Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

OCT’S on patients with diabetes

What is everyone doing when billing macula scan (92134) when a patient has diabetes, and other dx’s seem to be kicking back also. Are you just not charging for this service, or getting an ABN? We are doing a lot of OCT’S right now and not getting to bill for them??? Any input would be great! Thank you!

Jennifer Rogers
Berg Eye Group
[email protected]

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

diabetes 2 with hyperosmolarity without nonketotic hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar coma

Can diabetes TYPE2 with hyperosmolarity without nonketotic hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar coma be coded in an office setting or is this coded only used for inpatient settings. I was told this code is only for inpatient setting because patient are not treated in office for this condition. But this is what the doctor documented in the office record- How should this be coded.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Coding for Diabetes with A1C results

Hello, I have a question in regards to HCC codes. If a patient comes in and the provider states the patient is there to follow up on the DMII, and the provider documented that the patients’ A1c levels are @ a 7.1, can the coder then documented Diabetes Type 2 with Hyperglycemia, or does the provider need to specifically state "Patient has diabetes type 2 with hyperglycemia.. This seems to be a constant topic of discussion in our coding dept, so I am looking for some answers and references if possible.
Thank you

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Guideline Hypertension, CKD, CHF and Diabetes Mellitus

Have a question for the guidelines experts!!

Discussion

Assessment plan:
Diabetes with CKD-3
Hypertension

Code:
E11.22
N18.3
I10

Rationale/opion given is that the physician has linked the DM and CKD utilizing the word "with" and coding guideline for "with" should be interpreted as "associated or due to"

Similar question

Diagnosis
Diabetes with CKD-3
Hypertension
Chronic diastolic CHF

Code:
E11.22
N18.3
I11.0
I50.32

So is this the correct interpreration of the guidelines as opposed to coding?
I12.9 on the first one.
I13.0 on the second one

Thanks for the help

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Coding I70.203 with Diabetes

I have a question regarding Peripheral Vascular Disease that I am hoping someone can answer and possibly point me in the right direction for resources to share with my co-workers. All the research that I find states that there are 2 types of PVD, Functional (damage to the vessel) or Organic (plaque build up). This is my question: If a patient has I70.203 and they also have Type 2 Diabetes, would I use E11.51? Since I70.203 is a more specific code of PVD, and the new guidelines "with" for Diabetes, logically I think E11.51 is correct. I found the following article which states exactly what my train of thought is regarding I70.203 being more specific for PVD. Any guidance could be provided would be greatly appreciated. Here is the article I mentioned:

Documenting PVD in ICD 10
The last six months of ICD 10 implementation has brought about many new challenges and learning opportunities for both providers and coding professionals. One such opportunity is the documentation of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Documenting PVD without further specificity in ICD-10 codes to I73.9, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Unspecified.
In order to document most specifically for PVD, it’s important to include these components in your documentation:
• Location of vein/artery affected
• Whether the vein/artery is native or a graft (and type of graft if known)
• Complications such as intermittent claudication, ulceration or rest pain
• Liberality (left, right, or bilateral) and specify if one or both sides are affected by complicating conditions of atherosclerosis.

An example of best practice documentation for PVD without complication would be: Patient has atherosclerosis of native artery bilateral lower extremities without ulceration or claudication. This documentation would result in code I70.203, Unspecified atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities, bilateral legs. This is a more specific code than I73.9, reflecting more specific documentation, which is more clinically relevant.
To document a more complicated case of PVD, one could document: Patient has atherosclerosis of native artery of right lower extremity with rest pain. This documentation would result in code I70.221, which is very specific and includes the complication of rest pain. A briefer method, such as PAD d/t atherosclerosis of native artery RLE with resting pain would also code to I70.221.
Many providers may prefer to continue documenting with the term PAD or even PVD. Our recommendation is to document PAD due to atherosclerosis, because including the term atherosclerosis allows coders to capture the more specific codes, when the condition is caused by the atherosclerotic process, as most arterial disease is.

Thanks again for any help you can provide.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum