Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Keep Your Cool with July’s Coding and Billing Challenges

July is a busy month for medical coders and billers because so many CPT and HCPCS Level II code changes are implemented July 1. It’s hard to keep track of all the changes, but it’s essential that you do to ensure your coding/billing is correct. Here are several coding and policy updates you will need […]

The post Keep Your Cool with July’s Coding and Billing Challenges appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Postpartum Drug Challenges Medical Coders

There is a lot of excitement about a new drug for women suffering from postpartum depression, but Sage Therapeutics’ Zulresso will present challenges for medical coders, their employers, and patients. First Postpartum Depression Drug Zulresso is the first drug developed specifically for postpartum depression. Often un or misdiagnosed, postpartum depression (F33.0), affects an estimated national […]

The post Postpartum Drug Challenges Medical Coders appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Challenges and opportunities in data analytics

Challenges and opportunities in data analytics

Healthcare organizations have become mass gatherers of data. But without sophisticated analytics, integrated IT tools, and processes to mine that data, they may not be able to take advantage of it.

The 33 leaders who gathered for the HealthLeaders Media Revenue Cycle Exchange, held March 23?25 at the Fairmont Grand Del Mar in San Diego, discussed some of the challenges and opportunities they’ve identified within their organizations around data analytics, as well as the tools that help them maintain an effective revenue cycle.

 

Let the data do the talking

Popular wisdom says culture starts at the top?but data is another important catalyst for change. The ongoing managed Medicaid expansion is requiring organizations to collect more prior authorizations and precertifications, presenting a challenge for revenue cycle leaders. Changing the culture of the organization is often key to handling that challenge, and one way to make the change is through data, says Jane Berkebile, MA, CPAM, system vice president of revenue cycle for OhioHealth in Columbus.

One significant challenge for OhioHealth is educating physicians about the increased need for preauthorizations under managed Medicaid. In the past, many of these patient accounts were written off as charity care. However, Berkebile’s organization now needs to focus on the administrative requirements around Medicaid.

Educating OhioHealth’s 343 physician practices, as well as the employed specialists and primary care physicians, by showing them the importance of preauthorizations, has represented a change in culture.

"For communication with our physicians, clinicians, and administration, the best tool we have is to show them in the data what’s really happening," says Berkebile. Her organization’s data analytics team drills down to the information that impacts each department. Departments usually see the gross charge number and think they are doing well, she says.

However, if a department is not getting appropriate authorizations, it may not actually be getting paid that amount. Berkebile finds physicians in particular react positively to seeing data.

"If you show them the data and don’t preach to them, and let them discover the problem, you can get more positive reactions from the physician community," she says. Following the data trail can also help you avoid pitfalls, such as relying on anecdotes that may hide the actual problem.

"The tyranny of the anecdote will not be allowed in this organization," says Doug Robison, performance improvement leader for John Muir Health in Walnut Creek, California. "You have to back it up with data."

 

Turn data into information

Even data only goes so far?it needs to be turned into information, says Russ Weaver, vice president of revenue cycle/finance for Adventist Health System in Burleson, Texas, relating advice he once received.

"You will be more successful if you figure out how to turn data into information. When you’re given something, ask, ‘What does this tell me?’ "

It is important to get back to the root cause and have a sufficient level of detail to address change. As part of the transition to the Cerner Patient Accounting product, Adventist has taken the opportunity to review its processes and reporting. As part of this, Weaver is careful to avoid relying on anecdotal information.

"You can’t go to the director of patient accounts and say you think his or her department is doing something wrong without having meaningful data to back it up," he says.

Sometimes what seems like a data problem is really something else, so it’s important not to lose sight of the basics, such as whether your organization is collecting required data on the front end, according to Doug Brandt, CPA, associate chief financial officer for Truman Medical Centers in Kansas City, Missouri.

"We’re focused on capturing the data items that need to be captured. There is always some low-hanging fruit, so identify and fix that first, then move to the harder-to-fix items," he says.

For example, it is important for revenue cycle leaders to look at the root cause of things such as denials. Even if you are measuring all the right things, if something is not happening at the front end (for example, the registration department is not verifying the patient insurance), you are going to get denials. UnityPoint Health in Des Moines, Iowa, is using data to get to the root cause of denials.

