Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top right corner of this page

Practice Exam

2018 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Can a hospital stay be considered “outpatient” if more than 4 days

We had a patient who was initially under 23 observation stay but the case management in the hospital couldn’t get it approved for inpatient stay. She is a patient with severe comorbidities and complications. She had to stay in the hospital for 5 nights before discharge. Since hospital classified it as outpatient we have no choice but to bill 99211-99214 codes. However, our biller said that Blue Cross Medicare Advantage will deny the claims since we cannot bill outpatient codes consecutively for more than 3 days. I had called the hospital and they maintain that it is an outpatient stay.

What is the ruling for this situation and how do we go about billing it?
We have the medical records to prove service is rendered however, the technicality of outpatient stay of more than the 2 midnight rule is confusing.

Thanks.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

using 99080 more than 12 diagnosis codes to report submit 2 claims (split)

I am looking for advice for when a provider wants to submit more than the 12 diagnosis codes from an annual wellness exam for the sole purpose of Risk Adjustment. Let’s say the provider has 15 in total to submit.
Wouldn’t the provider split the claim? Submitting the first claim with the CPE 99397, then CPT code such as 99080 for the 11 remaining codes (B-L) of course 99080 only allows the 4 codes on each charge line (total of 3 99080 lines on the first claim), then the second claim only has 99080 with the additional 3 diagnosis codes?
This is a new process to me that providers are wanting to take on. So I’m looking for advice, since there seems to be very little information out there on this subject.
Thank you

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Theft at Portland medical clinic affects more than 5,000 patients

A former employee of Portland, Oregon-based Northwest Primary Care (NWPC) allegedly stole the personal information of 5,372 patients. The employee accessed this information between April and December 2013, according to a statement released by NWPC. The incident went undetected for two years until law enforcement informed NWPC of the theft on October 13, 2015. NWPC notified the public on December 11, 2015. The former employee accessed patients’:
 

  • Names
  • Dates of birth
  • Social Security numbers
  • Credit card numbers

There is no evidence that the employee used or attempted to use the information, NWPC says. However, NWPC is offering affected patients identity theft protection services including identity recovery services, 12 months of credit monitoring, and a $ 1,000,000 insurance policy.

Reference and background checks are performed on all employees, and employees who work in highly sensitive positions, such as working with patient financial data, undergo additional background checks, NWPC says. Existing policies, procedures, and the employee code of conduct contain guidelines for accessing PHI and prohibit employees from inappropriately accessing or using PHI. NWPC is increasing its technology monitoring and employee training on accessing patient records in response to this incident. Additional technical safeguards will also be implemented to further protect PHI from theft or other criminal activity.

HCPro.com – HIM-HIPAA Insider

Medicare Coding Question (really more Billing than anything)

We are having an issue with a patient. He is stating that he has been told by Medicare that his dad can have a second surgery only 60 days after the first procedure (same body part – opposite side).

However, my very experienced biller (30 years) is having difficulty making him understand the concept of the 90-day global period and the fact that if we do surgery prior to that time on a second body part, we most likely won’t get paid for the surgery.

So, if a Medicare patient has a surgical procedure with a 90-day global period, when is the earliest that patient can have another procedure by the same surgeon? EG: Patient has a LEFT total knee on 1/1/17. Is the EARLIEST he can have the RIGHT total knee at any date after April 3rd (92 days total as listed in the CMS global period)? Is my biller missing something?

Any references you can point us to would be helpful as the patient states he has two sources that are telling him 60 days – one at the national office and one at the local office. HELP!

Julie V.
TJRC

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

MI Auto Carrier Paying Less Than Billed Amount

I am looking for information regarding Michigan Auto Claims and how to handle the remaining balance.
Some of our claims are paid less than the billed amount with the carrier stating it is "above the usual and customary" for our area.
We do not have a contract with the auto carrier and feel that they do not have the right to pay less than our fee.
Normally, when dealing with an insurance company that we have no contract with, the unpaid portion is billed to the patient.
The auto carrier is informing me and the patient that we are not allowed to balance bill the patient for the remaining balance.
I would appreciate any input on this issue.
Thank you so much.

Medical Billing and Coding Forum

Why Outsourced Medical Billing Offers More Benefits Than Ever Before

Which Medical Billing Solution is Best for your Practice?
Demand to rise 168 percent over next eight years as more physicians outsource billing

More physicians and medical practices are choosing to outsource their medical billing. According to a recently released report by Grand View Research, Inc., the demand is expected to result in the rapid growth of the medical billing outsourcing market — from $ 6.3 billion in 2015 to $ 16.9 billion by 2024 — surpassing demand for in-house billing.

This new data echoes similar 2014 research that found that 90 percent of independent and small physician practices were planning to outsource their billing as well.

Here’s why so many physicians are moving from in-house to outsourced medical billing over the next decade and why it may make sense for your practice too.

