Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Surgical Complication Diagnostic Coding: Quick Tip

When assigning a ICD-10-CM diagnosis code(s) for a surgical complication, report the code for the complication first, followed by any additional diagnosis code(s) required to report the patient’s condition. Example 1: Complication from a surgical procedure for treatment of a neoplasm. The complication is the listed first, followed by a code for the neoplasm or […]

The post Surgical Complication Diagnostic Coding: Quick Tip appeared first on AAPC Knowledge Center.

AAPC Knowledge Center

Diagnostic Lead Evaluation

In CPT 2018 Professional on page 203 it says on the top right of the page: To report Fluoroscopic guidance for diagnostic lead evaluation without lead insertion, replacement, or revision procedures, use 76000.
Can someone give me an example of this? Can you tell me when a Diagnostic Lead Evaluation is necessitated? I’m having a derp moment. :confused:
Thanks,

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

PT Diagnostic Service Claims Denied in Error

Valid claims submitted by physical therapists (PTs) in private practice are being denied by some Part B Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These claims are for the professional component (PC) or global code for certain diagnostic services involving electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction velocity (NCV), and sensory-evoked […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

92612-Coding for diagnostic by physician

I’m being told by my organization that a physician must use one of the functional G codes established by Medicare for therapy services when 92612 is used. This is confusing to me because he is not establishing a plan for therapy but using this as an evaluation of the patients swallowing. Is there some guidance published on the use of this code when it is not being used in therapy? Is the guidance correct that the provider must use a functional G code whenever he does one of these swallow studies?

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Re: screening and diagnostic mammograms on the same day

I understand that we bill for both diagnostic and screening mammograms on the same day.

77067 – screening mammogram
77063 – 3d tomo

77066 – diagnostic mammogram
g0279 – 3d tomo

Here is what I am coding for – 77067 & 77063 for the screening mammograms (59 modifier on each) and 77066 and g0279 for the diagnostic mammogram (GG on each for Medicare claims only)

We are getting denials for the g0279.

Can we bill tomo twice per day if its used for a screening mammogram and a diagnostic mammogram?

Thanks,

Jo

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Colonoscopy Diagnostic vs Preventative – What’s your Opinion

Hello Everyone,

I wanted to get other’s opinions on the much debatable issue of diagnostic versus preventative colonoscopy in my office. I have several providers within my office that like to order "screening" colonoscopies for the below scenarios.

1. Pt says they are here for a screening colon, first colon ever, but in the medical record physician documents symptomatic issues of constipation, rectal bleeding, diarrhea, etc. My provider feels that since the patient has not had a screening colon that they can order the procedure as such. I advise the provider that since the patient presented with symptoms then it is not a screening, per several articles I have found on the web from AAPC. How many other coders/billers have come across this issue and how did you handle this situation?

2. Patient comes in for screening colonoscopy. Provider documents that patient has "stable" chronic constipation. How would you code? In my opinion, patient has an issue and thus would be diagnostic, but the providers states that since it is stable it can be coded as a screening. Opinions?

Thank you all for your thoughts and opinions.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Bill diagnostic test for TC alone from outside referral?

We have outside physicians refer patients to our clinic for the sole purpose of using our diagnostic equipment. Can we bill for the TC of the test(s) performed? If so, a technician is the one that performs the service (with no interpretation), who would we list as the rendering provider on our claims? Any insight is appreciated!

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Diagnostic Laparoscopy, Removal of Anti-reflux Device

Can someone please help me with this one. There is no specific code. I choose 49329 but wanted to know if are any other codes.

Diagnostic laparoscopy, explant of Angelchik device.

Operative Technique:
After obtaining informed consent, the patient was taken to the operating room and placed in the supine position. Following the smooth induction of general endotracheal anesthesia and a surgical time-out, the abdomen was prepped and draped in a standard and sterile manner. Hasson technique was utilized to enter the peritoneal cavity supraumbilically, and pneumoperitoneum was established to 15 mmHg. A 10mm, 30-degree laparoscope was introduced and intraabdominal adhesions were present throughout.

Fortunately, the left upper quadrant was relatively free of adhesions, and two 5 mm ports were placed in the left lateral abdomen under direct vision. Inspection in the epigastrium revealed a Silastic or silicone-appearing ring free-floating in the left upper quadrant. The right structure was consistent with an Angelchik device, and it was grasped by the tail and removed from the left upper quadrant through the Hasson port without difficulty. Inspection of the surgical field revealed excellent hemostasis.

Pneumoperitoneum was taken down under direct vision as the ports were removed. Port sites were irrigated and re-anesthetized, and the fascia at the Hasson site was closed with a 0 Vicryl employing 3 interrupted sutres. The skin was closed with a 4-0 Monocryl and sealed with skin glue.

Thank you so much for all your help:)

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Modifying Diagnostic Test Orders

It is expected that testing facilities will not routinely modify diagnostic test orders from the ordering physician. Although diagnostic test orders may conditionally request an additional diagnostic test, the conditional request must come from the ordering physician. New orders must be obtained when a test is determined to be clinically inappropriate or suboptimal, or when […]
AAPC Knowledge Center

Clarification on cardiac diagnostic testing

I am having a discussion with someone about the billing of diagnostic cardiac testing such as Echos, Stress tests, etc…
When it comes to observation/IP patients do you bill the date the test is actually done or the date the physician gets around to signing the chart? Help would be appreciated on this!
Thanks,
Laura

Medical Billing and Coding Forum