"We’re using data to drive that change by having the service providers focus on getting it correct at the beginning, versus always having to do it on the back end," says Renee Rasmussen, CPA, MBA, FHFMA, vice president of revenue cycle for UnityPoint Health.

 

Ensure ‘clean’ data

Organizations that can’t trust their data might run into problems with data standardization. Alternatively, organizations can fall into the trap of having too much data, but not enough accountability. The first step to ensuring clean data is to assemble a group of stakeholders to determine what data is necessary and where it will come from, says Tammy Thomlison, chief revenue cycle officer for the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson.

Her organization has set up a team to look at the data warehouse generated by Epic and agree, organizationwide, where they will pull data from.

"As an organization, we had to decide where we would pull certain information from the data warehouse, so that when we’re pulling reports we all get the same results," says Thomlison. Her team also uses the Qlik software to provide reporting options on top of the data warehouse. Having data in multiple systems and managing various interpretations of that data is a challenge for many organizations.

Systems must also ensure the data is clean once they have it, says Don Shaw, vice president of revenue cycle for Baton Rouge (Louisiana) General Medical Center. "Once you start pulling information, you find that sometimes you have surprises that you have to fix."

Revenue cycle leadership must hold itself to the same accountability standards it hopes to see from other departments. Data transparency is one way to increase collaboration and trust between the revenue cycle and clinical departments.

"I think it goes back to making sure our data is as accurate as possible. If other departments find differences or errors, we acknowledge that and go back and make those adjustments," says Rasmussen.

 

Measure the right things

The University of Chicago Medicine focuses more on internal benchmarks than external.

"Your benchmark is what you did last week. Now do better than that," says Charlie Brown, MBA, vice president of revenue cycle for The University of Chicago Medicine. "To really set those individual targets, you’ve got to measure against your own internal performance."

UnityPoint also focuses on internal benchmarks, but supplements them with HFMA’s MAP App, says Rasmussen. "We look at the key performance indicator of net revenue yield for our nine regions to really compare different areas."

The most important thing is to set your own benchmarks and targets, adds Berkebile. "By looking at your data and seeing where you are, you see the opportunities and continually set targets to improve your own data. We don’t try to match somebody else’s number?we continually work on improving our own performance."

Organizations need to avoid the pitfall of measuring the wrong things or being so inundated with data that they can’t make a decision.

"There are an endless number of things we can measure, and you don’t want to be playing a game of whack-a-mole where every time something pops up, you hit it and then another thing pops up," says Brandt. "It’s important to find the balance and identify where we need to drill and what we need to focus on."

HCPro.com – Briefings on APCs

PCMH Model Soaring, Despite Funding Challenges




Health Leaders Media


Please add this newsletter to your Safe Sender list
View this email as a Web page | Manage Account

  January 20, 2016 Follow us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterJoin us on LinkedInRSS feed

PCMH Model Soaring, Despite Funding Challenges

Rene Letourneau, Senior Editor for HealthLeaders Media

"Showing payers the ROI of the [patient-centered medical home] model will help them want to [support] it. Payers are realizing increasingly that it is a good investment on their part," says NCQA executive Paul Cotton. >>>

 

Editor’s Picks

Meaningful Use ‘Bombshell’ Leaves Nary a Mark

Andy Slavitt throttles back his forecast for the end of meaningful use as we know it, disappointing many, and proving that government reform is coming… but at its own excruciating pace. >>>

Screws Tighten on 340B Program

A MedPAC recommendation to reduce by 10% Medicare payment rates for 340B hospitals’ separately payable Part B drugs has been greeted with a chorus of boos from hospital trade associations. >>>

Are These the ACOs for a New Generation?

Medicare Advantage provides hints on how CMS’s Next Generation ACO model will work. >>>

Q&A: Donald Berwick Calls for ‘Moral’ Approach to Healthcare

The former head of CMS advocates for a single-payer system and for bringing "pride and joy" to the workplace among physicians, nurses, administrators, and executives who are all involved in doing the work of caring. >>>

AMA, CMS Leaders Signal New Era of Cooperation

A joint appearance by leaders from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the American Medical Association may signal an important cultural shift in how the two organizations work together over the next few years. >>>

Slideshow:
HealthLeaders Magazine’s Big Ideas

HealthLeaders Magazine takes a look at how healthcare organizations have enacted big ideas to solve some of their most pressing concerns, including a health system’s joint venture with an IT vendor, and physicians who have adopted patient-reported outcomes. >>>