Reasons for Increasing Demand

The entire healthcare industry has faced a bunch of changes over the past several years. From the introduction of the Affordable Care Act to the implementation of ICD-10, physicians are finding it difficult to keep up with all of the new regulations, especially those related to billing and coding.

Below are some of the top reasons why physicians are choosing to outsource medical billing:

 

  • Limited in-house expertise. Coding and billing — and revenue cycle management (RCM) in general — have become increasingly complex, requiring a greater level of expertise to achieve maximum reimbursement and optimal cash flows. While in-house billers and coders may process hundreds of claims each month, a medical billing company’s staff likely processes thousands across multiple specialties. Medical practices can benefit from this wider range of expertise and knowledge.

 

  • Obsolete software. Billing software has undergone its own series of evolutions in order to meet the latest industry demands. To stay compliant and maintain billing efficiency, upgrading software can cost anywhere from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars. Physicians who are reluctant to invest in upgrades may find that their current software is obsolete, making the billing process more difficult and less efficient.

 

  • Refocus on patient care. With changes like MACRA and the shift to value-based care, physicians are under pressure to refocus on quality metrics to prevent penalties that can lead to lowered insurance reimbursements. When billing is outsourced, physicians can focus on patient care without the added stress of also overseeing their medical billing. On a similar note, front office staff will likely benefit from reduced call volume as well since all incoming billing-related phone calls will flow to the billing company.

 

  • Lower overhead costs, increased revenues. In-house medical billing tends to be a fixed cost for medical practices. Costs related to staffing and IT expenditures can be a significant cost for an independent practice and must be paid regardless of the amount of revenue coming in. Outsourcing billing can eliminate a portion of those expenses, shifting them to variable costs that are based on the number of claims processed as well as reimbursements captured. Medical practices with high claim volume experience significant revenue growth by outsourcing, in part, because 20 percent of claims are processed incorrectly by payers, resulting in underpayment or no payment at all. Even small practices who have a few dozen unpaid claims per month can see a vast improvement in cash flow and revenues when outsourcing.

When Outsourcing Makes Sense

Outsourcing your practice’s medical billing can be a tough decision. However, there comes a time when it makes too much financial sense not to pursue it.

Making the switch can be an intimidating and daunting experience, especially for physicians who have completed billing in-house for years. But moving from in-house to outsourced billing can actually be a smooth process — not nearly as scary as many may think.

It’s important to remember that not all billing companies are created equal though. So if you currently outsource your billing and have had a bad experience, don’t settle. Look for a billing company who meets your needs, is responsive, and has a proven track record of increasing reimbursements and paid claims.

And while pricing and budgets should be part of the discussion, refrain from making that the ultimate deciding factor and look long-term instead. Paying a lower fee to a company who collects less money is not the bargain you’re looking for.

Going with a company who has proven recovery rates who also charges a higher fee often wins out. The increased recoveries not only offset the higher fee, but puts more money in your pocket to boot.

Plus, the improved cash flow means physicians can now afford to pay staff to do follow-up work and go after even more of the practice’s money.

Consider Capture Billing

If you’re interested in outsourcing your practice’s medical billing, Capture can help. As a physician-owned company, we know that every dollar and claim counts. We understand the complexities of revenue cycle management and how accurate billing processes lead to more satisfied patients — all important factors in maintaining practice profitability.

Why did you decide to outsource your practice’s medical billing? Please join the conversation below.

— This post Why Outsourced Medical Billing Offers More Benefits Than Ever Before was written by Manny Oliverez and first appeared on Capture Billing. Capture Billing is a medical billing company helping medical practices get their insurance claims paid faster, easier and with less stress allowing doctors to focus on their patients.

Capture Billing

Mammography Claims Require More than Correct Coding

Screening mammography is a radiologic procedure used for early detection of breast cancer. Medicare has provided Part B coverage of screening mammography for women since 1991. Mammography Code Changes For 2017, CPT® codes 77051, 77052, 77055, 77056, and 77057 are deleted. New codes for these radiology services bundled with CAD are: 77065 Diagnostic mammography, including computer-aided detection […]
AAPC Blog

Transition to ICD-10 easier than expected(ICD-10 slowdown of 14%)

The extreme predictions about the negative effects of moving to ICD-10 just didn’t happen. Now, over eight months later, one of the country’s leading organizations which has been tracking the ICD-10 transition says that there have been minimal effects at best.

Read the full story here: https://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/the-transition-to-icd-10-was-easier-than-expected

The post Transition to ICD-10 easier than expected(ICD-10 slowdown of 14%) appeared first on The Coding Network.

The Coding Network

Modifier 57: For More Than Just “Surgery”

If you think of modifier 57 as the “decision for surgery” modifier, it’s time to change your mind. Modifier 57 applies when the physician determines the need for any major procedure—whether surgical or non-surgical. “Major” Means 90-Day Global Period The CPT® manual doesn’t define “major” or “minor” procedures, but the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid […]
AAPC Blog