diagnosis codes, among other items on the claim form. Triple check should also include verification of required items from a compliance standpoint, such as signed physician orders, certification for skilled care, and validation reports to confirm assessments were accepted. ?Conducting the triple check meeting should be the final step before any claims are billed?to improve compliance as well as providing billing and nursing with peace of mind that what is being billed is accurate and supported by the documentation on file.
Another benefit of triple check is helping billing identify any assessment issues, such as late, early, or missed assessments, all of which have billing implications. For example, if an assessment has an assessment reference date (ARD) that is outside of the allowed window, the claim must be billed with a default resource utilization group (RUG) code of AAA for the number or days the assessment was out of compliance. If an assessment was missed altogether, those days would be billed as provider liability, which results in no reimbursement to the provider. The guidelines for early, late, and missed assessments can be found in chapters 2 and 6 of the resident assessment instrument (RAI) manual.
Going forward, billing and revenue cycle management are not going to get easier. But by implementing some relatively simple but highly effective best practices, and ensuring that the personnel most directly responsible for cash flow have thorough training and helpful resources, SNFs can thrive despite increased regulatory complexity and oversight.
Thromboendarterectomy of common and Deep femoral artery
femoral and profunda femoris artery. CPT 35371 and CPT 35372 can we bill together with 59 modifier. Thromboendarterectomy for two different vessel we can bill altogether but for thromboendarterectomy on same vessel with two different branches, i am not sure. Please help.Thanks