Industry Survey:
Ready, Set, When? The Drawn-Out Shift to Value

This HealthLeaders Media report outlines the top challenges providers are facing in the transition to value-based care. The transition to value-based care is significant both for the magnitude of the task and for healthcare leaders’ reluctance to make a full commitment to change, the results of our annual industry survey suggest. >>>

LIVE Webcast

Webcast: How BCBS-NC Uses Cost and Quality Transparency to Drive Patient Choice

Date: January 26, 2016, 1:00–2:00 p.m. ET
In this expert webcast, discover what motivated BCBS-NC to become a trailblazer in transparency, which tools and technologies are leading the organization to success, and how payers and providers can work together to deliver the highest quality value-based care.
Register Today >>>


News Headlines

UnitedHealth Q4 profit falls, says Obamacare is one factor

USA Today, January 20, 2016

Merger mania resumes: Jefferson, Aria sign definitive agreement

Philadelphia Business Journal, January 20, 2016

Opinion: Is it better to die in America or in England?

The New York Times, January 20, 2016

FDA exec on cybersecurity: Hospitals, healthcare providers under constant attack

Healthcare IT News, January 19, 2016

Drug shortages in emergency rooms rising

The Boston Globe, January 19, 2016

Is an annual physical necessary?

The Wall Street Journal, January 19, 2016

New guidelines nudge doctors to give patients access to medical records

The New York Times, January 18, 2016

FDA approves fixes for Olympus scope linked to infection

The Wall Street Journal, January 18, 2016

Obama proposes funding boost for states to expand Medicaid

The Hill, January 15, 2016

Here’s why income soared at Cincinnati hospitals

Cincinnati Business Courier, January 15, 2016

Stay Connected to HealthLeaders

Don’t Miss the News You Want.

Spam filters exist for a reason, but not for the news you need. Make sure you aren’t missing your daily and/or weekly industry coverage. Add our address — [email protected] — to your address book or e-mail whitelist to keep the news you need in your inbox.

Is All of Your Leadership Team In The Know?

Our award-winning Daily News & Analysis e-newsletter can keep your leadership team abreast of relevant breaking news, and with in-depth industry coverage through 10 weekly e-newsletters that hit every pillar of healthcare, we’ve got your whole leadership team covered. Subscribe to any — or all — of our e-newsletters.

Multimedia/Events

Care Coordination Collection

Get top evidence-based strategies for strengthening care coordination across the continuum, sourced from the industry’s most progressive organizations. Access four best-selling HealthLeaders Media products for 63% off their usual price.
Download Today >>>

From HealthLeaders Magazine

Big Ideas

What big ideas have you enacted? What big opportunities await your organization? >>>

 

Ups and Downs of High Volume

 

Remaking the Board

Sponsor this Newsletter

For advertising opportunities in this or other HealthLeaders Media email newsletters, please contact [email protected] or call 800.639.7477.

  MAGAZINE | NEWS | TERMS OF SERVICE | PRIVACY POLICY | ADVERTISE Follow us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterJoin us on LinkedInRSS feed

©2016 HealthLeaders Media

If you prefer not to receive this email newsletter, let us know.
HealthLeaders Media Health Plan Insider is a division of Fortis Business Media
HEALTHLEADERS MEDIA
100 Winners Circle, Brentwood, TN 37027
Serving the business information needs of healthcare executives and professionals.

 



HCPro.com – Health Plan Insider

Outpatient dialysis brings coding challenges

By Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer

Approximately 450,000 patients in the United States received dialysis treatments in 2014, according to the National Kidney Foundation. Dialysis is an artificial process used to clean the blood by removing excess water and waste products when the patient’s kidneys cannot do this. In addition to hospitals providing this service, independent centers and home health agencies help patients receive treatment.
 
Reporting diagnoses
Patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) require dialysis treatments because their own kidneys no longer function properly, leaving behind waste products and excess fluid in the body. This condition is reported with ICD-10-CM code N18.6 (ESRD [chronic kidney disease requiring chronic dialysis]).
 
Underlying conditions, such as diabetes and high blood pressure can damage the patient’s renal system to this point, and they are considered the most common causes of ESRD in the United States. In these cases, reporting N18.6 will not be the first-listed diagnosis code. Instead first report:
  • E10.22, Type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease
  • E11.22, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease
  • I12.0, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease
  • I13.11, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease
In addition, the patient’s status as a dialysis patient will need to be reported with Z99.2 (dependence on renal dialysis).
 
Commonly, the term dialysis serves a generic function for a category of renal replacement therapies. However, in reality, different types are performed.
 
Hemodialysis
With hemodialysis, a mechanical dialyzer extracts blood via an intravenous catheter, filters out waste products and excess fluids, and returns the “cleaned” blood back into the patient via an intra-arterial catheter. Typically, patients receive three sessions a week.
 
Prior to beginning ongoing hemodialysis treatments, the nephrologist will order the insertion of either an arteriovenous fistula or an arteriovenous graft. This is reported with CPT® code 36147 (introduction of needle and/or catheter, arteriovenous shunt created for dialysis [graft/fistula]; initial access including fluoroscopy, image documentation and report).
 
Hemodialysis procedures are reported with one of two CPT codes determined by the number of evaluations provided by the physician during the encounter:
  • 90935, hemodialysis procedure with single evaluation by a physician or other qualified physician or other health care professional
  • 90937, hemodialysis procedure requiring repeated evaluation(s) with or without substantial revision of dialysis prescription
CPT also includes a code for hemodialysis services performed by a non-physician healthcare professional in the patient’s residence, including a private home, assisted living, group homes, nontraditional provider homes, custodial care facilities, or a school: 99512 (home visit for hemodialysis).
 
When hemodialysis is provided via an arteriovenous fistula, graft, or catheter, coders can use Category II codes to report this service:
  • 4052F, hemodialysis via functioning arteriovenous fistula [ESRD]
  • 4053F, hemodialysis via functioning arteriovenous graft [ESRD]
  • 4054F, hemodialysis via catheter [ESRD]
Access flow studies may be provided to determine the effectiveness of the dialysis process. These may be reported with the following codes, depending on the method:
  • 90940, hemodialysis access flow study to determine blood flow in grafts and arteriovenous fistulae by an indicator method         
  • 93990, transcranial Doppler study of the intracranial arteries, vasoreactivity study
Other renal therapies
Other types of dialysis may be provided to patients with renal failure. These include:
  • Peritoneal dialysis: The catheter is connected to the abdominal cavity, using the peritoneal membrane to filter the blood
  • Hemofiltration: A mechanical filtration circuit cleans the blood of waste products and excess fluid using a convection process
These procedures are reported with one of the following codes:        
  • 90945, dialysis procedure other than hemodialysis, with single evaluation by a physician or other qualified physician or other health care professional
  • 90947, dialysis procedure other than hemodialysis, requiring repeated evaluation(s) by a physician or other qualified health care professional, with or without substantial revision of dialysis prescription
However, if these services are provided at the patient’s home by a non-physician professional, the following codes should be reported, depending on the length of the service:
  • 99601, home infusion/specialty drug administration, per visit (up to two hours)
  • Add-on code 99602, each additional hour
ESRD
When a patient is diagnosed with ESRD, dialysis services are reported on a monthly basis, rather than for each individual encounter, with a code from the 90951-90966. The correct code for reporting dialysis service is determined by:
  • Patient’s age, grouped into ranges:
    • Younger than 2
    • 2–11 years old
    • 12–19 years old
    • 20 and older
  • Location of where the services are performed, either an outpatient facility or through home dialysis
  • Level of physician services determined by the number of face-to-face visits by a physician
 
If a facility does not provide a full month of services to a patient, for whatever reason, then you should use one code from the range 90967–90970, determined by the age of the patient, multiplied by each day of service.
 
E/M services that are not related to ESRD that cannot be performed during dialysis sessions can be reported separately.
 
Editor’s note: Safian, of Safian Communications Services in Orlando, Florida, is a senior assistant professor who teaches medical billing and insurance coding at Herzing University Online in Milwaukee. Email her at [email protected].

HCPro.com – JustCoding News: Outpatient

Overcome billing and coding challenges for comprehensive observation services

Overcome billing and coding challenges for comprehensive observation services

by Janet L. Blondo, LCSW-C, MSW, CMAC, ACM, CCM, C-ASWCM, ACSW

Billing correctly for observation hours is a challenge for many organizations. Getting it right requires knowing how to calculate observation hours for each patient, which is far from straightforward.

According to CMS, observation hours start accruing not when the patient comes into the hospital, but when the physician writes the order for observation. Observation hours end when all medically necessary services related to observation are complete. In some cases, this means that you can still bill for time spent completing the patient’s care after the physician writes the ­discharge order.

For example, a physician comes in to see the patient at 7:30 a.m. and writes the discharge order, which states discharge will occur pending the completion of tasks X, Y, and Z. The nursing staff finishes up those three tasks and the patient is finally ready to leave the hospital at 11 a.m. The hours between 7:30 a.m. and 11 a.m. are potentially billable observation hours because they were used to complete the patient’s medical care. Observation hours therefore end not with the discharge order, but with the completion of medical services.

In addition, because observation services are considered a temporary period to aid in decision-making, CMS states in the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual that only in rare and exceptional cases should observation services last more than 48 hours.

If a case reaches the 48-hour mark and the physician still hasn’t made a decision to discharge or admit the patient for inpatient care due to instability or risk of an adverse event if discharged, nor has any documentation made a compelling case for the need to continue observation, the services no longer meet the definition of observation care and the hospital should not bill for future hours. Hospitals should also not report observation hours after the physician has decided to send the patient home or to a lower level of care if the patient is receiving no active treatment and is just in a holding pattern until he or she moves to the next level of care or goes home.

 

Coding for comprehensive observation services

The 2016 OPPS final rule implemented changes for coding and billing for observation services. Among the changes made by CMS was the creation of a new comprehensive APC (C-APC) for comprehensive observation services.

Specifically, hospitals will now bill all qualifying extended assessment and management encounters, including observation services, through the newly created comprehensive observation services C-APC code 8011. A new status indicator, J2, was also created to specify that more than one service was provided.

CMS now requires hospitals to bundle services provided and previously billed separately?services such as level 3 ED visits, IV infusions, echocardiograms, speech therapy, and similar services. CMS pays a flat rate for the comprehensive observation services, which includes the bundled services.

Hospital staff should bill all hours of observation for a single encounter on one line under revenue code 0762. If the hospital provided observation care to a patient over multiple days, the date of service should be the date that observation care began. Although one rate is now paid for comprehensive observation services, HCPCS code G0378 is still used to bill observation services by the hour. When using this code, the organization should round to the nearest hour. For example, eight hours and 20 minutes in observation would round to eight hours, whereas nine hours and 40 minutes would round to 10 hours. If the hospital ­provided observation care to a patient over multiple days, the date of service should be the date that observation care began.

The second HCPCS level II code for observation is G0379. This code is used for a direct admission or referral for observation care from a physician in the community. Note that this code is not used if an ER physician or a physician from a provider-based department or clinic makes the referral. This code previously allowed hospitals to bill for costs associated with the visit, including registration and collecting clinical information about the patient, but costs are now bundled with the payment for the comprehensive observation services.

Claims that meet the following criteria will be paid under C-APC code 8011:

  • Claims that do not contain a procedure with HCPCS code with status indicator T (indicates a surgical procedure)
  • Must show eight or more hours of service under HCPCS code G0378
  • No other services on the claim must have a status indicator of J1

 

Services must be provided the day of or one day prior to the date of service for the following visit codes:

  • All ED visit levels, CPT codes 99281?99285 or HCPCS codes G0381?G0384 and critical care services CPT code 99291
  • HCPCS code G0463 (hospital outpatient clinic visit)
  • Same date of service for HCPCS code G0379 (referred by physician outside of hospital)

 

Hospitals can no longer bill separately for observation if these services are required after an outpatient surgical procedure. If a patient meets criteria for observation monitoring after the standard surgical recovery period, the hospital can place him or her in outpatient observation, but the cost for the observation care will be bundled into the payment for the surgical procedure.

Although hospitals are not paid separately for ancillary services under C-APC code 8011, all ancillary services received are reported on the claim under their corresponding HCPCS codes. Use the revenue codes corresponding with their related cost center, such as the following:

  • Laboratory, 30X and 31X
  • Radiology, 32X, 35X, and 61X
  • Covered drugs, 25X and 636
  • Noncovered self-administered drugs, 637

 

Under Medicare OPPS policies, outpatient therapeutic services in hospitals and critical access hospitals must meet the following requirements:

  • Provided in a hospital or a provider-based department
  • Ordered by a physician or nonphysician provider
  • Integral although incidental to the services that the facility is providing
  • Provided under the appropriate level of supervision

 

Grasping the complexity of carve-outs

Sometimes, observation billing requires organizations to also have a grasp of what not to bill or, more specifically, how to carve out nonreportable services. This might include time the patient spent in imaging for a CT with contrast when he or she was monitored by other clinical staff. The same would be true for any other service that includes active clinical monitoring, such as chemotherapy or a blood transfusion.

If your organization isn’t clear whether a service falls into this category, ask your Medicare administrator what type of services it considers to be monitored and should thus be subtracted from observation time.

CMS includes the following two options for calculating these carve-outs for observation time:

  • Document the beginning and end of monitored procedures and subtract that time from observation using either a manual or automated process.
  • Subtract the average length of time for a given procedure. This will require the facility to create a policy or procedure to ensure that all calculations include a consistent methodology. For example, the organization might establish a guideline that a transfusion of one unit of blood takes three hours.

 

Whatever process your organization uses, it’s likely that it will be a costly investment because these carve-outs require staff members to look at medical records to calculate this time, adding to the cost of care. With a bundled payment for comprehensive observation services, it may be most cost-effective to adopt a policy of automated calculation of carve-out time for monitored services.

 

Ensuring proper patient status

In addition to ensuring that these requirements are met, it’s also important to ensure that patient status was determined accurately. Sometimes, patient status is not correct, and the problem needs to be addressed using condition codes 44 or W2.

If a patient is insured by Medicare, the hospital will need to file a change of status using condition code 44 if the patient has not yet been discharged from the hospital. However, if the patient’s status was found to be inaccurate after he or she was discharged, the hospital can use condition code W2 to change the patient’s status.

Condition code 44 is most often used when the utilization review (UR) committee determines that a patient wasn’t assigned to the correct status or no longer meets inpatient status criteria. To use the code, the following must be true:

  • The physician has already written an inpatient order
  • The patient has not yet been discharged
  • The claim has not been submitted

 

The UR committee notifies the hospital, the patient, and the attending physician in writing of its decision that the admission does not meet inpatient criteria no later than two days after the determination. Documentation should indicate the reason for the determination, as this information will assist coders. The patient may be placed in outpatient observation with the agreement of the attending physician or with the concurrence of at least two physician members of the UR committee. Physician concurrence of patient status must be documented in the chart along with who was involved with the change in status, why the change was made, and what care was provided to the patient.

The order for outpatient observation cannot be backdated, but the entire episode of care will be billed as an outpatient episode using bill type 13X or 85X, reporting condition code 44 on the UB form in one of the Form Locators 24?30, or electronically in Loop 2300, HI segment, with qualifier BG on the outpatient claim (CMS, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Section 50.3, Chapter 1, 2015). The hours the patient spent in an inpatient bed prior to the order change to observation can be submitted on the outpatient claim using revenue code 0762.

If not all of the criteria are met to initiate condition code 44, the hospital uses bill type 12X for covered "Part B only" services provided to the patient, such as diagnostic lab tests, radiology services, surgical dressings, and some other services listed in the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual.

If the UR committee determines after the patient has already been discharged from the hospital that the patient’s stay as an inpatient was not medically necessary, it’s important to self-deny the claim and resubmit it for payment under Part B Medicare. If the claim is not self-denied, it is likely that a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) will deny the hospital’s inpatient claim under Medicare Part A as not medically necessary. In this instance, if the hospital agrees and does not plan to appeal the decision of the MAC, it can resubmit the claim for payment of any eligible services under Medicare Part B. This can be done using condition code W2, which may also be referred to as Part A to B rebilling.

Part A to B rebilling must be submitted using a 12X or 13X type of bill within one calendar year of the "through" date of the original Part A medical services. The form must include condition code W2 along with the treatment authorization code A/B rebilling (see MLN Matters MM8445).

The rules regarding observation billing can be complicated, so it’s important to audit and monitor billing regularly to ensure compliance.

 

Editor’s note

Blondo is the manager of case management at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, Maryland. This article is an excerpt from HCPro’s Observation Services Training Handbook. For more information, see www.hcmarketplace.com.

HCPro.com – Briefings on APCs